Text

Nonconformance Rept for Jan 1974.Rept Consists of Bechtel Nonconformance Repts,Nonconformance Rept Log & Status Book, QA Discrepancy Repts Quality Audit Findings & Mgt Corrective Action Repts Written or Closed During Month
	ML19329F078
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	01/31/1974
From:	; CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	;
Shared Package
ML19329F076	List: ML19329F075; ML19329F078;
References
	NUDOCS 8006190882
	Download: ML19329F078 (64)
	v • d • e

l' .,

. g-- ;c. , q) q.j v

[u

,gsj[ NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK ggggg ,33 o, __- y /-

,Nf. ) #

PAGE COMPL PROJECT NO. 7220 Q.C.ENG.StGH l}S'[# PREPArtED SY F40NCONFORMAfJCE SOURCE STATUS 4R M.

()

CLOSED BY DESCRIPTIOfJ/ REMARKS DISPGSIT. ROUTE XMTD REPLY RETD C 1-12-7_ epic}c_Grote Wall dowels and Access Tendon Gallery Slab. Unit 2.! id PE Re-:.ssued 3-2Q-7j CD Buck _Kipney With sketches attached. PE AA on C-1-1 0-1-1 :7-12-7' Dick Crote- Wall dowels and Access Tendon Gallery Slab. Field PE' 7-12-73 8-1h-7[

8-20-7' H ILuclq_Ki_nn_ev Attached Sketches. PE AA 8-20-7 C-2 S 7-73 Euck Kinney ll7 Rebars in Cont _ainmcpt #1 are Und_qrsized PE '

0-1-73 10-h-F 10-h-73 (b Buck Kinney PE AA C-3 9-12-7.,' d Steve Grant 28ea #9 Rebars cut off 0 582'-6" to set certain Pield TS 3-13-73' 0-5-73 10-9 4 10-9-7' N Steve Grant Columns for supportinc frame. Reactor'Blde. #1 PE AA C-4 9-28-9 Clay Clark Liner Plate S-1-5-2-1 veld cracked after Field PE 10-1-73 go_g. 73 1-11-71 M. P. Hendrick Application of prime coating. PE AA 10-5-73 C-5 9-28-71 Steve Gr_ ant Trumplates by INRYCo in violation of documentation Field PE 10-1;-73 jo_g_7; 1-30-7h T. E. Valenzano Requirements PE AA 10-5-7j C-6 10-h-73 Clay Clark Liner Plate S-1-1h-U-1 Mill Stamped Humbers?and Field PE 10-h-73 y 11 6-71 Clav Clark Vendor Stamped Numbers do not match. 10-15-73 PE AA 10-1 Q

' C-7 10-8-77 Richard Grote P_our No. CC.(575 _ Ticket 11787. 6.19'a Air & G't" Field PE Pour CC 1. 10-15-73 1 1-26-7, 12-7-71 Richard Grote Slumbo. )a12.W Tickets 1179h 1179 veErecti ely. 5,117 36 air ntent.2.lb 2. . PR AA 11-23-73 C-8 10-8-73 Richard Grote Pour No. A(571da. Ticket 11711. Low Air Content & Field PE 10-15-71 1 1-28-7' 11-10-7 3 S. Graham 11712. No Testing. PE 11-20-73

__.AA C-9 10-29-7 3 Clay Clark Liner Plate S1-7-U1 Mill Stamped Numbers and Field Mat'l

Spysr. 10-29-7-3 11 11-1h-73 Clay Clark Vendor Stamped Numbers do not match. g ,, 11-13-7 3 l C-10 10--29-73 Gary _W._ Knoll 14" Concrete _ Aggregate _fAiledd._ gradation. U.S._ Test _ lleld_ PB 10-29-73 1 73 11-29-7 1 Gary W. Knoll ing did not retest or notify Bechtcl. PE AA 11-23-7

!,C-11 11-8-7' Steve Grant

, 418S. Grade 60 rebar. heat WKE 20hO failed strenet? Pield PE 11-9-73 Steve Grant 11 - 2 3 - 73 11-30-73 tests run by independent lab. PE AA 1J-15-73 ec inc:a acv. 2-is 72 PAGE 1e l

i _

[ I.

N s Y@g;$ NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK nEPORT AS OF I

- PAGE COMPL PROJECT NO.. 7220 O.C. ENG. StGN 8SN PREPARED BY PJONCONFORMANCE SOURCE STATUS CR NO.

~co / CLCSED BY DESCRIPTION / RET.1 ARKS DISPOSIT. ROUTE XMTD REPLY ' RETD C-12 11-2-7 3 B. J. Stockton Rebar lengths increaced from cut sheets 10-1h in. Field PE 11-16-7 3 1 1-26-73 Test bars cut from fabricated bars v/o approval. PE AA 3-E C-13 'L199-72 'C 5. Kinney Cndwelds in plaqe e have voids creater than allowed Field. PE 11-20-7j 11 73 12-31-7 L. R. Albert by Spec. C-231 Rev.14 '

/ i... PE AA __

11-28-73 C-1h 11_-16-7 3 S. Grant f)b Rebar _JIe_at 4 C3807h. ASTM Grade 60 Pniled tun ri nl a PE 11-20-7J 11 73 F. A. Kapla PE AA 11-23-7 )

1-2h_71 of six tests.

C-15 11-16-73 B., J. Stockton _Tencile_ tenting _repivomontn' nt_1970 nhut anun Field PE 11-20-73 1 2-3-73 Cut 2 Splices from Unit #1. . PE AA 11-28-7 3 12-13-71 B. J. Stockton C-16 11_16-73 Steven _ Grant Type "B" Cadweld_Elcoven on thickened _ liner plate Field 'PE 11-27-73 1-10-7h 1-1h-7L L. R. Albert 1969, chew rust inside. PE AA 1-9-7h C-17 11--21-73 C._E._Kinnev Cadueld Splice Ho h-E-107 shows no evidence of Field __ PE 11-23-73 1 2-6-73 PE AA 11-30-7 3 12-13-7~ C. E,_)(innov Demanent_refcrence f lineyc_C-2310 Rev. It c-18 n-23-7 S. Graham spacinc of rebarn_& micainc._iebara_ Ant nlag= n TAnc _Ficla PE 11-26-7 3 12-6-73 12-6-73 S. Graham Wall. Elev. $7h' pg AA 1 1-30-73 B-19 11-29-71 C. E._Kinney Listing of Cadugld culices with interrppted derom. Ficld PE 12-5-73 ations, per Spec. 7220-C-231 Q, Rev. h. PE AA C-20 11-29-71 C. E. K_i_nney Listine of Cadweld Splices with interrgpied derom._vield PE 12-11-73 4 1-10-g l 1-10-7h B. J. Stockton ations, per Spec. 7220-C-231 O. Rev. h. PE AA 12-31-"3 C-21 11 - 2 8 -7] L. R. Albert 60EA 60' 18S__R__ebars heat # 79T167_r_ ejected for Field PE 1 2-5-73 1a-17 '2-21-7? L. R. Albert failure of elongation test per ASTM-A-615-72. PE AA 12-13-7J

/f:/ s n ts ." d_ ya * * :-

C-22 11-29--71 L. R,_ Albert Listing.of Rebar Heat Numbers on which_m:er_tentL _li nl a PE pf/,, ,Og/ /j g.ff

/0//h3 [. /[. /d n n # 1 have not been verfomed. Mat'l re'd prior to 11/70. PE AA /YZ 8., bpm a e a r' C-23 11 ~30-7 9 L. R. Albert Cadweld splice # LE123 found to have cenerally Pi ol a N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

1 2- 31-7 9 L. R. Albert porous metal per Spec. 7220-0-231 Q. Rev. h. W oc-mca arv. :-e s-7: PAGE 2C

~

i -

~~ y .

' 4

' ,i

':cy ,y Q j '

'. S t

g.,j: { NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK V g, ' REPORT AS OF PAGE COMPL PROJECT NO 7220 Q.C. ENG. SIGN SCR UO.

07:' PREPARED BY NONCO!FORMANCE SOURCE kE CLOSED CY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS DIS?OSIT. ROUTE XMTD STATUS REPLY RETD C h 1-30-71 B. J. Stockton Rebar size 18S. heat 80-38972 failed initial user Field PE 12-5-73 -

'2-17-7 2-19-73 B. J. Stockton test. 2ea subsequent r mules passed ASTM A-615 PE AA C-25 12-3-73 B. J. Stockton Rebar size 6,_ heat # 91117 railed user test. 6248/! viela 2-12-7' B. J. Siioskton delivered. N.A. N.A. N.A. H.A.

Not used for stnuttural rebar _ Reject C-26 19-5-73 n. R. Vimey 0 Arean of North _ Plant-.Dite,_ Vent P1nnt nika. Unen mi a PE 12-17-73 east Dike. & 100' BerL _7220-C-208,Rev.2 test fragt.en. PR aA C-27 12-4-73 C. E. Kinnev liner Plate S1-4-U-1. DiJr_ojition of NCR 40-h not Field PE 1 2-10-73 1-22-7 followed ner Snec 7220-C-60. PR AA

~

C-28 "?-5 73 C. vnn11 Admixture tanks on_On-Site Batch Plant do not have Field PE 2-7-73 1

!2-27-7 a means of agitation ner 7220-C-230_.Rev.2. Para,_ L ] _PB AA

~

C-29 '2-4-73 S. Grant Two Sleeves welded on thickened liner vlate for Field H.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

_ inner primary shield _imll prior __to FOR C-2h approvr lIhject C-29 ' 2-12-7' S. Crant Two "B" Rev.1 1-8-7h Cadweld sleeves velded on thickened liner Field._ PE 1 2-13-73 S. Grgut 1-8-74 plate usine P1-AME. No weld specified in 7220-0-111FE ^^ 12-31-7 3 C-30 ' 2-19-73 S *Cv9nt Copine of Reactor B1 des Base Support Columns excedcd Field PE 1-22-71 S. S. Grant 12-1h-73 1-22-71 minimum allowable. ,_ PE AA l-7-7b C-31 12-19-7_1 C. P. 01nvk A f1t-up 1ug_nas__remOYnd fvem T.innv P1ntn 99 1h TT1 ml a PE 1-16-7h C. F. Clark 2-19-72 1-o&-7h cuatine a' coure creater_than_1/16" daep_ PE AA 1-b-7b C-32 12-1h-7 3 C. F. Clark E6010 Wold Rod Ser.#h2660-N docymmLtation reports Field PE 2-27-72 18% elongation. C-111, Rev.2_ requires 22Vo PE AA C-33k2-12-71 0,_E,_ Clark Plate _asacablieLS2-h-U1 & S1-1-U? innt prnnnnen nn Pinia test. N.i. N.i. N.i. N.i.

C-3h 1-h-7h Rowork B. J. Stockton 'Certqin 18S rebars from INRYCo are not cut to with-- Field 1 7h L. R. Albert N.A. N.A. N.A. N.

in 1/8" from square.ner snee C-39.Rev. 6 Reuork QCfNCR RCV. 2*l 5 72

-~

PAGE3 0

'h .

) \ \

f *f

, w- " *

j. NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK acPoRT AS OF k'{,j PAGE COMPL Q.C. ENG. SIGN OTO; PREPARED BY SOURCE STATUS

,CR NO. cLu PONCONFORMANCE DAY CLOSED BY DE.,ORIPTION/R EM AR KS DISPOSIT. ROUTE XMTD REPLY RETD C-35 12-3-73 C. F. Clark Plate assembly S1-6-U-1 gas channel blocked 2'0" from Field PE 2-19-73 1-08-7L 1-16-71 C. F. Clark left edre. viewed from bott.om. PR AA 1~h'74 C-36 19-31-73 n J. stockton somn cadweld sleeves have burra. shnvinrrs . etc. viola PE 1-2-74 1-1 0-714 2-1-7_lt L. R. Albert lInnnon Pomi ner to C-931 nov. h PR AA 1-8'Ib C-37 12-20-71 L. R. Albert 3-2 Section 11.h,_JLirid Sheathing must have end cap Field PE 2-31-73 1

-11r7h 3r other devise for protection from damage. elemente PE AA 1~7-7b C-38 12-31-7J B. J. Stockton r,ugs for 3/8" nlate fabricated on wrong side of Field PE 1-2-7h l-22-71 1-22-7h S. S. Grant 31 ate for Base Slab Units 1 & 2. PR AA t"7-7h C-39 12-18-7? G. Knoll Juring tanks below specified temperature. C-208Rev.P Field PE 12-28-73 1-10-7L 1-10-7} G. W. Knoll PR AA 1-10-7 i C-10 4 1-3-7h M. P. Hendrick 31 ate assembly Sh-3-U-1. heat discolorations and Field Sulges. Elev. 633'-2" and 6h8'-h".

C-141 1-9 7h s. Grant 111 19" trim bara(mk R12) Mnnufactured 13'-3" nnt vini a PE 1-8-7h 13'-O" out-to-out as on INRYCo cut Shts. PE AA 3-12 4 1-h-7h S. Grant Trumplate assemblies R/B 1 & 2 grease vents, contines. Field PE 1-1-7h 4

and rust. PE AA J-13 4 1-7-7h B. J. Stockton Horizontal B6 x 8.5 s not fabricated in accordance Fieli PE 1-8-74 1-10-1 1-2h-7h F. A. Kapla w/_!L1]1YCo Dwas. E._3. E-h. E-7. & E 8. PE AA l-8-7b 3-1;14 1-15-71 M. P. Hendrick 1/8" E-6010 Weld Rod SN $h023-0 & Sh283-0 received Field PE 1-17-7h at .iobsite with twelve (12) broken containers. PE AA 3-15 4 se e nog nwnet 7.

-38A - 7h J. m. stocks PR's aisposition or ncn n-38 nuthnr42ea une or v1-e pi ml a on column luge. Field used P1-A-Lh. Revnrk '

sc.i ne n m . 2-is-72 PAGE hC

l] h L

D T

7 E 8 M

R 1 Y i 1

L 7 1 P - -

) 4i E f~ J S 3 E U R - G

< ~ T J1 A

l\

N A 7

- P F T D 2 O G S f L I T 1 S P S M - f,;

AM G T O N X 2 1

,~

j, j

R C E ,..

oE . E P G C E A T E A i, R P Q U P A t.

O R '-,-

E T 6

)~ .

C I S a R

U O

P 1 E P N O S S

D

% d e

t f ro K P f O n' r e

O . p B 0 9 t S 3 o U N T m e )

A t T T n S o

. i

& S 3 t E K 3 a G CR - n O NA P im L AM )

3 a

) ME 8 x T R /R M E m

' .A,()_ ON

.- \O R FO J : O P T

P E OT CI P R NR (Lp o(n 7 E

C

- OC NSE ai c t c

r a

N D d e p p

A l e s e M w n e s

R I O h" p .

F / o d N 3 h e S s O 2 u C 1 ) g N B O a N n e Q i N 1 S e b

t o

n s

i Y

B Y t t D B r e E D e e

~

R E h h s

A S l A

P O s E L i R C .

l P R h t

L f o .

)/, e 7- _

, , ? c s 2;(\ 7 n i

,y f Y,_ - a 2

? 0 l .

i S f 1 a v _

b e O' - n 7 2 u a yfI l j

O

. l T c u

N

"/. j'S Q i.

R 1 c C I

- a

(' .- x rs L3 -

t

/ t -

zf]% A ^^'

'T ;j}fd NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK

, )

REPORT AS OF

" %i M PAGE COMPL PROJECT NO. 7220 Q.C. ENG. StGN O$yfl PREPARED BY SOURCE dCR NO. cL NONCO!JFORMANCE STATUS .

0 CLOSED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS DISPOSIT. ROUTE XMTD REPLY RETD 10-24-7] M. Parker Hendrick Radionraphic Reports 10.-16-73 10-18-73 10-19-73 Field -

V-1 1 1-6-73 M. Parker Hendrick Field NA NA NA NA

& 10-2h-73.'No record of ASNT-TC-1A for Case & All otrom Th's hninnen of' thin sheet in not being uned. see pare 7.

GCtNc3 R EV. 2-9 5-71

//: # M ./ PAGE-1:W~

]. '

lQ -

I g -

NONCONFORMANCE PORT LOG & STATUS BOOK ka I

RcPORT D ATE PAcC COMPL

~ o ,c. cuc. sicn

s. PROJECT NO. 7220 f

ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE UCH NO. DATE PREPARED BY STATUS

D5ECRIPTIOM/ REMARKS 4. s.oare so.

! nourcl1.oxuToyc *.oxve wcro c'osED

, ccosco DV Nonc nformar ce Reports written tnder G-3 Rev. Oh were desiensted by letter (den ating Civil, Mc chanical and W1 ding)'

and y numbc r. Nonconformance Faports written under G-3 Rev. 05 will be design 1ted by consect.tive ntsbers caly.

h5 1-18-71 G. w. Knoll c-930. 1 1/2" & 3/h"_conerato ncerecatn nnntam-inated with rock salt on 1-15-7h & 1-16-7h.

h6 1-21-71. L. R. Albert C-19. Rehar Ht 479Th57 fniled 9 77 500 PRT PE 1 -215 -71 during tensile test of qualifying splice 7-7-V. AA 17 4 1 71 C. F. Clark 0-60A,_DiacrcDoncy between mill stamped nna nhn?

stamped slab numbers, plate S2-6-U-2 upper plat a.

h6 1-21-7l C. F., Clark C-111. Iesk_chann_ channel.,_Sh-2-U-1 A R3-1-U-1. PE l-23-7h repair procedure not folloved. AA h9 1 71 C. F. Clark 0-111. Weld enn bc1Wecn_Equetration R-12-T, nna PE 1-23-74 assembly S1-3-U-2 not within specs. AA 50 1-21-71 P. T. Carpenter 1-20_8. Fr.qqucpey of teating_nccrecain for nnnn-re' uct complied with per USTCo QA Manual.

51 1-22-71 P. T. Carpentor 3-230. Placementn ec($89_95)n A(578 67)nAh; 00($82.0)a, A($73)a, & CC($85)a, air test aata.

9

$2 1-23-74 P. T. Carpenter C-930 Plnnomnnt A($7h)n 3cy_ nnnnrnto pinnna with air too high.

50 1-2h-7h P. T. Carpenter c-908 Prnqucncy nf tnating_nccregatn for cone-Rev 1 reto not complied with por USTCo QA Manual.

~

$3 1-29-7h G. W. Knoll C-?30. 1 " innnming_aggregata nnt ne y ,antinn-5 15 1-30-7h L. R. Albert C-111- Mn pronnanrn in c-111 Rnv. 9 for removal of rejected Cadwelds from Thickened Liner Platc srin -

.P A G E 7 oce

PAGE 1 OF 2#

No. C-Ir b*

.f

, .M NONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH g,,.b,.-

Y1s 3. Mo day yR i

A AHD PROJECT NO. 7220 DATE 7g TEM LOCATION AREA /BLOG. 5. DWG/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM NAME Q No. 1 ki !

SContairment #2 Liner S-1-5-U-1 Liner Plate Assembly '

7. INSPECTION CRITERI A DOCUMENT NU.Vgf. TigL p DWo O SPEC @ OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-50 Rev. 7 & Accessory Steel l8. SOURCE: ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER $ (EXPLAIN)

Southern Boiler & Tank Works. Memnhia. Tmm. 7220-0-60

10. 11 NONCONFORMANCE (DISCRJPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES O, No. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO Z 1 E-1-5-Q 1 T.inny Pinto Excessive veld metal was applied when attaching the 2" gas channel over the veld joining the two h0'-0" Liner Plate- to make one 80'-0" Plate assembly.

