ML19329E731
ML19329E731 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Midland |
Issue date: | 06/06/1973 |
From: | Bacon J CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML19329E726 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8006170888 | |
Download: ML19329E731 (31) | |
Text
. .w- -
.<e,' . . <"
.'s'...,-
s
- i n . *
.-j * * =
.'.; ' I . ." .a..
q , ... ,
- l. , . ,. f'.e'. .. ' . .' . * './ . 1
, ,4 ,., .
/
[_\ . , f. , .
. . ; j -
...'l.
' ' 2.
s .
.. ,,: t .,, . . . ,.
.r.
.u . '- .
. ~ .;. , . :.. < . ;...
. _. , ?>. - ., -: .
.'. . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA "N . .'
Ay,E/ksb *
.:.-' . ., DEFORE Ti!E - . .: ..
- V, l- E
.'. . ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION .
.s
,s ..
"'...:a .~
. .-x
% ,.. . :.. . . .c , .
,o
. , , .? . ., ,: -3 <. ...~..e ..% .-
4
.s..s.; .
..t,.
r, ,.
..a. . e g ,. , -' -' .,
In the Matter of u
- " . . . ' ' . ". .J.V.:. . -. ... .' :..' ' 2. "" ,,
- ;.
- .;..mg. . ., , > '.; , , . s r .,,..
, . - ~s
.3. . . ,< .
. . .t
. ".Q . '.';'t., Do.cket Nos . 50-329A Consumers Power Company.
e, . _ :
.^ . and 50-330A
-(Midland Unita 1 and 2) .
_ -4. . . . . .* . a. .~. .. ,
-x...<.
.. e. ..!, ,.
a
, .r.
,- .. <-t ,,', , , ,
/
, , . '- , .y .
.e .;.
. . c.. .
.-(.. ..
- ;. .. . . '.
- . . v, . / . . l;,.
. ,.. t 4... . -l .., w,,. . . .J Washington.,,
. D. i.. . C.... . . ..~.
a -
.4 ; .... .. ... .,.n.,..~,.. ..
.. .- , . . .. . :.. a ,. . . . .
M:.", f:. ?'f,.f y . Wednesday, June 6,, 1973
,; /' -
. ,M. - . .. q
./ . .
. . . >,, ... ' a . ...
- 4. .. .< s - . . ..- ,
Deposition of JUDD'L. BACON, a witness of lawful
't .
.. . ....e .. . L. .
.~
age, taken on behalf of the Interven'ers in the above- - ~
' entitled action, pending before the Atomic Energy Commission, ,
.~ . .
., 0._. _~
.a . . .
< pursuant to Section 2.730(c) of the Commission's Rules- .
u.
o'f Practice (" Rules") ,10 C.F.R. Part 2, before Susan Drake, a notary public in and for the District of Columbia,
.; ,. .~,
at 10:03.a.m. on Wednesday, June 6, 1973.
- - .y
. .,.. ~
, u. ,
n; . ,. .
,'g. ,'.4..,' :+ t
. , - l. ,,,.,
- t,,, ,,5 ,', ,,
- *5 -
4,. .. . . , . .
- ,. " . ,- ;. .... T.., , . ,. ,..:. .s
. , .. .w.~, s v
s -
= -
g..
. r 4,
.* g* .
- e
- .. s .,
.. e '
, .. , 'e. . ...- .'.-s
' . s
. f g g ,, - *. % *
'e
,t
.8 .
~ .- . .
3 . .. ; .
.E' . *
- , ,. r ..
.s .
- f s .- .
O 4 . .. .
. .i 9 .
g . g 6
. '* '.4 .
1 s , , . .c
.p v .a.
g '. , 8%[ . ,
- . s . . v. *
.....,,q. -
- f.' ,
' (, . i . -
- 2. / ~ V
.s . ,
,.:'.. ~ . . , .. ~ . ;. ., , .
, ;,., e . g. ,
.,,.,c
.~,- :, ., .
.~.: .A .g..y ,s.
, - a ,,. , ,. .,.* . . . - . . .
-~
e a.
.%. t . * . .* o .r .s-; '.
% r-APPEARANCES: * .4 . t ;
..t>i
. . - 'u.
, }
1., o _
..a~ ,
Oit bchalf of Consumers Power Company: ..
\
.. - . ./...
, , l
.t . . KEITH S. WATSON, ESQ. ,' ,
'. i- .. .
1
/< j. . , , ' -
e '1326 19th'Stro'et', N.N.'- '
'. 5:36,, ,: M. . e :. .. -
.s. ,
.4 ' -
.7 s
. . . Washington, D. C.,,, .: .- . ,
, , .;.;, . .- ,S.. .
- c. , -
ST U ',, -l -.; c . . . '
.g , ,
.u .
" ~
..'On. behalf of.'the Dep'aitmen [of' Justice: .
. - - .v .v"..,. . . .... e, , ,
,. . , . . .:t . . .
- . ; , ,.g~
. C. FORREST DANNAN , ESQ..c' ,
.JDepartment of Justice .;. . c 1 ['
Anti-Trust' Division Y,,* ,'
4'- 'd; . s.O - '
-Washington , D. ,'C.'. . Q,'~, .,, ,f.. ?, .c. - ,
, ' n ,.
(D.: . ,
1 ;? M J, *
~
~ ! <
" On behalf of the Interveners: '
-~
e >;. ., .t - .. 3.: ... -.
-4
~ SPIEGEL & McDIARMID
'l . ;< 7,
' [. L '
.Dy: Robert A. Jablon, Esq. '; - .;
Watert' ate Of fice Building ;-- ,
2600 Virginia Avenue, N. W.,, ', -- * ' -
- ". Washington, D. C. 20037 - - -
~
- , ..' :, : . 2 ' ' . f ' '
} ...~..: -
Thereupon, J.- ,s'_.
,.'14 ' 7fr. .,.. . J 'f:y..
. a. - .
~ '
" "' .. . 'JUDD L. BACON a witness of lawful age, was' duly sworn'by the notary public, -.
- +
. being examined by counsel, testified as follows:
.. - , . .,: u .-
' - ' N
.- DIRECT EXAMINATION
. . . :- s. , . ~ .
,'BY MR. JABLON : . ,.
? - . i" t .c 1, ' ' ' -
-Q ,Can you begin by giving us n' narrative on how . .... - ,
. . s., . .
' ' ' ~. ' ' ' '
the file search was done?
MR. WATSON: I object. That is too broad a O
question. .,. , . . ,
.....'...y . . . .
.9 l .... , .
I MR."JADLON: You in'struct him not'to answer?
~. .. , *
,' . .. 4 .
. , .g . ., ..s..> <
'J.
~-
F g.,,. . ,
..c...
. . .,.,,.s. s ;
- .. ..~.
.~. , , :' +. s. -. . . .-
3- q. ,
. .5 .. . L>: -
. w. ,
^
.'. . ~..- .: ., - ,
,. * % 's a u .,
' ~ ~ ~
.y .- - - - - - -- ,
, f. -' _ .
, , _ # ,_*c!
'I ~q o
,g._ g
l
~
< .. . . 1
[
..e. .-
0, ~ ,;. c. * ., u, .. . .,
3 ' . ,, , .
- .. s. . .
..s..+
) ,- ,
> a *
.: \ . ,7,. . ., , ,.. ,
i.
',- .% ,,. . i. .
.. , s .,
. . ~. . . .
.r
- s. ...
,5....,*y,
. .i . .,. ,
n...-
- t. . ,
. / * .,.) -
. 3, ,
..t; . ..,s.; .
. MR. WATSON: ' I object as to the form of the question.
.r>-. . ;u... ..,:. , .
- ~. .y .
.e BY MR. JABLON: ' : . r . . . 4. . -. ':j, . '. i,... L. ' ....'..:...
~,. *.
r .
-~
. ./. . t. .. *. :.. , . ,
.n . -
't '
,. .;s,,, *
.9.. .
g '
.Mr. Bacon, we have compiled scme of the discovery l
/ .
. Q
., , : , , _ . ' , * . .. ,. ,, , .4 - ; . : , .. ; .
