ML19329F051
| ML19329F051 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1973 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329F048 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006190845 | |
| Download: ML19329F051 (44) | |
Text
V -
3
(
(
FORWARD Work at the 111dland site has been in a chut-down condition for approximately two years. Subsequent to AIAB-lO6, remobilization of site activities was begun in order to check the status of material at the site and construction work previously completed. Remobiliza-tion continued through July with the only substantial construction-related work being earthwork and the placecent of some concrete forms.
Thus, full-scale construction work, as such, has not recommenced.
The Nonconformance Report (NCR C-1-1) included in this report deals with the rework of a pre-existing discrepancy found during the bplementation of the detailed inspection program set forth in " Applicant's
\
Report on Quality Assurance Action being Undertaken to Insure Satisfactory Condition of Work Already Performed and Materials Now on-Site," submitted on May 25, 1973.
The 15 audit findings discussed in this report are the result of applying the previously-approved Quality Assurance Program to activities during the preconstruction remobilization program. The type of discrep-ancies found are those which are inherent in a remobilization program and, for the most part, merely indicate areas where remobilization has not been completed.
\j 8006190 f
4
- - t' D i- - T E
[
' R
~
j Y
0 L P
S E E U R G F N T
A T /
D A P
O C S D 2 Lk S T 1 S P M / .-
AM G X 7 T C N R C E _
O E . E P AG C.
E T
R P Q U O s R_ Pg E T .
d C S I
l R O_ e U P i O SI r S D e K
O O
B b S
a l
U s T y A r T e S l l
& S a E K c G CR n O NA o a
L AM d h a
ME R n r T R / e o
) OJ! T t
,, a FO NI s t,-
tE O PT s e n CI R NR c e OC c h E- NSE A t
c C D d e N n A a
- M ( s h e l +
O e i F v e
u N d 2 O
C l t N l a 'n O v i T
N Y
N.
B Y B
D e g, E R
D E t s'~
s O
N T
C
. A P
E R
P S
O L
C c
k u
r c
'N E i J
O D R n .
l P l e 3 s pd (' $E 2
S T OA E
7
/
2 v
1 r v 8 L cD /
7 a
2 j a
' c O a
,h N 1 s
/ ,-
R - c
- ' C C o N
l FAlsL i Ur- O n 1 Np. C-1-1
' NONCONFORMANCE REPORT sxETcti Y:s 3 3. Mo oAy yR A A MD DATE PROJECT NO. 7220 7 77 73 4 ITEM LOCATION ARE A/DLOG. 5. DWG/PART No. REV. 6. ITEM NAME O No. 1+11 Slab Iloinforcing Stool ndon Callerf 7220-0-1LODGICUMENT77Up.(DE]q TIT [E PECTIOf4 CitiiERIA DWG (d SPEC 0 OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) eS URCE: ENGRG. O CONSTR.@ OTHER O (ExPLAiNi Ann Arbor
- 10. '1. NONCONFORMANCE IDISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: ASME YES O Na. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE)
NO M 1 The locat_ien Of vertical vall develo Drotrudine frca the London Aqsceu.Gallerv slab dOes not allow for correct rebat ornam tO be mintnin d en the unlin.
Thri nting cnyerage vill hn hnth long tharL nnd grnntov thnn +hnt opnnif'ind nn
- nhnen nn pnfmn 9 thnnngh &
Date CONCURilENCE: Odte
- 12. NCR PHLPAHLD BY: /
Responsible RIsponsible Eny. -l 3.e/LL
?
.gC 7/12/73 Lead Engr. _ cf 3/.12/23_ '
- 13. FIE LO DISPC iTION. REWORK O nEJECT O ROUTE TO PROJECT { GRG O ,
NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT L SUPV O Field .propo.9en to_corront ovi ntinc nituntinn pon pnrnn 7 nna A- AttnnhnA nien tnh f A#
Date APPROVAL F FitLO O POS Tl f Date
- 14. FIE LD Ol5[0SITION BY:
Mfr / 'If /d " / ) 1 PFE
- [!/8 b!h fAl$ 0~~'~
/< 74 a'u 1?!#"Es?"1 y LNGHG Olse05 MON. REPAIR b REJECT O oCN REOo: YES O oCN No.
USE AS IS U SEE BELOW O No O l
l
, APPROVAL OF Date l?.HEINSPECilGN ACCEPT O n,,ponno,e en,,. o;,,
ENGRG. Date wasm w eno om Date REJECT O OtSPOSITION ONCURHENCE AUTH. INSP. CONCURRENCE: E n.Insp. o.,i .
SHADED ARE AS APPLICABLE CC - 2NCR CHITE - O C. Ef4GR. PtNK - O.A. ENGR. R E V. 7. t.72 N -fM W M Ef*R FQSEENROD - RESP ENGR. TO ASME COMPONENTS
, gg -
o ~
- s. cur '" O i
/~d.- carr ! /
~
, t 5 8 ve rtr A., / fa J. C .,e (5 f, v,j .
r.:sv o : 4 6,st s . .cf waa:S i * ~ so 4 _ v .r *r y
- 3o. .,o suasecs ll *'r !~ *2. t*-- en* Tc* cov.'ro M n su T -' )
't Pc'R " A' s><tti eno ! /3
- D,7, .
9,4 . bs'.4 H.T.S : I s . ti l .' 1 l 1 -ll ce, w. c., p j , ; ; j . . f4 O ccuTC &, D*J4 C-t e7 : . .. t ,Le w c A l. .W A L L LChe75 f r
, . START fism n A rs n ou g l
! A N ab P P.c C C O C.co st e p. (Lo c t io s f. s l
= l
.w . * . .
I waica stor
- 4
.l. \
(.. . I 1 J #
.. >,~.nc . . . . - . _ .. .. _ . ..
r $ ! l
*>e ox ~~t
; , e
- e s .
j Te sgw>t sLas gr . J '/ t l l
~
'l .,; & %y3 .
l ; ; t
. ./ i y * ; . . . .- ;
j [ , J' t a l I i i ! . .
- e .
% #7 ! 4 ** 1 g ? .V L
- 1 .
...-.l'..~--.
- g *,
a r , l g .y 86' i , l ] -.} - ..4..-.. .. . . ~ - . - - . . . 7 4 O l ' A m I i .I
, . sa -
& 2 I ;
; i x4 .
g = 0 ; I
! ' S I
'1 I /
- l k J6 '
f . to g
. _ . ~ . . . . - ._ ..- _ . _ .
i
' I 'a - 1
', f ',W" .
l .l l g
/ [
yx .
..' . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . _ .
...~..!
l
. , !, i l ' '
- LCw C w 1; i
i e l t i j QC Co o r) A - luse sc aF s. steps? w nss. Ho ost cs u in e n e. cri r .c q a r c s. . . . . s .
} . .. . .:. . .. . l . . . .. . . . .