Part of the weld cracked after the assembly was prime coated. (See attached !

~

sketch.)

I i

12. NCH PREPAHED BY: Date CONCURRENC Date

?n"rY l 8.: ' 9- z-8-7B ?e?$e"n? f. /*f'$ [~[?- 7.5

13. FIELD DISPOSITION:

REWORK M REJECT O ROUTE TO PROJEC!ENGRG Zl NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT'l SUPV. O -

i 1 vinia nnnn-nnan+4nm Remove defective weld by rrinding. Visually insueet channel and plate for ibrther defect. Reveld in accordance with specification-7220-C-$0. Test with liquid penetrant, and pressure test per C-50.

P

/1

14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY: Date APPHOVA 'OF F1 D' D SCSI TI N: Da'e PFE . INN u

G IU0^f Eb5

/ UV *Eh' h A H SP

m. LNoHG Diaosmos:

REPAIR REJECT O DCN REQD: YES O DCN No.

USE AS IS U SEE BELOW U NO M r / We 6i, cu e se b & Id rc co-en c/d/on wouciarc G repaw de 2'd lo-1 croe:vian.'.

-l 2 V 4 feef ./Ar ene.g ree.n-n d behrs ,tle sta db// w.<s on$nc L '

sae s :c. n n:,< c-a 2'.2 a esa.,

a wu' c k. r. w:

l + fally nto r.4 44 c. Shp M% o! Z l#*K /~/nr e cAiranc / -G.- ~/b.*r-l Su m er,J e. J 4 eI j) 5e -0, e.o c u. ./v.'.. o o>-:. n t e i-n ./

' d l C' ' '

/$d !.~/4 4 0hN 'lCk*/14 -

l6 (P O N O Y.! N*' k i l, \

n i. 0 '

A M

\W L Sb* ~ ~ \\ \!

16. APPROVAL OF - .[ - Date 17. H EINS PEC T ION :(

/ * ~~

PE 5 $ ACCEn O ENGRG. h 7 / / '

D te f ay,,sie e,y. v . Dat, PFE- ?h1

t1 *$ M I' lO/Diti L ' ' ' ' ' '

r*Q

Date DISPOSITION CONCURREhCE {j REJECT h* P^5j4.LesaE,qs_, ,,, ,

- '~

AUTH. INSP. CONCURRENCE: "En. insa.

to n.

~

HATE -f*RfWGL . PRTR - Co)./Ak.1MeYik RirdLN@uMWhiYa8Mfca#N4 -

4 J - aMM

/<. . s.. + .

.p. 1 On-rc - cf-zg.y 3 N g, g n c .

SM- 2. of ,E ./ . "

..c,

'l'

\

/

b .

. . . / -//-

. 1 1

1 1

' l f

. I i i

lf&J 0/AuMNE/M_ ,

y> .

t

- /

/ ,

/ ~ f

/-

/

' CJEM K IAIlr/ELV '

f s c.s -)

V I

,p /'

l A " I

- 1 ' LIhtC C. P Lo.Y .

g -

-.~ -- . . . . . . _ . -

'~

p(f -

+ .

1

- 1 l

w 4

. a 4 .

. l

, l

~

1

1 o

b -

4 N

. I e

1 A- .

l O 1 9

I. i. 2. l

'e. - .-

PAGE 7- OF -3 No.

. ,f NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT C-h

'/ 9M, ?,i SKETCH Yesk 3. f.iO DAY YR CONTINUATION 9 EET ATTACHED PROJECT NO. 7220 .

DATE 1 11 7h l-

11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) CONT *D or C

.{ W:. 13. FIELD DISPOSITION CONT *O or - Explanation of Reinspection Reject.

. .)N T*D 15. ENGRG. DISPC3tTIO'J CONT"O Block 17': Checked reject by Quality Control. Repairs to Liner Plate under Specification C-50 is not proper in that C-50 is a shop fabri,cating specification and is not applicable to field repairs.

NCR C-27 replaces IICR C-h.

. . P. Connolly PPQCE 4

[_ ) 00 2R

[,c. . v j - u' PAGE- 1 O F.,_

P' )

, ', ., g NONCONFORMANCE REPORT No. C-5 SKETCH Yts O a. uO oAy yR 7220 ATTACHED 28 73 PRO /ECT NO.

DATE l9

. ITEM LOCATION AR E A/B LDG. 5. OWG/PART No. REV. G. ITEM NAME O No. 1.13

ontainment //2 C-2AC Trumplate Assembly

. INSPECTION CRITERIA DOCullEN T NUMBER & T6TLE D'i!G O SPEC 0 OTHER Z (EXPLAIN) NQAM III Paragraph 3b, number 7, page 2 of 2 I' SOURCE'. ADDRESS 9. P.O. No.

ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER U(EXPLAIN) Chicago, Illinoir,.

Inland Ryerson Constre tion Products 7220-C-2AC 10, 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES U

' ~

N ;. (LIST SERF AL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICADLE) NO [E 1 Trumplate Marked Nurbers H-2, B-2, AK-2, AC-2, AM-2, AH-2, AL-2, AE-2, A2-2 DX, A2-3-DX, F2-2DY, U2-2DY, E2-lDX, AA, 2-lDX, C2-2DX. AC2,- 1DX, and AB2-lDX supplied .-

by IbiYCo in violation of documentation requirements. Specificany, Statement of. Conformity required was titled Certificate of Compliance, other specificatior.s not referenced other than throu?,h the purchase order number, specification revision number omitted. Statement that documentation meets requirements was not included, drawings not listed nor were drawing revisions.

12. NCH f-HEPAHED U Y' -

Date CONCUH H E N C E - Date n _

l l ca E ,[ ff k !b$

13. FIE LD DISPO5tTION: REWORK O Re;ECT O nOuTE TO eRO;eCT dGRG '/l NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. U ROUTE TO MAT'L SUPV. O s

~~ b i i t t

_ bl -

[1E 19 bfD* /'te'll. [ h'd _i ' *t4 1.*T h _ .

Y 6, , - . c,. ,k g ,,,

x t

-i t iy l ,1.V

.. -s,- g v xe

,, ( l . . n y. ,w ~G l ,,g . ' sf ;,,;w y y g gg f , ,

P n t_ \ r ~ .

s ( ,

Pli 'tWN.1, C W\#_kt '** $ _ t ib( _..+v.'- I* Fi?.

N OIbd t'A /.;:- .b/lU fi.u 4.u..

1\ fi% L _,

. d

14. FIELD DISPOSITIO A'. Y: g . Da te APPHOV OF Fi p ITIOr e S / ..e(khr af f f $ A TH NSP t

16. ENGF;G Di$POblTION: r7 v) REPAIR LJ RE;ECT O oCN REOD: YeS O DCN No.

USE AS IS {_3 SEE BELOW E NO 3 Correction of mistitled, non-re ferenced, or missinn documentation cited above is being corrected by Field and, Inspection. Ennineerinn anrees that this approach is correct. No further Engineerinn action reoufred.

A he L eM Esa D /s c s.) th' effs't//18 AsJcl t'$

ota 0I. } Q- b- lp AttMcfAf LW Lt3 * */'*h ;Dh$$?& */f y0 - c. $ t,o

&/:n e- c'- 23 fe:v 2 , We p p n n m w

'Sput.caTir % , -pf , \

a-[] b 7o an p .Q u ;; 9 c!I' Y " A n _

, Uu i f U -)

'#'Q' l~&'/%.g,g ENGRG. [/ W ,e l

f gf*,pyg 'ACCE M"L'"Svyyn b td I

Cw*, ,y;jt.f8[.ji:(3 r,b ?- . "%",rf7 ,_. iz,ll 7 /

PFE'. f / e # b '/t M /r?,Date

'# *D I' -

' ,c" ., 4 r u-~ ~ _L.

3 f . lj. ,.i./-l

/f~: REJECT L e CISPOSITION CONCURRENCE ,/ ---

AUTH. INSP.__

b CONCURRENCE , ,'W~ iE , . - .- . . ' ~ 7 : . r,3.

WHIT E - O.C. ENGR. PIN K - O.A. ENG R. SHADED AREAS APFLICADLE '

f 43 , J- MNCH L CCCYTXLaIZfWh[ irk 4~L . . M. Wo1 M hMS3 pn M6 M M VS _Art f f,9

M*N'kif'sL3tt 'iJ R E V. 7-173

. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT No. C-5

- SKETCH Yes O 3. Mo DAY va

, CONTINUATIOiV SHEET ATTACHED DATE PROJECT NO. 7220 1 31 TL

11. NONCONFORMANCE (D'ISCREPANCY) CONT *D or l'

13. FIELD OISPOSITION CONT'D or 4NT*C Ja. ,

,15. ENGRG. DISPOS! TION CONT'D ._

1. Correct trumplate identification numbers noted in .lescription of discrepancy.

Corrected trumplate marked numbers are: H2, B2, AK2, AC2, AM2, AH2, AL2, AE2, A2-2DX, J2-2DX, A2-3DX, F2-2DY, E2-1DX, AA2-1DX, G2-2DY, AC2-1D7 and A32-1DX.

/ ,e C2]

/"3/ ~ 7f g

.. I >

l l

l I

"4. l WHITE - 0.C. ENGR. PIN K - Q.A. ENGR- OC - 3NCR

!) 1'PAGE 1 OF 1 2'- ',A

,..,g',& J; C-14 pk NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yes 3. t. o o Ay v y, +

ATTACHED I PROJECT NO. 7220 DATE b.1 16 73

/*RE A.D.OGs.$ DWG/PART No. REV. G. ITEtA NAME ,,11 '

s .e;, O No. -

l l TEM LOCATION . .. . y &'

stock Reinfor_cjg3th'.' DA DOCUMENT ivuMBER & Ta f LE Reinforcing Stl. !

7. INSPECTION CHITEF;tA. y ,. , , gg % ,. s Ono O SeeC @.Oh> egg',ic' PLAIN) X 220-C-208 Materials Testing Services d

8. SOURCE:

ENGF G CDNSTR C OTHER d (EXPLAIN) Inland-RyersoSO"d[$nst. Prod. "C"O.' " '

] .a>- ! C l'I'. .' ?

rw4c ~ _'

7, , 7220-C-39AC

10. 11 NCNCOAFORM GF (CISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES U No. (LIS SEfilAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO @

Heat Nd?.C38074, rebar size #4, ASTM grade 60, failed two of six l tests ruI[ bir 'indebendent laboratories. -

I The rebar from this heat no. is stock material and has nqt ver_been !

used for any structural rebar. The total amount received is 11.903#. !

l Attached are the independent laboratorv reports along with the Lemont l Manufacturing Corp. mill test report furnished by Inland-Ryerson. !

l l

/ Date CONCUHHE i Date u.2"l NcH """ PHEPAHED tf Y): %Hl/9l75

, $~ Ce"%'pf~.e.c j Mm{'7b?$ ,_ /t_'-B-?.?

D. L.D DISMmo.t REWORK 0 RE;eCT O nOuTE TO eRO;ECT pNGRG ,1.

NOTIFY AUTHORl2'ID INSP. C ROUTE TO PAAT'L SUPV. O

.A.

m P G P 11 M E I N '

l di E, W '6 A D lih 1\\ L:

~

NOV 2 6 PJ/3 Ey,c;nt.C io.JMi W

1.4 *O~

~

[P

14. etELD UlSPOSITI N BY- Date APPHOV/at.

j OF FIE1 - SF sit ON: Da t e*

PFEL '/ i L/Mf / 'N E' 'I $

()

Mij 2,.2C uw N ///r bl? f4 SSN$$SPf'

' 'N b PAIR RE O se;ECT '0' DCN REQD: YES O DCN No.

U51 AS T U SEE BELOW E NO 3 The low stress #4 rebar for Heat No. C-38074 should not be used for any Grade 60 structural rebar. However, it can be used either as a temperature rebar to prevent the crack of concrete, or as a structural rebar where a yield stress of 40 ksi is required; Engineering will indicate locations where Grade 40 ksi - #4 har are acceptable, ,,f

[ '//0.I /7 .",> k!; Y I'/4 * / . > *:

$ b. t I b A l\ O t I db C^,, D,-W4h Sh2d W \i d' M / u m ,t. d ,Mccat(\co p b y

16. APPHOVAL OF 1 s,

' '- p 7 EINS ItON i 9

PFE U,h I4-

^

te M' ) ! '

7' '

I '

Date D5te /

DISPOSITION CONCURRENC -tU -=f,/ -

REJECT M '* ./ Resp ns.bie Lead Ence.

/ ./

i AUTH. INSP. CONCURRENCE: XIdin tr.m. O v ,.

WHITE f.XUhTeVA PINH - Q.A_. ENG et SH ADED ARE AS APPLl@AC_LE OC - 2NCa

('N~ '

. i.

PAGE 2 OF 2 2*

u

. ,~ cv ' ,q"qjn' C-14 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT No.

d'j?I!' ~

SKETCH ves O 3. t.to DAv va k' ." s~ l CONTINUATION SHEET ATTACHED 7220 DATE PROJECT NO. 17 13 73 j 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) CONT'O or C No. 13. FIELD DISPOSITION CONT'D or CONT'D 15. ENGRG. OtSPCSITION CONT'D 2

!teld has decided not to implement the engineerin'g disposition and to remove this material from the site. This will allow better material control and increased assurance of utilizing the proper grade'*of rebar.

Nl l WHITE - O.C. ENGR, PINK - Q.A. ENGR. OC - 3NCR CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - RESP. ENGR. REV. 7172

g 'V:M.,'.l.I/j',. PAGE 1 OF 1 e ., p . . , . .

No.

C--16

- pt':..) ,'}. '

qNONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yas O 3. r.:0 5Iy ye

/ >

ATTACHED y ROJECT P NO. 7220 DATE qq qgl73 REV. 6. ITEM NAME 1 211 ITEM LOfLT10N i ~?

AR E A/B LOG. 5 DWG/PART No. Q No.

hase Mat ~.. Reactor Buildings 7220-c-335 5 Thickened Liner Plate

7. INSPECTION C, BIT 6 R,f A . . j, ,,

DOCU.'.;ENT N U.'.'.C ER & i tT LE owo O SP'EC Z oTHER O (ExPtsiNi 7220-0-231Q. Section 10.10 7

. OURCE:

ENG'RG'. W. CON'STR'.b OTHER 3 (EXPLAIN)

~

' Storn --a Ana to pl e t cHt+Am-' 7220-C-$U.-AC

10. 11 NONCONFCRt.1ANCE BOISCREPAhCYP OESCRIPTION: ASME YES O N a. (LIST, SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO Nl ,

1 Although the thickened liner nlate for the primary shield walls, column _;n_cn_d sister splice assemblies for 83' series cadwelds were stored with rust inhibitin:t paper enclosed inside the sleeves and plastic caps taped over the ends with duct clocure tape, rust is present inside the sleeves.

2 Some sleeves after inspection were not able to be properly sealed and consecuently are essentially open to the weather.

12. NCH PHEPAHED BY: Date CON LUHR ENj,;cQ j Date

"',y' "*'* /4n ~ .8 11l1,/,; i,7e"'l."f,-vi.,)ff'n>f a g/.b(!;;;_

13. FIELD CISPOSITION: ' '

REWORK U REJECT C ROUTE TO PROJECTINGRG f I NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. U ROUTE TO mal'L SUPV. U q y Un pronque to clean the _inside of env rasty sleeve by randbinating to r net On i ' t.- M of Specification 7220-C-231Q When cualification tests for cadwelders were made in the vertical position, sister splice assemblies for the 'B' series cadwelds were used. These vero cleaned by sandblasting, and the inside of the sleeves was as clecn as a new cleeve. When tested, all four qualification tests ended with fractured rebar, with an average of 99,262 PSI and a low of 96,750 PSI. This meant that eight out of eight sleeves sandb3asted perfor=ed to the design criteria.

14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY: Date b

APPHOVA OF FIELO D(SPOSITION: D te PFE W //< <28

.G A# .

hh7/74 g,gUgs,Nge s

E

. g' rt

~

ue Ib. ENGHG Di POSIilON:

O ma .O mum m0 ma USE ASIS O See estoW K No M ell 1&2 Ennineerinn approves the sandblastine method for cleaninz B series solices as specified in Specification 7220-C-231Q Section 10.10.7.

~

Y[ ndL p L. t ' c ) A ; i.. ; 3 hA" " '**

i ~ ~ """

7o 'Ahm lg 'g yQ

. _ . . . _ , . , . , , 15 I /i ? r'.LJf,V> i . M JAN1uim+ y.. i . ; y -

. q t .:

_, e - M i ', . . . , n m n.

l l

. W.M b TEN M.[ ?e (!1Gl tYG(2 ( - / 4 .*i W ON $f ' ,. _,m

6. API ROV AL OF < . ' 4' ^ '

Da e 1/. HEINSPEQiQg .) G - 6ie '-

ENGRG.

fI

'f -

h( U / Cate /

f A Wk (D $;f VE W l l -U '."

Hmnsib ngr. ,

Date f

PFE. t]w [ I. .fillif b ll ^l7'!' Ul -

~^ 0 ~I '

DISPOSITION CONCUHF3NCE ' h # 'D5 te' REJECT O pr]' ' ;ee awns Lead Engr.- Date AUTH. INSP. _ _ CO NCUR R F.NCE : Wh. 6nm. o.<

WHITE - O.C. ENG R. PIN K - O.A. ENG R. SH/.CED AHE AS ATPLIC A3LE yg _ _ _

s.

2.

~*

r': O i*PAGE 1 OF 2 REPORT

.NONCONFORMANCE

~

'. l SKETCH / ei G 3. ,,5U Sb t

ATTACHED PROJECT NO. 7220 DATE p' g 7'j '

ITEM LOCATION AR E A/8 LOG. 5. OWG/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM fJAME 7 gg 1,lY1 Base Slab Cont. #2 7220-C-310 2 Rein forcing ' Bars-

7. INSPECTION CHITERI A DOCUMENT NUMBER & TITLE- [ormb @ PNdQ3 b MUL DWG O SeEC S OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-231Q, Rev. 4 S Curinc of Concrete ENGRG. O CONSTR.@ OTHER O (EXPLAIN) .

3500 E. Miller Rd.. Mid't an d . Mi. 7274-C-?9

10. 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES O Na (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO Y]

1 Suecification C-231Q, Rev. 4, Section 10.10.1 states in part: " Ear deformations shall be full size, undamaged , and uninterruoted by trade ,-

mark or any identification mark for the last 12" on end to be soliced.Y The following cadweld solices do not meet aforementioned specification!

Splice No. Solice End .X Dimension Sell East 4" SE30 East 4"i

~

SE91 East 1 1/2"i SE130 East 11" (See attached sketch for definition Date of X and X0.) DJte

12. NCH F'H EPAHE D BY 'CONCUHHb b / f own W"*JBxJkh

13. FIELD OtSPO;alTLS)N:

ukhd= l a iva REWORK O RE;ECT O nouTe TO eRO;ECT.iNGRG O L.a 4~

NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. U ROUTE TO MAT'L SUPV. O 1 Reinforcinc steel purchased under Item 9 (Containment #1 Reinforcing Steel - 1970) does not conform to present soecification cited above (Item 7). Portions of Cont. #1 steel are being used in Cont. #2 in 3

lieu of late delivery of Cont. #2 reinforcing steel. Field disoocit4.c is as follows: ,

Sell - Project Engineering Evaluation SE30 - Project Engineering Evaluation i SE91 - Project Engineering Evaluation l 5E130 - Accent as is: Sufficient deformations..to develon shear.