7, - + iyl *p. ,
. R : . :q
- documents for our 'wn o purposes and I show you any number ,.
..s ..i , .:n.m..-
- . \
.9. . . . . . - .
of them just at random.. For example in a document entitled,
- { . . -
- . Q ',..a .........[, , _
...y '
l.,'" Power Pooling Study Cost Allocation for' Contract Municipals"
~', ,
.- . iO .
<1 6 ,
,.,..^,q.
'. ..there is a printed n' umber'on the bottom,. 001977. -
Can you
.s _
- +,
~
p.'
..s explain the derivation.,of'that'. number? .'s .V.'.'
ss i
.y .. ~ , .. ..
. ,. .: 3- ,
. - .,,.. s w / .; r. . ". '
'M. R. ' WATSON :I.. obj ect.
' C. 5
.. . -c a.
.-. ..s.. . .- . . . .
. f. ~ . . .-
On what grounds? .
. ' ~
.?.J . ' '..
,MR. JABLON:
-7
- m
- ,; . ,
., ,~_,..r-.,. .
. , ? ?. .. .
. . ~
~
.c MR. WATSON: ..,Work product.
. , , .w.
. f. ' '<!-
. s ,
- 'l 'k.
T MR. JABLON: I sec. ; -
.) ..-
Can you explain the derivation of number 221
. e-
'and there is a blank 36. . .
> : a. ..
I ' instruct the witness
. ,.MR. WATSON: Objection.
' . s.. :y y-t , . ,
. , 4 .
.). ,, . '
not to answer. It is a work producit. '
- ~ : j,. . .
'3 - 5; . .
.Can you explain a date on the bottog
. , MR. JABLON: -
which says December 8, 19727 .
- "- i
. MP. WATSON: Same objection. -
c .
.a
~ y~ ,
, , BY MR. JABLON: .a
.. O Is there a general repository for Consumers
. Power's files?
' -l . . . .' '. . .
.W A There are several repositories for Consumers
, , s
, ~
Power's files. .
~ ,
- '-
- v. , ,
9, , g L_<----- i
1
. . . .N. ..,..e. s c. . . . . , J
,.3..,.,,,,,,...,.,..t.,,
. ;,d ' :.y ., tl,. 5,' ;. :. .'
...)
. . ,, . , i , . .. ' ; . 9 . j , .
.. ..,.os .i,.
. . .c.,
e.. .a . .; ,.. .. , , . .
., . *, >.. .r -: ..
..;,.... :, ........m., .
.r . . , . . - . , . . . >. g,,..
.4 .. .,..
.,. ,...:.. .:..' ......r
- . . . ' \
,. s ... .
1 . ... ~ .r .
. j -
"_A I'Contral . division,' northeast division, northwest f.. " .T. . . ,*. , ..
< ., - i.
9., :.. ,-
< r '
.s*
' , . - .e
. . ;, ., $ : ..!-.....e, division, Jackson, division.e g . .t r , n :,%. . .;. .:-" . * . .
" .e . .. ". ...
.. . , . , ..c.~. . . . . . , .
3 ., ,
. ~ . .
.' .7 ; . Q . ': 6 And what are the purposcs.'of those divisions?
- . ,' . .,'.. ._ .;;. J:;..: .,:3-;% Q _ : ..y .f.. v. ....-
- ~
, _They are the operating,di, visions. ,The~ company 9
..'.'A .- ,..
.t.., .
.a. ,
- s. . -
has split its service .ter.,ritory into geographic areas,
.~. ,
... m. . . ,. . .;... . :
. . s . .
. . e. . about a do::en or so' of them, and' ench area has its own
..- - ,. ...,:.. ..... q . .n ,s . . _ . .
. v a.., ., . ,,
v .n . - - .... .< .. . .. .
ffice with a division'mancger and.. customer service people
., 2,i t o. , , . . ..,1. , .,: . , . , . .,
- r. ... . n. . . , ,c. ;. ... ... a.
s . .... .r . . . , ....
, .s ,
,y.'. .and. operating people. '.,-cQ. J D- 7.l.L;i'... e. . .. c$n . .,a... .9.Y.,i.g...- ( .d.p ; ; .
...- .e
. ,.. ..... . .a . . . . . c.. ...- . ' ~
. :~' . 7, * ' l Q You have'a' Lansing office,'do.you not? -
- 9
.,: . ,.. i ~; .u,. . . 4 . ;. ,,. -
. j, . .
- . . ,;. .A Yes, we do. : :, ' . .;.. : .
. . . ,- . ,i,. - .. . ,. . . .. . .
. And Mr. Raymond said that was 'for legislative
',s..'.'. ' ' ..: .jQ
... . . -^.
. s. . ... . ~. '
c .<.
' liaison?
- , ',e-
., . . e..
.: ;i.
. .'~ ..
,A
. That is not'a division office.
J
.What would that be called?
. lQ
. .-- :A We.have a legislative representative who has an n.- .
.,c.,. . . . .. .
.,s office in Lansing. ..
And there'would be files there?
/
.. -0 .
A ,I presume so, but'I do not know. .
Q Now, going back to the central files. Do you have separate sub'-files? How are the files kept? -
You said central files.
A 'To which files are you ,
O
. . ::s. -- ,.
referring? . Vw
' ^
Q The central files at 212 Ucst Jackson. ,,
. {' ~. .
i...: ._.
.. s. - .
,<. = . .. : . .. . ... . -.
- s .
- ..'. r*
.t , . ...*
s .
. M;
. 1..,., .
, , , - ]
..-< , + .-, . .... '
s -
~
.. ,,,1,
.")
.g.. ,
L . I-
. *\*I...
.. . ~-
.s, .,. ,. ,
.a..- .,- , .. .G
-;:; ..: : c.,.,-
.~ s'v * .
. , , .. . ' . . :... w
- ~: . .
. r. ...4 .. :.
s'
. , . .i
- ..r-
. .; , s , , . : . .~ -
I JA-
. You mean'the ge'neral' files? '
[ ' ' ' '
' ' ~
...~
.r.
,Q' The, general files.
, You call them the general
'. ~ .: .;, .
+
'.'
- j. -
, . files?
'.. ,- :r' , :,. .. . -
l,
.~ .
,A :
Yes. .
.,. .,-- .. ; . v.
~
~. ,. .
, . :. - ' c . . :r *
..c..
'.,...." .s s . ,.
'O . . Going to the general files.
.. . , . . . f, '
IIow are the files
.kept?
d
- H: - *
- ~ -
' . . '[- Q: . ., % . . >
.. , s. ;> . . . ' *.-
' Iou mean.Thysically?
., . . '. A -
, . ;::e ,
.a - . -
..... ~ .
/
.O Well now, the"_ broad classification--are they by . . . . ...
e . . .:, -
y
.~ . .
2
'sub-matte..r oi. by date or both or- ,;
'They are divided by sub-matter.
~
.',. 'A'
.. As to any divisions
.~ .
by dates, I can't tell'you. ,
O O Ilow about by people? ' ~
, I don't know. ."
~ .
A 0 I"take it[t!here would be a' file index so somebody .
. c.
could find out what the sub-matters were?
A I i.ecall that there is an index or at least there -
' ; . . r.: , ,- .
was.
Q Well', would' there have been one- and not be one now? . . .
A- I am merely saying I can't tell you if there is Q one now. .I did see one at one point. '
.Q And is there somebody in charge of those files?
A 'Yes. < s g , .
g .
p % e
, k
. i s. . , . ..
.f,. .w . : . . . ... ... .
I.: .. ..'
, ,. . .~ .-. .
.. .*
- 8
.r.s..s .
. - A: .n. - - e' . n.. . . ' -
,...e'. , . . , , . .. .<, .f.
3 .
....#,t .. o .
.* f. .
m .*< .* f,..; ..*.:e,.,. . , s.3,V;. . ,..,**.,.,,3A...**,..
,s.
a ..,,;,,
s .. ,:. ,. . .
L,:,
.y.
' r.s..
., . . . qc . .'.
.... . t J~ .8 e . -
,, '..... , 4 '
-.( ,p * ' *.