B- cu rs ,o d- o r- s u s , a s- se a.. . cco o c.u o vc.s s e c re. . .n o ., l l I C ~ l N ssOE o F oo YssoC W a s.t. ~ St.u d l' .. l t e D- ouisesc or oorssic wats , , , , L a nc A s. H A b t. L. G raGTHL ACi A PrTG1 e or a rC i Y t i .- . R
- o rf R SPacore s w a s
- sis cp ses k seu<rs ;.se ns m.ipea c<or, i c ua.:7 5 coa a. ,.ios.r-o c~ rs sa.: .~a,>r ax n u r.r i fs. ass cm.aa-e~r. r&cic ~ e-s.a s e,, en n ,.ocra , ne .
. ov o's a c. . ss e re s o .r .r it sf .a sa *LL cors** * . f * .o r s. o ? N #* *. s. ( A s!'.A ** *.*
- D) D e.w s*L- SAAS. Co v C at s*,cn/wp drt#J** t/
wa s: r o s .:~ D e -, ' ' -
'<' ' ' r ** < " 's '".r' el.o rwnn . l fo tC ar L ou & i l.. l.... . . . . . . . . _ _ .. _ . . . _ . . ..
e g. e S e
, . .. . . . . _ . . .. . . . . , . . . . . ~
, ,. . l
. I g --
' i g a e l t 6
l e 0 ( ., _. . . . . . .'. ..._..u. . . . . ..t... , i * ,
~
, ; I I
/ : '
{ s D . ,
-/ .
g
. . n l'
1 i 4 e .I 1 l t
? I
,i .l j _(
1 >
' i i
.q b , i t I l cl l
t
....-.%..**. l .. .'- y M
l l
* -y l %
k , . l . I g * , e h 5 K . a =
- e .a pf + ea s ,y nxn pes ,s +a y a, 'q. q s' C- , I 3 ,d ' . 5.m -...o.
s , k h*.....
. : : I 4w , , , g , ;
s w =q e A ss A x, ' RE$q.RR
- g
.i e *
#' ' +. 'N, S ,4 oss. ' @
t k s sY
. = !
g ,
- . . . b g g [._g g g s g%g
; g i .
Y' , vi . s g i I e
., N
_ u <,o g + f .
.- l 1 b. l 3 s .
n. c _. i g-g, ! . n .- 1 s ' l
- s. -
s. i
<,- A
* .T
....._g,.,..___. ..
l .
] 4
-__ i 4 .. .
N gg N * [ l t l < to
. . l e a 5t 1 0f . . :
? .'
4 , y
. . . ._ k . . - - - _ - _ . . s 4 i 4 %.
Ma
) f a I N . g 4 0- ...., _
.y.,
A
.,... ., s , ,, . . .. .. .
k Q k N[Q S k,N _ e
. k.kkkN $
g l l T 3 i "i !
=
e
.l 0
...i._ - - .. .-.6
-e ,9 I ,
e i 43 . i l u. . t v, .i i l
' [~ q .
< + ..t s(
i i - -
,' e3 d 1 .
)NN m 9 d"54%eesto>RgNe % N*N bN s. W Ns%sNNN A o s ,i I ' l
\% d . ..8'.....
' _ _. . . . f . . .
.! . . . .I y
(* 2 . _ . .. j _ _ . . . . . . . e s 1 ! .
, I
\ h ) '
R s o a ' i ; p.
- i. g3
,i 4 i
y l i
$ % e s : *
{; } e , + i e
- s : !
'e
- u
- 6) .h- !. i = -
'
- 1 -
4
.. .. a . ._.. . . _ . . . .
O .'
..) 7 d
e 7... , .---.-.y- , l j . s I 6
. l l i * ' *
'. l s l 1
l -
, , - _ . . . . . . . t
'JV ~
l . . . - y . I R- - _ _ _ . . .
! y,4 { _. . . .. . . . . . - .
* * ' 4Y*
g%a
-+4 . . . . . . . . . . .
l o .
- s. . g . . h k.. Oh a
A I
; .e
- a p ,. . .. . . - . . . .
A , "a n af I - c M . . N k
. 5
! -l
\
y ' i s u 3 . i C I q ~6 v T f I g e * . N e l d . s I i
.i.e __. - ..l .. _
i l l , D k 1 - 9, - -
.e t . : a -
1% 5
- 4 t e I
i 4 l i 3 N . T ' . . I
'e --
f
= l s I -
8 _ _ l j .
- s . s - . . e
{ h %%f hN' i t
' NM 4b 9 I
% N ; [ l .
l e i l !* - i . h
~ .
I
% .. I g
o i I W i j
% ; i
( . f 8 f - 8 l t t> t t l .I' l l N k ]d 9hbo l
, l i f
'i % Y
~
- l. i 2 . . - .
.o.. . . . . . ..
w ,
% I
- l.
- A N N 4 % % l j f l '
J *
-{
k . l g 2 tJ > t l _ . ....-.. ..._. jl l s w(* O t a a E % a L a -,- t g j - t r j = 4 W ; e l : ' u ( y % l r
- l '
i 1 4 l
./ , . ;
9
; *=
*=.*ee... ...se . . m...
-,,,7_
l s J - y',
,, ,) g y -
' o rf 3 3 g Il '
[I 3 a 988 9 i. xj s vus. -
. t-f ;r j g3 '
Yh
-.9 31 1 YO a v
% 40 .h
- s,
, ep .
g3g~ . p- a 13 i o
+ ,. , s.- . 6 ,'] at ,
'$V52 4
-3cd a o .( $Yh 6
4
-+f F 3 l A L o,e 1 1 i ? 'ol e v.
O Th j . . 8 j4ii 2 J 's s ! ,( dv 1 e -
,6 \ s .
(^' ; ; ,,% ,, tsx .. u' g m , , . a a
\/ 1,~
fh
\
.3 4 ./ -
k 3 ( ,! g ->,m, /,/ .tsin o.on
.e 2 n , .
, v .;
}
d 3f - e
,\ )j'<' 1 ~
r [1
)s, 'b:a L
- x x.
[/j/ J s y a .
... -N'.- + yJY,t %
. NN=a,e- " >
g{ [( i) b 8
- 'u n
"""~ s' h
g g . ..
', j, 3 3 1 s" !
'I'1 l l!.4itp a
.N g - j5 g{?- 9 d I I .
$3 g_
~. -
...t
=
~.) - ),' 3 6Gv )
- ri s --
( Ce i c ., , i
% W\.K g 2-.)p^\ k $
e -- J *
. . . / . wt. .
d~in' Tz.z.o ,
._ _ m __ D1 _._ _T _ $D.S - -93 _
$O'N' \ ..
b)$-50A,_ .. C'I t % b%9 t\Q Q %T hM\bv2. GR'c V., . C.C W4M.R. LACC\'J.4_Q, C 2a ' cc 2p' wa 9'ec zz ' unu
/~/ ' W ZZ s'.U I. C ll 'Cf 2] (g 2L G 5' ex: 25 " wit t. /3 ' cc 22" MLC
/' c f 2-Y
!d14 L ?I ' JG 2-) " /U-?L. L 4' ac- Z 3 ' /s.,VIL L 'S ' c?F 22 t.aqt L.