14. FIELD DISPOSITION : Date APPHOVpL OF FIE D DIMOS.iTmN: Date

- PFE - * !W ' [ !C / / 4*! ? / /L ',

- /Yw_h )

ll 'i!73 $$??"$sP"Y U _'

~'

REPAIR O RE;ECT O DCN REQD: YES h DCN No.

USE AS IS O see nELOW L1 NO te 1 Engineering reonests Field to remove the existinn Cadwelds and make new Cadwelds for bars No. 5 Ell, SE30, and SE91r-5ngecorti r.eymg.3 i th . Specification C-231 Q Rev. 4

((dh'Nd(l(.jb _

2 The existing Cadweld for bar No. U3kis acceptabi Q _

Lt.b ,3., i n in 7,e fa I4' "N/// i h.

v n i i .i. v w a ,

MCHE. POWER CORF. '?/6_p73 iGC - T.':.0

. . , s.

'T/ /d.

~

,, y riR.

/ 11 EING C TION b - APPROVAL OF Date ENGRG. ! gsp,apsible Eny. p PFE V 'N!/ ' 'i' !* ^!!// / Par 5 llI O h /

m

~

j%=* * *

/

/ DatU / REJECT O DISPOSITION CONCURRENCr[

AUTH. INSP. CONCURRENCE: Aunt in o. _

D .t e WHITE - Q.C. ENGR. PIN K - O.A. ENGR. SHADEO AREAS AFPLICACLE GC - 2NCa GOLD ENROD - RESP. ENGR. TO AST.*E COf.TONENTS R EV. 7172 m _ CANARY -. FIELD ENGR.

,3, . . _ ,

. . .,,4 4,,., ., . + . ,

Si .' RCR C-20 Rev. 1 page 2 of 2 U- .<

, REINFORCING STEEL .

1 s- 1

+

. Intercupted Deformations i

f,$fff f h'.h$NkkQ

_ 6 45] '

18 5 T1PIC A L

. Interrupted Deformations One Side Only (Typical) l w

~, X ^

SL 56 VC

! l [CADWEl D FYXX_Xyj'4 1%NX >N 'i'4 s, _4PE * /8.f Interrupted Deformations

. Totally Enclosed Within Cadweld Sleeve

_ X' . =

C ACWELO SLEEVE

/g ^

[k/s X ((','/.dkVA'XXfl s

$ W /85 Interrupted Deformations Partially. Enclosed Within Cadweld. Sleeve l

9 9 +t=- -=*e- 1 -w- -m,- t e w vevPw v 4*r,t9e= sv ,p w a=+-s *tr---ver-'y y rv * * *yyp -

g y "= cr==u-*

C

,d% 'PAGE 1 OF 2 f No. C-29 Rev.1 i

/ SrQ NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT Yes b g' "-'.6h I

h SKETCH ATTACHED

3. MO DAY Y.i

[ 7220 DATE

. PROJECT NO. 12 l B ITEM LOCATION AREA / BLDG. 5. DWG/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM NAME Q No. 1.211 C-409 3 Thickened liner plate

. 3 aac_ ggt._Ranctor Eldc. #g -

DOCUMENT NUMCER & TITLE l 7;1NSPECTION CHilERI A

DWG O ' Spec 00 OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-111 ce'.A gOuRCE: . gyggg, O cONSTR.$ OTHER O (EXPLAIN)

C 's .* 7220-C-50

\

/ ',.

10'.M / 11. NONCONF03MANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES C No*/ #*DiU' TSSERfAL NUMBERS WHERE ARPLICA8' El NO N]

1- Two type 'B' cc.dveld sleeves were velded on the thickened liner plate for the innel primary shield vall according to velding procedure F1-A-LH by a velder qualified to Section IX of the ASME Code. The sleeves were located as shown on the attached 7920-W*<-C-50. No velding procedure was specified in Specification 7220-C-111 and the locations are as shown on 7220-SK-C-358A nor did FCR-C-25 call out a specific veld procedure.

DJte CONCUHH t;NGE" . g/. Date 12.,D';***

NCR PREPAHED

/ BY;be t.tu

~

? l>luh4 C?l@Q.edh, je h __ pfp D j 7 # ' '

la. riELo DISPOstTiOy: REWORK O REJECT O route TO i ROJECTfNGRG f R NOTIFY AUTHORIZFD INSP. LJ ROUTE TO MAT'l SUPV. O 1 The. field reco:= ends that the cadweld sleeves be accepted as 107 ' N C; ~-

h ! : ,

'_K.~i.iY,' : G'

. '# Ma :, j b1E.[d 9- s , ,.

bM p r *== L.- , ~- , , . .

- u. e s u. .s s . .. a wg,

--.t r. n r;n. <..~..m

. a H. R f'"

lf/ t

14. FIELD OtSPOSITION BY: Date APPHOV L OF FIELD DISP 0ilTION:

h / Date '

/ /3 CUR EN AUTH. INSP.

15. ENGHG 015 POSITION:

REPAIR O REJECT C DCN REQD: YES O OCN No.

USE AS IS h SEE BELC7; U NO E]

1 Engineering concurs with Field's proposal to leave the Cadveld sleeves as is.

l l . of nicA.s _

l PhJ

~* n12V'l7\

/

l I __

l J -

M-p _

17. H EINSPECTION

/4

- 16. APPHOVAL OF / O ,

g

^ MP055'bfo Engr O.;t e

" ENGR.G. . g/ j p Ul04.; ate /~k PFE l'"' ***

"A M4I '

REJECT O j espons#0lc Lced Engr.

/ ,Date

Dati DISPOSITION CONCURREPd'E AUTH.IW. CONCURRENCE: Auth. Inm. Ove

. PIN K - O.A. ENGR. SHAC'ED A TEAS AFPLIO;,BLE Oc - 2icCR WHITE - Q.C. ENGR. R EV. 7172 NJYWOf4K41.. (@fWf@i6f0- fin 9 GNM TO ASME COMPONENTS ,

DAT" 6' DATF UlII!70 CHECKED BY SHEET NO DEstGN 6 ,

pgg - C - gO JOB NO 72 PR* JECT uni P' PRitAARY 5AELD VJALL WICr91Cb Ltt's. Pt t TE , RE Acto R ELb',, * ,1 FILE NO

- t T

= .

TY Y CADwCLD SLECVES (1 AEoJE i iBCL*W PLhTC) wutCH H Ab 2.Ctr> Ti<KED ,

TD CNE CECTio d of 7 tic Taity.oeth PLArt 4 REtA VCD TO ALLOv3 FoR FICLb WELlett4 '

CF TilC Tdo CCc.Tlor,J$ - "

FCR-C-24 15svez, to FCLocATE ~

'i N

'"""' 'OO~ O y"'Ooo'g'

./ OC lo -

O'f x ,

OO's o \.,

O y)

O Oo '\

O o:i o

vy O ' l K) ,

oI O oj I O oj O

~

,o

, .s .

/ O r O '.? - /'90 O / .-

GOC >oo J u.

C OC -

, focATietJ cF THE Two cADwCLD

' - SLECVES WELDEb To 7 AC- VNCC-E-SibE O F TH E PLATE P A68 2 To rtecEiPT c r ws EEvtsco owc..C-4c3 r

, ;' - . -~

'r l1 1 1 f:

7 11- S9t'-d Y0'0f : i ~ 1 d

't, ll

d.

b b; h @ m u J ,'?NCR ggggDJcg :kg,.C 9

%(~'N !

J AH 3 'l374 J A- A (TYe) BECHTEl.

f,*0,)'g) CORP. -

. UF300Ehelled

' 2.

lPAGE 1 OF 3 , _ , .

~. )

r.fy,,ll NONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH (f.oaC:3 f.

Yef hI* 3. ,. f, rdQ OAy yn ,

PROJECT NO. 7220 ATTACHED / /, [7 ' -

i AREA /8LDG. 5. DWG/PART No. REV. G. ITEM NAME ,T[;

gTEM LOCATION , Q- N b. . ' 1. 4 5 - i Rse Slab Cont. 1S2 7220-C-393 5 Reactor Bldg { Ba'se Slab Steel 1

't. INSPECTION CRITERI A DOCUMENT NUM6ER & TITLE . . ,,,.,.

gg .j .

DWG 3 SPEC 0 OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) d ' i' 71, ., -

7220-C-393, Rev. 5 fs/

ENGRG. O CONSTR.2 OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) ( *,h

'"',. f'

s. - 77:2!2 00C-3 3

10. 11. f40NCONFORM ANCE (DISCREP ANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES O~~' '

N;. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO Xl 1 Detail.3 of Dwg. 7220-C-393, Rev. 5 allows a maximum two inch web cope to the support columns for the connection to the horizontal beam.

Coping of the columns in excess of 2 inches was done based on the ,

attached telecon of 12/3/73, which resulted in the writing of the attached FCR-C-26 on 12/5/73. The telecon did not specifically 7 reference FCR-C-26, which would have provided traceability to the DCN to be issued as required by Section II, No. 6, Par. 7 of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual.

12. NCH PHEPAHLD BY: y Date CONCUHH W 4 Da te

??*"* _ J u d ~~ M2h3 "L"e"#fdj;mlN/2t% /2&& '

13. FIELU DISPOSillON: '

REWORK O REJECT O ROUTE TO eRO!EC/ENGnG M ,

NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT'l SUPV. O No further cooing of the columns in excess of two inches will be

;q f performed until Project Engineering approves FCR-C-26.

The work that has been completed on coping the columns conforms to the change reOuested on FCR-C-26. The field recommends that the w k be accepted as is.

A

14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY: Date APPROV OF FI' bD D SP StilON: C, te PFE * '

t !-t ! H m b

/z/ah3 c=.M' '* e O~ 3:t o REPAIR O Re;eCT O DCN REOD: YeS O DCN No. was issued for FCn "

NC [3 USE AS IS O SEE BELOW X (not NCR C-30) ,

1 Method of copy'ing the U6 Columns was discussed with Engineerinn by telecon of 12/3/73 2 FCR-C-26 was approvd by Engineering on 12/13/73.

3 Engineering concurs with Field's proposal to leave the work done durinct 12/3/73 to 12/13/73 as is.

- m4 Items 1 through 3 transM";d to Field by TWX on 12/27/73. .

'I' #MF/77 5-5 l DCN No. 2 to drug. C-393. v. 5 issued 12/13/73. C d 4 '/. /7 I FG. APPROVAL OF 1/. HEINS C T ION PFE . 1'-

-- 'N -' -' '^# !# ~

-/ ' Da t e REJECT O spons me- w/,' Ea<r. ' care DISPOSITION CONC'URREt(CE AUTH. INSP. CONCURRENCE: Auth. Insp. Om f Cgh P SH CLE C

m.. .-.

J -

. ~- '

- fpy)

^ .

x L50$/53 CS .

'n C-30 2 or 3

~

sa A #

4 .

"-"j.y1 l a& p. '

y a l oy -17 /yg ,, ,,

.- GLllxs;p.a w , _ , , _

4 m Aq sea A x&

49.pu clay ,_ tr L.,~~ d~vm c-a y ,ax ay,,.;n

,ey,un+ c

?lOyss%.4. J ?&4d A 4 ,*A.d y mMma oclc<>,.~. A 'He ca. q X L il p a,p ;(z a te" <<ye. </ Vi ene ;t4 uk-."

.p, ,>t:4 4 1 5 / u c. t& cf uM hxel W' s')>gl 4, ,<~n

/ #7d y . Abu CA & , e .

c

,p;e.~nz,f vf C~ pits - 1 a+,4 pG,, ,

g,y i,y %

ciA~

& ,c,, q e- .

'A 5

[(4, ,,,Q lt inu _ci' R i.y.u.'Ur bd -k--< t m~<V " "'? AsJ ft g4 un i C6 i ^*'),, NA~ he. OK fo=

w .a ,ap h, -

gj, 5 y ,w 9 _

^ S$ 5 % An'~ .

g ,- g g lf g wud ,w2E 9

f .

bzd nt) r -

i 6

,- - e - = , ,

i "

FIELD CHANGE REQUEST PMGE 0F

,,- %I.#.J

. We, .

3. Mo DAY Y g

7220 Q No. 1.h5 DATE l?- f l7' l

. PROJECT NO. )

~

REV. 5. TITLE 4 . REF. DWG. oR SF EC." UcR c-30 3 of'3' T EQ-C-3930 5 Reactor Bldg. Base Slab Steel framing _ /; '

SIGN ORIGINi VENDOR O (IDENTIFY) NAME ENGRG $ ,'.

7. EXISTING CONDITION:

3 d GE Co s a nde e em M 2". 'N Mas dn be ,

to be coped creater than 2" in order to install'the 6" beans to the correct elevation in cartain areas due to a combination of: 1) fluctuations in the finish grade of the mud nat, and 2) lovering the elevation of the 6" beams in order to obtain tne proper rebar clearance a

8. CHANGE REQUEST / SKETCH ggg /

j

. ..J,s'6' r

~- rI... -:.- '-

TCt>

-/' -

I

-. 3,, c.v<,\ t2 4 I

( a

~

" \ ^

,,, '[ 2v; m.

cope l ,,

s v

l f j \ _. ._ -. _. _ 3 _

s -

' - Tbe t.,2Kulq

~

y ALLov/ Y[ (4 WC4444C - i l

,1{ l ca.if t tJc i.G Tb Cola'W

. V3E6 G.LtP (\tJ ul.E5

< sueeceT colupN

.. e' s _-

Parmission is requested to:

A) In areas where top bracing occurs, allow a maximum of 3" cope. Ynere the cope has to be greater than 3", the short pieces of US vill be removed, lowered and revelded. The top of the column vill be cut off to allow for placement of the bracing.

B) In areas not affected by the top bracing, cope up to 6" to allow for placement of the -

CB8.5 to correct elevation.

- %+ m9 ,, q q

. 1 g nm .".2,p .

. 3 .i U E J J. - *.

'*w #% 0h j. iW I La

< \

g 't. .- (g'm.a u.m -u s w{

t ' -

- \, \- a_a Date 9. /p4/

A , d. f M X )?/5/zt t

10. REVIEWEDyY "aee^ato av:

- c,y,c 11. APPROVAL OF FIFLD DISPCSITION:

f ,f f ELECT.

MECH. "' # [g

~d . Proice seid E i Dc,te WE LDING _A ' "

pro;. ENGR.: cate:

12. PROJECT ENG*R'G APPROVAL: YES O No O REMARKS:

PAGE 1 Oi: 1 tf

['. W-

,,(( '

.'No. "~' C - 31

.yg NON. CONF 0RMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yes Ch 3,. . MO DAY YF 7 r-

'*v [/ PROJECT 7220 NO. ATTACHED /. DATE 121'2 73 ~

. lTEM LOCATION , AREA /BLOG. 5.XI4.U/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM NAME j, ., Q No. 1.21 Containment Unit #2 S2-14-U1 Liner Plate

7. lNSPECTION CRITERIA DOCUMENT NUMBER & TITL,EEreetion.of Reactor Building '

DwG O SPEC E OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-lll, Rev. 2 Liner Pla_te -

8. SO U RCE.* ADDRESS 9. P.O. No. g ,

ENGRG. O CONSTRM OTHER O (EXPLAIN) '\. ; ,,. !.,

10. 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES ' O - ,,

No. (LIST SERIAL NUMCERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO O 1 A fit un lug was removed from plate No. S2-14-Ul. The remcval tore plate metal producing a gouge greater than 1/16 inch deep.

Repair was done to the plate in accordance with Appendix B of Spec.:.fi.

cation 7220-C-111 which had not yet been issued for construction.

Date CONCUHHEN Date

12. NCH PHLPAHtD g .

/

N'$ "~' 0s(

13. FIELO DibPOSITION:

!WP /J.-m m ?c'a'Te"$ k '/i ' Ah /Eh$$[

REWORK O RE;ECT O ROUTE TO PRO;ECjr/ENGRG ik NOTIFY AUTHOftlZED INSP. U ROUTE TO MAT *L SUPV. O 1 Field rcQuests croiect engineering aoproval to use as is.

/ /)

14. FIELD DISPOSITION SY: Date APPROV/ L OF FIE D Did 'OSI iQN: Da}e PFE. /b1 t +s s' UFC' . It A ns <-r i llr/tlll T

& F 01- n.w.7s me.? a m" Ib. ENGHG Di$POSIl'lON:

O em O m em mO ma USE AS IS N SEE RELOw 0 NO XJ l Engineering Concurs with Field's propor,al to use as is. l

, 2 Appenoix B of Specification 7220-C-111, Revision 2 issued on i shs

. 1. /

%i .

m,-.,. ,b ~'/73 Y .(" (.. I'.". i \ t' ['."..! ) Uts LL- M A.-

..e - e--.< ._ , /1 .

i U A C f. L' i l[j,,Q )L'f 'f).sLF. )'l--4.a f)l.pd $ f {* l I' ll l

a6. APPROVAL OF 17 jgVJ'3 Hll/b l u(,th~ W h IN@tfe7y p /-H in

. HEINWECTION(%'lIf~a/

- , p.._'* 1 /b ..&,,. /

- I h/ Dan '

' ' ' Date REJECT O Psponsitale Lead Engr.

DISPOSITION Cdr/CONRENCE AUTH. INSP. CONCURRENCE: Autn. Insp. E, u # ~ __

WHITE - O.C. E NG R. PIN K - O.A. ENGR. SHADED AREAS APPLICABLE CC - 2NCH C FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - R ESP. ENGR. TO A5ME COMPONENTS R EV. 7172 l

2'

, my PAGE 1 OF l h.h '

NONCONF0RMANCE PROJECT NO. 7220 REPORT SKETCH ATTACHED Yes O 3.

DATE If10 DAY Y 12 18 73

6. BTEM NAME A*l1 ITEM LOCATION AR E A/S LDG. 5.

'} T Jg E V.

Q No.

Base Slab Cont. el A sp 7220-C-310 p Reinforcing Steel OGCU .1ENT NUi4aER & TITLE

7. iN:PECTION CRITERI A N DeWlig, NMeds~

wG O veC E OTHER O (ExPtaiN> 7220-C-39 Rev. 5 and Deliverina Reinforcino Stan1 88 ""C'

ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER h (EXPLAIN)

Inland Rverson Const. Prnd chirann. Til 7??n_r_70

~ ~ ~~

10. 11 NONCONFORMANCE (DISCHEPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASbE YES O No. (LISTSERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO b

1. Certain #18S reinforcing steel shipped by Inland Ryerson Construction Products Co.

to be cadwelded on the Reactor Blda base slabs have bar ends which deviate from the souare more than 1/8 inch. This violates sec_ tion 7.4 of Soecification 7220-C-39 Rev.6. Nonconforming bar ends have been recognized as certain bars from Inland Ryerson dwg. No,'s R7, R8, R9, R10, E3, E4, ES, E6, E9 & E10.