, 7. , ,
3 e, .,
8.,
, . . , .,.,t.*
- . s g,..
s a.
f.,
7.
..s...g L. f s ., .* '. / , '" " . . . . .*; .
e n. . . g .,. ;g, , *~,* . * * . . , . .,..e-o .
. . ,".*A .., ;*;, , e , , .
- ..v
? > .. .. *
.....,..g. ;
..,q... . , . . .
- e. .-..s4 . .
...t.. .....,.#..,.f..
.....v....t,,... . , ....,. ..~
.t.,. . . ,. c . .,,
..f. .
..s g...
.. .....s...
. ..- .c . s . . . . ..~.. . , . m . . .
s 2 .,n
. .s. ...,.. ,. . .~.
. .. .:..<. . y. . . 7.
.'.Who is'in~ charge.of the' files? ,.... : < , !.
. .1 . ' ., , . . Q '.
- ,; .., . . u... ;M. ,p,Q,.f .<V
~
- ;r. . :. , . . .. .. ..;.a. v..;. ..
- n.".~.... ;< , . ,.
.~ .,, 1 . .,
. -~.s,,..;r; .
' - ~ ,'
- r,. . A
~. . .
l}isnameisGordonHarris,3,'beli, eve.
';.'.,',"... i;'
- ..,. ..,..ss . ., y { / . .
. ( . gf g , , . ..r..
, 4 e *. . .. ..
h.. '
4.,, . .<, . ,. w . . .
,N '. 2 Q' . And 'how many peopl'c . work tihere? ' I, am O' . ,;& 4
' , ' , ' . ' 4I v.C;'.l .'.. . .
.* 4:i.k ::':h .
- just talking
- inn.the'filea. ~
' QT.. .C: . ; .i., . G. :'H, v?:'}Wi'M.':,*.*t'. ':., .H.5, J . ' ' ' ..; ,;.%.
.%w :w..i5 : . .1V
- R. NUl'..'n% i:
s..,.
w..>.
- e. s
.a ;,q ..n :o.r,.
2
. . < . . .. c . .., . ' ..+.. ~ . . ,r . . . .. . . , .g,e . ..
.>,.,g........,g.. - , .y ", ; .*;
- . . $c ,
'.t. . .know.
, ; A - ',.\. .,I'. don
.. . . Y '% ./ *.s...S.,P - .,; t d e . c '.. ;;G ~.5 .o ,yc u ;.*:,. '. . t
';~';
-: .,.,.. ' . .) z'w-,..* ;
,. _ ; , . 9. :. _ .
~.;
. e .g.;j. . .<e, ,
- ,, . . >..'--s . .
n
- :~
Q^ .Would it'be more like one or 5 or 10 or 507
. . ,. ... .. . . . . %. . s . , g.3. . . , . . .
.s
. .s. . .
..,.- . . v. .. . .
u:
I would ha::ard a' gu.ess tha.t it is more ,.. ,
'A.
.~..
like 5 -
..n' . ::;. m : w.
>. r . . . . . , . . - , ::.: . . :. u. ;.s .
l" . , .. :.' thdn 50
. . J. ^:,^s.M.
. 'M.
. ' . . .:i ?'M. . .. .. t.. ; ,.'0M,.n. 3 :.:.~.P'.V d M. O'-i.. s.%.
. ? "N N ,-,,- 'l O 1h'..
s...s . .... c:; .. ... ,.. . . .:..
. ,.. , p.
.. ..z.. . . . : . . , . . ..
-u
.., ~. .. -.. .. .
/ :v. .
. . c.- 3.' . ., .c - -
. g* . m, ;. ^ - ..f 'O ,.".Now, in what.you call the area and region offices,
. ,;.. 3,; yh. .. ,.; _. .,..p ;. ., . : q , g, y . . ;.y (.
.. , ~, . .
. . . ~
. ' are. those files also kept by sub-matter? .~.. - . - -
.r. .. .. .... . - .
- * , . .C. . M..
- sg
. . .. . . , .mn .a . .
' l. ', '.-
' ~
". A I do not know. .
?. <<. M...I. :. .; ' -
. c ..
..,. x+. .
-. . .s.; .
,. 7
]
'O How about the , files'in the division offices? ,
- f' .
A'
- "Ilcannot say"as lo all'o'f them.'lIlave
. . . , .c. .;,
'seen -
.t he ' files in the Jackson division.
My recollection is they
. ......3.,,..
. ..wereikept' by sub-matter, f . .: q'.4
. + -
., . c ....
. c.. :8 - .
. .. v. . . : . ..
. Q' And is' there a person in charge of those files? .
fA' I'n 'that division.there was a person in charge
. , . .. .I. . ..A'* . ..
.1 %. , o % , ,
,"c
.of,the files. -
'Do you know his name? .
0 '..' :. , .
c, '
.a, . . ..
.x . .
. . . .. . . ,. r .
, ', '.: A
.I.do not know her name. - .
f, . . .,
~
.~.. ,
Q ,And would.there generally be some person in' charge
', of occh of'the division files.?
~
.g.
- sp
- u. .. .s . :
' c '
A I.can't.say. . % .' .! - 't. -
s -
- N o,. " ...3
.].4 '
.s. ; . .
. .-% , , @. 4 % I
. . . . .,. . se, ..t,. . ' . , . -
- * i
. I 'B O' ~
. wo* . es.
.Q ,.* -
- .. , c, ,.. . - . .
, . ,,. ,. . y e- sm .
. . . , , . ,;.t ,s..-., . - . .
. . . . 3 (*. 'ew.
. *. i< .* iv.. *re..:*..
.+.,. ,,.,
,g
- h. b
, ~..:. .. ;. ,.- . . . . , f9, . , ;,, . , ,,
....s
.r
.;q . : -
-k ts:
.?.
.. E '%**._ ,,, ' v. ...' . T . . '. .... % ; '. . . ..
~.,. .y .. s. ..*D'.':.C.'.u....
. . :y.... . , .
... .. .4-
~
- 2. .
......-(-..
..~.~...,. .
- 4 Q Incidentally,.what'is the difference between - -
.. . .*. ;.. .,.. . . .: .c . . s ;. ,,
.a division office. and an area and region office? . a.- . .
t .. .
.u -:. ..
) .- ~.
A An area office would be . .,;
a smaller office. ,within
- .. 2 ,. 4. . . y . . .
... ..H.,
n .. ..-.
'a division. For example, the' northwest division is an area
'.;p- .
...' . r.
~ '
'officc in the city'of Midlan'd. ' Region' offices.are a' lit'tle C... .
-; . . + ...
- y - . . .. .
.... different. The company's' bulk power operations are' divided . .
.c
' . . ~
.c - . ,,. : , .
- . ., a s, .
' ,'? .
into geographic regions. ' - e '
'e'- T ..'c; ' .
-:. . . . , .a . ; . ..n. l . ; 7. .
e ..,; . .- .. .
- ^
. . i . , - . . . ' , :; . ' '. . Q Does.that complete your answer? . , : 7,'f 7 ,- -
- s. .
. _ . .,1 ;.. . ..
.qr. .- ;
- v. . . .. . ..,,: 2 .
, . .. 6. , . . . .-
.A ' . .Ye s . , '
. ;;.y ri ,'". F k . . ,: (,, _ .
R.. - - .*.
s -
...- ..<.t.. . 56 ., . x: .;-
..-. , . . c
.. 'Q 'Now, I.take it each major company executive would ha've his own files, is that correct? -
s .~ . . . ..
' ~ '
A In general I think that is true'. , s Q And these would generally be kept in their offices
. - .~ . . - . ., .
.or in their section offices? .
~z.
. v. , . a
-A' 'Yes. .
T O , Do the secretaries to the major officials generally
^
~
a_ . . ~~
have separate files? * '." .s-
- +
- A "I do not know. -
.. s.
Q . Mr. Aymond is chief executive and citairman of the Board of Consumers Power _ Company, is that correct?
., . .y. .
A Yes,'he is chairman of'the Doard'and president.
O
- ~ -
Q Where would Mr.'Aymond's ' files be k'ept? -
A .Mr. Ayr.tond's files are in his secretary 's of fice.
