ML19329B064
| ML19329B064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/21/1978 |
| From: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Roe L TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001300663 | |
| Download: ML19329B064 (3) | |
Text
,-
~,
Distribution NRC POR RPDenise Local PDR D
c(3)
M o i R Docket File r LWR #1 File WHaass RSBoyd PMatthews RCDeYoung VLeung DBVassallo GVissing Docket No. 50-346 FJWilliams RReid JFStolz FAllenspach LEngle TBAbernathy EHylton JRBuchanan Toledo Edison Company RJMattson ACRS(16)
ATTH: Mr. Lowell E. Roe
((ght s
Vice President Facilities elopt RTedesco Edison Plaza DMuHer j
3C0 Madist.o Avenue o$er Toledo, Ohio 43652 MLErnst Ge d e
SUBJECT:
FIRE PROTECTION REVIEW, PERSCHNEL AliD QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (Davis-Besse Unit No. 1) i We have evaluated Sections A-1 (Personnel) and C (Quality Assurance Program) of Table 4-1 cf the Fire Hazard Analysis Report, Revision 1 for the Davis-Besse Huclear Power Station, Unit No.1. Our requests fo'r additional information required to complete our review of these matters is provided in the Enclosure to this letter.
We request that your response be submitted by September 23, 1978 in order that our review of those matters may be completed in time to interfacewiththeissuance(December 31,1978) of our Safety Evaluation Report regarding the Fire Hazard Analysis Report, Revision 1 to Davis-Besse, Unit No.1.
Please call us if you have any questions regarding these matters.
Sincerely, ortsnat sig::ed trl John F. stolz John F. Stolz, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch No.1 Division of Project Management
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information 7a ecs: See page 2
. O 6,,,e.
- DP DPM:LW8 #1 LEYe:aN JFStolM 8/31/78 88[/78 un*
unc roax 3i.
i,.7.> uncx.24.
- o..................,,....
8001300 g
. x.
Toledo Edison Company.
ces: ifr. Donald H. Hauser, Esq.
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P. O. Box S000 Cleveland Ohio 44101 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, H. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Leslie Henry, Esq.
Fuller, Seney. Henry and Hodge 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43604 I
\\
t catc h
/
sac roax n e <, 7.> umor o2.o_ _ _ _,, ilr
.........,....,,...,s.... _.... _
I l
o ENCLOSURE EQUES_T FOR ADDITIO!!AL IllFORMAT10tl DAVIS BESSE fiUCLEAR POWER STAT 10fi, Utili tiO. I 1.
The Quality Assurance (QA) program for fire protection should be under the management control of the QA organization.
This control consists of (1) formulating or verifying that a fire protection QA program incorporates suitable requirements and is acceptable to management responsible for fire protection and (2) verifying the effectiveness of the QA program for fire protection through review, surveillance, and audit. Revise your submittal contained in Revision I to the Fire Hazard Analysis Report for the Davis, Besse Station to clarify that the QA program for fire protection is under the management control of QA, or provide an alternative position for the staf f's evaluation.
2.
Mr. Vassallo's letter of August 29, 1977 on fire protection provides supplemental guidance on QA. Modify your submittal contained in Revision I to the Fire Hazard Analysis Report for the Davis Besse Station to be responsive to the latest supplemental guidance on QA for fire protection or provide an alternative for the staff's evaluation. We note that if the fire protection QA program criteria are met as part of the QA program (Chapter 17 of FSAR) which meets Appendix 0 to 10 CFR 50, it is not necessary to submit a detailed description for NRC review.
3.
Your description in Section A, Table 4-1, of your submittal relative to your compliance with the " Guidelines" in Appendix A to BTP 9.5-1 does not provide adequate information on your fire protection organi-zation for us to complete our review.
Therefore, please provide the following information:
a.
Describe the upper level offsite management position (s) that has the overall responsibility and the direct responsibility for the formulation, implementation, and assessment of the effectiveness of the fire protection program.
b.
Describe the onsite management position that has overall responsibility for the fire protection program.
c.
Describe the reporting chain for the Fire Marshal.
d.
Describe the responsibility of your "shif t" Fire Captain relative to that of the shif t Foreman for activities that might affect safety-related equipment, systems, or components.
.,