A .i

\/AL r harr -n Ql(NX WOW PR1W I

2 */

Date CONCUHRENCE: Date

)}$$D 1 '

12. NCR F MEPA HE D BY:

""l*"*'"_%

n l- 2 -u U?e"Z.' $&' y ll&h+

13. F IE LD DISPOSITION REWORK 3 HEJECT O ROUTE TO enOJECT ENGRG O NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. C ROUTE TO MAT'L SUPV. O

^-

1. Bar ends to be cadvielded which are out of square more than 1/8 inch will be re-worked prior to cadwelding to correct the excessive deviation by saw cutting or flame cutting as provided for in section 10.10.1 of Specification 7220-C-231 Rev.4 .

1

. . _ b .?

CtM v2 M!C.N ;uWf PRh & 1 97v

14. FIELD DISPOSITIQfJ BY: Date APPROVA). OF Fl LD DISPOSITIOrp' Date PFE '* f

'!-L A^!! ?- l 7

15. EN Q Ah CISPOS! TION:

/ 74 tot"r"SPE O

u E y ' Date /

REPATR O REJECT OCN REOD: YES O oCN No.

USE AS IS O SeE eetOw 0 NO O

! 6. APPROVAL OF Date 17. REINSPLCT(ON / . ,/,e

~ ~ L'E ' '

PE Date

^ .Y\ B' "Nute Engr. ' Da+se ENGRG. ,

PFE Date Date REJECT O Re:ponsible Lead Engr.{

OISPOSITION CONCUM GNCE AUTH. INSP CONCURRENCE: /. u 'I t in:p. D" WHIT E - Q.C. ENGR. PIN K - 0.A. EN G R. SHt.DED AREAS Al FLICASLE QC - 2NCR

' CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GO LDENROD - RESP. ENGR. TO ASI.1E COMPONENTS R EV. 7172

1 OF 1-

,m.,a No..C-33 g c,} / vN v' '^:

PAGE

. ,y, n e

)(. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yes 3. MO DAY YR

'(

~

ATTACHED PROJECT NO. 7220 DATE 12 3 73

. ITEM LOCATION /.R E AiB LDG. 5. DWG/PART No. REV. G. ITEM NAME .. O N o. 1*2*

Contairr.ent #2 S1-6-U1 Liner Plate. Ass'y r3 .,ey

7. lNSPECTION CRITERIA 7220-84 M M ur.g g .g g,gcpgy17c7/ of Reactor 31dg./ Plate DWG O SPEC G - OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-111, Rev. 2 Erection of Reacter 31d3. Liner Plate ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER @ (EXPLAIN) ,

Southern Boiler te Tank Works , Denhis, Tenn. 7220-C-50

10. 11. NONCONFORMANJ6 (DISCREPANCY) DESCHIPTION: ASME YES O

No. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLf 0ABLE) NO E 1 Durin~'the cicaning of olate ass'y Sl-6-U1 air would not nass thru the gas channel attached by the vendor. Probint- vith a rod indicated a solid blockage. By using the probe the blochage was located 2'0" from the left edge of the plate as viewed from the bottom of the assenbly.

2 Appendix 3 " Repair Precedures for Reactor Euildin'; Liner Plate" of Specification 7220-C-111 had not been issued for construction.

12. NCH PREPAHED t$Y: / Date CONCUHHENCE. , y Date

M_[i

&'? .[l - / - 71 Ie'IEn '

/[ ! /MV

13. FIELD OfSPOSITION:

REWORK U REJECT O ROUTE To PROJECr'eNGRG 8 NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. U ROUTE TO MAT'L SUPV. O s

1 Removal of crmr6x. o inches of ras channel revealed the obstruction to be sand that had become lodzed in the channel. The shop veld in this area uas ground and excmined with licuid pen. per Pt-SR-1, 2. Exanination was sctisfactor'/.

A new section of gas channel was installed over the scam.

2 The field reauests engineering to evaluate field disposition #1 for compliance to the intent of Specification 7220-C-111, Rev. 2, Appendix 3.

14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY: Date APPHOVAL OF FIELD DISP iTlON: Date PFE '* I ' ' L . ' : ' ' l

'E '

A > /Z-/Z-71 S?"h"OsW 'l REPAIR O RE;ECT O oCN REOD: YeS O DCN No.

USE ASIS O See BEtow X No x) 1 Engineering Concurs uith Field's repair procedure as stated in disposition #1.

_2 Appendix B of Specification 7220-C-111, Rev. 2 issued on 1% .:A,

' /'- 'M//p

/

1[' r -t5 i t- m T A f i V E L) C 4.. M ::' A :-

/ '

lis M n n to :t

' " ' * ' (*~,..ca.:~,::=rc c

, .. jn3 7y QjQ;y h,*

'^ ~) . :s LENGRG.

i C i}'yc'Y$YW Y-f (k.l7f.. " (7 b ? ) n., ! l - /[ . 7, .

f . ACCEPT Date jf LECllTEl. D 3 72;;g, 6 6i'tj .

- . , '; -og,/7.-

r /' , y?.

j ny)b:e Engr e %'-:da%rp f. 7 j.):

's/ pons >o.. Lead Ensr. Date Date - REJECT O DISPOSITION CONCURREr/CE g/

AUTH. INTP- ~'

_ CONCURRP:CE: Auth. Inm. Om WHIT E - O.C. ENG R. PIN K - O.A. ENG R. SHADED AREAS AFPLICABLE QC - MCet CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - RESP. ENGR. TO AS .*E COMFONENTS REV. 7172 2510 f 7-72)

7, PAGE 1 OF 1 No-

.O . REPORT C-38

'qpf. ij NON,CONFORMANCE SKETCH Yss O 3.

MO DA9 ~

A M CHED D PROECT NO. 7220 DATE 12 31 '3~

AR E A/B LDG. 3. DWG/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM NAME O No. 1.45 l l Dane ITEM Slab LOCATION Co<,. #1 f.: 52 7220-C-393 5 Luns for Cross Bracina on '. ox25 _

7. INSPECTION CD s'sillT DOCU.WNT NU /.BER & II'l LE DWG O SP C 0 OrHeR O (EXPLAIN) Inland-Ryercon SU528526, cht 4-18 .

"" 1 " "-

& SOURCE: ENGRG. O ConsTR.O OTHeR 2 (exetAiNi Inland-R"erson Construction Prod. Co., Chicaco. Illinoic 7220-C-33

10. 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPiiON: ASME YES O No. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO O

1. Certain lugs of 3/6" plate for attachin.; the croca brccing to the Wex25 for sup-port of the ton .at of rebar in the Reactor Bldc. base slabc ucre fabricated on the wrong side of the colunns.

2. Certain other colunna vere placed in the trrong ouadrant due to incorrect or par-tially obscured narkin';s.

Date CONCUHHENCE: DJte "12. NCR PHEPAHr 0 BY: ,

if ,

, ) ls s , ' / *A . ] e E *I -

13. FIEt D DISPOSITI REWORKES REJECT O route To PROJECT ENGRG D NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT *L SUPV. O

& 2. In order to install the support colu~.n cross brnein.', as cho"n on the vendcr's drawines, luTs nade of 3/8" or better steck 0-linted plate will be ucided on the correct side of the colunns u;inr- 3/16" fillet ucids as sho .'n en the vendor's drauings in accordance uith Ucidinc Procedure Pl-A-Lh. As an alternate colution, the lugs shall be treated as fit up attachnents: renoval, necessary repairs, and preparation for reveldint- chall be in accordance with GWS-Structural Rev. O.

Reuelding of tne lugs will be as listed a'oove for the new plate.

f /~*

14. FIELD DISPOSITION SY: Date APPHOVA OF FIE , DIS 'O T ON: /)/ j Dite ,

PFE /II4/ a EI41*? ? MM ) C '

M Ahth'

~

ht}- <)

{

w CoNCUHREN()2

_, . AUT H. If4SP.

15. ENGRG OlSPOSITION:

O mm O e mm mO ma USE ASIS O see ettoW E No h1 1 Engineering is in general agreement with the Field disposition described in paragraph 13 of this NCR.

2 Correct.1on may be made by either 1) adding neu Q-listed stoch 3/8" plate, or

2) removing and/or relocating the existing lugs to the correct locations.

3 Bechtel Welding Procedure Pl-A (Structure), Revision 0 dated 2/23/73 should be used in lieu of Welding Procedure F1-A-lh as you have stated. 49 '/,,/-7.

QSL.OM.a! 0;i', v.vdv ;-J 7 Y !.

V'-/J '

} /' i v 11. H t:lfeSPcc T t ON , ._ /-

6. APPROVAL OF ,

ffpgf, s'

e -f Yj(YR I0 'lte/")ll' j

//)/h:YV{

$ lh ENGRG.

y at/ /,

ACCEPTsS Res reWEng . 4 . Date PFE e/

l'^!v .0 +*^. . i t il1./- f l"ll ' W$ {b_ff -

Date h

Date REJECT O t.<xpensac Lead ener DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE ,

AUTH. INSP. CONCURR ENCE: Aoih Ir. n. D='*

PIN K - 0. A. CNG R. SH ADED AREA 5h?LICA53LE GC - 2NCH

s. . HIT E - Q.C. E NG R. R EV. 7172 C FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - RESP. ENGR. To ASt.;E COMPONENTS 1

PAGE 1 OF 2

,p o - C-39 c ?m:Dj REPORT Yes C Mg day 7 le ,NONQONFORMANCE SKETCH ATTACHED 3,

DATE' ~12 18 73

'Ud d PROJECT NO. 7pp3 1,12

5. OWG/PART No. REV. 6. BTEM NAME g g,,

. ITEM LOCATION AREA /BLOG.

Concrete Test Cylinder Curinc Tcnk T On-Site Testing Lab 7220-C-208-2 DOCUMENT NUMCER & FITLtd

7. INSPECTION CRITERIA owG O SPEC O oTHER O (EXPLAIN)

Technical Specification 7220-C-208, Pev. 2 -

8. SOURCE: ENGRG. O CONSTR.O oTHER M (EXPLAIN) United States Testin; Company, Cn-Site 7220-C-203

11. NONCONFORT.1ANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION:

ASME Yes O 10.

r?O 23 No. (LIST SERfAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) 1 Temperature of curing tank was 66'F from approxirately 0430 to Oc00,12-10-73.

Events leadin7 to this are as follous: Temporar:r newerline Tomeerature to the sTell lab was

, uithin soecifica-accidentally cut by an end loader 0 0900, 12-17-73.

tion, ras raintained throuch day by addin- co to 100'F noter. At 1615 hrs. rover a

was restored. Temperatures recorded at 1700 hrs.--76'F and at 2200 hrs. -74"F.

Min /?&.x.

Temperature at 0745 (12-18-73) was 68'F. Temperature at 0900--70'F.

therremeter recorded 66'F low. Temneraturen clotted on a r,raph indicate O C430 temcerature uns 70'F. Fron 0430 to 0900 terceratures are86 susnect of being outside cylinders to be tested specified limits 73t3'F. Tank contained 115 cylinders.

at 90 davs and 29 cylin'icrs to be tested at 28 days. There *,

vere (cont'd on next D nc r.

Date CONCUHRENCE:

12. NCH PHEPAHED BY ' ~"'

R 12-2"l 75 "$$ "$ 4s D-)27/M

$" flc.W >J t 4.

REWORK O RE;eCT O nouTE To rRO;eCT ENGRG E 13.FILLD OfSPOSITION.d NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE To MAT *L SUPV. O 1 ' Uhen permanent laboratory is completed, curing tant vill be plcced inside pernanent lab. Powerlines are undercround, barring ra.ior poner failure, power should be

( .,

uninterruoted. Field has initiated stens to have 7 dcy, spriny, wound recording therrometers to record curing tank tenperctures.

Field reonests nro.iect engineering to evaluate effects to cylinders on cure.

I em ate Date APPROV OF FIEL Ol'20SI TION: ,

14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY:

PFE 'Ylt' * - . !'E ? ff t ~~~ t llf ? I I.5

[-) / Date -

CONCURRENCE N,W . f _ A. (2 2 *f-7 $ AUTH. INSP.

45. LNGRG DISPOdITION- O mm O m mm m mu USE AS IS C SEE EELOVI.S NO W l A 2'F (max.) deviation for 4h hrs. (est.) from the standard curing condj.tions (ASTM C192-69) is considered insignificant in a curing period of 28 or 90 days. It is Engineering's opinion that this deviation will have no measurable cuds, effect on the data obtained from these cylinders. Hence 3,*emimre' n-that the cylinders be"used as is ", but tha Field should if '.a u n : td to hl id h M//d /// /d/b b D hi W

prevent reoccurrance.

o e il ,n,,, nmu G6V.d M V H W .L U 4 G l '1 f

/ i'ECi4TEL--~PO.'.Trcir, CCRP.

~

1. *~~'#'

17. REINSPECTION (0

'F / Da '

16. APPROVAL OF kNy / *%L g W ' ^l /~ ' O ' I +

pg a \ 'D')

'~

b-M '? / =

PFE COEdUdAE CE h / Datt REJECT O pwn= L u %

OfSPOSITicN CONCURRENCE: Autn. Intn. am AUTH. INSP. Cc - 2NCR PIN K - Q.A. ENG R. SH ADED AREA 3 AITLICA9LE R EV. 7172 WHITE - o.C. ENGR. TO AsME Co.uPONE.'4TS CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - RESP. ENGR.

3' e +" PAGE 2 OF 2 s," ,;;O. 3 REPORT No. C-39

/p Lg;p , N O N, C O N F 0 R M A N C E SKETCH Yes O a. uo oav ver i.^iNt A' CONTINUATION SHEET ATTACHED DATE

{J{g*. ) 7220 12 18 'M PROJECT NO.

U*

11. f40NCONFORMANCE (DISCREP ANCY) CONT *D or 1

13. FIELD C;SPOSITION CCfJTD or ,

No. .-

CONT *D 15. ENGRG. DISPOSITION COfJT'D no 7 day. Cylinders in the tank. Last cylinders sore cact 12-10-73. !

, -7. '. ,

b 9 I

. , 5. 4 ; , .

' s

. . * , 4

.g

. (~^,

\ ~~_/- 1

~

.o OC - 3NCR m rMWL-[ AVL [G%R. w

PAGE 1 OF2 c.h.f.

g . No. C-1;3 -

,N O N C O N F O R f.1 A N C E REPORT SKETCH Yes O a. c.:O oAy y,:

7220 ATTACHED 7, PROJECT NO. DATE 1 y 74 !

(_ ITEM LOCATION AR E As 8 LOG. 5. DWG/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM NAME O N o. _ 1.45 Base Slab Cont. #1 S C2 C-393 5 Misc. Metal l

7. lWECTION CRITERIA DOCUMENT NU.'.*BER & TITLE owc *d) SPEC C OTHER C (EXPLAIN) Base Slab - Embeddedi Misc. Steel Framing

8. SOURCE: , ACDHESS 9. P.O. No.

ENGRG; Ll CONSTR.C OTHER 3(EXPLAIN)

Inland-Ryerson, Melrose Park, Illinois 7220-C-33

10. 11. NONCONFORMANCE IDiSCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME Yii:3 U No. (LIST SERF AL NUMBERS WHERE AFPLICABLE) NO iPs a

1. Horizontal B6 x 8.5's whJch support the top mat of reinforcing steel -

in the reactor base slabs #1 S #2 were not detailed and fabricated in ,

accordance with Inland-Ryerson's plan drawing (

Reference:

Plan Drawin "

are Inland-Ryerson SW 528626, Sheets E-3, E-4, E-7, E-8; Reference l detail drawings are Inland-Ryerson SW 528626, Sheets 1 S 2.) Quantitiek of assembly mark numbers do not correspond with those required. !

I

_ _,, , I

\!ndn.,rnMlW.w'M ppm

- 1~ 7 W

12. NCH PHtPAlii.Q Y: ? Date CUNCUriRtiNCid l.h Date l

";":iL A b t'>

13. FIELO DISFyo$

Ihha "'We"V&md W MzzN!

REWORK b REJECT U ROUTE TO PROJE dNGRG E NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. U ROUTE T f.iAT'L SUPV. O m

s

) 1. Field recommends that: - '

a.) Beams be cut as required. i b.) Beams be spliced for additional length by welding or bolting splic/

plates to the beams as required. Welding to be in accordance with-welding procedure Pl-A. !

c.) Where bolt holes do not line up, either weld the connection or .

depending on the condition, add neu bolt holes. WeldinF to be in !

accordance with welding r;rocedure Pl-A. l d.) Unit #1 misc. metal be used tp make. up, quan.tistyfl, ,(Con) te r.pn ,Ghe.e '.

14. FIE LD "POSI Tl N BY: Date Ah'itQy AL'O Ly 'DrCPO5'<T/ON: ' ' 7 ' ' ~ g Date -

1. E2d-') r PF 'b * *'/ '*/F.d

~ -

//7/7</ i ,$%"Sg ENCE- / i/ / 7 M e' l REPAIR O RE;ECT O oCN REOo: veS O oCN No. I USE AS IS U SEE BELOW U NO O >

Reply by '1HX BEBC-146 dated 1-7-74 1 . .

OMNWWV~T B 69 /7d

M.:-@c:u W j :p 1 ;) '

i p.:'

~

Np;y w..; - t/o,e-y. l

"-"-' J A R 171974 /

B CHTR POWP cgo JOD 72.0 4) f_ /} - ~

~

, a

' ^""" V^'

"k'[Vd/hgg[ Q fgyp '""S

' " Q gjhM'dgM$

PFE Q/ /d'!!

nesponscie 'ead en95<

N odte REJECT O oISPOSITION CONCURREdCE AUTH. INSP.

[ / Date CONCURR E NCE: Auth. Insn. Oxe y

. b n~,O i d[h_ L e b_ I .b^2 E_NGR.,__-_ SH_ADED AMfgpAE %-M

j. .-

C , ., .

1.

PAGE 2 OF 2 2*

No.

Gf .*ji dj NONCONFORMANCE REPORT C-163 '

Yes O '3. t.:o o^v vn f;!IM

- - - . f -' . L C ' ' CONTINUATION SHEET SKETCH ATTACHED

~' D PROJECT NO. 7220 DATE 1 y 74

.f 11. NONCONFORf.MNCE (DISCREPANCY) CONT *D or No. 13. FIELD DISPOSITICtJ CONT *D or CONT'D 15. Ef4GRG. C;SPOSITICN CONT *D

} ;, '

.. 1 shortage in'. Unit #2.

~

Stock Q-Listed material be used to replace any

'( S[missirig

.: e"/.7 ; gq?..';,'t'- beia'm's or angles in the framing system.

1 I

1 1

,....;3 l l \

l l

l d

/

WHITE - 0.C. ENGR. PIN K - O.A. ENGR. OC - 3NCR CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENRCD - RESP. ENGR. REV. 7172

k O ()

^

.~ PAGE 1 OF 1 f < . '.. N:.c _:ri g* *ip' %.- 'f1 O TJ s, 0 N F O R t.1 A N C E REPORT SKETCH ves O a.'

,50 u A Y YH-

"'.'.- 7;'.^O ATTACHED PROJECT NO. DATE 1- ;I _j ITEM LUCATION AH E Ain L OG. nT .,fg G. ITEF.1 NAME 1,111

5. p?! 'j Gip /g HgV. g fj,,

De ro cin') Cont I:1 f. :ja ,,, ;n ri-U n ? Cn'!vrl<! Sireven i.ituilifica CHiTLR A GacWUTfTahira a TITLE DWG O PEC U. OTHEn D iExPLAirsi ,:co-e-231,it:v. 4

.+ c.u l e; ci:.-t r. :;donCrt:f Pir.c r dr},c,,nen! r.,;irr ur:1 ct er. 30

3. 50VHC E : ADDHESS 'J. P.O. No.