. . .. l
- . 4 g .
- \ " p , ,
ee,- &
.=.
- *. , *. ..s, . - . e ,
i *
.. e . ,.
,,..)- < . P. .
a so . . * * . ,..p. .. ;:
.. . 3 . , .a. y s .-
.,hg*t .,s*y p.' *
- .s. .*. .p.-
- _.. e
- 11. .
. . . ; ,.,c 7 3,.s* ~.
.v. ' : .,. -
. ., . , . . . .. s. .. . c . . . ,, . . . .
=s,*:
- n
. .x ,,..r. ,. . , . . . 7.* , , , . ,.
.s' .
..;..~.,.-
~
. i..,.,.: , e < ....;......,. i
.a .
. <. .. , : t.... . :. .. . . s. . s. .. .. .
, ~; -
.~ .
, :. . . . , ~
..t.
A.
iGenerally to coordinate the efforts of the file 1 <
. ; ., . , .g.' ., .'.. . . ... ..
. s . ~ z .
'-~ '
searchers, to keep track of the search 'and to see that -
s - .. , , ..
, . .- a
. ;a q .. .. .. .
). -
2...
it was completed in a timely fashion.
- r. .,. .. .: .
.. . . . w,s
,3
'l'.
- e. a. .
.'Did you spend full time on'this? .+.
' ~
.c- .Q
- H_ ., ,. , - - . .. . , .-
.o. . '..~ . . .
.a. .: , , - . . .. .. . . . . .. . , .. . .;
' ^
,,[. 7 * (~ *,,r . .
'~
, , . I..A
. .s.
. 'No. '#NN .
f.' h -( .'F..',5v;(J
.... , ,, .y. -,. . .
D.lI.'I . . . , - ' .' ..;
I .' Ei .. -,
s
,.,,* . ; . .m .
~^
,- ' ,3
. O Approximately how much'of your time did you -
- ). . :
.). .
. . . . '. *' . ... :;. . , ..?. . .
b.
~ * '
~
.. - . devote to this? n..:' "..l 8.s:' . ~
... . .,. ... ,.2 .bi .'.'. ,~
, . ...s~ . .. ;e.w. ..
~n. .
. . .v !,. .
.~ .
- n ,, , .
. s. .
. , . , f... j" : n...'..A' " It would vary,, of course, and I can't put a number q
- . 3 . ,. . .
s - ,
.'on it, but it was a relatively small fraction of my time.
. . .s
.* ,
- y. ., . * .- - . *
,'- ~
,, .O Was there a person'who was in operational charge
< .. s . . . .
of it as opposed to a. coordinating or more removed supervision?
+.,
. .s
. s .
} .
,A You could say that.
6 . ,
/ '
. . .Q_ - Who would that be? ,
n ;, ,5 '
./ ,
.MR. WATSON: Had you completed your previous 3.>. . .
. .., . ~ ... , - -
. . statement? . . .
.. l
..s_ '
- , THE WITNESS: No. I was going to say that one of the file searchers who took the lead is within that
.. ~~-
. . r =
'. *. e .
section that the search was carried out in. .
c .. .
. m. ..
Who was this?
- s ' MR. JADLON : '
].
~
MR. WATSON: . Obj ection . The question is not
'y_ ,
germano. .
., e -
. . MR.'JABLON: I think it is very germane. If
. - Mr. Dacon cannot answer all the questions we might want to
.e. . .
. . . /
,. . either corroborate or otherwise. depose these people. Also
.s t , -- ?
\ ., ,. . . . . , . , .. .. . . . , .
l
, -s a., , ,
b m. * . * . * .,
, , ,* . ,? ,s. ,
.e ,
' b
\
.. . ;. , ,...'*y.~ > 12 . . . '
.r- -
~.
- s. - ...
e
.... ,- .,, 5. . -
3 . . . , .s . ,. ,
Also, in your pleadings you have made' mention of the number
- . ,.z....
of people who have worked on the file se. arches and we want
, .: . : ~ ;, ,
. . ~^ -
O to find out who ther are. . . Do . . . -
you inseeuce them? -
u .,
- u. ~.-
.Let me say for the record,'Mr. Dacon
,. -,"!MR. WATSON:
,, . . ,. , i,: '
.has answered the questions.to date, I.think with some
.- . , .gj * , ?,/ ,
- . , ~. .
completeness, and I therefore maintain my objec' tion and
- , ;j. : \' .
t..
: ., y .
3.*
instruct Mr. Dacon not to answer.' . '#.<*.
I~~'
. :> :- ' . 'u' . . - -
. ?:. . %-L. '
s' . : BY MR. JADLON: .
, A. .,.w'. v ' . . ' . ' ' " , . . .Jt.".r . e - . .
a .. . . .
O Can you. describe in detail how
, n ..< .
you~went about
.your coordinating efforts? . ..
A 5 Generally through meetings of cobsel and repre- ;
O sentatives of the departments principally concerned. -
l 9
Q .Well, what kind of problems would you consider?
.- ,.;~
n.<..
A Interpretations :. .:-of the joint requests, the 1 mechanics of'a'ccomplishing the search.
- s .n. .
I
.Did you have periodic reports made to you?
O I
., , . . - l A .Can you amplify.what you mean by reports?
.O Yes. ' For example, you just stated that--let me
.,- l
- strike that. Were any written reports made to you of any kind? .
~
. .- . 1 A ' I can't recall any off hand, but there may have Q -
been. *
~
, e
{ . ' .. ,
,.n L' '
A .
.- .. . e
..g
- g* ,
.,, , + , ; .,
,...j ....,
. ;.< ,. . s- r.
,.., +.
+1 ..
- 5. .
, . . . , _.. s . . .- '
~. >: '.
= ;.
. .u .
- '14a : .
6
.. .s . .
- s.
..,....r
- .....7..
discussions with counsel. *
. - ';-.: . . y .; .. c . ..
(-
r . . ., .i : ' ' -
.O . Lot.me ask you this.
Wero these meetings .,
,. :,. .s , .., . . . . , . . . .
.. ., . .,r s .. .
O .
~
likely to be with people on your own sle'vol'and.su.perior.
rank.
- . ,. z.x . . .
. .,- .w :.,.. -
' , or outside attorneys or consultants or w'ere yourself and
. v . . , . , . ( '; , .,c. ..
~
. '. '? . .; . . ,.
e
. ,peopledoingthesearch,orboth?,.',;,'.fy7.,'.ff',',',..f>
?, -
- . c ., ,- ..
It i.ncluded both.
/A '
... . .. .. "l1. ...-
I.f/..
. . . . . :...s Q' At th'e. , .same time? . j ., " J. s t. ' - , j' ' '[ . f,"
,s...-
.. .s. . . w.. . . .
A n. . ' ' ,5... ' ,
s: .Yes.. '
~ :.
' ?e <;:?.
,2 .,
..: '. . .,..' . , - .i *.2.~. 3 .
..c:,. .
. .n. .. .
"Also coparately, I take it?
, . O '. l'~
-.v....*....
~..:..*. M. .
- . - , * . -.. ;., ......;... +, 9,, .
... j >.
- .. .~'. .
A Yes.
..r. . ..
..e. ,
s .
~. ..
Q Now,' did you have occasion to make written
.~ ;
. . , .v
' instructions either for your own use or for people doing the search?
. v. . ;.. . .
. <3 .
A -I.did not. '*
.r .~ '
.(,'
Q. :Did somebody else? - },
, . .... ~
A Yes. '
',. l'
'...} . ..
. O W
<.ho'was that?
~i - s' '
.As fitr as wri ten instructions are concerned, I
'A believe there were two documents. One was a letter from .
our Washington counsel written, I believe, before the joint ~
request was received.
The other consisted of an annotated O .
version of the joint request. ~
~
.. a. ..
O And who were these addressed to? Wait a minute.
. :1
. ,_., . . : . . . .s .
1 ..
- . . . ef. ;- r e ,.r * . *
, s,,. . ;. - e c , . . ?
. e. . .
