ML19329A664
| ML19329A664 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 09/21/1972 |
| From: | Peltier I US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001090651 | |
| Download: ML19329A664 (1) | |
Text
^-
D b(,(h [
3 'dd-[
SEP 21371 NOTE TO FILES TELECON WITH BABC0CK & WILCOX (JMALLAY AND DSTEINKE) AND LICENSING (PELTIER, HOU AND 3RMDER) - BAW-10008, PART 2 2EVISION 1 SEPTESIBER 19, 1972 The conference call was set up to discuss areas in which the subject topical report was felt by MEB to be deficient wi-h regard to the Oconee application. The areas listed ' elow were discussed and B&W will call back with answers to the questions raised.
2 1.
Why was a 3 ft leak rate used for a 36" pipe break?
2.
Is the response spectra assumed for the vessel mounting conservative for the Oconee application?
3.
Does the response model for the fuel element which ignores nonlinear effects in the first stage of analysis but includes them in the second stage conservative?
4.
Is the ' assumption of one degree of freedom (one spring-one = ass) for the fuel element conservative in view of the nonlinear multi-mass-culti-spring arrangement?
'.).
N7 4 1 b.s' I i
I. A. Pettier, Project Manager Pressurized Water Reactors Branch No. 4 Directorate of Licensing l
cc:
R. C. DeYoung A. Schwencer j
D. Lange S. Hou H. Brammer I. Peltier
/
8001090
.