ENGRG. O CONsin.O OTHER O (EXPLAINI ja ico vec le't::, Inc. , Clvtalarri, Chio 7220-C-2'.G-N;

10. it. r40t;C0fdFORMANCE IDl5CHEPAf4CY) DESCHIPTION:

. A';M E YES O ..

NJ (LIST SERIAL NUMBER WHERE APPLICA0LE)

'NO d

1. C:.C. c1d cleevoc de; not eCr.rcr:1 'n Pt.ra-r..r.h 10.9.3 ef Urnet rir.c. tion '/.5.0-C ;'il ,

liv. Is. Crecifier.lj'/, cc.*e Cuh cid nice /c : hre fi.r.rorrr'v e ToChinul, i.e.,frirr...

r.h:.vir.c; , etc. re:ain innich of cleev.t.1, r.r.1 ::C.1 tr.w 2*uC L ulor. ; th's ire. . de ;.r e . c - ,

12. PsCH PHLPAt3 D, Y:/ f/ f) Date CONCUHHENCE: , teata Retronsible rs 3 ( '/_14 ". /t ${. O_ l~ f. ' '} 1 ?v cp E n;r.

, .[g1 Res:nnsible

/

Lc PJ Encr.

j '/- I'<*

13. FIL LO DISPOSITIDF REWORK O REJECT TOUTE TO PROJECT ENGTtG el

' f.OT'IF Y /UTHO'llTED IN!?. O HOUTE TO f.*AT'L SUPV. O le I etOr to C:h.icidirv , be.rre , thavi n< ;t , ru ;t . rte. , ill b.s v. .va-1 by :.nnre. of ri

irc:bru:h, crall total p1C'.cz or oth:r cultthle) i nn tru...:nt s ,

IP nr: con: ary, the it.nica of the niceva trill b: : in&lr.;;tn l. C ... . eld r.lca'.e3 i hich trill rest 1.:et t' .-

rrr-dr:c.:.nus ot' lava;rq:n 10 9 3 cf sp::c. 'thU-U-231, ixv. 4 su car r./.cor.:, vd.'. -

rej:ete 1 by the field on.incer inen:ctin: t.he cr.c uld cir:even.

7

14. FIELO DILFOSITiofJ SY: Date AP/HOVAL OF FILLO 0107054 TION: D te

! A' PFE. f ,.. /. ' < /. '.. .

m y~ _; f./r,6

'3 + . v /l o.-typ-) -

,g y _ on

/-7. - ~W- 9 ; W. ..!;.CE Id. LtiGHG 080rCslilGN: . i; ? At3 0 rE ' CT O ocn REco: vEs O CCn rio.

U:E AS is O nc.:E:i.cv. O No O 4

APr ROVAL OF Date 11. H EIT4Sa'cC TI UN ENGRG. Date Ruponscia En2r. One ;

2 PF( - Hes;;ons.o Le:d Encr. Cate Ol$ POSITION *CO'.CURRENCE . , . Date- REJECT O- .

A'JfH. ins? ._. .___ CC'. 0U R P. C'.C E : a .A . .n c...

WHITE - O.C. ENGR. PifJ K - O.A. Ef;G R. SHI. QED M3 AS AT/LtOACLE C.O - L C R

1. CANARY - FIEMD(UFTk GI.NWWS - TN 09. @&Ek W1&A*RA6EeMst@ .

f3 R M P

PAGE 1 OF 1 I

' C- h0 !

- !O:! NONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETcil Yes C 3, r,tg OAy yn i ATTACHED !j PROJECT NO. 7220 DATE q IT E f.1 LOCATION AREA / BLDG. b.ZXIIPART No. REV. 6. ITE f.i f 4 A?.1E g gg, 1,gj sntain:nent Unit #2 Sh-3-U-1 & s3-2-U-1 Liner Plate

s. INSPECTION CRITE RI A GOCUMisaT i4U'JSER h T6TLE i DWG O SPEC 1 OTHER C (EXPLAIN) 7220-0-111 Rev. 2, Appendix B, Rev. 2.

ENGRG. O CONSTR.O oTHER E (ExPLAiNi Southern Boiler & TPnk Works. Mer. rhin. Tennessee 7220-C-60

10. 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPA?.CY) DESCRIPTICN: ASS.iG YES O No. (LIST SERIAL NUMCERS WHERE APPLICABLE) f40 M'.

Plate a m mbly Rh-3-U-1. 9arin1 D mber A h2618. After % eta.llaf f en on the t'nnt Fabrication Jir. a visual inspection underneath and ton side reve.alCd_th2 f011guin conditiens:

1 At Elevaticn 699'-2" on the subject plate. heat discoloration ard bulces vern_ngled adjacent to the vendor's butt veld nnd the field sean veld.

9 At Elevation 6h88-h" en the snra plate. adjneent to the field sens ueld,_hent discoloration nnd bulgen vere also noted.

12. NCH YHEer eD Date CONCum 'E l Ua'c V: "* RQtrcK. L(' w.m "

"dO' A'kqku(jcf _l-3 Q

13. FIELD DISPOSITION:

REWORK M RFJECT O RdVTE TO PROJEQT f[GRG U NOTIFY AL,THORIZED ,NSP. U2 ROUT E TD .1AT'L SUPV. O

, s "j I & # Remove defective ar_ea_by_ torch cLLt_ tina - repla.ce_nith 'O' lie.ted_ plato in I accordance with specifications 7220-C-111 & App. "B" to C-111.

- _ /1 .

14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY; OrAX u?. N l W v/w O Y / P/Q\({$ / # 7 Date APPHOVAL OF FlyD L Sr 351 TIO N: ,[ Date PFE 8 <4 > 'i? ! ? *1! 'l"_Date W '/ __

_ j f"'i f g+N.- ~

/.f Q CONCURREf/CE AUTH INSP g'

REPAIR O RE;eCT C DCN REOD. YES O cCN No.

USE ASIS O See eELOw 0 NO O

_ ^ - A

' ~

n ( (I

{ } )]. f_

Low & '

tiG rn m cs (Yh wcf U1MO ~

1 l l 3 l

[

, .Y

, APPROVAL OF Date 1/. REINSPEC110N ACCEPT O no, pons,oi, Eng,. o,,,

ENGRG. Date PFE Date REJECT O Respons bie Leaa ense. D.t.

DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE AUTH. INSP. _ CONCURRENCE: Gh. Inm. 9 , , ,.

WHITE - O.C. ENGR. PIN K - O.A. EfJG R. SHACED AT EAS APPL 1CACLE OC - 2t.CH N3Y W.V r%n mwsywysetrtWER F.ML&LW

PAGE 1 OF_,,J.__

,7r; .y - ~Jr

( .,-

REPORT 4.'.0!!':g:9)t:ONCONFORMANCE SKETCH ATTACHED Yes O a. 6.004. vR I

L. % I r PROJECT NO.

7220 DATE ip go .p ;

_M LOCATION AF;E A/U LDG. 5. DViG/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM N A'.'E O No. I*11 I i Esse Slab R/3 "2 7220-C-309 3 Rcbar 7 INSPLCTION CRITERIA DOCUMENT NUMBER & llTLE DW3 O SPEC 0 OTHER O (EXPLAIN)7_g ggm g_g, 337 7373 4gyg j ADDRESS . 'J. P.O. No.

8.

SOURCE : ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHEn O (EXPLAIN)

Chi.cero, Ill 7220-C-30 Inland R:rerson Const. Prod. .

10. 11. NcNCONFORMANCE (DISCHEPANCY) DESCRl/ TION: ASME YES O N::. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE)

NO {9

1. The '.01 (& 212) ",12" tri::: bars in the buttresses vere nfr, appro:d: atel:r 13 ' -T out-to-out vs. the 13'-0" es shoun on the Inland Ryerson cont. shecta.

/

r n4 s. .f i

\l.iu.(i W O h b MifV,:.'.yni:LU l */-71

12. NCH PHLPAHLU BY:

Date CUNGUHHLNG

l**t.5 Date

/]7/y<!-

,W Il11% my,"g'_V,t. d - l./ (i , -l%.

. ... _J.\

13. FIE LO D45PO51 TION: REWORK REJECT O ROUTE TO PROJECT'ENGRG O NO'TIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. U ROUTE Td MAT L SUPv. O

- Recuest ner.ission to use the trin bars as fabricated for the tuttrerses r.t O end 120 in Reactor #2. In order to obtain the proper robar cicerance in the buttre::s O 240U in Reactor Bldg. 52, the field proposes the following:

4 STD. RMI'Jj 5'f " (TYP) 4 4

~

n c/)

q g. 3..

l .ia,

. /> '

l'f-II" -

.q-/d N, v_, 22(. / TIO 'd/(.

h:<' {lV/

,.-a.- .,

L Aenro fal '.o use sa ne nethod of ccrrection for .he steel in linit u,l"is ,a]na, 'r'n dM -

pate .

14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY; Date APPpOMAt/ OF FIELD QtbrQS1T, ON: /

PF

'S' 8M ).N'h

l[7 [7 ef,. Co. .tuR n ENCE

/(

. p f/ / K oie AUTH. INSP _ _ _

lb. ENGkG Otsro$tT 4GN:

REPAIR O REJECT C DCN REQD: YES O oCN No.

USE AS IS E SEE DELOw 0 NO O h

Dats t 7. HEINSPECTION 1G. APPROVAL OF ,

ACCEPT O R,, pons,3,e ens,. D :,

ENGRG. Da te PFE Respon;cle Lecd Engr. Date Date REJECT O DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE Ne AUTH. IMP. __ CONCURR E NCE: Autt inm.

- - - - - mam _& m n mum m r P * - ' n O s -- 1.'. C H

PAGE 1 OF 1

.4 h[.

,p'b . -

NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yes O a.

N- C .42 MO Day vH 1 PROJECT NO. 7220 DATE 12 20 73

. ITEM LOCATION AR E A/B LDG. 5. DWG/PAHT No. REV. 6. BTEM NAME Q No. 1.13 Base Slab R/B #1 & #2 101822 Qallerv Trumolate Assemblies

7. INSPECTION CHITERI A DOCUMENT NUMBER & Tie LE ',

DWG @ SPEC O OTHER O (EXPLAIN) Vendor Dwg. 7220-C2-8-5 ENGRG. O CoNSTR.O OTHER G (EXPLAIN)

Inland Pvorton Const. Prod. Cn. Chicann. T114nnie 7990 r 9 n.

1 o. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES O No. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO O

1. Plugs in the grease vents for the trumalate assemblies in Unit I do not exist.

2. Vendors dwq. 7220-C2-8-5 calls for coating of the trumpets on the inside and outside with N0-0X-10-500 or equal. The trumpets in Unit 2 have only the interior coated. The trumpets in Unit I have little or no coating remaining.

3. Trumolate assembly baseplates in Unit I are rusty on their permanently exposed side.

. n dl ./

lll% m M %H5HM.Cf1Rh4 9 /</ 7u Date LONCUtlHthCE: Oate

22. NCH PHEPAHLO t$k:

""T "* _.

Y3. rt E LD O!5POSI TION.

Md JhhMn"C' REWoRKiZ REJECT O route TO PnO;ECT ENGnG E

/& d-'f /4ht NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O route TO MAT *L SUPV. O

], 1. Plugs have been ordered and will be installed when received.

2. Request that the dwgs. be chanced to only co6t the inside of the trumpets.

Request approval of Viscosity 1601 rust preventative as an equal to NO-0X-10-500, to be applied to the inside of the trumpets by field forces after cleaning of the tubes with the Hydro-Laser.

3. Baseplates will be cleaned to insure full bearing between the baseplate and post tensioning equipment just prior to commencing of the post tensioning operation, and to provide adequate seal surface for grease caps. .

OM u ? 'v6G ;'. yLW . Pf0% / -WW

( e APPHOV $L OF FILLD 1::POSiTI 'N: Octe

14. FIELD DISPOSITION SY:

PFE. ' Ilt ' * -f' "'

- ' *m! $Y

'/ ' Date '

CONCORR E'/CE AUTH. INsa [

lb. ENGHG OISPC51 TION: O YES O DCN No.

REPAIR b REJECT DCN REOD:

USE AS IS O set eEtow [.X NO {N i Engineering Concurs with Ficid's proposal on the f ollowing items:

1) Install new plut on grease vents.

2) Dwg. 7220-C2-3 will be revised to call for coating of the trumpets on the inside '

face only. Your request to use viscosity 1601 rust preventative in lieu of NO-0X-ID-500 is approved.

3) We approve I'.cn 3 of paragraph 13 of this NCR. ..,, / // / .

yy- altyd,-

e 19 / li 1/ !..

DQ . ,_ f f . , .' f. *W &M iL\l;n

^ '

yfhffb-4Nfw' /j$$l7q. ACCEPT Responstte Engr. Date ENGRG.f7s / // / / Date PFE

' '#/ '/" 'N h-* W w =

-Ope / .' REJECT O DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE ,[

AUTH. INSP CONCURRENCE: Auth. Inw. fDie 4 ~aetc-e.v w w a ! m y w .1gys&YehL MMPl AREAS Aff LIC AML_E Oc - 23C H

"'PAGE 1 OF 1 p U C-kh

. y NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yas 3. f.;O DAY Yi[

-

ATTACllED I PROJ6CT NO. 7220 DATE 1-p$- 7h

4. lT EM LOCATION AREA / BLDG. 5. D'.".'GiPART No. REV. G. ITEM NA!.*E O No. 12.3.

Dispersal & Farc Area E-6010 Veld Rod. 1/8" E-6010 Red SH 5h0230 & 5h283C DOCUMENT NU:/.GER & TIT LE -

SSPECTION CRITERI A owG O seEC 2] OrHsR O (EXPLAIN 7220-0-111,Rev.9 Para. 7.h & WFCM-1,Rev.10 Para.3-3 1 & ? ,2

8. SOURCE: ADDRESS 0. P.O. No.

ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER Xl (EXPLAIN)

Hobart. T*oy. Oh!6 l7220r-5937

~

10 11. NONCONFORI.1ANCE (DISCnEPANCY) DESCRIPTION : ASME YES O N J. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO E 1 1MIC-1 Rev.10J_ar_a r : anh L 2 stat _es in part:

" Covered electrodca rcC.eiv.cd in brolan contninern W el l not hn unna "

Contrary to the above. t mlve (12) 40 lb. contninnvn of 1/8" 1:' 6nin unia vna.

Borial nchers- 5h023-0 nnd 5h283-0 ucvn vnenivnd in hvnbn nnntninn*n- nna e+nrca the rod room for dicpersal. Theco itonn hevn neu boon pinnna nn ~Jnla in the vna room. -

Date CONCUHHEUGE: Date

12. NCH PHEW = '),f Y r ,

$g j {0 /-/ Q Q ?c'a$$n\ - .fik:M l- l A

13. F,lE LD Dib/OSITION: REWORK O ne;ECT La NOTIFY AUTHORf 2ED INSP.

Route O TO PRO;ECT ENGRG %.g/

ROUTE TO. MAT L SU?V. .

C "s. TMIC-1, Rev.10, Para. 2.h states in part "Other electrodes and filler naterials shall be suitably packaged to prevent dannge during transportation and storage."

The cate m ry "other" includes E6010. " Suitably packaged" can include cardboard containers which are not air tight. Para. h.3.3 does not include heating require-monts for E6010 and indicates the lack of the technical need for heating.

Therefore it is the opinion of the Field Engineering that Paragraph 3 2 was not intended to include E6010 electrode and that the electrode can be used as is.

(i(~A)G.: .:'aaLc(=.Qlt' .'q c.s<l'u' Inym. 1 t 7 9l'

14. FIELD DISPOSITION 8Y: Date APPHOVAL OF FIELD YOS4 TION: Date PPe (i n . ( 4 n .. .. - ) th/v.~

4W: F6 V 1pNGHG DibPOdlTiON:

/#ff 1??#Mb"C'

.6 ' * *'i REPAIR O REaECT O oCN REOo: YES O oCN No.

USE AS IS O SEE CELOw 0 NO O i

I I

l l

b '

O. APPROVAL OF Date 17. Rh 4NSPECl ION l CCEPT O R,,pon,,oie eng,. o,,, l ENGRG. Date Date REJECT O wawe w % ==

oISPOSITION ONCURRENCE ,

AUTH. INSP. CONCURRENCE: E tern. rp . .,

Q1DTE - Cel(B. ENGR. PIN K - O.A. ENGil. _

SHADED AREAS ARLICABLE O j

. 'PAGE 1 OF 1

/e%-

9 NL C-38A g3i l I NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yes O 3.

r.iOcAY YH ATTACHED

'Q! PROJECT NO. , 7220 DATE 1 g 7L ITEM LOCATION AR E A/B LDG. 5. DwG/PART No. HEV. 6. ITEM NAME a no. 1.45 Base Slab Cont. #2 7220-C-393 5 Lugs for Cross Bracing on W6 x 2

1. INSPECTION CRITE Hl A DOCUMENT NUMBER E. TITLE owo O SPEC O OrsER G (EXPLAIN) Welding Procedure Pl-A (Structural)

^ " ' * ' " "

ENGRG. 3 CONSTR.O OTHER O (EXPLAIN)

HA

10. 11. NONCONF ORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YEs O .

No. IllST SERIAL NUVBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO Td 1 Engineering's disposition to UCR-C-38 received on 1/9/74 authorized the field to weld lugs on the support columns shown on Dwg. 7220-C-393 according to welding procedure Pl-A. On 1/9/74 the field welded 12 lugs on the columns according to welding procedure F1-A-Lh.

The difference in the procedures is that welding procedure Pl-A requires welders be qualified to AWS reauirements, and welding procedure Pl-A-Lh recuires welders be aualified to Section IX of the ASME Code.

12. NCH PREPAHkU 6Y; Date CONCUHH tin L L. . < < DJte En"9 .,f // [ d [ h /f/fj_ [e7En7. i! , [f d_ [~[2* 7i

13. FILLO UlSPOSITION: REWORK 3 HEJECT O ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGRG O NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. U ROUTE TO MAT'L SUPV. O

[ l THX #2670 from the Project Engineer on 1/10/74 amended NCR-C-38 to allow the lugs to be welded according to either welding procedure Pl-A or Pl-A-Lh, at the field's option.

The 12 lugs welded on the columns can be accented for use as is and future welding of the lugs will be in accordance with NCR-C-35 and TWX #2670, which allows the use of welding procedure F1-A or Pl-A-Lh.

Ocp w,2,r6Ax G $ '<'X g..tm l 1. L1 7Y '

l

' bate.