.t -j 1
. e. ;
w
-. _ ' ^ - -
- ~ '~ ^
.' . .... . - e .,<
,,,4
. . . .c. 4.
,....e c.
.,...,. i a
. . . ,15 , . ! ,.
s -..
l-. - .
1,.,. .
. .s..,
. . . . , r .- ..
...L ,
Beforo I ask that, who di...d the annotated version of tho n.
o nt request? ... .
a .. ,
...-n..... * . ..u .,
O. .
. <i '--
'. A You mean who'kept up the document? . -
~..
. .,..- _t" .0 I mean you said that the Washington counsel had
. . ... ne .
. T..' + T." written a letter before'the joint' request and I believe
,- ;. .Y , . *., r . .
.i. . , . . . . ,
,e
..you stated that there was another annotated version of it.
, :.Q,, -lk .
. i .' ... .
-. , , ~ .;'.#: , . ' . ' .;Was'
. ;u. . ,-y ~., this annotated .
version. from ,
- y the Washington
. . - - . ij . .
.,,counsel or did somebody also make it? ' -
. & ;;w.rf...
,. : . ' . . ' ." : ' . . . . 0, -.
j -
.: . c . , , . . ,. . ; ; < y . .
. , - A Tho' document was physical'ly annotated by one
.,. ., . m. ,.. .
'< ' ' ' ' P- ' '
'of the file searchers. .
a-
~'
.' .Q Oh,.I see. .So the document from the Washington counsel was physically annotated by?
O
.v
. ..~.
- +
-No. .
A .
- e. -
Q Okay.
'A The document from the Washington counsel is a letter. The other document is the annotated version of the .
[ joint request of.four documents. ~ '
. 'Q 'And who did this?
Who annotated it? .
MR. WATSON: Do you mean who was the author of the document of the annotated verrion?
. MR. JABLON: Yes. .
O
' ~
- a . .- .: ' '
BY ' MR. JABLON :
O . I tako it the document itself was the joint request,
- .. . .:. .y.
. g4e .. . *
- b. ...>
.. .. .I - .
g . ._ ,,
a . . . . . gr
,o,.'.,.,c q .,. .. ., - '
.. .. 16
.. . . , .e . ...,, ,.
- ,*'1 * . o.. *
? -G : . ,s ,
!l"p .l .
.- ~- - ..
? ',. -. . '._v is that correct? '
.. . . .. - . . ..n .
. /. .se . 9. ...t .
A. Yes
. .s*-.. -
s.,...
i ~ f.. . ,
, ..,3 . , . . . .
. . ~, .. . .. .. w. .v :, , .
,...r..,'.
O~ Now, who did the annotating? .
L. .
.'1'l * .-
- 4. . . . . . . ..
., .. .- v.~. c . .s . ._ , ; .. . .
(
'A .,
?If you mean physically who did it," it was. one . - -
>. .s . :g .., . . . . . -
of the file' search'ers.
If you are referring to'the source r :. ~
. .s. , o. &,;; - *
- ' 'r .
of the annotation, that 1.s not necessarily tho' case,. #It
. - .- . .,- '.~..
. ); ]. ." , ._
- , i I th' ink there ma..ya
. . lso
~
might have been advice of counsel.
t . ' . . . . . . - . -+ -
have been instructions or'cl'arification'by.'or.. der of.the .
~
. Board that w'o uld ha've been " included in the annotation. .
.s.
. .i...
c.,
Q , , The Board of Directors of Consumers Power?
..l
~
., A -.~ No, !! caring Board.
- e. 'l, .
. O Of the. Hearing Board, and when you said counsel,
., do you mean yours or Washington counsel? - -
. :~
'A' ~
Washington counsel. -
{- E .
i
-. . ., l
~
Q And were the sources of these annotations verbal
= . ,
or written?. - 4- *
,. '. i-
, .y. ...., . .
..They. could have been either or both,
-A I. don' t .
~
?
recall. .
- ~ . ' '. -;, -
. . . , c
' . f. .
O Now, you mentioned they had about five people s
work on the search of.the central fi) s? .
. A No.
.. ::+
O- .
O I am sorry.
- 4. .
About' how many people worked on the
.. '. ~'r..b search of the central files? .... . ,
.i .
- t.
- 4-
.. . , s. . ..
. , .. . . et .
,.y.:
. . s . _;
-9 . c :.. . . . , , , . . * .. > . . . ;
~. .
. , . . O. g f* 9
. 6 .
~
, ., s
. . . . . . , - . ~ ...
.. ;. .;. . . ' . ., e * , 17 .. . . >
...l .
.l : ,;c . .
\,. -
., . , , ,, . . o. , s . ..a
,..,y...,. .. . , .
. .' . . c .
. s ,
. <. .?,.-
-- .- e .. q. . ..
. .. , . , .... s 4
'. .'A
- - -Probably two or three. l 9 , . .. .' ' ' s. , ..',' t' O.
N ~.... .r, y .~e. . .
. .>y
- . . . u ..
i
, , . , ~Q Is that including yourself? .- .
- ;~.
. s. . : , . ; . :. . . .c.
- n. .. ; .;. . ., t.
.s
}*~. )
' s.u. y. .
. . .. -.4a. .. .n . .no, s
L',
. ... s
- Q.?'
C*n,.-
.,s,,
.- ', . g.,, t * . . "'g... , c. *
" . " " Qi
. Woro',there any supervisory personnul between
. a. . -
. - : .: .. . - ,e . . .
(..~
. ?. . . . . .
g,f..Jyoubscif and these two or three people?
- l. , , ,
~.; s u-
..:t
. s. ~
~
>.. . 'r
.:, i. - -
- c. n no, ,
, _~
.+. . . . . ..
.2 .<
s . , . . . , ,. . . .
~
.. .. q.. .
r> , .
' Q .
What can you take--did all of these people have .
- s. *. , -
. . ,. . , . ,. . .c.:. ,... o. .,
,,.~~.. .....- .
' ~ ,-l-(
' , "; .. .u; . . : . . the same relative rank within the company? -
.. . . w . . , . . , . . +.
! .~ ~
N.;. .' -Q
} ' ' . , ' .A ;I believe so'. ' ' N ', '. .Y;, .. . .
.. . ... s , .,-
. . .e , .
Q ' For purposes of the search,'were they company
, . ~
/,
. . . :;. :. e .. . .;..- ..
equals? '
.. . , .e.- ._ <
.- , . .. , ..n .
, , ?
.c. .
.. .3, .
A . .That.in a little difficult to say. I believe I
.,y , . . ., .
mentioned.. that on.e of the file searchers took the lead in seeing that it was carried'out. I Elon' t ' recall whether -
r .
he was one of the pcirsons who scarched the general files
- v. . ,
. . t,' t .* %
or not. " ' .
- ';- ; c .
'. ,. *c-
~. '
Q. . And who was this? ..'
- s. ,.
. ~
~ ', . .
'. *
- MR. WATSON: Objection. ..
.~ .
.J ,
BY MR. JABLON: .' -
~ . . . .
, Q Can you--but this person who took the lead may or
. .S '
may not-have been engaged in the' search of the general files?
J. '
Q .
- L
- .A Correct.
.i.,'-
.. . t .
O ' Assuming he did not or she did not, would the s .
- . } } [ . 3 .1 .
..i+. - -
. 1.. . s .
%'4 , * ,
s -
~ '- . . -
.3 . _ . .,
p .., . .
l.
t
.s . .
g a d
- .(-
. 'It .
.s.
., ,. . ~- , ..- ,
- 1g' <; -
... ..t
~
. y .
.- ... .s
. :w. : . . . . ,. ..... ,-
2.. - -
. r. .. .,-
other people,doing the search have,roported to him or , . . . -
' 4... v ..t.
- directly to you? *
'h ' . ,".' .t ' -
S -/. '
$ ~.,
,2c. ; ' - , ., .
. , , , , , . .. .. ;. p e. 4 . g .,,
~' ;., . . .
O_ A .I take it you don't mean organizational 1y? -
- - ~ * (
7,;
. "_1, 0 No, I mean functionally. ". -
. J.'s . J r. ';]. ; .-
......,v, .