'3 ' Cf 22!!dALL l'O I
CC 25' 4 A96L 3' -)# 2/' lv4L(, /.5~' 6/ 2,2 !d-%
/f' dA 22 '/4,/) (, L ~ Ar%sA JL.C ba30 NZ'/ 4# 2/ M4/44.
/f ' >" 22 twcG M CO"43P 9 G 2/ /416L c' up 22." untc . .
/{ l >= 2/ /Ab C sf'hr 32. ;&?L L
/O' )G $l s (A94 G *
~6 ' 3(2 22 hh)L.C W op 2f rt]& L f is v lbY Y
/z ' of 22 &vn cu 0 ' OG 2/ ' cl% c 7'C# 37 ' MIL (
/Z! &= E/ ' 'CMLt
/z ' or= 22'tauc Z'/ ' oe 2.2t</44L
// ' Y Z/ /Wt L.
5 ' ac 22." as.4Lc fm
\ // ' o,e 77 ,M.) . L w .,'
Pp8 1
^
JoS " 7 22.0 T6N6 N ts c.csss GALLCP_Y APGA s FoR conplN#.(:J rJ ib 2. @ CF., 671,O' A U PacatxM: INCIDG Gid G >3 # FROM F o Ps/ A 's NoR outs 10G BbRS 42" FRoM Fo RM S .
' l:
B.GN D INSIDE BARS TO GTAIN .N! 2 # . PROPOSAL
- ct.) l
.CLGApNJCG WHEI2G- p.0 Qui RED ,
THAI- J wou LD g6 c_ Lose (2 ours Ds 65Ans
$s To
! J b') WBERG i
THE WALL THIGidt
,j 2 To FORMS, 19Cr2EA56 ADGQUATG CoJER HEW p ,:sFORM
!; 06TAliJ -
FORM L1NES f .
! . i
{
,c 5
! V l
/ / e--k-- g acutsc ll VJALL
- I rmao:cs:
O :: ' ii
/ .
/
lj nom THIsT T14s BASE sLAe; j; #
/ l w m pouReb To ~ EyTeND '
j TliE WI:LL Lit 3 C- p outs IDE .
/ \
i-I l No Sc.ALG swTcu SY SGc, _> s 7 N s o Y N _g , EL. 674.O' ' ' '
/ -
c b - p A s
/
/ .
s ,s - o , ,' j p 4' '
, /
A (
\ / ./ / .Y 0'-
{
/ / / / / / / /
- i .'
- I I / / / -
i
d06 4k 7. o TtNooW Acass G N.L GRY AREA / Yca ccNTenithEtaT
- 2 G GL- G7 A* O (U) t PP.oP,LCrA : 2 8 **7 11J51DG 6AP-5 4 34.i FRot4 FOR.f4 PP, opes. AI. *. ,6 i.
fensdf ALT' e 1 - MtWG FOP,M OVER 3/4 " '
! ,At;C *2 - G HI P DOWf4 2 o F Cot 4 CRG TG A rJ D B Gr4 D B AR 5'
. t 1.! '.! 'i TD oBrbifJ A Mird. CLEAR 4JGG O F 3/.t * . Nest) A
- OF 3/+" mop.E - CLEARAtJcG .
- 1. .i -. .l. l. .. U.'M AL t
t ; !
.l.
. FORTA LuJes
, e i s ,
c-- , ,
. . Y ,
. . a. ..- . ,. g
,l
! t-ALT.*1 ~ .
/
l .
. i .
. i. . . .. . . . - .
ll;l b
.. . i 3ll' - .
lj . n .
;' i l -
ll !
. , i . .! -
ll .. i ! i : ! A LT.
- 2.. . - l
- i
. . I
.. n .' . .
.i :. - I.3 ,
! ! i ; i l
.i
. l}
' - I i : l i
1I - 1 ' ;l
, NO SCfNLC' - -
i I. I - J <
$KGTCH BY SGG [ .
l 1
- - ll 1 I l I ll EL.674 O '
-jl , !
CP.lPPlrlG: Lit 16 o.- o.. - y . [ S .. l
.g, ; '
- u. -
y .
; f
; .h.;'
l l / /a> .
\
1
, s NCR C-1-1 O' 7
, The Field suggested a method of connection of the nonconformance to Project Engineering. This method was reviewed and aperoved by Project Engineering and the nonconformance is currently being corrected in the field. The method of correction is fully out-lined in the attachment.
6 8 9 e 1 4e 0 I 8 4 O A
1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM . Fc68 1 ct ,2 ; . PROJECT AUDIT REPORT .'(i. t . Job Na$ne & No. Midland 7220 Audit No. 0-1 - Unit No. 1 nna 2 Audit Date _ 7/16thru7/19/73 Type of Audit SI nt-a Auditor _ J.__]htnmg H. Lill M
. Organizations Audited Conntruction D. Polub Irulividuals Contacted D, Folton, J, Hunant F.Pnhin
. t
. R. Groto. O, Kinney P. I h no % .*f.ek Dc,ccription of Audit (Agenda) . !..
o' l'.
- 1. Decicu Docu::.ont Control J
- 7. @ Dn.e:nt Control'.
- 2. Dubcontractor control .
- 6. Loep clo: irs -
3 TCR Control 9. f.rrytt?.mtimi ' D 9 [Y 13 1raparation dr Fiola Subcontracts
- 5. Pr.cporation for rocoivins enti otortyp
- 10. Inloot:1 ration er.1 Tre(n.5,3
- 6. Innpoetion Planning ' '
. i * .' 3 Sumnm ry of Deficiencies Noted and Corrective 'I- Dato Action Cor,unitments (QAF II) (See Attached) .
Re sponsib1)lty,
' Coinmittad
- 1. c,w 1 001 ' ,.
A Folton-i ' 0/17/D
- 2. " 002 .., .' - -
. E. reiton .
0/27/73
- 3. " 003 D. R. J hnnel o ' '
< . G/17/13 g, , n cel, , D. T.-Itcs ;; 0/.1/D '
=
5.
" co5 -
- 2. :7ol. ten : 7/27//3
" 006
- 6. * '
EEIM li E/17/73 :
} a s 7, u oo7 'D. E. Johnaca 5 0/20/73 ..
D. " 000 . E. Felton .
,0/17/73 '
a ' 9, a co9 , E Toltoo/P, thrt.tir.:. ,' .. 0/17/73 p 4
- 10. "
" 010 '
,E F81** # 0/l7/I3 *
\}I ;
.' ' b ..i. <,;.1 t.
t, . . t .
., .: e r -
. POAE's Signature + N -
er :-
'. ). . . , '; .'., ; ,,. .. c.- r l
,s .'-
o . .. i. t '
, inte ncient Date 17/I 73 , _
.---- ~..
