ML19329A560
| ML19329A560 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1972 |
| From: | Peltier I US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329A561 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001070558 | |
| Download: ML19329A560 (6) | |
Text
.
]'
Docket Nos. 50-26 M G3 0o9g
~
50-270 and 50-237 R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Director for Pressurized Water Reactors, Licensing TdRU:
A. Schwencer, Chief, Pressurized Water Reactors 3 ranch No. 4, L SITE VISIT TO DUKE POWER COMPANY OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - JULY 12 & 13, 1972 Enclosed is a' report of the site visit made to the Oconee Nuclear Station on July 12 and 13, 1972 for the purpose of discussing crew size and other review matters. Also enclosed are an agenda and attendance list and a copy of Van Nial's trip report to fgegjgrydgly 19, 1972.
In-ing.% Peltiet I. A. Pelt.ier, Project Manager Pressurized Water Reactors 3 ranch No. 4 Directorate of Licensing
Enclosures:
1.
Meeting Sumary 2.
Agenda 3.
Attendance List 4.
Van Niel's Report dtd 7/19/72 cc v/encis:
DISTRIBUTION R. S. 3oyd Docket (3)
D. Skovholt PWR-4 Reading D. 2nuth RP Reading R. Maccary R. Tedesco H. Denton PUR 3 ranch Chiefs R. W. ;;1ecker M. Rosen 20 (3)
- 1. A. Peltier (2)
V. II. Wilson- (2)
- t. Hildreth C.-R. Van Niel C. E. Murphy (20:11) omer >
.L ;.PWR,4,,,,
,,,,,.L.:.P,WR-b)
/
uo
'\\
so-c,
..IAPel,6..f..%,r,: emp, ASc.ye,ncer om, h/.li/72,,,.}7/,,).i /72
' Fons AEC-5144 Rev. 9-53) AICM 0240
- c. s. coverum PET 30 OFFICE : 1970 0 - 405+346 8001070 b T 8 g
ENCLOSURE I REPORT OF SITE VISIT TO OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION JULY 12 & 13, 1972 OPERATING LICENSE REVIEW Summary 1.
Crew Size:
Based upon the information received at this meeting and our internal guidance, Duke will be given a letter stating our position on the crew size for 2 and 3 unit operation.
2.
Licensing of Assistant Control Operator:
Duke was unwilling to commit a third licensed operator to the Oconee 1 startup until AEC committed to giving licensing exams, both oral and written in December 19'/2 and oral in January 1973. For the July 26, 1972 amendment to Ehe FSAR the tech specs would not be changed to include such a commitment on Duke's part but we would arrange with OR for the required exams to be given. By telephone call (subsequent to the meeting)'on July 14, 1972 Duke was requested to write a letter requesting the required exams. Pending resolution of this matter we will change the technical specification as the situation warrants to require the three licensed operators for Unit 1 startup.
3.
Units 2/3 Review of FSAR (Section 12):
Van Niel (OR) reviewed his concerns regarding Duke's response to the first round questions on Section 12 of the FSAR, " Conduct of Operations". The purpose of this review was to avoid second round questions. All matters j
are er will be satisfactorily resolved in the next amendment (July 26, 1972).
1 4.
Radioactive Effluents Tech Spec:
Close agreement was reached on the modification of the Oconee 1 tech specs to conform to proposed Appendix I requirements. A few technical items outstanding at the meeting were resolved by subsequent telecon on July 14, 1972 between Duke and Joe Graf of the Radiological Assessment Branch. Duke will summit the revised Radioactive Effluents tech spec in its July 26, 1972 amendment.
. 5.
Administrative Controls Tech Spec:
The redraf t of the Administrative Controls Tech opec presented by Duke was compared to ANS 3.2, Scfety Guides 16 and 21 and found to be acceptable. Duke will submit the revision with its July 26, 1972 i
amendment.
6.
Industrial Security Plan:
Van Niel toured the site to view areas of importance to the Industrial Security Plan. We confirmed our intent that this plan be in the record before Unit 1 is licensed and reviewed and approved by us prior to Unit 2 licensing. Duka will informally provide a draft for our preliminary review. Because of the late date some allowance for implementation of the plan will need to be mada at the time of licensing the Units 1 and 2.
7.
Schedules:
Duke plans to submit a Units 2/3 review (including references to topical reports) and a Unit 1 tech spec amendment on July 26, 1972. A further
)
amendment providing replacement pages in the tech specs for Units 1 and 2 operation and Units 1, 2 and 3 operation will be submitted prior to the end of August. Our goal is to approve Unit 1 Tech Specs by August 30, 1972 and Unita 2/3 Tech Specs by October 30, 1972.
~
ENCLOSURE II AGENDA JULY 12 & 13, 1972 OPERATING SITE VISIT TO OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION LICENSE REVIEW July.12, 1972 MEETING 1.
Crew Size a.
Control Room Design and Layout Philosophy O. S. Bradham b.
Tour of Control Room M. D. McIntosh, G. W. Cage and O. S. Bradham c.
Demonstration of Loss of Control Room Emergency Procedure M. D. McIntosh 2.
Licensing of Assistant Control Operation for Unit 2 July 13, 1972 MEETING 3.
Units 2/3 Review of PSAR Section 12 4.
Radioactive Effluents Tech Spec 5.
Administrative Controls Tech Spec 6.
Industria'. Security Pla-7.
