ML19329B062
| ML19329B062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1975 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329B060 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001300660 | |
| Download: ML19329B062 (3) | |
Text
.
(~)
v.
APPEXDIX A AUG 1 1975 P
Toledo Edison Conpany Docket No. 50-346 A312h Mr. J. P. Willianson, President License No. CPPR-60 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652 NOTICE 07 VIOLATION Centlecon:
Based on the results of an URC inspection, conducted on May 19-22, 1975, it appearn that certain of your activitics were not conducted in full coupliance with NRC regulations as indicated below. Thecc items are considered to bo infractions.
1.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, " Design Control", states, in part, that " Measures shall be established to assuro that applicabic reculatory require =ents and the design hcsic, as defined in Section 30.2 and as specified in the license application.
are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions." Paragraph 8.1.5 of the FSAR sets forth the design basis for the electrical systens and references several design documents which are to be implemented. Section 8.3 of the FSAR describes the on-site power system which is designed to meet ap elfied r.quirewants.
Contrary to this requirement, the applicablo requirements and the design bases relating to cable separation and seienic support of electrical conduit have not been translated into specifications, procedures or instructions.
2.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, " Instructions, Procedurco and Drawinga", states, in part, "Activitics affecting quality shall be prescribed by docu=cnted instructions, proceduras, or
. drawings,... and shall be acco:plished in accordance with these instructions, precedures, or drawings."
Contrary to this require:ent, certain activities affceting quality relative to cable raceways have not been accomplished according to prescribed procedures. Exa:ples include the following:
A.
Cable trays contained debris, including rags, pieces of conduit-and unistrut material contrary to the i= ole =enting procedure, "ischbach and >% ore Procedura IIP-7749-E14-7c.001, paragraph 3.2(2), which requires inspection "to assure that specified raceway is cican without protrusionc, abrasives, or sharp edges which could damage the cable."
S 8001300 O
'e
- AUG 11975 D.
Sharp edger vere apparent at cost wireway installations observed, and cable: and conductors vere noted to havu insulation damage contrary to the impicmenting procedure, Fischbach cnd Moore Procedure IIP-7749-F.14-7a.001, paragraph 3.2(7), which requires that " Sharp edges and burrs which could affect cablin3 being pulled into the raceways shall be removed."
3.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 3, criterion XIV, "Inopection, Tect and Operating Ststus", states, in part, that "Measurea shall be established to indicate by the use of markings cuch as stanpa, tago, labels, routing cards or other suitabic ecans, the status of inspectionn and tests performed upon individual items of the nucJear power plant These measures shall provido for the identification of items which have satinfactorily passed required inspections and tests,
." The plan for implenenting this critarion is cet forth in Parsgraph 17.1.2.14 of the PSAR.
Contrary to this requirement, routings for cables numbered 2C3F11 SOC, 2CVDH13.iI, and 4cYA05A which were marked as having been catisfactorily inspected were determined by our inspectors to be routed differently than indicated on the routing cards, and in one instance, different than the easter circeit schedule for cables.
- 59. Appendix B, Criterten XVI, " Corrective Activn",
4.
10 CrR Part
- states, in part, thst ':'casures chall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality cuch as failures, talfunctiona, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipeent, and nonconformances are promptly corrected." The plan for i=ple:enting this criterion is set forth in Paragraph 17.1.1.16 of the ESAR and quality assuranco manuals referenced in that paragraph.
Contrary to this requirement, a review of the Fischbach and Moore nonconfor:anco report log showed that 26 noncenformance items remain unresolved.13 of which relate directly to dnficient ite=s identified during this inspection. Of the 26 unrosc1ved items, one was outstanding for 10 nonths, one for 7 months, and nino others greater than 3 months. Three of the other items in the icg, itens S1, 37 and 91 were dispositioned by indicating that the itets could be used as is, without any rationale or indication of corrective action taken.
4 ed w
-3_
AUG 1 1975 This notice is sent to yoa pursuant to the provisionn of Sectico 2.201 of the.NRC rules of practice, Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations..Section 2.201 requires you to sub. nit to this office within twenty (20) days of your roccipt of this notice a written state =ent or explanation in reply including,1) corrective actions which have been taken by you and the results achieved, 2) corrective actions which will bc taken to avoid further noncompliance, and 3) the date when full compiinnce vill b'e achieved.
FOR THE NUCLF.4R REC'JL\\ TORY CO;2ilSSICN Disinal Sisaed or 1 a savts s
John G. Davis, Deputy Director for Field Operations Office of Incpcetion and Enforeccent Y
'\\
i 1
e 9
e e
=
9 9
e+
E e
e e8
- -. -