14. FIELD DISPOStTiON BY: Date APPHOVAL 0 FIELD D1 OSIItON:

f lu . , Li . Ui ! .b ., .. i ~ 1 ,Ad;J

,/jh. _

/ "/ h PPE CONCURRENCE AUTH. INSP. / /)

s V / Oste' Ib. ENGHG DISPOblTION:

REPAIR O REJECT O DCN REQD: YES O oCN No. I USE AS IS O see sELOw 0 NO O i l

l l

N

6. APPROVAL OF oate 17. H hlNSP ECTION ENGRG. Date A PT 0 R,,pon,.1, e ng,. o,1, ONClJRRENCE Da te REJECT C DNW% N DISPOSITION AUTF. INSP. CONCURRENCE: Autn inw. Oxa WHIT E - O.C. ENG R. PIN N - d.A. ENGR. SHADED AREAS AP?LICA3LE OC - 2NCH W s N JfYV4D M __ __ N M _o HPR-) h . _ 25)MMXN MMM__ (Kf6. 89.F8

f, ,_ - - - .

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT !

" OP

"" " ' 1 DATE I

23. L tSPO 14 TION CONCu JW %E 8

L: AWIN f /PA' T L g L J.V. 7. PH OJECT NO. 12 . _PO E STED CV beh. Spec. 7220-C-230 I

, 2 7220 w. MtML !' /- /8 'M " " * * "

). STEM DESCR SPTION S. ITEM LOC ATION VA ATEDBY I DATE Foming Concrete Aggregate On-Site Batch Plant .f/bs J '. L-[ . y !/ .?? F/ 7, y, ( ,,

k,..,.s gy g R E V. Pa o8E C T es t e

8** ****

e su h SEHI AL NuMCCl4 9. ST AR TUP SYSTEM NO. ? '. A CPLACEMENT P AR NO.

N/A N/A I N/A [ l . , , , - . . . . ,, .... .

J. PuHCH Art ORDCR NO. 10. QC FIELD INSPECTION PLA N NO. 16. REPLACEMENT SCHI AL NO. /,,.{l,per 4.,, ,

[ { (, / d4 '7 F

A-C-230 N/A N/A 5 pV'='"" " '"* ?/ '

). CO NT;:A CTO H / LOC AT aO H tt.ASMC O vcs 's. Sou nCE ,_,_ _ _,

smnion a Inc. _ iT E M E) NO Subcontractor, Champion,I - _._

ac. _ _ _ _ _ _.

0 3. HOUTet4G INhTHUCTIONS: Q HOUTE TO FIELD ENGlNEEHING O acute TO uATEn AL SueCH viSo n GC. MONCONFORMIPaG COND8 TION:

1. On January 15 and 16, 1974, the 1 1/2" and 3/4" concrete aggregate delivered to the On-Site Batch Plant uas contaminated with rock salt.

23. FIELD DSSPOSITION RESUL 2,.

q m tD dis,0s;Taoa OFRCLD Rf1COMMCNDAT40N/ route TO PftOJECT ENGINEEMENG

~

") . . . , -

1. Aggregates rejected due to contamination by rock salt. As of 1-22-74 all contam-inated aggregates have bes Stockniles to be re-inspected to insure complete removal of contaminated removed from site.

material. /) w u ; M s - 4 s -,4 Stockpiles have been re-o inspected E are accepted f

22. EMGINLC h aNs. DISPO SITION 2 3. ENGINEEHING D0SPOstT AON HESULTS: U@

AM i b 42 WT W

G. AT R 8 A L. DISPOS 4T BO N Qwarenas to sure6 san 27. QC ACCEPT ANCC

. 27,.13 DCS8GN CH ANGC HEQulHCD hNO U~"

O vES. sEE 4TTacNED, ,,_,, , _ , ,

DRAWING H E V. OCN aureeossato enspe ctom pagg HEV. ADD.

l O PEC.

aca s "' , .

p .n pu.u:y.g ,

, g ...

.-,_-....-s - - g-( !

"^ ' '" '

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT i Or __y_ ?._ ~

h6

'2""" " '- ' S 5'" "C "'"""'"

E-10j "'"- ' " " ' " ' " -

.,,erson E-3 thru O 7220 [.' /d^ - G.' die lI/^NM7'/ " ' ~ ~ "'"' ~ ~ " '

_ Cusi TION

^

s.iTCm loc ^" " Field Storage Aree'

..cS Reinforcing Bar

& Cont. //2 Ease Mat Y2)*rY/ 'i' n [#

tCGM'd'["?/ ll '2/'7Y l

- *d 6 CT P es to e .seama a n ente

9. ST ANTUP SYSTEM NO. RT NO. RCV.

l. 2 C 84 8 A 4. N ut-4 0C H [b.RCPLACCMCNT I uzA N/A N/A I ,.... . e.... ,

..v.

t 0. QC FaCLO INSPCCTRON Pt.A N NO. 16. R cpl.ACCM ENT SCH I AL NO.

1. PU;tCH A!C Of4 DC H NO.

C.-39A C-55 hA N/A

b. CO NT R A CT O f4 / LOC ATION ll.ASMC O vcs $7 souacc Subcontactor *"'"*"'"**"'** - **'"

cOOC Jnland- Ryerson iT C u El NO Inland _Ryerson ___

l18. 8dOUT tNG BNSTHUCT 60NS: ]HOUTC TO FaELD CNCINCCR aNG O NOuTC TO M ATCa Ai.suPCavicou l

'83. NC NCONFORMING CONDsTiONa l During_the_.courne nf tentindcr.tien1 Onnl i fi nn tinn Splinn L7 V; Gvn An Q 189 veinfnreinr hnv Thi l fro.m U. S. Steel Corn. . Heat No. 79Th57 uM3_iruml;inc_the._ splice broke at an indicat_e_d total load of 910.000 nonnds.

total load indicates a tensile stress at failure of 77,500 P.S.I. The tensile requirements of Grade 60,18S bar is 90,000 P.S.I. as specified in ASTM-A-615-72, Table 2, Page 669

28. e.CL.O DisPOsir.Ou R Csui.Tsa 2 S. O ic'o ois*os'o n pic'o acco==caOAT ONiuOuiC TO P,losccT CNGiNCCniNG

_lk-qualification of reinforcing steel is not included as a part of the testinn pronram for Cadweld splices. The testinn referred to in block 19 in coverned by Specification 7220-C-231, not 7220-C-39 as' listed in block 5 Justification for this is the fact that a Cadweld splice is comprised of three (3) items: 1) The Cadweld sleeve. 2) The filler metal transferring shear from rebar deformations to sleeve grooves, and 3) The reinforcinir D. CNG 8HCCRING OlsPOSITION RCSUL.TS3

22. LNCIN CC HING O gGPO SIT 40N (Continued)

- "c " ^' c a '^ ' o '5"o S'n o " Oa""*'"'** 27. Oc accCPTANcC 2* 83 DC?tGN CH ANGC RCQUSHC ONO U*"

O yCs. SCC AvrAcNCO, .. .... esameensee ,,,,

RCV. DCN DRAWING ewvmonease -* JPECYea ggyg RCV. ADO.

fPCC. -

o c'

'~

-'* 3 k l l } l

11\11l\1l\\l\

ll

\l\l\\\\\J 3

G-6 C t

h g .

'e e n h r i o t i i m n l r

, f s o i o n f )

e n 1 y o t - c n

(

i h l t o i n b r a e a t h '

p + t e e o .

c n n .

2 c u a s r e i . -

o ,

n e s 2 r n i bM' o n h c f e t n e e

r i

a r

t a ,A7 ' ,'7 L

A n h N

/v7 s h l !

T c t e

n d ' B I

Jn u~

r R o .

O t , i

?,&J " Y i a

- t n 9 i

)

D u

a c

- s o

p

_A H'"

7T;l T 0 '

s 2 s N a 2

'g O s 7

n C

( m n i T e o r t i e R i t e O n n P ) e i E 3 i g R

( r n t E

. ., e c e e d r p l

'a h s e A t e

i F (

M e n R s a s

O e - i F h t o t N l I O s C t n i n o .

e i e

- s t r

"- e c u r e t .

p s c e a - .

r e r n f 9

1 n r e a k n b c e e o - r l e -

b r r -

4 o n i i

q , _

i e t o r u -

t o e -

d h l e t l .

y pu r -

) r

. e b t f ,

n o

e r e a e r

c c n

r t u

~ n e c v a s1(_ ts i o

cf r

e E

e T

i n e v

o e l . e e .s

. B l e l .

- e 4 s m

- e , e

> t p s t s a i i 2-4

_ 9 0

e .

, ,. _q .

Bechtel PowerCorporation 7

J interoffico Memorandum "

O. 7.

.J. Connolly om January 28, 1974

~

se Job 7220 -Itidiand Project rrom L. Carter /

NCR Ho. 47 PO 7220-C-50A os Field Procurement ,

/ '

%w J. Brush n Midland, Michigan P0 File t

Attached is a letter from the Vendor indicating the correct slab number to be used on part No. S2-6-U-2.

Report.

This information should be entered in box Ho. 21 on the l'onconformance 9

> / a

$5'.&kD h~ C1.. Carter %s Material Coordinator I

i .

1 i .

(')

(f T

- mu vm = *

- ., . - . , . . . , , . , , - , , - - - - , - ,.,..- ,.. ,-- , =. -,,,.-- --..- .

< SOUTHERN Ec.Itsn & T/sz V.Tonas, nic.

HAf4UFACTURERS OF CARDOiJ STEEL. ALUMINUtf & STAlf4LCSS STEEL TANKS, PRESSURE VCSSELS At4D FADRICATORS OF PLATE STECL ,

t .

j (o00 sa7 7373.noo TuoMAs sTnccr /o%g p

..~: g:,:...y, . o. eox 7274.wcupetis,7cuN. soior s.' .

/ January 25, 1974 Bechtel Pouer Co.

P.O. llox 2167 Midland, Mich. 48640 Attention : Mr. Lee Corter Centlemen:

In responce to our telephone conversation with Mr. Lee Carter, we have checked cur files on che11 liner plate material 2S-2-6.

) Our investigation indicates that the correct heat r.s.Scr should rend 517Z1292, Terial nutaber Z97014 This 1ctter will cerve as your authority to re-stencil this particular Shell liner panel accordingly.

Sincerely, SOUTilE2N BOILER & TANK L'ORKS, INC.

l 6(4tk. g ob s_.A E- fA M q Robert L. Strong Chief Engineer G

RLS:dh .

b

-O G

l

/ . .

D 'm.)

gp[0,4'

_.

' ' " " ' ' '2'""" '

NCNCCNFORMANCE REPORT O r _$_ h7

2. D H A"A lnw G /PA R T NO. IREV. 7. Pfv0JCCT NO. 4 H L ('Of*. T d[ p Y 25. O f SI OSITsON CONCUH RE.NCE lDATE S2-6-U-2

i. erru Os.SCn:PTaoM

$ 7220 S. ITCM LOC ATION 2

l hA ~

6 3. V A LID AT ED B Y 1l~2l~74 I DATC

~' " ' " " ~"~

I'"" " "

t N .M' l' 6N,,.3 -

_ Upper._ Liner _P. late Liner _ Elate _AscerAlv Area !I-28 ~7Y

. a s : u. n o u r.n s. ST AN , ur SYSicM NO. -..... .. .. -.-- - - - .

.uEPLACEuENTPeu7 no. , R E v.

_Sc.2_BlockJ9. _3fA '

UA I ...m.......... ....

. PurtCH ASE ORDER NO. 10. C C f- 8 ELD INSPECTION PLA N NO. t o. NLPLACEMENT SERI AL NO.

_ 7220-0-50A c-111-37

_ __NA

.. c o ;. : ^*s* C TG Fe / LOC AT 80 N 9f.ASME _ _ _ . _C YES 17. SO u t< CC CODE

- SouthernBoiler&TankWorks/ Memphis,Tenn. :T r:r.i 00 NO Vendor is. noui se.c issTNUCT One: O nO uu. TO Pic LD ENG N EE Rie.G e nouT. TO M ATER AL SueCRviSOR I a. H O; . OC i* t OI. f.18 N G CON O l".~aO N :

Di_ccrgpancy_ e_xists between s1_ab_ numbers stamped _on the upper plate of assembly S?-6-U2.

Mi l]._q t ampsd_fl ab__m2mb_c r_.i n_Z-37_03 h .

Shon et aped _cl.Ab nuabar is Z-970lh.

Documentation seems to authenticate the shop stamped number.

\

, n ., O. , /. . /., ;

2i FIELO DsSPOSITION / PICLD REbOMMENDATaON/ ROUTE TO PROJECT CNGINEERING 2 9. FIELD DISPOSITsON R ESULTS:

FleId Materlai Coordinator wiiI contact Vendor Attached letter from Southern and will follow up for positive identification in Boiler & Tank Works, dated Ja writing of correct sIab number. This will be furnished 25, 197h is authority to re-to PFE and documented in Block 21.

[. / , , stencil correct Slab Number 0 Milk. /** W~~ 7Y z-9701h. % ,,

3.' i - T' 2 2. ENGtN C E RING DISPOSITION / 2 3. ENGIN EERING DISPOSIT BON RESULT $a

,/

20. B 3 DCSIGN CH A NGE R EQUIRE 2'""""""""""""" U""""~ ~ *'"^"**"

ONO Q ues-

. O y ES. ScE 4Tv ACNEo. . . . . , , , . . . . . . ,,,,

DR AWINC REV. OCN ,

nuveo-nsoe sp.c.o. e.,g 7PEC. REV. ADD.

1.^kt '- G C*G U. ,,i. '4 :$

/*

. s" 3fy*1jj , . _ _ .

'#^ " " "

_ a NONCONFORMANCE REPORT c'

, b3

. _ _ . _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _ _ /

E, t)j?yy{./PA RT NO. s R C V. 7. PR OJ CCT NO. 12. R CPO R CD Y DATC 25. DISPOS 4 TION CONCURRENCC Sh-2-U-1 & S3-1-U-1 L STCIt DCSCPIPTION

! 7220

8. ITLM LOCATIO N

[72 N 7 App T L VA L.sD ATCD L3Y

/-4/-74

~ ~*"" "'"' " " ' " " " " " "

Lenk chase channel Liner Plate Assembly Area O Y [.vy y M 1 6 lDATE

s. Ca;us AL NUM13CM 9. ST A RT UP S YSTCM NO. f.. h i PL A'CI'M E N T A R T N O. l'.l IR E V. _

anos.cv re.6. e; ea s.. . . eat.

m. m . m i ...s_.. ...s.. .... ;

. PU RCH A3C ORC ;R NO. 8 0. OC F ICLD INSPECTOON PLAN NO. 16. RCPLACCMENT SCRI AL NO.

E/t C-111-11 ITA

. CONTR ACTOR / LOC ATION 19. A OM C C YLS 17. S OURCC CODC NA iT C u 5) NO Construction J C. NO UT 8H O INSTR UCTIONSs y ROUTE TO FIEL ENGit E e i F UT C TO ht ATCRI AR, SUPCR VISO R JL NortCONP ORMING CONDITION:

Dur_inR DIqc;Lur,_a_dacay__ieniing of the_2adahare_synten attached _by tbo finla n 1n

v9n discovered on the left side between elevatio_ns 623' and 673'_t__ Rep;tir t.o thexeld_waa_not done in accorannea -

with specification 7220-C-111, i.e. , the area was not rround out before repair veld ims nade. J

23. O ric'o o'5"osiT'on KFtCLD RECOMMENDATsON/NOUTC TO PROJCCT ENGINEERING 2 9. FRELD DISPOSITION R ESULTSs Use as is.The specific area of repair is not discernable at this time. The small pin hole leak was repaired by cleaning the slag from the weld and adding a second pass of filler metal over the area, as is done for any two pass weld. After the repair, the 1,eak chase system pass the 80 lb. Pressure Decay Test. (g) / gi, /7,n_, / ,_ 23-7 4

!.( V. m % - 1 - 7 5 -7 + '

22. ENCIN CCRING DISPOSITION 4,/ 2 3. ENGIN EERING DISPOSIT8CN RESULTSs

26. RCJECTED M ATERI AL DISPOSITION O a n * a a * * * *

68* a 27. QC ACCEPT A N CE

24. IS D CStGN CH ANGC R EQ UIRED

]g O.caa-

. O v Es. SEc ATv ACH ED. ....... . . . . . . . . . , ,,,,

DR awn *g3 REV. DCN _

SPEC. RCV. ADO.

,f m hhhhPAkJ h h ' '

'~'~

R-12-L [

L tlCM DEGCftlPYlON NONCONFORMANCE l g'[ Dn'dg[CT NO.

REPORT 7220 m.

Penetration 8. ITI: 12,' Ec f*O R T E D,0 y 9. PA G C E- - ,,,nww-C. SCHI A L NUMBER M LOCATsON Or 1 14. NCR N O*-

R-12-L Jig Building '

1(7/dG_b t 1, V 3-DATE l/- u-yo.

25.

t h9

- Dist'05t TeON CONCU AllD ATEOOY 5, PURCH ASC ORDER NO 9.STARTUPSYSTEMN O. ~~" RCNCC 7220-c-50A NA

@/ *gg M /yL/ DATE -~~ ~">

C.

NA CON TR A CTOR/LOCA N TIO 8 0. QC FEELO INSPECT ION PLAN c,0

/. EPLACEMENT P NA A7 NO. !/ 7f C-111-16 - i REV.

14. RCPLA CCMENIATLSER .moJect Fsske e =see tem n

t e. NOUTING INSTRUCTI ONS: - tt.A$MC Q YES NA NO.

@ ROUTE t 7. SOURCE

% D. NONCONFORMING CO TO F4CLD GTEM NDA Tf 0N t ENG tNC E R ING El NO Construction ='"~'"a*-*""

a v ywow

~

T_he_ geld _ga_p_b_etween thp O whi p Rourc To M^7Ea'a' 5urcavi5oa (

suseas.ecrom -

enetration R-12-L and the line nrmitted bt specification 7220-C-111r_. plat 2h _

Q FsCLD DISPOSITION To use as is andonal thickened liner plate .

make additi @FICLD stringer pacces betw E TO PROJCCTRCCOMMENDATION/MOUT ENG4NECR ING material. eenthe1/4 ........

l1 I s. F4CLD This will fill the 5/8 root OSSPOS8 TION RESULT gap with properly applied n the wcldinch liner plate a s

5 '

f'7 1

, 7-79 ..

L

23. E NGIN EE RING OtSPOSIT40N RESUL

,p,

4. 85 DC0tGN CH ANGC QUIRCO HE -m-,

ONO 4 A WIN 1$

R EV. O YES. SCC AYTACHCOs C C. . DCN ,,,,,,,,

fg R C V. ,

p.,...

' - A D O.

27. OC ^CCEPTANCe o"'

s ..- \,,,.,.,,,, - ecane.=een

. _- . -- & ~

1 .

l c . .

gC4-C /fY ' z l' 7 f '

v - . .

ftUX AEAC / /! b *,;

s i

-L . N

^ , - ..

N c d h e # b .- W @ c. -

4 -

i N

\

4

/2%&.-#

A fwkJ7 & o-+4 l

~&

j ' / ? dj

j o< '

'/gpg! i i I

A N NA , ! , ,

2, . L..

I ,

e

' / / f, f l

s i

i r.~.l l

. . . . . -. . . . . - i l

1 i

i .

)

. ., ,...f ..

7: : , ... ..;it; u.. .. ;-u.

' ~

^. . .

. ....,e.,. .

. . s. . . ,.

-; c u .. n p ,

as.. r es .

1 -. . ...4 .. ,

T O

s 4 .

v' -.-M- *r e ge w e r* e- wy *ewre--+--vevg e'.w.pm

' ^" " * " " '

"[g$$ e incv.

l2 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

7. enOJ:CT N s.