, , e . u. ., m ' 'a'- j
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Pace 2 of 2 PROJECT AUDIT REPORT
/j ,
(Cont'd.) Job Name & No. Midland 7220 Audit No. C-1 Unit No. Audit Date Type of Audit i Auditor Organizations Audited Inclividuals Contacted
. t l
l Dc.scription of Audit (Agenda) . l
.... l 0
~
- l I
Summary of Deficiencies Noted and Corrective . Date Re spons tbility - Action Commitments (QAF II) (See Attached) Committed
- 11. " " 011 . E. Felton 8/17/73
- 12. " " 012 P. Martinos ,
8/3/73 13
" 013 P. MM-tinos 8/3/73 1h. "
" 014, E. Folton 8/17/73 15
" 015 -
E. Felton 8/10/73 i
- f'a ribut ion: I V ' rni, I c t N1.,na ge r . PQAE's Signature 'Y tt G A Supervisor l'rniert I:nn ince r
[f b l'res.ie ct Siipe rintenelent Date l l l [ . - I
- r. , w. m PI ~,'
a QUAUTY AUDIT Fli!DlHG .... ... 7-17-73 (v) ~ l u., a r.u w. :.. . .a . . -~ ~
- p. ~.a u.7, --- 3.,;;. .
f...b. -
.. ....!.!1dlone Job
. . . . . ._lio.
. . . . . -7220 ..
.Syote=0 . C*'= J. Dotnon .
l 1-10 2 ALAB-106 Renponno C. Kinnoy .
- _ T P""~ip*p'fic'diit d6p~o'r~t"'ot1 tality Aoourenco notion I ~ ' "
u .,3 unanv+nunn _ nanponoc tn ALAN infi (1) "Bochtol.. .haa propared proceduroc. ..They are being carried out within bacio framework of their Quality Accuranco Program." (2) . . .llonconformancco, if any. . .will be. . . documented in cecordanoo with the dotalled proceduros cet forth in...the Bochtel Fiold Inopoetion Manual." e - i ..
,2,, , - -
Containment liner plate coating inspection conducted May 1 and May 2,1973 by Moooro. liowcomb, Grote, Hondorp and Hincon with the following results: "Throo
,- glaten exhibited defects ou.fficient to requiro complete removal and replacement (q,- )f the primo coating." The following defects woro observed:
Mud cracking - 12 plates Wold opatter - 3 plateo Overnpray - 3 plateo Dry opray - 3 platon Ruoting - 4 platoo Sago and Runo- h plateo The report reco= mended candblaoc to come extent on all platoo oxnmined. lio non-conformance report vao generated no a result of thio inopoetion and thio io a departurefrcmrequirementoof(1)and(2)above.
,&.m.~...... --
R:: commendation: (1) Prepare liCR'o to cover inspection resulto ao recorded in Inapection llumber 2.0 . or (2) Chango CPCo nubmitted reopence to ALAB-106 to doloto reference to carry-i ng-out ineP.a..c.t.i..o..n.,..wi.n i n. . . . . . .. ..b.
. . . .n.. .i.n renmngn
- ne nnchtn1 cA n-n m n.
8/17/73 y y ., y m.............. -
~~
( ; - J . g.n. .. . . ..r..a..c. w es.w. J.w.1.5 ... ; . ... .. . e = - - --
' ~
QUALITY AUDIT FINDING 001 { V} s No corrective action is required. The preliminary liner
's plate ir.apection was conducted on May 1 and 2, 1973 A detailed inspection could not be made of the li~ner plate at the time because many of the plates were inaccessible.
The results of the May 1 and 2 inspection were reported to the Appeal Board in " Applicant's Report on Quality Assurance Action Being Undertaken to Insure Satisfactory Condition of Work Already Performed and Materials Now on Site" submitted
. on May 25, 1973 As indicated in section 2.6, " Conclusions and Recommendations",
all liner plate will be inspected with calibrated instruments as it is unstacked to establish the extent of required rework or preparation prior to recoating. Thus, the previously reported preliminary inspection requires further inspection pursuant to Bechtel's detailed program - for inspection cleanup and requalification of liner plate. The liner plate is still being stored prior to being used. Some of the liner plates have been affixed with QC hold tags due to defects found during the inspection when the material . was received. Corrective action has been identified and will be v'"T performed by the construction forces. At the start of field (ss/ fabrication the liner plate will be placed.on a jig, prepared for welding, fit up and welded. It will then be removed from the jig to be sandblasted and repainted.' QC hold points will insure inspection of the entire fabrication. The completed - fabrication cannot be positioned in its final place of installation until the QC hold point inspections are made and nonconformities, if any, resolved in accordance with the Bechtel's CC program. , In summary, the preliminary inspection has identified the fact that further detailed inspection is required on the liner plate. This detailed inspection will be carried out within the frame-work of the Bechtel QC program as outlined and as heretofore-submitted. Accordingly, the recommendations contained in the
* " Corrective Action" section of Quality Audit Findings 001 are
- not required. ,
/
e p* l
- a
/
v ' 1 .' I A e s 7 _. - - - . - - _ _-- - _ , --
~
. 2,7;*:.i.,. --- - -
Ogit f QUAL.lTV AUDIT fl;1DlilG ....? *
/^ . .
M E 17
~73 l 4
(,) 2 .;.nas;i.e.;; u.o..ii; -- -- ~ ^ -"f.~.~;e i .., ~ qg... . ....... Mid1 rind 7220 Syotomo O .. . .. . J. Dotoon
- 5. n .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ...........
h _ _ _2 Civil Diociplino Spoo 208A D. Grote m ..... .. ........................... ........ (1) NRAM Section II No. 6 Para. hd (2) FIff. G-2 Parn. 7.h (1) " ... Standard apocificationo iocued by tho diociplino Chlof Engineer...oubjoot to hio approval, modificationo are mado...for project uoo...chancoo to and interpretatieno of opecificationo are acoo::1plished throu6h rovisions or . addenda." (2) "Th.o field change requeot providoo field engineering with a monna of reporting to project engincoring diocrepancies in project opocificationo." ... c Technical opecification C-208 was modiflod by field and included in oubcontract
#7220-FSC-h1 prj or to obth.ining appr; val of changoo from originating group. No -
f-Ti:1d chan6e requent vaa made no required by FIM. ( \ L,/ '-'
- 4. u . . . u . . ..
Submitopeoiricationtooriginatinggroupforapproval/ic.aueviafieldchare r:quent proceduro.
.. .a. - .m.ca . . -
. . . . . .z . . .w.w c.w. . . . . . . . . . . .