~ . . . ..
-l _ ;, .
.- . rg . . . .
. A, , And' reported in what sense? . ..Do you mean if they -
\; )- '
, - , _..,1. .
had a problem orwhat they did with the documents or what?
a.. . .. ,.
.. O.. .Either way. Let's break it down. Suppose they' A
.--.-l-
' , . , . q . ; ' ., . h q,(
-~;. . . .
" x., -
.. . had a problem. What kind of problem would they be likely ,'
.e .,.,.- ,
- y. . .
.to have? or let me strike that question. What kind cf i... , . - -
. . .c .: + . : - . .- .
problems did they have?
.' , .. A' ' As I recall, the biggest problem was j est physically
- .. . .: . . . : .u. . ,.
, .trying to completc the search within' thin time allotted. ,
"C
- 0 . .
IIow about probit ns of interpretations?
,.s .
Would they
,' . c' first go to this other person? ' '
' ~
.,. _ . . , ' . f, . .'r:. s,,.
. A They might. *
, . ; s. . .
- 4 - -
. 'O And this other person would then report to you? '
. A -On problems of interpretation? '
Q Yes. - -
/
. 1,. ~ , ~ .- ., .
.A Not necessarily. ..
^ -
I
.Q .
.Whom would that un-named person report'to?
A He might discusa the problem with Washington O.
~
counsel. .,
a -
x -
. . s -
, O Directly? -
N.
2 *. *
- ~
....b, n
. ..E.g-
, s;-
,e i ,. , . e h *, . *.
I. %
t-*.
. we - - -.
m-
,. . , . - . - . -,. .._;, .M. -- - -
r %
. . . . . s
. . . . = .. .* . ..
l.
- \ - . .
.. .g . . . ,
39.. ; .-
. ' .-. x. .. .,.
~ . . s.
... .,, .. t. , , . ,
. .n,
._ ;, 4
- 3. 4 . ,, . . .
, , . ,s .
, v s o.. s .;.,
.v
.....,~ . ,. . . , ,.
yes, <7 ...
n.
- c. ., , .. ~ . ~ .: ., u .y -
y .
, . . .... . , ., . . . . , , . a. .... , . . . . . .
. . ; O '. Would ,he either discuss it with Washington counsel
)
., v .... ..
,g. . , . . .. -
i,~ . ..
. ,JU f. o. r.'with 'yourself? Was there,anybody elso he might report p.
. " ~ ~... '
+... ..:... .
...,~. g .g, .p ; . _,9 . y . *. .;. c. * , f,. .,p,. :.). ., ( . .; ,g f
.<.. ... .. .. ^.;. . . . . w. .-
, . .. .. - ~ .
e- .~~- ' n,: a. ; ;, . .- p
., ,i, ,.
,4 , % - *A... es.
A. .. . * , . , , ,
a ..:- . .-
-z . . ... .u . . ..:.~.-
, .o..A... .
.s Who? .
.~ . . , . .
- . . . ~, : . . . .-. ..s.
. - .. .e . .-
.. .u .. . . .. .
J'.
. ,i % "
., .A- with the General ~
,., Ire ~could have. . ,discussed'it:
. ~
...4
.. .' . ' >;.....~.- . .c: . *. ... . ^... . . fn N'
..5. 3.
y:s . : '.C. o un s el ,
., ? . +
.. .....- ...r.
^s .
.Q
,' <, ,j .
.Is there anybody else apart from legal'who might
. . a., ..
,, ,. .t .
be,said to act in a supervisory position over him?
- w. .
- v. . ., ~
..,.-r..
.f .
.. . A ,
Directly over him? ,.^- ,
_ .'f a , : .
( . *
(. ,
..g
.- .O Directly or indirectly. . c,
. + . . , .
..' A Organizationally the General Counsel reports to .
, . a senior vice president. -
- s. .
0 Incidentally, would this person have been a lawyer?
'A Would what person have been a lawyer?
Q The person we are talking about. -
- A The senipr vice president?
< e .
2- 1
, Q The person ..
who may or may not have. participated l
. . . 1
- in the central office file search?
j 4
- ' " ~ '" .
A
.: Ye s '. ~ - ;
) .
-. l..
, . U.
,. O IIe is.an attorney. lIow'would you describe the l
other two people who were working on this search in terms
. . . r ,,
. ~, :- - - -
., . f t . .* .
s ,
, , , .a e %
~ . *. e.
'~ , . . -
1
, . i. : ..
,. ;. . . - .. ~
.- .' . . ~
7
- s. .
.. . . . , n ..
., . y.
s
.. r- > .
- ~
. . ,. e,.- . . - .. .. ... ./. - s.,20 . .
2...
./ . . , ..... .
~: . . . . - ..
.y :
..u ,..'*-
. , . . q
. ,_ :.~q. .g .-
,.- ,~,, . .. .. . ., .
. . - . ., g, .
of type of position? Were they clerks, were they attorneys, ,
- .. ,. ... ;... . .. . . .. y , , , . ,
.a *
,1 ~. -) t ' ; _. '.
were they accountants? -
' J,. , g 2-
. ' ' ' ' . % . P.
,. . . c. ..
, . . . ..,. . ~ . :: ... ;. ..
..,...e< .
- ._ . . e , ;. ., .
Well, first of. all',* let me make it cicar,'J an'd I
) .. . .' -
.A .
4-m.1 ;y ,. _v.. . e. . ;
. .: .. .: .. n. , .
. c..; . .
think I did at' the outset, - I am not sure exactly how many
. w :; - , .,e : ,ya. . s. .
.~- '
peopic participated in the search.of the goncral files. ,; .. .
, . . - ; . , ~ ' - ,..^ -
, 3_: ' . .
J ,
~ ~
. . -I think the searchers of the general files were prob' ably ;,
a
. . . ;. . :.g, ,. .. .
- ~
1., . ' ' <,.; e~ - ,. j.. . ...
.i
. . . all attorneys, but not necessarily.
.. . - . .. , .; '; ~ :.1,;.;$(..Q . ' ,
...s
~
. ,..r.. . ... . v. .
~
.,. ' I refer y.ou to Consumers ~ Power's motion for Q i.-
.'i . -
t ,
..p- -
. ~q , . . .. . '
'can ' order modifying procedural schedule. ' I.believe'it .
.J. . .
.i.
.. : ..~. -
.- ; .. w . .
. .l-
~
..is dated December 22, 1972, and particularly to pages 3 ,
.';. through 5.
Incidentally, are you familiar with this' document? .
~
A .
'I believe .-I was - . .
a.t the time..
I would have to read
. , .... .. . .. . . . . . . ,'s ., . . ,, :.s .. . .
. . ^ . &. .
it again. ,,
- : ; '. :. v /. :.5 . .. ,. .
. n.
~
Lot me--you may r'end th'c whole document, of course, Q . .
of you uish, but let me call your attention specifically
. ,.Q ' ' -
e to page 3 and really page 4 where it states two company
. attorneys were assigned to the search on a full-time basis
.' .w hile another senior attorney and other non-legal personnel
-* A.- -
.l,, .
also contributed significantly in time and effort. Have -
.s
.,e,
. ..g., s : . .. ...;. .o.~
\
~I read that correctly? - l. . .
,'f .
..< .: e . . .. . e. -
, ~,
A *I* believe so. .
Q -
-Q .. And also on page 5 where it states that another
.. r - -
company attorney was committed to work full-time on,the ,, .. ; l
- - .,. .. .. . . s.
,. . . .. : : y .
s *
.e ', s , ;*
- s, .
,e.y ,
,, {
n s. * * * . -
.,'s... .-
.. . . i .- . ,
. .a.- u 4
..N
. . c. . . .y .,..
- .
- '" ~
..l
, . - s. . 2 5' a .*~.
, ,. ;. .;, .. . .g.t
. ~
n.;.y :.;.u.
.u . . .... . .o -
- , t, . .
. . . . . -..; . . . . . . %..,..w.
~
. s affidavit, what ..
files ha'd been searched as of ,the ^da.t.e' of
. .,. .. ...,,. . . . . ..,.,.7 . .. .
the document. .