7220 2.

fa.st i.Py a . r ri n y opTE

'T &P h:$j ?~ 'b/ T

[

l'"Or

" T 2

23. usSPOSavioN CONC

" ' " ' ' ' "'I NCE 50

~"

[Tre cTP- tsoN quency S. ITEM LOC ATION U. S. Testing Laboratory ( ")13.f

/

DATED 4)Y

/ -e,<

/ f L t ', -

DATE l/ .?/ 7'-/

REV.

! [,J ( I, 'j/ . .j ;/.;/rj

- Tu D yg[ sJ C H 9. 5T ARTUP SYST EM NO. /lb. H EPLACEM ENT F[ ANT NO. , ,

'}

N/A N/A I ... u . ..... , .... ,

11 A / d/

j(/

gf Onocu NO. s o. OC F 6 ELD IN0PECTION PL AN hO. 8 6. R EPLACE M ENT SCHI AL NO. ( l // * . , ,e 4 ( / /

aa'=

g, 'A N/A U/A ,~ < v = = a c = 7- -

g gc0 (O u/ LOC ATION S t. ASME [ YES 17. SOU R CC ,

> Si, te Testing Laboratory ,'Tc] No N/A _,

yp aC NsrHuCriONs> O HOUTE TO FaELD ENGINCCHING Q ROUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPEHVsSOR g , N.OnuiNGCONoiri "'

Failure to comply with the frequency requirement for gradation analysis of incoming concrete agg. tc used lby Champion, Inc. in the production of concrete for Job 7220. U. S. Testing Laboratory Q. A. Manual states such test-be made on every incoming 120 tons. This was not done during the period 12-3-73 thru l-16-7h; a minimum of 20 tests vill L1 -

arc--ind icated on the coarse agg. received and only 7 were made.

e ILLD DBus OSIT80N Orac'o "EcQu=ENo^ TION /aouTE TO RHO;ECT ENGiNEca:NG 2i. r ELo oisPOsiT ON ncSuLTs.

The foll Wi"C. corrective action has been taken:

1_, ) U. S. Testing Laboratory Chief was notified of the discrepancy.

2d He was informed that even though final acceptance of concrate aggregate is based on test results of camples obtained from the belts loading the plant bins. He is still expected to - fully comply with the requirements of his Q. A. Program that states (Con't. on Sht. 2)

22. ENGOMCCHtNG OISPOSsT4GN 23. ENGBNEERING D8SPOSIT80N REbuLTS:

2* 13 DCTIGN CH ANGC HCQUlHC ** " " * """ """" U~""~~ * ** *

ONO O.cene O vEs. sEE ATvACnEo. .. .. . . . . . . . . ,,,,

DRAWING REV. DCN avTosomesse .es.es c,en ..,g R C V. A D O.

$PE C.

= = - '

q v

ORl2iML /1 v

m 1\lll. lllllll l l1 \ l l \

q Jl 4

se -

t a

g

o. e o

c r

g i

h s

g a % n t e g - -

f_ ur i n D' qt m

_ b o g

mi -

e n e

2 h

t g

h t i_

n o

r n n o

i i m

n o

+

2 )

e r

o a m L e z f r s c i n g b n s i o r L a M e e P t

n o

f c

i . t i

e r T 1

s f A. s 2 3,

l O Q f y e b e d h

)

( m o t e t f g

'D g H p l T g g c e t a r N a n c i h O i a n C

(

T R

O P

e t s s r r

a T e o

c S

e i h

t i

d t

n a

W /

E f h i R o . t d U i u E . w a C s o y_

N A

M d

y u

t i

e c

i e

c n

a l

l a

n At '

Oa R c f l o O f p s .

F 0 b m r N 2 o e 1 t c p .

O g a c C t l N n r i t i c l i

O m n r w N o o t c c s r n b o i u r s S o i h f v c l r a e y e e t t p h i u n c s S o e s B e .

e c b d y e a a b n L

) m w t e t u e nh s h b e t e I s T T l f N l e o .

O i b w C.

C s

l_

l a dn Q N t i l k O s w y I e e T e c t e I t r e e n h c

w S t_ e a O

P n_

e e ei t i c B e

S r e c I

D c s

l_

A d f

e h T

n o - '

D L ) )

E . .

I 3 F h 5(

%h ;

7;

.. P

'l ! '., - .

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT or _ _2 50 Rev.1

2. D H ;;W s N G/PA 54 T NO. GREV. 7. PR OJ E T h O. 82. # 25. 08Sa*OStT TON CONCUH N t NCE OH18.0 9V snoc. 208

3. IT[M DE SCri tPTION l2 7220

s. ST EM LOC ATION m

\ A / h ,d_9((

33 V ALsOATLO Y

b'DATE 5

DATE 79

- ' - - - """ ~ ~ " "

_Tes_ ting _ Frequency

..SE..tA,_NU m e U. S. Testing Laboratory

.. ST A Y U ST S1EM NO.

. ![ hf_jD' !/-2N7/ _ , [ m.

. . . . - . d.....'.f " # c,/ _J .

,,E V.

J,., y. ,, E PL. C E ,m N T ,. A T _

_ un n/A HM i ..,u,.....,. ...,

. PU RCH ASC OR DER NO. 10. QC FIELD INSPECT 80N PLAN NO. 4 6. R EPLACCI*CN T SE RIAL NO. .

l 4 'j u ,p( ([ '

8/~

U/A G CONTW ACTOH/ LOC ATION N/A 3 7. SOURCE N/A ,7"" '*"* " " ~ ~'f ti.ASME Q YES CODE

_ ST E M _ _ S __N o__. ._ _ _ N/A _ _ _ _ __

14. HOUTING INST R UCT80N Si g'] 5dO UT E TO FIE LD CNGIN EE RING ] stOU TC TO M AT CR 8 AL SUPE 44VISO R 9 2. NONCO NFOftMING CO N DITION:

Failure to ;omply with the frqqu.pn_cy_ requirement for cradation_ ang_1ys_is_of_incominn congIc_tou._

be used by Champion _Inc. in the proc u_ction of_ concre_to_for_ Job _122_0 U,_S Testing _Igboratory Q A._Manynl state.a_stch ter

__ing will be made on eveq incoming 120 tons. This was not done during the period 12-3-73 thru 1-16-7h; a minimum of 20 ter were indicated on the coarso agg. received and only 7 vere made.

2 ). Q F 8 ELD OtSPOSRTION OFIELD HECOMMEND ATION/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEERING 21. FIELD DISPOstTRON R ESULT$s The following_correc_t_ive_ action has been tak_g_n:

1,) U,_E._Tonting_ Lab _qratory_C_hief o was notified of the dip _cr_op_angy.

2.) He_was_ informed that even though final acceptance of concrete aggregate is based on test results of samples obtained from the belts loading the plant bins, He is still ex-pected to fully comply with the requirements of his Q.A. Program that states (Con't shn.2)

22. EtaCIN EEN ENG DISPOSIT SON 2 3. ENG8M EE RING DsSPOSIT40N RESULTS:

20.12 DCSaGN CH ANGE REQUIRCD 28. REJECTED M ATERI AL DISPOSIT80N O ==vvaaeto****"'" 27. OC ACCcPT ANCE hNO U~'

O v ES. SEE ATT ACNEo, ""***""' ec me.eemasm ,,,,

ERAWING REV. DCN

^ agreson'.4 ao assa.acrom omva (PEC. REV. ADD.

m. m m_

ll l 1llllllllll l ll \l 1l Iij l J

w o

,J 0

5 s

w e _

t a

c a

R a e r.

n i

h t

n

.'s e n g

n i So r n r ui o

u mo t

mf c 9 e n r

h e i o

t h t n

< o 9 n i i g n

s m o c r m_ L a n.

s .

foa ngb r s a

s

) i o a m e r L z e P m i c e i s i . t J

f i e f A. s

) n o 0 D o e

' t e d h _

T s m e t N y nat p l O b -

e a C ( r c t

( n c i T .

g t i a n R i g ar O a ei d P

e e n E T_ , th a

R c r s t E a h i C o . t d N c U i u x w a A f o e y M o t c l R c e n l O n c a a F o i i n N t f l o f p s O 0 o m r C 2_ o e N j t c p O g c a t l N n r c l i

m in i r i

w o

c c s At r n b o i iu or f i s

h f v c 1_ r a ny e e it p hi u n c s S o 2s e J ec b

d a

n ren L a

I b_

t. e t e nh s b e t e D t T l

T N

l e_ of .

O i h C.

w C_ s Ldn 1 a 0,

N t i k O s w y le e I e c t e T t I

r_

e e c n h w _

a S n t i O e i c ci B

? e S r I c D s 1_

Ad T f

e h e

e e

c n

o qv

- D, i

, - - n ) ) .

! l .

( 3_ J .

-. .d1

' y ' ~* * ' _ . . -

' ' ' ^ " '

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 3

2 "h "$x 1 H We G/PA H T NO, 3HEV. 7. PH O J E CT N O. 12. H Es*O R1 E D,pv .

2 5. Dis *J',a T ION CO N CU H H E N C C

_ Spec. 07220-C-230 l2 07220 - r/. ~ ' / .~/hdM(DATE 2 " -7:-

I DATE

" - " " ~ * ' " '

"""~j"'""" "

3. ITEM DESCRlP(80N 8. ITEM LOC ATIO N f 3. V A LID A TED D y h l2-874

~

_Concr_ote Placements As Shown in Item 19 ,f (,' M.J '

.L ENS AL NUMU 2R 9. sT ANT UP sYS TEM NO. 1 &{ H EPL ACC51EN T P ART NO. REV. emon e . eue e nemrae nava n/A

n. Pue4CN AsE ORDER NO.

WA

10. OC Fit'LD tr.sPECTBON PL AN NO.

U[A 4 6. H EPL ACEMENT sE n g A L NO.

I ..m ,. ..... p...

H/_A As Shown in Item 11; __ H/A

. C. C1.. NT R ACTO R/ LOC AT80N

. 83.ASME ] YEs 3 7. SOURCE

_ IJ/A_ . ten O NO Concrete oppphed_by_ChampicA I nc. _

1S. HOUTING INSTHUCTIONsr Q ROUTE TO FIELD ENGINEEHING O aouTc To uarcH' AL suPEnv. son

30. NONCONB'OHMING COND0 TIONt(1) Concrete placement No. CC(582-25)a - Pour IIo. h - on q0-02 form ror Concrete Placceent record in the field, ticket #116h$ chowed 8 c.y. of A-2 mix _ going _i_nto the nour with an entrained _ air content of 2_.@$. The allowab rango as shown in Spec. C-230, Para 9.1.5 la 3 - 6. The three following loads - tickets #116h6,116h7 & 116h8 vere plach without testing. The inspection plan for this pour ic Ho. C-231-13 (2) Concrete placement No. A(578.67)a&b - pour Uo. 8 Inspection Plan C-231 on field placement form QC-C2 ticket no. 11757 chows 8 c.y. of A2 mix being placed with an en-trained air content of 6.1%, maximum allowable is 6.0%. {cce item 1 above) (cont'd cheet 2) 21 O ricLo oiseOs T ON er ELD nECOMMENo ATiONinouTE TO PnO2ECT ENGiNEEn.NG 2 . r EtD oisPOsiT ON aEsULTs, Proceduros for placing concrete have been reiterated to all placing engineers. Particular points strecced were testing procedures and the fact that no specification relaxatiott in alloued for lean beckfill concreto.

Test cylinder results for the placements mentioned in the nonconformance are as followa:

(cont'd cheet 2)

22. ENGiraEERING DasrostTION 2 3. ENG IN E E RING DISPOSITION REsULTS:

- "c'c "^'c"'^' '5" 5 "'o " O""'**"""*" 27 ac ACCEPTANCE 2?,13 DESIGN CH ANGE REQUlHE On a--

O y ES, sEE arv ACNED. ,,,,,,,

C R AWIN 3 HEV. DCN avTwo= san a pospectoe ..,.

f PEC. REV. ADO.

_ - - _ _ _[ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ [ f 8

(*

(* .

$ ($N NONCCNFORMANCE REPORT (CONTD) ..noc 2 or 2 n. ac -o.5LRev.

_(Item 19 cont'd)

_(3) Concretel acementl No. CC(582.0)a - pour No. 15 - Inspection Plan (C-231 shows 8 c.y. cach_of A-1 mix on__tiskets

11835 & #11836 placed with an out of spec. entrained air content of 6.5%. (See Item 1)

_(4) Concrete placement Ho. A_(573)a - Pour no.17 - en field placement fora QC-C-2 inspection plan C-231 shows an 8 csyc load of A-2 mix ticket Ho. 1187h was placed with an entrained air content of 6.h%. (See Item 1) The following tuo lords 3 c.y. on ticket 11873 and 1h c.y. on ticket 11875 were placed without testing. A signed statement at the

_b_ottom of the sheet states that a 2% air loss between plant & placement would bring the air down into spec. range. The

_qtatement_does_n_ot_ reference _ documented correlation data to validate this. Research shoued there is no documented back-up record of testing _ for air loss in transit.

_L5) Concrete placement no. CC(585)a - par No.19 cn plant and field placement forms QC-C-2 shows that 8 c.y. of A-2 cix on ticket No 11881 was placed v'_th an entrained air of 6.8% 8 c.y. was placed en ticket No. 11882 without testing.

The Irlopection Plan No, is C-231-71.

(Item 20 cont'd) y CC($82.25)a A(578.67)a CC(582.0)a A(573 0)a CC(583)a 7 Day Ave. 2035 h035 2630 no test cylinders 2095 28 Day Ave. 3hh0 3185 5035 3910 ea t at:

90 Day Ave. $145 h125 6550 5075 and mix same as A($73)a oreto listed is lean backfill, 2000 psi.

_Fleldire_ commends"use_ asis".

O D:n'otes actual ticket in question, k m 'M it. 2.--8-7 4

$u, - ib-y pa 2. .r <-h,i

_.e

, n om, ,

,n..

. .*. ^'.e ., -.,-.m un a .m.,,,u.~

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT or 1 52

25. u t .s*OSIT ION CONCUM Ht ACE 3

I RE V. 7. PH OJC CT NO. 3 2. i e u '*O it T I. u tt Y , DATC

2. O f4 A W3 N G/8* A f t T NO. ' " " " +

. . ,/m[ , _s,,

/-43-7 f W "

_Spo_c. C-230 l2 07220 z___ _c_

mf. . V AltJ ATC D ts Y .

I DATC i

3. 4T?.M DCLC#s tPTION S.ITCM1.0!ATsON Concreto Placcecnt -

Concreto Placccent A(57h)a f ' e/M:Ju.l:&/.- .-

!/ D-7/

REV. r= oste *F*u e ****a*** **

6. k% H 8 AL I4U M L;.; H 9. ST A HT UP S VG f C f 6 N O. 3,*

R Cs'L A CC M E NT PART NO.

f

'/ #

u.c/A

- n/A N/A ! . .. . ... . . . .

3. PuliCH ASE OR DCR NO. 9 0. QC FIELD IN5PCCTtON PLAN NO. 15. R Ca*LACCMCf4T SCRI AL NO. ,

""a""""*""**-"" *"'

H/A C-231-11 _

U/A

c. Co uT n ACTO uitoC ATiON ii.AsuC o vis u.souRCC ""'--""*-****'** ***

COoC Chen.pi.on, Inc. 1 On Sito Plant-- - -=-

,T C M e NO N/A O wouTo ra^Teasa'surtavisOa 9 3. STOU Tet4G INSTR UCTIO NSa @ e3OUTC TO F BCLD I;NGtf 3ECRitsG 9 9. NONCON FORMING CONOST40N s Concrote placement Ho. A($7hja made en 9-2h-73, 3 c.y. or out-of-cpec. D-2 concrete waa_nlaced. This mix has a rcJection limit of ld" of slump and the subject mix had a clumn of 61".

2 9. fee LD DISPOStTION R ESULTSt

21. O FICLC OBSPOStT80ta QrICLD RCCO MMCND ATsON/MOUT C TO s*ttOJa.CT Lt4G eret: Chit 4G All placing engineerc have been reinctructed in proper testing procedures. Concrete that is to be touted will not be plucca ir the forms until all tests are completed and test results are satiuractory. Test results for placement A(57h)a are cc follows: ,

Average 7 "ay = 4735 Average 28 Day = 6260 Continued on Sheet 2 2 3. ENG BN EE RING DISPOSBTION RCSULT S; 2 2. CNGIN EE RING Dt0POba TION I

2183 DCSIGN CH ANGE RCQUIRC ONO

* ' " " " " " " * " " " " U"...".""~~

a .

O yCs.seeArTACNrD. 2. .. oc........ ..,

RCV. DCN _ ,...a...... 2 - ..,

DR AWING .

Rev. ^ o o-v*c e. -

i ux-> - . . ,

f p.qpg .;,

m -.

))

l l ll 1 ll 1l ll ll l1 1 il l I

dl 2

_ T-Q 5_

o n

c u

f'

~

2 .

r o-2 c .

c

m. W i

N C

)

D T

N N

O_ n C

(

T w

y R_ s O-E M

R m P ._.

E C.

m V-

) '

N._

A e lC, _ <

1 E. - r /

R u I ,

O F

N p

m4 2 o _

ms b'c ,

n O

C ~ - ;

N p e

O. r N- :

Lb mL(

M i

fc kf a .b. ;, .

r o

u._k e w$

b/

m - .

/,

0 ,.

rm 1 4 -

A 5

7 m r m

= o -

y e ,-

pa c a m

Q a'

s s 9 e

g e m= u c

a r a

- r c A

e v uea,-

R h,

ao e

~

2-s

, n n e o

e

'- i

$W - _ . . . . ._ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _d

~

- ' ' " ^ " ' ' " " " " ~

NONCONFORfAANCE REPORT Or__1 3

. O st A vis t4E3/PA'. .T e fi E V. 7. PH OJ 3CT NO. 3 2. H E s O H uY 25. DesrOLaTION CONCUhENCj

{ lDATE Technical _ Spec. 72PA- 0-230 l 2

> ITL M DELCH ePT40N S. ITEM LOC ATsON 7220 . Gary _H. Kn211 I 3. V ACtD AT ED ?

s-29-M 11-29-7h .

I DATC

~*~ ~~

"'{ '

"'""'"j'"

Incoming concrete aggregate L Er 8 AL NUMDER On-Site Batch Plant

9. ST ARTUP SYSTEM NO.

~

1

- kht/

RLPLACEMENT P

(/IRT NO. h'2 REV.

)w b w .J raesk(l**L6es==emas ._1hsa[_d n/A IMA UfA b I p..,u , m ,.... , ....

, PUNCH A $L OH DE R NO. 3 0. QC F sCLD INSPECT 80F4 PLAN hG. 5 6. HEPLACEME NT SERI AL NO.

~'" ~ *' ~'""" *"'"

J220-C-230 n/A IUA

. CONTS ACTOH/ LOC AT 80N ll.ASME O vEs li7.souacE ______ , _,

_ Champion, Inc. Iron. Mountain, Michigan .T E M E) NO _ l Subcontractor, Champio_n,__Inc.

14. HOUT ING IN?.TH UCTIONS: Q HOUTE TO F8 ELD ENGSNEENING O HOUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPERVISOR

n. NoNCn NFOaM.NG CONoinoN.

1. On January 22, 1974 165.05 tons of 14 concrete accrecates delivered to the On-Site Batch Plant was out of l

cradation specifications.