8/20/73 g,_rpngn ig) *
'w/
. .n & C .- - - - ~ . TE.~. .'s & f 6. ..JJ..~. i'. .;, . ... .Ti *
~
...~T. .a........... ..... - - - - - - -
O. QUALITY AUDIT FIITDING 002 An investigation disclosed that a verbal change request was made and verbally approved by Engineering prior to modifica-tion of the tecimical specification by the field. The verbal approval was followed by Bechtel Inter-office Memorandum, P. A. Martinn:: to E. E. Felton, dated July 16, 1973, which ctates that Engineering concurs with the issuance of C-208A for Interim Testing work and that C-208A is an accurate condensation and fulfills all applicable requirements of C-208. The Inter-office Memorandum, although date'd July 16, 1973, was not received by the Auditor until after the audit date of July 17, 1973 After receipt of the Memorandum, the item waN closed out. l e 6 IO I % t' t ,r '
/
*m o
l 9
\
O .
.4 9
m__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Be ' !el Assoc.ates Professional Corporat}en
/../
Inter-offico Memorandum O ' Qo E. E. Telton , Dei, July 16, 1973 subjeci Hidland Plant Units 1 & 2-nom .. . artines Job tio. 7220 Specification 7220-C-208A *
- 8 ""#'"8 File: 0274, C-208A ,
Copleolo Ann Arbor t Dom M . R. Grote C. Shortt . K. WieJner L. Wilcox The Specification C-208A, written by the field for the Interim
; Materials Testing Services has been rcviewed and compared with Specification C-208. A paragraph by pnragraph comparison shows that C-208A very closely and accurately fnllows C-208, with
. allowance made for the changed scope of work under the interim specification.
'Iliere are four omissions in C-208A (Para. 5.2,13.3,13.5 & 13.6 .t of C-208) . Ilowever, in cach case the Quality Assurance Manual or the' Quality Centrol Precedurcs r.ubmitted by PittsburCh Testing i Laboratories adequately cover the omitted material. l l
Specification 7220-C-2C3A is an accurate cond'ensation and fulfilh l all applicabic requirements of 7220-C-208 and the ERN issued for C-208 is considered appropriate for C-208A also. )
\ a l
/W f l
*[ ,
F. A. Hartines
- RLR/lak i
. .I .
. g j .
'I ,
t .
##f bo . .
O hp ' l
+#T# l
. T
~
.u ...
,p' -
J) QUAllTY AUDIT fii'DlilG M. . dj.7-73 (v) .. 3
- u. . .m. . . . . . . . . .
. . ,; . . .a.. -
m;.. . - g.... Syntomo O .. . ~ . J. Dotoon o.,.... Jiidlnnd 7220 ............ ....... .. C. Kinnoy 9 _ Q,uality, Control ........ 11QM1 Sootion V liumber 6 Parn. 2.5 10CFR-50 Appendix B Critorin II
- =
"Chlof field quality control oncineert preparon and implomonto, with the anointanco of hio staff and project field C.CEo, a romal su.d continuoun quality c:ntrol training program which includoo utilization of the field inopootion manual."
- c...
No fomal indoctrination / training program has boon ootablished or implemented at . c (w/3*J.dland.
)
\
,.x;;r..am.r.
Develop and implemont an indoctrination / training prog sm.
... . .. c...T . .......e
.;......w...a................
8/17/73 D. R. Johnoon/C. Kinney
.w..... ........... .n.
qj -~6' -' * * - -- - - - -
. . . . . . . J.- . . . - - - - -- " .C. ;, r. . . . . .- . c.. . ;.; ;; . gr.. .;, . . . :.'. Ti.... ...... ,.: X.; ;~ ;.. - - - --- -- -
?
s -
= . .x.
6y%. . . I QUAL.lTY AUDlT filDli!G m... . .!.
. mir,.17-73
,m3 .. .
t ; i pa.s..... m.,, ...i .c ....'...-- 33... . Midinnd. -. . 7200 Syotemo 0. . ." J. Dotoon
.. . . . .u . . . ; - -
3 1 S. tar. age _An.a 0. Kinnov p . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . . .to ........ (1) FQif,,:3..Enr.n. __1.1 (21 l'M G-1 Pagn. 4.0
- g. . . . .. .
(1) "A venthorproof tag which ohall be uood to phyoically identify tho item re-requiring remodial aci; ion. The tag chall remain attached until remodial action in documented and completed." (2) " Segregated stora60 arono chall be utilizdd in conjunction with the tagging eyotem." , 3.. ... Nonconformaneco nunboro 0001, 0002, 0003, 0009, 0022, 0051, 005h, 0056, 0059,
- 0060, 0062, 0063, 006h, 0067, 0068, 0069, 0071, 0072, 0073, 007h, 0078, 0079,
,s 0080, 0081, 0083, 000h and 0085.aro not taceca no required abovo nor havo
(<j 'pgregated otoraso areas boon provided nor utilized. ._ ..._- . . _ .-. i 2.m............
' S .
Ro-identify by re-ta6 sing nonconforming itoma listed abovo and establish a ecgre6ated storn6a area (o). _... ... .i...a..... .........w.ca.................. 8/3/73 E. Folton 3,;.s a .... A a... i... (, ) - o
.'..e* &... .. .......e.g. .........
3 .. ....... .. , 2.4. n ..irr.; i.i.ve . e.. ~. 7 i . i r - - -- --- "-
QUALITY AUDIT FINDING 003 No corrective action as such is required. The chief Field , Quality Control Engineer is in the process of preparing, with the assistance of his staff and Project Field Quality
. Control Engineers, the formal and continuous Quality Control and Training Program referred to in NOAM section V number 6 paragraph 2.5, and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria 2.
This program has not previously been prepared for the Midland site.because site work is now in the process of remobilization. During the inspection and site preparation activity the chief Field Quality Control Engineer, the Project Field Quality Control Engineers and the Quality Assurance Engineer are conducting continual training, both formal and on the job, to assure that persons assigned to particular functions are properly prepared to handle them. e 4 o u) 4 e 1 o
QUALITY AUDIT FIITDIliG 004 1
~
Upon shutdown of the project, nonconformances were tagged with paper tags, in accordance with procedures then in effect. Due to the prolonged shutdown, the tags disinte-grated or became illegible. An inspection disclosed the need for re-tagging these items. Subsequently, the non-conformances have been checked and weathorproof Quality , Control Hold Tags attached to nonconforming items. A / segregated storage area has been established for use where / appropriate. /
/
/
e e i 9 t I . e e e i I. 8 e e
, - - - , , .-- .,-, , - , - . , . , , ,e-, -
, - , , - - . . , . . - . , , , m e. p ,
a y e,-
h,% . QUliulY AUDIT FiliDRIG
., ' 1 7 17 (7j s
.. . .. . . -7 3 v
5 v . m ...a.i.i..,.. u . ---- p.. .m... 9;,.;.- p. . . . . Syotomo ' Midinnd - 7220 O . . .. . .. . . .u. . . . ,e,,,, 1 1_?_ Civil D. Groto
.. ....... ..c.,...........................
