ML19329B059
| ML19329B059 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1975 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Williamson J TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329B060 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001300658 | |
| Download: ML19329B059 (2) | |
Text
.
-t e
AUG J 1973 Toledo Edison Company Dochet No. 50-346 ATTN:
Mr. J. P. Willianson, President License No. CPPR-80 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652 Centle::r
- This letter refers to the inspection conducted by our Pagion III (Chicago) Office on May 19-22, 1975, at your Davis-Besse Unit i k
facility of activities authorized by NRC License No. CPPR-80.
It also refers to the discussions held with you and Mr. L. E. Roe,
{
Vice President of Toledo Edison Conpany by Messrs. J. G. Ecppler b
and D. M. Hunnicutt on June 12, 1975.
[
On May 27, 23, and 29, 1975, senior representativen of the Region III i
Office discussed with Mr. Roe by telephone the quality assuranec/
quality control problems identified by our inspection in connection with safety related electrical work at Davis-Basse.
At that tine, Toledo Edison Ce pany agreed to establish and innlenent a progran i
to assure the av uncy of all site installed safety related viring, cables and recew, s.
Cn May 30,1975, Mr. J. G. Keppler. Direct:ar of Region Ill, insitad m I-c.a* -te.'.ctica Latter la which the specific cor:::aiteents reado by Toledo I'dison vere delineated.
s The inspection on May 19-22 consisted of selective eruinations of procedures and representative records, intervieJs with personnel, and observations by the inspectors. A copy of the inspection report was miled to Toledo Edison Company by Region III on July 2,1975.
Based on the results.of the inspection, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full conpliance with MRC requirenents.
These matters, which vare discussed with you and Mr. Roe at the June 12, 1975 meeting are identified in tite enclosed Notice of Violation.
.'.s you were inforced during the teeting, the findings froa the inspection raise questions regardin:; the quality of construction.
The problens found, if not detected and corrected, could adversely affect the health and safety of the public.
.D 8001300(5 7
T;
^
' Toledo Edison Company
~~2-AUG 1 1975 Appendix 3 of 10 CyR Part 50 sets forth the quality assurance criteria and requires, among other things, that an applicant shall regularly revica the cratus and adequacy of tha quality assurance program.
Of particular concern is that the itets of noncocpliance cet forth in Appendix A,. when viewed collectively, indicate a breakdown in management and procedural controls with respect to taintenance of an effcetive quality assurance program. Consequently, in your reply to this letter, you should dancribe those actions taken or planned to improve the effectivencas of your managccent control system to assure that quality accurance activities affceting safety are properly implemented and caintained.
As you are aware from the " Criteria for Determining Enforcenent Action," which was provided to you by latter dated December 31, 1974, the enforcecent actions availabic to the Co= mission in the exercise of its regulatory responsibilities include adcinistrative actions in the form of written notices of violation, civil conotary penaltics, and orders pertaining to tbc modification, suspension, or revccation of a license. After careful evaluaticn of the itens of noncocpliance identified in the enclosure to this lotter and of the cocaiteents for corrective actica rade by Toledo Edison Co=pany, ne have concluded that a Notice of Violation appears to be adequata at this time to achieve corrective action.
We plan to conduct additional followup inspectiona to determine the adequacy of corrective actions taken by Toledo Edison. Our findings and your reply to this letter vill deternine whether other enforcement action, such as civil penaltics or orders, are appropriate.
Sincerely, afsbi sr.:,,
E a pavis
-i John C. Davis, Deputy Director for Field Operations Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosure:
Notice of Violation cet L. 3. Roe, Vice-President w