27 @ F8 ELD Ds5PossTaON Orac'n acco=Mcao^T'oa/aouTC TO enO CCT ENGiNEEH NG 2i. riLLD oisPOs T.ON nEsuLTse

1. lb" concrete aggregate delivered 1-22-7h has been rejected.

The nggregaton nrn to he remnvnd f'rnm M tn _ LU l - 2 9 -N C e 0wg- - an-u

22. ENGINEE H ENG DISPOSIYaON 2 3. ENG 8N EC H 8NG DISPOSITtON H ESULTS:

E 0.13 DESIG N CH ANGC REQU SHED 2'"' "^"'^' '5" S' " D""""'****'" 27. ac AcccPraaCc ONO ' ,

Oscene O vEs. sEc ATT A. NEo, ......, ,__ eavu DH AWING REV. DCN awveeeneaso seescucto" eats SPEC. n Ev. ADD.

s. ,

OlliSIUftl ()

i c..,. ; j i ! !

! T 7 I TTM i . i I.1 !., i.~. . l ( 2

, .s i.

-.,.t' ,,.

i

.c i ,. i,. i>

l. i. , . + i, . 3,

c. .. :, i.

6 i i

i 2

y

' 4

.eo I

. . I : : = l ,

i y i t . ,. , ,

4 si

! -i '

i iU */

i2 t!.! ,s e t.S i.

c

vi. i A. k;, _1 y

bj i .

z 0l s

C 4 t

(, s. ,e e .,

- a. ,.

- o o .

il t .i. r w b -

o g a

!j -"

i. s ,i.i

i - U -

e-n

! :a ! i m.

3- .g - ! l . -

m ..

- - - - a* -

.. 1 - '

.4

- -

8 - ' i j , J ; .*

' J 0 i < - ,i

. j8 {

'[

5 i . ', j # .

E l? . , i M i Z U i

'. 92 3 J s J .

r *,

t 1 3 e l i 6 .

O.

. u a-' l in la t. 1* e ,.

, t a

s

. 3 g

[ , -.vg ===l= .

.' ., P8 '8 '8

\

! 6 1 1 ,

- .1, c:7 s ! ! .

i>

t

' }'e i

l 6 l {

4 1

\

I a

t :6

' }

! .I l ,

i .f ! ,, ,

I. l t. ,

. .- ] .

s .

..< ;<'~ l 4 .

'y,l

i 'o . . I t. ., 7 . c 1 !

o < - r l .

e a :

t.

,., Q-3

f, >*

.. ( o. ly ' *

6

. ;J !g2,

>< ," C C'

.l'

, e

~~t l~~

~~. . c. ,~~

i

~~. >; ;J : *O I <~~

~~=. ! ,. i~~

g '*- ,3 I" l 1 -
~~l.I i l [ f l . . .,~~
.i 5 i:.; ' ' '
.~ :> 'I !O - jd 'l I l l E -
l 2 }
..- i .: 43 e i e
p. i ; ,4 e * .I. i.
e ic s;
l' .
r J
o ,
c i J t i-i i i
.O " t, ..,l 0
xI .
'f 'tC .
1 3.s
.~
a - i o w
'.. f*g i i> h i i *-
) : "4 l h' I !
bb t l
' C *
' E I f .- I C f l l i > e O '
.l C' '
si
! 12 feW.4
~~2 0 d; ec*.O .. i l .!+] .~~
3 l l u
3
+
J $
8
'j LU 1, ,. j < V E j E
g '
i.6 e'
C ; ; N I
' 2, C i t.
i 6 it 4
j =
.. f w a i-e
'6 i i g . !l jJ -
'Z 3 a
J 9- *
r . ;O .E t. 0 2. g q,
~~a 9 s- I i~~
.~
r l*-tj 3 8 p ,- .
g
, .-[ .g
! '*4 e a 4 g
'* * .: ;d #-
n
} ' O C .c~
,8 r .E i7 1 i. ..
.w t
1 I Z
u e
t t-
-' .t ' .
5, i- I ! I s i
< . e i 1' .J -6 , . .
e
. e= h '* e- - j h I !f C, is ., l
, il M .g ,
~~,g ;~~
~~, y l1~~
~~s. '. .~~
~~-- .- 4=~~
g i 's I a
. 1 e '8 ai 4
~~t, ; I -~~
. : y 3, i,A:.- . :. 'n
.)
3
- -s i i.
, t oc I l ,
,y z -
3
~~5. , o.~~
e3a ; {J t I e
{ p n-
4
~~.7 ;-. ;.~~
, t , ..
1 ! t 4 <1
~~i t~~
Q h.
l .j l..,
i ,'
J: t
! i l
l l 1 i w gl 1
s i l l . ,
l 1 : .
e v
. r i ;
~~cw 2 >~~
l ..
' t
' l ' ' 1 ! l
{ l'
! I i i I
i ! 00 lii
, i
~~l t,~~
_ i 4 4 i .
.; i i
+
l 2
~~r. i i i j . O~~
+
! a i ! ; .
I
' ,i i > >t e- l ,
i O.
c"
. } .
, ., i t , :. . . .
, ,. . i ii ,. i m
~~.a o i ; ; i -~~
, I :
e e
e e
. m c i
I 4 .
i
. ' .'i' ,
i t
I e c
h.
id. .:
,. 'J b '. .
'A
- El
?t t
i b-a ,l l' - 3
~~i l,~~
2 i
t e t i -
g
[
~~2. . . - .:~~
,3
~~s e t~~
i c J i j -
, i !
y x.s,
' , , i i i
~~i .. ;~~
~~4 -~~
~~e; i i ,, ,~~
, 9 , I h ls .* ; . 4 '
F l 4 * '
O j f ; I .
i t ' ,
O y }. -
~~g7 !~~
,'i .
3 I
~~e '~~
.i -[
. s i . g.
.: . i . ,
2 .. : .
.. .. .: , I i .
t - ,
b!
D d !: i: C !.i :: i !l i i l l !.,I d i i i l; i d., .i l
N~ .y i
\ i e l, ,
g I f
.a
!$ 8 e
i 6 l ! j .:
>> I '
e i
t ') j I a
i
, g e
J 3 h i
? ,
I, ,
gf
, l h * ' I 1 i 2 )'I . 4 I
j '
I
~
I ! i h
i j
,. l , ,! ,
3 i \ 't I , l l
~~e I~~
8 e
l C* ' ,
I .
f I t a i
I e
f ' '
~~n e -~~
$ f l' .
f .
' a f.
0 h l ,
i .
I. l
~~f. : ,~~
L f i -
j
. i ' # 1
- l , . '
l 4 .
l ' ' 4 f
' f 4
i ,l 1 , , ,
g I I j t
~~; , i t/_a~~
+f ., \
I-i i i
, i, .
8
< I l O f. ', l .
r
.b3 i !
I a I zr {
O' ,'
o..
w .
t !
I l l h *, . ! l , .
c? .
, i s'
, O e
i., J ,
, g w ., t Ek #* ,. f I L,11 Io l I ; I.
] l i I i ,
ME .
..~
~~l l~~
~p < .
CO i
l' l 1 ll% , , .
'! - lT L
z .
l q ]
.t j j 1
i Ot .t l t e , '
o ?' .
's :
l 3 Ot 2,
f , .
/. .,
i
,f f j r ,
f
~~. I ,> .~~
I s f "' k ..l' .
i
. t t:~ '
l
,: : t i l
~~5 .~~
i q
j
.)
~~t ,^ \~~
-l '
,q an'l 3
j, i y .' ,, d.
h :;
~~k. ,. *;; , n. ' ., ['~~
t.
[ -,
3 ]
i ,
f j
} ,i ^ 5 - .
f ,
f #
t , z< l 8 1 ,
i i 's 7 ';
l l ;
i .
l
' ,.; j - 1 ;
s
' s.,m i t. :.*.
i ,
f l
, o p,A
.-
~~l 4,~~
. < n ' t
, 4
. _ . , o. m , c -
4 ;' 1,
'.9p;t C-3-1 J/. ..'. o , QUlili.Y I.UD!t ri.c, ..,n, m, L a . . . . . . .
1/28/74 l
. .. .ww.. c . j . . . .. . . ... g... . .=r -
Quality Control Construction 0- J. Dotcon
.......m ............. .......... .... .... ...
D 1
8 5
Quality Control ' J. Connolly, E. I'elt
....... .m ............... ............... . . . . . . . .
3 PSP #_3 3,(d) _
a "Tho Project Superintendent chall be responcible for coordination of the interfacing activitioc of the Field Quality Control organization uith the activition of the joboito conctruction forcoc..."
~"
wc.
There in no doccription/licting of the cbove interfacing activition co it in not noccible to audit for icple=entation.
n := x r n ,... .
InterIncine nctivitica and sechanicmc for coordination chould be doccribed.
~~.... m :..cc... .... . a .- c.T .= 7.; 7.; . .-. ,;;. . . . ...~~
3/30/7h E. Felton/D. R. Johncon c.,c ...........
L
. . . . .rr, . . w................;".,T,...... ' --
~ - ~ = " =
5 5,,.Ud ...YdM5 69 . . ....
~ " ~ " "
C .: yg g ..... ..
+ n. ie o n SI9 .
Qljl!UTY &Jii E2:3 ~
L.....S-3-*
1/29/74 l .......
t Z. Tucker
~~r.. .7.m 7;r.m. .... . , a .., g , ,, ,,, p.. . . .~~
Ien1qmentation O . .. . J. Dotson
... . . . On n14 +v _c..e.n.t..r.o..l a . .
1 3 -
psp jfL3,_aev. 9 1 a, b.. p.,_3 FET G-1 213 __
m "The Chief Field Quality Contrcl Engineer shall be responsible for the functional and. administrative direction of Quality Control Engineers..."
"The Project Superintendent shall be responsible for coordination..."
CProject Special Provisions Notices are used to convoy special and unique project administrativo instructions and technical directions that supplecent the standard procedures..."
g,. . . . .
PSP # 3, Rev. 2 has changed Quality Control reporting responsibilities. There are no indicators in the FLi that changes have been cade nor that attsdard procedures are no longer in effect for the IIidicnd Project. Mditionally this chance reprocent:::
e conflict with the Uchi 1.c., use of Special Project Procedures is not recoCnized as the mechanism to revice or amend the FH1 - (HQJJ1 Sec. V 'iucber 3) rc s r.c
.ca Provide a cechanism to inform all manual holders of chances in FD1 procedures as required by NQJJi Sec. V, No. 3
... . ei .....a ... ..................n..........
3/30/7h D. R. Johnson U. c .r.T di A .....
~
o
. . < . .. m.w. . . . .a. r. . . - g,y
m/., . ;= ic, . ~ ~ ""
W.,.]tW '
n W'.M;' " O'[il. iip r-
[;{}0ilFia..n r, . e r .
0-3-3
$ d : a _ . . . . .
1/29/7h E &= .d E. ,,,E , . W o.7 IE L.
.WD.,..
Quality Control Construction O .. . .e . J. I. Dotson
. D,,,#.4 C .C k... ,R e & . K , o g a. . D . .C W . . C . W . ,
1 5 Quality Control J. Connolly c .. .u..,....,-........................ . . . . . . .
PSP #3 hC E. W _1.. . . . _ ms "The Project Field Engineer shall be responsible for reviewing and approving field prepared requisitions for "Q" list materials..."
m...
is Procedure for fulfilling the above cocnittent not available. Auditor could not check for successful cc=pletion of the above activition since the "What" the f
review should be for has not been established.
r x;r..,.e.... - - -
Establish /impleconi; a procedure that defines the who "what" "when" "hou" for the chove cocmitment.
< . o ... u ,. ..... . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~" -
2/15/7h J. Connolly
. ,,..T:G.. ,,... - -* - -
s r1 6, .
E .. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
yc... . ..................
.. . I
.- t l
Copy To: Route To: File 16.6 Issue Date- .ianuary lo, o/4 6Hijowell CQHills ,
9 Project Midland Mftessler HWSlager (
0 GSKeeley WFHolub Consumers FDWef File Title File: Midland 16.6 Nonconfor: nance No QF-3 ms "onconioir.ance neport la issued to: Prepared by MM/AMb Date M/d7V Bechtel Quality Control Reviewed by #M[/Mo Date I/N./7-#
Action Re(puired by D February 18, 1974 Reply Required by Date January 28, 1974 who is responsible for correction action. -
Nonconfomance. Description and Supporting Details:
See Attach:nent l
AEC Reportable Yes No X See Procedure 9 - Reporting of Deficiencies to Am AEC Notified on by Method R:ccamended Corrective Action (If Appropriate): l i
~~1. Review all existing NCR's for implementation of proper tagging. !~~
2. Instruct Quality Contro] personnel in proper tagging procedures. j Agreed Upon Corrective Action? l Corrective Action Approved by Date of QC QA Corrective Action Taken:
Underlying Cause of Nonconfor=ance:
' 1 l
Nonconfomance Implemented and Closure Confimed by Date 4
a m $$ de
~
January 16, 1974 Midland Project
()N (m, QF-3 Rev. 5 of FIP G-3 which was received by the PFQCE on 12-31-73 requires tagging each piece of a nonconforming item.
January 2, 1974 ,
Approximately one quarter of the assemblies with Type B sleeves were tagged.
Janaurv 7, 1974 H. W. Slager discussed tagging of the Type B cadweld assemblies with 3 G. Tucker and J. I. Dotson. At this time it was stated that it was
'ypchtels policy to tag all nonconforming items. Z. G. Tucker said he vauld contact '. Connolly on the subject.
~~January 10, 1974 I~~
Tagging of the Type B cadweld sleeve assemblies still not complete.
'N January 11, 1974 uY Tagging of all assemblies with Type B cadweld sleeves completed. I 1
l This series of events indicates that a problen exists in the l timely implementation of NCR procedures as described in FIP G-3. I I
l l
I I
l v
l
l ,
il Filo 16,6 Copy To:. R ta To:
Incus DatcJanuary 10, 19/*
SHHow211 CCHille i Project.Hidland WE ler INSinger GS ;y CCI!!UmEf3 POWET Mc McNonconiomnce Reoorts 1 b ' on contractor (AE-Constructor)
.lai Midland 16.6 Nonconfomance No OF-4 (Construction) rnis Uonconzor=snce ucport,10 ;ussued ro: g gygg- ,
Reviewed bySWkN _ Date ///t'/hf Action Required by Datdebruary 14, 1974 Bechtel Project Sur :intendent Reply Required by Date Janua'ry 31, 1974 ,
who is recnonsible for correction action.
Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details:
Welding of 1,in,er plate leak chase was not being done according to the weld procedure referenced in Specification C-111, Rev. 2. Leak chase was being welded over a welded section of replacement plate on liner plate S1-1-U2 on 1-9-74. A worker was observed knocking the coating off a 7018 electrodd. The welder, (BM-34) then prepared to use the rod as a manually fed filler rod, feeding the rod into the j cre created by the electrode in the electrode holder. This method is not part of weld procedure P1-A-C-Lh on which the welder was qualified and which is to be used en liner plate.
- j AE Reportable Yes No @ See Procechare 9 - Reporting of Deficiencies to AE Method AEC Notifica on by I hteccxenended Corrective Action (If Appropriate):
The Bechtel Senior Field Welding Engineer stopped the man's welding and had the ,
" slugged" weld removed and repaired. Further corrective action needs to be taken by I Agreed Upon Corrective Action: Bechtel to preclude reoccurrence. It is recot: mended that l corrective action include increased surveillance of liner (
plate activities by supervisory ~ personnel. {
I Corrective Action Approved by Date of QC QA )
Corrective Action Taken: (see " Recommended Corrective Action" above, for corrective l action taken as of 1-16-74). -l l l
Un:".erlying Cause "of Nonconformance:'
i ~
I l
2 4I L_ I b _, r 9 - c - , --- p . , - w.
3 File 16.6 DD Routa Tet 4*
Issua Dato 1-2S-74 SHHr el' CQHills Project. Hidland
, ele, HWSlager
/' cc:fler (laat) g.g fy payg , File Title wn.,en.,enry nr. n-n.., e olub ' Contractor (AE-Constructor) yilo Nonconfomance No OF-5 (Construction)
' Anis honconiozzance Iteport in a.scued T,o a by / b b M W D s M S-7 E. E. Felton Reviewed by Md[dd Date //~.c4 Bechtel Project Superinte-dent Action Required by Datee uary 22, 197_4 Reply Required by DateFeIruary 8,1974 who is resp 6ncible for corre'etion action.
Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: Leak chase pressure decay test is not being conducted in accordduce with the controlling documents. On January 3, 1974, and January 4,1974, a test pressure of 90 PSI was observed on leak chase of . plates on the west jig. Specification C-111 calls for pressurization to 80 PSI. Regulatory puide 1.19, which was in effect through a TWX dated December 26, 1973, from P. A.
Martinez to E. E. Felten, calls for pressurization to the containment de' sign pressure (67 PSI). .
AEC Reportable Yes No O See Procedure 9 - Reporting of Deficiencies to AEc AEC Notified on by Method Recanended Corrective Action (If Appropriate):
}
1) Provide assurance that all tests I) { conducted to date are valid and that the pressure used in the instance above was not detrimental to the plate 2) Clarify the requirements of the specification (i.e., sc Agreed Upon Corrective Action: a pressure range for the test)
Corrective Action Approved by' Date of QC QA Corrective Action Taken:
Underlying Cause of Nonconfomance: ,
l .
t.
7.n Date ,.
(j INonconfomance Implemented and closure Confimed by N
1?/h/n
y112 16.7 lkm / !ss ' Rout 2 Tat ,
'SHHowell CQJIills .
Issus Datn .L/2 M 74 WEY.raler(2) ,TiCowes Project Midland Units 1&2 y 151Slager (last)
" File Title liCR'u on contractor Consumsts Poutt Y (CA) f"$%d 7 lmia Monconsc:mance neporT, u usuea T,o:
Nonconfomance No CF-6 g pg[- ,g g !
Mr. Z. G. Tucker aeviewed by @WMm Date 563/79 Ann Arbor, MI Action. Required by Dad 2/1/74 '
Quality Control Supervisor Reply Required by Date 2/1/74 who is responsible for correction action.
Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details:
During a Consumers Power review of the cadweld runspection data, to determine if a more i cimplified void measuring technique was feasible, it was found that several void areas j were in error as a result of simple mathematical calculations (see attached letter). )
Th:ise errors occurred in spite of a review of the calculations by Bechtel QC and the, high '
visibility associated with the cadweld reinspection. It is reasonable to assume that mathematical errors may be discovered in any data,'however, the number of errors found thus far is excessive and a complete check of the cadweld reinspection data may indi-ccte several more errors.
AEC Reportabic Yes No@ See Procedure 9 - Reporting of Deficiencies to AE AEC Notified on by Method
'ecermnended Corrective Action (If Appropriate):
l I Recompute all cadwcld void areas based upon reinspection data (this recomputation shall be done by two (2) independent individuals).
~~2. Provide assurance that all future QC co=putations will be mathe=atically accurate.~~
Agreed Upon Corrective Action:
Corrective Action Ayyrmcd by Date of QC QA Corrective Action Taken:
Underlying Cause of Nonconfomance:
~
fonconformance Impicmented and Closure Confirmed by Date
( > .
(,
, ,_-,. - _- .

ML19329F078

Text

Reference:

Navigation menu

Search