FmG-1 Apr.qpJix B and 0 FDi G-3 1.0 (8) " Thio procoduro chall bo followed for processing all nonconformancoa." (9) "Upon complotion of making tho approprinto entrico en tho tag, the responoible enginoor chalJ. affix the tag to the nonconforming item..." i
~
(.. ... Nonconformanco C-1 locued 7-12-73 vao not preparod in accordanoo with appendix ' B to FIP G-3 (see attachment) ho hold for QC cloarance tag vao not filled out nor affixod to tha nondonforming item.
- 1. Ro-ionue UCR d-1 with corrootiono.
- 2. Tag nonconforming item.
3 Provide indoctrination / training to field poroonnel in FD1 G-3 procodure requiremento.
.i.... .. ........... ................................
7/27/71 E. E. Folton
/ \
l > .
- q ,/ .
,]:2.... . r.ci......u ..r..;,e; j ....u au;.. .
j.,... . . . ..r: 4 ,,. . e . .. .. . . e- L . -
. N-QUALITY AUDIT
- FINDING 005
~ This item has been corrected. It involves the determination of a nonconformance on July 12, 1973 The nonconformance report which was prepared to identify the nonconformance was incomplete and a " Hold for QC Clearance" tag was not filled out and affixed.
The nonconformance report (NCR C-1) hac been reissued as NCR C-1-1 (see attached). The " Hold for QC Clearance" tag has been filled out and affixed to the item. All Quality Control Engineers have been instructed on the preparation ; of nonconformance reports and the tagging requirements l connected therewith. j l
. l O .
j l
\
l l l l l
/
l
., /
)
,- \
.- l 9
m
yw - '
~
QUALITY AUDIT FIMDIMG
....? .6 ..
7-18--73 O .? " h 6
- w. . . . . . '
Midin6d - 7220 Systems O .. . .. . J. Dotnen
- o. ....... ............ .......... .............
a . . . 6 la , Quality Control C. Kinney
.a........................................
PIM C-1 Parn. 6.1 99 Tho Toot / Data fomo oxhibited F the Forma coction of tho FIM are alno mandatory... any chance to a fom identified in the Fr.1 must be approvod by the Chief Field Quality Control Engincor. . . "--- - --.- _ - _ . . _ _ . G...... Y' . Contrary to the above, required fom QC-011 has been lined throuch in tablo of contents and removed from manualo #'s 1180,1181,1183,1181,1186 4 and 1188. .l i Esplace foms in manuals and follow procedure for Manual Hovision por G-1. l. 4, s' f -
..... ... ............ .............e..................
0/17/73 M. M. Krout 4 m
+e.=..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ,
8 .. j,.........ar.sm......4..- - - - - - - - - - - - - --
.w.- ---
_{,_ g- _ _gS__
./ ,
QUALITY AUDIT FDIDING 006
't .
This item involves a determination that a roll out drawing would provide more information than Form QC - Cll. Neither the Form nor the drawing which would be substituted for it will be used for approximately two months. In the interim, the manualo have been restored to their issued condition.
~ , The field is requesting a revision to the Field Inspection Manual pursuant to F.I.P. G-1 5 0 in order to accomplish the substitutien before the drawing is needed.
. I l
. % j
. , 6 i f ,
.\
9 e <
* . s
/
4
. . ' *t .
*/
/
1 l
. /
O $ g
. . e a .
6 P
. . g si
.:g l .
9 l l e l .1 , .*
7 dff QUlti.lTY AUDIT fiflDl!!G . 7-18-73 O, s v' 7
-o.c.c g.....
liidland 7220 Systomo C a* *'* =
.... ....J...
htoon 10 FIM R. Mrtthova, F. Joyco 5 _ HQAM Soo. IV No. h Para. 2 m . . ..
" Receiving, inopecting, atoring, protocting, and inouing of natoriale and equip-ment at tho jobolto are acco:pliohed by the Matorialo Supervioor and his poroonnol...
with technical noolotanco rendered by field engincoro when needod, in accordance with ' r:quirements in the Fiold Inspection Manual."
* ' *,.g
.a
. l.1, 1
ps 1 Requiremento for receiving, inspection, atoring, protecting asi inouing of materialo , l havo not been included in Midland Field Inopoetion Manual. , (, - 5 -
/ .
s
, .1 ~
. 1 4, i
[
. 1 a i \
\ .s Amsna the FIM to include a procedure that controls the above activities. +
i I 8-20-73 D. R., Johnson . p .................. I
)
w, ) e e
*..... *b....-- .sa..b..... ..e.g a. go g. . . . . _s y . ,eg g g. . . ,.
'.i gy
'..i .-
N QUALITY AUDIT FINDING 007 Requirements for receiving, storing, protecting and issuing (Os/ T of materials are covered in procedure G-1, paragraphs 2 5, 3 10 of the Field Inspection Manual. These paragraphs specifically incorporate the Field Procurement Manual as the document containing the' governing procedures and identify the-Fhterial Supervisor as the person responsible for them. The definition of " field procurement responsibilities" contained in Field Procurement Procedure No. FPP-4 includes, "...the roccipt, storage, protection and issuance of all construction material at the jobsite and the purchasing of all field directed requisitions for material, equipment or services." Receiving inspection will be governed by Master Inspection Plans which are being prepared pursuant to FIP G-6 3.0. These Plans will require adherance to Material Receiving Instructions which contain the inspection requirements for material being received. In the interim, inspection of material being received will be accomplished in accordance with the second sentence of the quoted portion of Bechtel's NQAM, which states, in the sentence immediately following
. the sentence quoted in the Audit, " Items on the Q-list are received in accordance with the Material Receiving Instructions and the documents processed by the Materials Supervisor."
Accordingly, all material being received will be inspected in accordance with the Material Receiving Instructions. O s_) -
/
,e
/
/
, ..'/
e
*a G1
.s*
e 7
.O y.Qs;j.
;..;ie.... c -
o w.M,, QUAUiY AUDIT FI':0!!:0
- m. o.1 16 -73 m ].
) "
J - - -- a i... w . m .. q.......... . . . . . . . . . . . g,* .* ' .. _ _.7. 2.20
!!Idirmd ....... ..
SIn.t_qm T.
.... .1111..ch/JIolub 1 1 Drawing _ Control Frnngkowink Ptn1a Tnnynntinn Mnn_un1 c7 parah y u "Tho Print Coordinator / Clark chall naintain a field drawing diotribution liot catablishing the normal diotribution of drawings fron Projoot Engincoring." ,
- _ . _ ._._...__...a.
t.
>.6..,
7 . A drawing distribution liot has not boon establiohod. ., O Y i . n.
. j. .; ,
.' *( '
2.u w e..a 2. ...; -- - 3. E2tablish a drawing diotribution list as defined in the FIi! Section G-2, paragraph'311
.t .#
. i. .
., t*
- t
;, {
s * .
- e. .. f.
i 1.t
.s' L.. .. .
- i. 8 /17/73 M, Folton '
4......... ...... ..... P' l
'}. l
- . :: e l
,. \
- s
*:('
-} ,
.I l ,. ...... .............................. ,
!* !i b........m.<.............---
- ,. i s. ,
.. 8
. e.