Schedules 1
ENCLOSURE III ATTENDANCE LIST SITE VISIT TO OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION JULY 12 & 13, 1972 OPERATING LICENSE REVIEW July 12, 1972 Duke Power Company R. James Ansell M. D. McIntosh (Station)
O. S. Bradham (Station)
T. E. Holland G. W. Cage (Station)
P. H. Barton S. E. Nabow J. Ed. Smith (Station)
J. W. Hampton (Station)
K. S. Canady AEC/ Licensing I. A. Peltier C. R. Van Niel July 13, 1972 The same people attended as listed above except L. Lewis of Duke attended and O. S. Bradham and T. E. Holland did not.
w w
e w
w-w-e
ENCLOSURE TU JUL 19 mg Docket 50-249 50-270 50-227 TO:
File TIEU:
D. Thomposa l
TRIP TO OCOISE WQ3AR, MTIN on Aly 12 and 13 I visit i the esense Emslaar Statian site to disemas with Duke Power Co. & Geense p.'at staffs a).
erow sine for one, tuo, and thras unit operatism b).
the 11eemains of Geomas staff c).
the administrative asatzels saetten of Tashmiest Spesifiaations d).
the Gesase Industrial Seserity Flas e).
several changes te Chapter 12 and 13 of the Feer for Units 2 & 3.
Fuel leading for 9mit 1 is aos seheduled for Jammery 13, 1973 and for Dmit 2 - March 1, 1973.
C3RW SIII I easted and save justifisaties for ABC's positian for the eres eine for 1, 2, and 3 unit operation. The muster presented weret A
W
- 1. 2. & 3 i
SRO 1
2 3
10 2
3 4
Utility 2
g 4e Total 3
7 3
- An additimaal utility operator uomid be necessary if the data legger uma inoperable.
v :;:: d, for 2-unit operassmag 2 30's, 2 30's, and 3 utility oper-Duka s
ators. The sessed 20 useld est be a member of management, and useld provide 30 relief. After soms operatias period Duke proposed that the number of utility operatore usuld be redueed face 3 to 1.
Buks umsted a commitment from ABC regarding this redesties. The problem une not resolved, and I said the ABC useld write Duha a letter esmeerming cree sise.
i LIG N ING QF OC053 MAFF Duha requested that the eeld oral emans he given twies, shoes a meath. apert, with written amams gives daring the first eral asas parted, shoot December 1.
J E 1 9 572 I
I premised to disease this with the sperator Lisenstag 3remeh amt 1st Buhs I
know as.bly 14. I emphasiand that atmos liesmeed aparamers win be needed en shift at east needing der eseh mit.
(em 7/14. ER agreed to give ths two oral amans and ambs une udstitad of this desistem).
i l
l taca spc8 - sammu.e I
A denft meetism 1.4. 6.2, and 4.4 ei the esemos 1 Seek. Spees (15) une l
l furnished to as der revise.
It appears that it util be W m a.
Several l
' preliminary geassises somassaias the draft uses anseemed satisfastertly.
A Unit 115 W un1 ne sehmitted.nsly 26. Am
- Aeremits 1, 2 and 3 15 should be la by the end of Aegnet.
. P, j
on pees 6.4-1, ambs agreed to add, as a geoep ed damamd witten precedures.
"persedte emot pseendoses." en pees 6.3-1, 3mbs aguend es ehemes part h j
to read. "Reesses of easite and effette aeriassumassai monsterias serveye",
and part j to read. "Basseds of mad & massive unees solanees and dispeaal."
0C01E5 IEWIRIAL.ECIMIILEM I seek the oppersmatty e n. at seemes, se tear the site and talk with Stan Mehme uhe is preparing the Industrial Seemrity Flam. % impreseien is that Behe will enkmit a Flas la gameral esadsommese with the draft 33 eriteria. A draft piam uns poemised d ahia 10 days.
CEAFIB 11 & 13 CE&EES FM W 3 1 1 1.
page 12-2 "The asperwisse du yeessany have primary resymmsthility for the units that ase in aparatic., with the Ase't shift Superviser samera11y having scopomethnity ist she emit ta the chesheet phase".
I stated that the shift eres for the operettag senseer shamad not l
asse s any duties for sheeheme. I an est sure if Behe agreed.
2.
peas 12-7.
I una assured that appespriate members of the shift eroe would seenige the assessary bastch petysias training.
3.
page 12-eb.
I une assured that asseemsets er lettere useld be reesived by Osames from these offsite organisettees that W11 he aalled spes to provide emergeney serviamo to the stattan.
(A es11 to W, Regian II as 7/14 asafissed that W uni series these desments).
4.
page 12-eh. Sehe sul redues the acties 1 meet at uhish the shift superMeer renommente edisism assies fres 23 BAN este body to a value esaparable as a la E m 1-131 thysoid does.
3.
page 12-11. Sehe agreed to shames the udstems meeting frequency of i
tbs ocac fuem 3 to 4 times per year (The atomos un1 he made in Teek Spose sessian 6.1.2.2.e.)
6.
page 13-4 and 13-7.
The pre-startay program (list of peu-assrtup l
JUL 19 372 j*
sheehm). and the pesar enestaties test peegram ase Ameseplees as I
presemaad. Sube esad that they ears working with e and unstd how an asemptable pengeon.
4 eall to 00, BesAsa II am 7/14 eenfismed this).
i i
pT i
,p,(c. R. Ten Ntal Operational Safety 3eamsk stresseeste ed Limemming I
i se
- 1. peltier i
i i
i e
}
f I
i i
I I
)
F f
l
?
I i
8 lt i
f l
t e
< l l
.