The non-legal personnpl as well as the ' 7,;.
m ,
- . ~ ,
. ; n- . i:.m .
J *
.( attorneys would.have participated in. searching,the, files c -
- . p ,- .. . ,o . .
, , - y
.;:. . .'"-~;,. .-
- * . . . . , , . :.r *. < Y. - -
. J11sted as having been completed.at that time, and I cannot,.. .-
~: , ..- ?;. .. , ;. y_. . - - L., -
- , . -..tell .
you now which .
of ,.., -
those' files was .
scarched'by which .
. . ... .. .. .. s
" individuals except I believe. .the . . . .
officers'. files ,o . . .
to have ..
,o -
.u - .c..
.. 4.,
been scarched by attorneys only.
h ' N - 1.i
. . .- c,'[ . . ;;, '
BY,.MR. JABLON: . 5..t.;.$..y'"%.*Aj',~
- > f / r .
- > .. . . ? '.
- 'A . _ -
. .s ' ..
.'.',l .
!Q -And"'were the no'n-l.egal employees and %he legal
" employees working on a company, equal basis in terms of ,
. .. ... . . : n . ., ., . .. ,
.r. function? ..- 1<; - *
. . .;. ; ~ . .,' . i
.. . t
. s,. . .
s .
A
} .
Can you clarify that?
y d
10 What were the position's,of the non-legal employees
, , in the company? '
~"
. ;. ' ~ '
A.
, And I take it the non-legal employees you are s' -
referring to are the three that are mentioned on page 5 ,
that assisted the attorneys on a full-time basis?
i Q That is correct.
- - l'
< . )
A As I recall, they were from two different depart-1 ments. One was from the rate department and I believe the
) .
other two were from the generation and transmission area.
l
'O And would they have had a college educatio:. l
~
s .. .
i, A I believe so, although I am not sure of one of '
, .. s . .,. .
3 a,
- r. ..~ ~..
'~; <
. - . ~ . . . .
- T *
- , ,.7- . 1,; ,- w- - ' - . , - ,- - - , - - - - ' - ' -
,. .f,. :.
- .,' . , i.
,,'.,"?:l.'..,,i ,, /
1 .. *
.., . . . ' 26"?
- h'
.h c'
.,; ; ; > .. x:. <.: x.. :v-
.. .,s.:
..,...~.. .
.- m. .
the two from the gen'eration
, r and transmission area. -
.. - a. :. .
- ' But in ariy event u they'would have been of what
.Q
. +
. y e..z ;- ,
Q you consider pr,ofe'ssio,nal. stature, is that correct? ,
n..u . . -
. 'A I am~not sure what you.mean by profen ional y . .
.e
'"s .
4..' -
. . .' .. . a.
\ ". atature? *
.'.\' 4.
j.r ,.~.' .. f f .:. ' %s i . .
.. . , .. <. . ' .: m....
~
. f . _in .;~ .~. .
- c. .Q ..
Well,, .. what ,would their'r.ank be in the company?
. . . . . .. . v.. . .
x
\ A' . : I', don ',t ..r. ecall t.h..eir titles . -
- L..
.. 3. .
.. .. : . . = l. .? r :;.
' s . . ,
- Q - Now, when, you answ.ered that there were two or three attorneys working on the' general files, two or three persons,
_-*- g .
. were you referring to these three attorneys referred to in the sentence,"To deal with this situation another attorney O was committed to work full-time on.the project December'4,
.' . 1972, and all three attorneys were ordered to work overtime."? '
, 'A' As I indicated before, I am not sure exactly who did search the general . files, although I believe I said s
it may have been two or three different persons and they were probably those attorneys. . .
..Q' . Incidentally, would you have been any one of these )
..~. . . . . . -
. persons listed?' .
'A As working full-time? -
O Yes. - '
Q A. On this search, no, I was not one of the file
~~. . . .
I l
searchers. ^
.- 't -
? - . i .:
, ,.~ -
l
.,',, '. ' - - . : a .
.s..
+ -
w ,
( -. , . .
. ...f
. .\ . ),, .
Y___
.' j'- .
s,.
- . q
.C. . . . . 2y . .
< . .. . . . a ,
- .. . j
,~. . :,
.- ~~.,
f...
i Wotil.ti you have been the senior attornov referred Q
.to on page 4 in the clause, "...while another senior a'ttorney g ..
W ,
.and other non-legal personnel also contributed significantly
- .- .. .h,. ..,..'..,
in time and effort..."? -
,.3 .' - ' , *. , . ,..s
'.i-. = * , . . . '
. * - . ' . . A' 'I'believe so. .' '
,e . . ., . .
,- 0-- How, in t he search of .the general files , did the search proceed file by file? ,
Let me withdraw that question.
When you proceeded to search the central files--
- e -
., - , .~ - .. .
A .I did not search the central files or the general
.- a ..
. .:~ . . . .
.' files. ' )' '
J . ..
~
3 -
~
O 'When Consumers Power proceeded to search the general files, they had a list of document requests, is that ,,
,s. .
. correct, the joint request? ,
F
~ . ' '
.A I believe so. ,
. O Now, did they go down question by question and go to certain files first by sub-matter or did they go
'through the files one by one attempting to sco if any of '
. .the documents ract any. of the questions or did they use some
.other method of' organization? ,
A I' believe it was the second method that you mentioned.
, -- .c . ', .3 O
, - t- - . .
. , O .In other words, they generally read through each document, is'that correct? .
o
- s
,(
a . ,
/
s
__ e
. . . , , , ~
l .
z .
< , ' A...
. ::.28 ,
.s
. t.:, i . - ..,.
..s .
. . s .. .
w~ .. ' -['. ,
' Y ' .
, , .q. : ~.[ . .. ..l* :.}
,; {. _. ' . -
- A That is not.wh'at I said. . -a '"4 -
t :.. .L .. : .....
Q 'I am sorry. Would ,you please explain how they
- ..m. . .
. - .... . :s . ... -
3~
. n... ... .. .
proccoded? .
.. . bJ. . '. :':9.~*. - h.
.~ .
~ q. .
..+ .
.s. :.;.
.- .s.
~. ,
A' I boliove thc6*to havo searched it filo by filo and 4, .
j , 7 , .l"~ L,.
, ' . .,4 L , ,c ;. -
\ ' , . , ,.
..: they would have pulled'documentis. they belicved to be responsive
\. .
" .! .. .- e ~ .:. . . ,, , ..fi
' ' , . . . ,-J ?
y ,.
s
. s. , to. any. .of the reques ts >. ., . . , . ' . .y .-
- .4
,. . : ,. . , ..'. . < ., . , y j f -
- f. , ,.. . - . . <
Q ,
So in other words they went,from drawer to drawer
,,.. t. ' * % ' , -. .; _, : . . . , - - s
')' essentially or shcif to shelf or however it'is kept?
. a.
A
- m. . f ., . .. *-
I belicyc so. .=. l. .
. ' ':o' n; '. . - -
. c .
. . . .. . 2 .
.- . .. . . . ~ . .
, c..., ,. -
y.. r. -
'O
, .-Do you ,know? .s., . . Y * .' . s n,- .. ,, .
, , .i . ,, .- ., y : .-
. . . .. . 'e. '..
.A*. . No, I was not there. *
~
O . 0 .. 'Was it discussed?~ .
s ^
,. . ,. ~ ,
-8.
, ,7, A It may have been. I can't recall a' specific conversation. ..
~
?
.O
. Did eithe'r you or anybody else give instructions
.. , s on how it was to proceed? .
- c, 7 A 'I don't recall whether the procedure was covered .
in the letter from Washington counsel that I mentioned -
earlier. It may have been. It may also have been decided on in informal discussions. . .
.Q" Why'didn't you simply go to certain sub-categories?
O hn. WATSON: .~.
...ho W is the "you" you are referring to? ' ' $
. . s- v,
- u. t. .
. **~' .
. . .d* .
6 I "
.e?
, g
- a< -
, , t.... . . ,4 .
- ,. . ey .
, , , s. ,*. .. .