QUALITY AUDIT FlNDING 008 () Corrective Action Taken:
, Further investigation disclosed that a drawing distribution system (card file) has been in existence in conformance with F.I.M. G-2, paragraph 31.1 since the inceptior; of the pro,1 ec t. This finding mistakenly arose as the result of a misunderstanding between the Auditors and the Print Coordinator / Clerk. The Print Coordinator / Clerk has been and is maintaining an appropriate card file showing the drawing distribution system. However, he did not under-stand the Auditors to have requested to see this file when they asked for a drawing distribution " list". The misunder-standi,ng has been resolved and the matter closed.
0
, ) .
d 0 9 e t k I
/
.--m l
'a
.qt -
f.dj QUAL.ITY AUDIT fit!DillG
.... ?..
July 16, 1973
!f- ) n. n ..
C/ g......,..........,..... , , , . . , . . . . . g , ,, , , .......
.ildinnd 7220 '
Systmn [') .. . .. . Lilligh/Holub
;;r... .,4 c........... ....... .. . . . . , , . . . . . . . .
3 . . , 11 quality Control F. Kapla l p ... m ... ......................,...... ........ I Alnb 106 Troceduro !.0 calibration of Inotrume ntation and Tont Equipment Proceduro m,.i... l
" Calibration of Instrumentation and Toot Equipment to be used in Quality Accuranco !
relating to construction activitico chall be performed in accordanco with bochtel l Field Inspoetion Procedure G-It."
- l 1
' I i
Th3 control and Calibration of Toot Equipment used in Quality Acourance relating to . cmstruction activitico veo not perfor=cd in accordanco with Ecchtel Field Inspection f 'oduro G--14 LJ . .
. . c.
- 1. The field must implocont Proceduro G-1 4 na contained in the Bochtel Fiold Inspootion Manual.
- 2. Project Engincoring vill evaluato/ justify tho inopoetion work dono to dato with uncontrolled toot equipment no dirooted by Alab 106 to datormino if re-inopootion is nococonry.
.....e,.. .. ,... ..... ..........o....,..............
- l. 0/17/73
- 1. E. Felton 9 D "Mi-g),7f,,g,,, _
e o'* ( ) . . L_J s s
', .. 4....e w ..e...2........
QUALITY AUDIT FINDING 009 To date inspections have been made of installed concrete and stored liner plate. The inspection of concrete was intended for final acceptance. A portion of this inspection was visual. The balance was performed with an optical comparator which was certified for accuracy by the manufacturer and carried to the jobsite by the Specialist who performed the inspection. The optical comparator is not the type of instrument which loses its calibration. However, it has been rccertified for accuracy subsequent to the inspection and upon such certification this audit item was closed. The inspection of stored liner plate was preliminary in nature and for the purpose determining the scope of final inspection necessary for compliance with procedures contained on pages 7 and 8 of Procedure 2.0 of " Applicants' Report on Quality Assurance Action Being Undertaken to Assure Satisfactory Condition of Work Already Performed and Materials Now on Site". This inspection was not intended to be final and a complete inspection program usin6 calibrated instruments is to be implemented. . s ~ k g 8 o e 9 e T O *
.,n........__--
d aunun num nam . a'L July 17, 1973 (')/ G 10 0,....,..........,..u.. ;........ ..... ... ..
.... .I,.i. .l. . ...t ,ljldolyb Syatomn '-'a=
l 72
.... . .i.i..dland . . . . . 2. 0. . . . .
1 6_ Drawing Control FIND 9k2yjok I Ftold Innnection M:grytl. G-2. enrnierp_ch 4.1 a.......
"The P. int Coordinator /Cler!. aball assuro that supornodod drawings are withdrawn f! 4 use."
i s ! 1 l l Many drawings on the Civil Stick File have been r.arked void and have not been . rc=oved. m ' l
)
i Remove superceded drawings fro:n uno as required in Section G-2 of the Field . Inspection Manual. ,
, , : ,6 .
i i 8/17/73 _ M. Pniton >b
. i .
l. rj m l . t
- 1
%.&. .....;r- --
~. .. . . . . . 4. . . . . . . . . . i ; ; J. . . ; . . - --. -
1 b.~~: = 4asi.;.........;....; -
. ~....
~
l J QUALITY AUDIT FINDING 010 No corrective action reauired. It is necessary for super- , ceded drawings to be available at the site to enable super- '
\ visors to familiarize themselves with the status of the l
-pro; ject which has been shut down for 2 years. Pursuant to !
Field Inspection Manual G-2, paragraph 5 1 the superceded l drawings are marked " VOID" by the Print Coordinator / Clerk to assure that they will not be used for construction. l l i
. l O
X
/
/
/
e" j e l
(g/
,1
, QUAUTY AUDIT fli:DillG
. ..? .'.'. .
p v j 4A 7-16-73
.. B 61 E ed 11-
..,.........,..u.. ;.......... gj,,,,
7220 111dland System 0 .. Lillinh/Holub ,.e...... ............ ....... .. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 7 Drawing Control Franokoviak
....o.....,,,.......................... . . . . . . .
I Field I_1ppectLon fiin'ial G-2 Para. 6.):
)
"Onrecolptofanowroviolonbytheprintcoordinator/olork,thocopinoftho '
superooded drawing chall be marked void and placed in a reforonco filo." O A random onmple of civil drawingo was mado and approximately 20 copiac did not ' the latoot revioicn an uhown on the Drawing Control Regiotar dated 6-29-73 c 7./
/
\
v' i* All copian in tho drawing control area which are shown to have a suporoeded reviolon when compared against the drawing control log are to be marked void and removed to o voided area or doctroyed. )
,.... .. ,s ........... . a a . a. . . . . . . . . . .. w . . . . . . . . . .
8/17/73 E. Folton O_ , In. :;aa.w - ..; :.n. . ;. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:. . .. .- - - - -
- e. ,,
= . . . . . . 2 . , a . . . . .a . . . ; . . . - - - - - - -
. r, .
V 4
, f fJS( rC/%
,m
(,) QUALITY AUDIT FEIDEIG 011
.N Sepias in the drawing control area that have been superceded when compared against the Drawing Control Log are being marked " VOID" and placed in a reference file in accordance with the F.I.M., scction G-2 3 paragraph 5.4 Any discrepancica between the existing revision and that shown on the Drawing Control Log will be rectified as above or by resolution with Design Engineering. This will be completed by August 17.
*o l
l
.c .
4 O e e
's . .
i.
, /
,/
e e
./
= . , a L/ .
/
A e e
- - . . .p;=.=.
1t la
.w. .'.2, .,e -
QUAufY AUDIT Fl::EG 7-17-73 (s s 12
=
- . u . a.. . w ...... . . . . . . . . . . .
- w. .. . .......
.11dland 7220 Systema L) ., . . . . Lillisdt/Holub 1 Drawing Control Finld Parnenpol_.
Scot. VII Pru n. 7.2 J..1IP'? 0 ....
"Drawin6a locued to the Field Offloo for conatruction shall be so indicated in the title block and shall bo insuod no Rov. 0."
i
. - - - - - - - - - - . . _ . . ~ . . _ _ - . . _ _ . . . - - - - - - - - -
4. Savoral drnvingo woro found which had Roviolon 0 being used for roanons other than the od rolecco for conotruction clacoirication. Rovicion 0 vca clco unod sa : ao for bid which should carry a lottered rov. , l
, l 1
l l l 1 1 i
)
rt:m: .;24v. 2 -- O Projcot Fngincoring ohould review all drawings inouod to date and roonll all drawings , that do not confor= to the require =onts of the !!1dland Intornal Procedures llanunl. j 6 ........ ........... ................................. I 8-3-73 P. Martino ; i .................. 1 G l (V a l l j,.4......... ........
- 2. .... ..c m c.;;.r.;; j J,.e.46. 4 .u w .e...........
_ _ . - . _ _ - . . . - . _ /% . . A S TR A- ; {. . 5 ) 4 QUALITY AUDIT FEIDEIG. 012 . r ; a This Quality Audit Finding has been voided. See attached letter. . . o e e e e r k e 8 .
. , /
u 1, , f
*. # .L p*
/
4 e , o-
. . e' s
- t .
f 4 i *'=., e-
** s l
e f
./
e . .* e O
$ e *
\ .
\- .
O s .* g I t
- e e r -
i p ., -g i i 1 l i : f . I l g .
-l ,
b e d R g 4
- a - .
.t
#4 Bechte Power Corporation
(') v. Inter-office Memorandum O
'o J. I. Dotson Date August 1, 1973 Subbet Supplement to the Quality From W. F. llolub Assurance Audit Findings of the Midland Construction Site g, Quality Assurance Audit conducted July 16 - 19, 1973 Copies is Ai Ann Arbor E. Felton W. Ferriss P. Martinez -
G. Richardson H. 1,illigh M. Krout During the audit of the construction site an apparent discrepar%y against the Engineering Department was noted. Since the Engin eer-ing Internal Procedures Manual uns not availabic at the site. the . quotation used in writing the audit finding was obtained through
'p a telephone conversation from the construction site to the cnginect-ing office during the audit period. Later review of the Drawing
*x Control Procedure (contained in the Engineering Internal Procedures Manual) showed avbsequent paragraphs to clarify the quotation. As
, a result of this investigation Quality Audit Finding number 12 should be cancelled.
b 3 t s W. F. Holub
, WEF/le *
\
1 (3 m i A
an,. ' -
~
- . :..a.. - -
b..?.'2.
~
k'. QUALITY AUDIT FllDitlG July 17, 1973 - 13 r.;;. , ,,. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ****'** Udinna' 7220 Systems O ' '. . [].... I.1111 h /IIol yb
......... ...6 1 Drawintt Control Franckovink ET_)I No. 1 Identification of Progreen Printn
~~~
"Progroso Printo of Drawingo are thoco which are cado prior to inoue ao rovinion no. O, or botwoon numbored roviolon icouco for distribution to the field. Procroon Printo chall be mado on groon Diaso papor and stampod - Progroso Print - for infomation only - in rod ink."
r , Mechanical Drawingo II-h52(q), M-h02(Q), M-h11(Q), M-h13(Q.) and M-h17(Q) that voro on the infomation otick filo locued by Projoot Engincoring no Progreso Printo voro not in re ordanoo with the abovo quotation. I s Projoot Engincoring vill inotruct all engincoring groupo that Engincoring Dopartment Instructiono ITo.1 la mandatory and that they ohould implomont it immodiatoly. i
, ~.
o..............e.e..- ...........................c..... 8-3-73 P. Martinoz .
... . . .. i, .7, .i.a . ;. . . --- -
.7 *
, ?
l v .
.; g7_. .,,.. _ _ - _ _ _ . _ . - . .
ljf.r QUAUTY AUDIT FluDliiG ....?li. ! July 16, 1973
..m. .
(_,/ ils p.v. . ;.v.. . . . . . , . . . . . . - :.......... g. .. . . . . . . . . Lillir,h/Holub Syotems J .. . .. . l M 7220 ........... waidinnd o F. Kapla l 7
- g. ........ ... . .................. .....
I Field Innpection Manual - G-7 Fara. i.0 "This procedure outlines tho bacio for the collection and filhc of Quality Control Rscords." e
\
g .. . ThoRudlityControlRecordocotabliohedtodatoarenotsetupaccordingtothe' / p m ocduro in the Field Inspnotion Manual, Scotion G-7 ' 8 (
- . t w .s....a..na-Implomont the procedure G-7 octablichod in the Field Inspection Manual.
t L 3.,,.... .t....,.... ......s.n..................... 8/17/73 E. Folten 4 . . 4 e . t v
...e.. ...... ..e....... ..... ...g. . . . . . . . .
8 .. g,,,
.e .,
QUALITY AUDIT FINDING 013 & 014 1 These items have becnicorrected. O
... )
)
l 1 1 g,s M er e
\
9 e e l l l ' i l . l . 4
~
El/ QUllu1Y AUDIT FiiDillG
....'l.
. 7. . 16
,, . . . -7 3 Is / 15
%n,.i....T.;.,..... . . . . . . . . . . ,
g ,, ,, ....... Midland 7220 System [--] .. . . . . Lilligh/Holub 1 h Drawing Control Franckovink
...m.................................. . . . . . . .
Fiold Innpcetion Manurtl G-2 Para. 3.3 1.2 e........
"The Projoot Fiold Engincor...ohall also assign a Fiold Engineer from the appropridte discipline to review and sign the drawing."
. 1 d
Thora is no documented evidenco that tho field engineoro havo reviewed and signed now j drtwings and roviolono roceived from projoot engincoring. I . u.4.. . . c a cirr All d' ravingo rocoived from Project Engineering should be reviewod and signed by the appropriato disciplino field en61 noor na decoribed in the FIM G-2 Paragraph 3 3 1 8/10/7,3 B. Folten i l . i l ~
-, +
l w - 4....a ... - - - - 3 ::.:. . . . . . . . ...;..... r.. . r..;r. ,j,.-......................... ga.
. , .t g i . ,,
/
^
4
/
QUALITY AUDIT FIITDING 015
~
All drawings received from Pro. ject Engineering will be reviewed and signed by the appropriate designated Field Engineer as described in the F.I.M., procedure G-2, 3 paragraph this Field} Inspection Procedure pursuant to F.I.P. G-1The field is requesting a 5 0. Under the proposed procedure the signature of the appropriate designated Field Engineer will be entered on a Ucw Drawing Sign-off Sheet routed to this individual. This New Drawing Sign-off Sheet will be filed and kept as jobsite records. o
#a 4
e t e l
-- .- - - .. _ , . - -. _. ._}}