, ;. , -', ' ?e -
- s. *
, ---wy ,
,, g -
ye
- i c..~ .
l30
. :h - ,
-f,.,,. ,, . .
rr . -'
.3 ,.-
- .'y . e
' - .- L:. , . . . . . . .,- ,~
- n. :.
.i.- . . .
...y. '.:.,_. . .
For' instance, our effort'atthe occasions when we did. ; . .. . .
'. outset of 'the. search was to ...
produce documents responsive - ;
- . .;,. - c .. '
)
'to the asterisk items in'the' request.'-- E' 2.
. - 'ce :
~
<- . .s ' DY MR. JADLON':
'Does that 'complet'e 'your Statement or answer?
. ~
m 5 '. ' -Q ..
7
. . m.. , . . -
'A' -
'I There could also N,have be'en dther instances .. -
where -
2 J ,,.,.y ,, ,
i
-we' were looking for docume'nts
. .v.
relating to a particular
. r, . %.c , . J.-.mt
.t ,
%, s' ~ - : +-~ ~ - ..
. question. ..... .
- ~
a ... .. . .. ,.. .
. ~*f . - , .. e ..4- . ,
Would you say
'I would likc~to clarify.your role.
. ?? .
7 V': O t
,. . .ji, - ; a ..:
5..< c ,._
'.' that you were in charge of the scarch?
s . . , .
. s .
'cz. . e . _
.lIn the way I have described, it was a general q, ,
'A . .. . _. .
?
l
- c
. supervision. I was not in charge of the physical searching
. ., ~
1 - -
',. of an area that I would be there when the.- search was made. .
,, , c ..
.But if there was one person in t ehcompany who Q' -
l
,Y
' .had general responsibility for it, would that be yourself? F
.*. m And'if not, who would it be? . .
. s ,
' MR WATSON: I am going to object'to the second
'part of the question but I will permit the witness to answer the first part of the question.
.THE WITNESS:
Yes, in the sense of seeing that l
'the efforts of the personnel concerned were coordinated . .
- and seeing that the search went forward in a time)y fashion.
O
'.'BY MR. JABLON: -
. l
'.Q
Did anybody clos ly supervise c ,%
your efforts?
. A Well, I would report directly'to'the General Counsel
. f ,. t
,.,, - . , 1.-
.- \
. . 2 . . .
.a
'*,, ,! 's'
., r **.*'. .. .
,.ww ~
_ u - - _ _ - . _ I.
+. s, .
. . ..- a,- : , :.
0 31 .
,, .. . , .. : . ..- ..,,/,,, . - . -- ,s
. .. . . v.
~ . .
, ;, - . . u c.,m . . %y.
Q That is Mr. Graphies? . :, ;- -
s
. , ~ . ' '- .. l 1
j , '; - -
, ,. -, . ., . . , '. , -. ,3 ,
. + U. - , r t .t.. I
'.A .That in Mr. Graphics? -
,. i.., ^ .. - .. .
g . .
.c.
,,;,.'..'., . . Q .' ' . (* m ., .. .
v And you do'so anyway? ' <
Q 1,*, . ,. '.. ' '~ ' ' " ;..- J .'#
.e; '
ty , *
. ,s '*.,,,
A ' ' -' ' '
.Ycs. . , .
. ..YY. ' .1 ...
~ .- - "
rg -(..,
. . n. . r.,.
. ~
Would you report to him on a ' periodic basis with
- .A
. Q.
regard to this file search? .~~~.'
\- .
~
?
. . . .; w.s - -
s
., . .,7..y: y ..
- Not necessarily on a periodic ~.basis in the sense ,,,
. , 'A, .-
.n
- ..~.
. .o -
that there was a regular interval of time.
?, :
, 7%,. -
y,,
- f. _ i
',$,: Q . '
,;, ' *But frequently? [, ,'. S;
^
N' . . .
-. ., .- , a- - . w.
, . . .~
.yes, . , . .r. '..,~:
1
,,s . , .;...
A ;
,/ es -
1: ,, r, About how often?
. Q-
~
.J. . .
. ~
Q ,
~A I can't recall., I believe it to have varied with '
, - < . ......;,~, - .
~~ '
the time. '
. ~
~' ' -
. . ~.. -
O Okay. Now, there wcro a number of people reading
- )g .
the documents from the general files. They had these an,-,
.y ,
notations, is that correct? In going throug the documents
~
.they had the annotations to guide them?
c A I believe so. " . rc b. -
Q And these were prepared by an attorney or at .
least checked or assempled. ,by an attorney, is that correct? .
a, .
A 'Yes.
g.
e , ..
Q When a person went to a file, did he read cach . .
- el . .
G
~ . .: .
w p.. .
- g .
s
}
mg 4.
.a
'_.__'__W;_ _"W_ - V3 m y ma Y
- i i
, - -. . - - +* . , r.
s a. ,.. . .s. , r* ,.. s .a 1
..? . ....
. . v. ; , ' . ..,$'*'.*- .=6,- -
3,.
.. ... . t '.i - / . 3. 4- . '. ,. ..
.. . , *:& . 4
- 3 .
.,>g, . . . .
..,f.,...' , . . p.. , . . . . .q. , ; -
l a
, .- y ,. ,5.... , , . .
i
, ..f., - . .
document? ..
- ....*- . F ., ) .
s - . ..
.,a.
s .s. .. -< i. a ..,. .x.- . .
N.-- ' '
.. A -- .... .I can't say. -
~
s..,.. .
.2.... ...v~. .\ ,. . .. .
.# - ,, , e. . 2.
'O
.If a person thought a docume.nt might . .. . > ... ; , . ;, .
be relevant,
. e < :. .s , m ,,
- ,7 . ..
did he read that document?
.\
.N C ' j,. 1L- . .
. l. .
\* :>,
, > . .q-
~~
- ;f '
-?* ', s. - ., ',
- *>.].}e". --
. T.' f ; . .
\. - -
EA. .~ I assume'so, but.as?I.have.s' aid, I',was not
, . .> . . .; ; .- ; ,. .x. .;.....,
\
.i. ,.-
' t'$,;
physically present.
. ;p
~~
. 'e. :
,...u, M -.
,, u
.; j s4 ;-
. %s. o :.. -
, .. , ~
\ .Q .
.,-..:,Now,.,.w, . - - ...hat . . , . would have been- .done with the document
~ _.. . ,
- u s s. _. , . .
< i i, . ' . . C .
. .1
..: . . . ..which was thought to be relevant? .
g ,
w r- .-
m
'.It would.have b6cn pulled from the' file.
'.,/.< -
. . . .: A
~- . .. ,
. .: . - . . y . . :- ..
. e
. ,' ; ;Q ' And. then'whati . happened, r..to it? . .
2 .
.: ;~
.A- Well, when a-snumber of'them had been gathered g
O <*"7"'"** "
""""*"S' " """ ' " "*"**"- .
p -
, Q~ ,.So the documents were assembled in Jackson and
, sent directly .to Washington counsel? , . .
~Ai* .I believe so. s O And there was no additional review in Jackson?
'A Beyond the file scarcher's review? , .
Boyond'the' file searcher's review.
Q i.
A I believe that is so.
m .
O Was there any occasion where it was called to your i attention or ~
somebody elses attention to your knowledge . .
'that there was question whether to send a particular document or. documents? - -
,,-. - .1
,. - , m.
t ._
- t. . . . . -
. . . ~, . .. ~. ,.--
,~ ,
, . , 3 4*' ,
../ -
, . . . ~ . . .
.u. , .
(- ,
8,
.33 '
,~- ., ..
' MR. WATSON:
Excuse me. I am a little confused
,, . . = :.
t b'y the question, counsel. .Perhaps we can clear it up. ,
.: < ~;
.1You mean af ter they had been extracted by a file searchcr?
~
. MR. JABLON : That is correct.
~
.~ . . , . . ..
~~
4 .;- _
..- . g ._ . '.-
TIIE WITNESS : Would you read the question back?
g, , qc_ ~
\ ,' '. (The question was read back.)
), . . , , . ,
.~
f THE. WITNESS:
d - :
I can't recall an' instance of that.
,._