ML19329A198

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Des for Facility
ML19329A198
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/1972
From: Rogers L
SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF
To: Jason West
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 7912300229
Download: ML19329A198 (2)


Text

l i

't a

6

saaes E M N oar er oocuucur.

oira ssemco uma _.

Feb. 11 1972 Feb. M 1972 3

3

! condesa, s.s. 29:11 l

Jahm s. seet g

1 i ro:

oasca cc ora m

,i Mr. Easter Esgsrs 1

{

acnon necessaar O

coacuaaraca D

o^re *~sweaso:

i.

no cnon uccessaar O co==rar O

av:

CLA55 tF

POST QFFICE F s' E CODE;

..j r

t U

50-269 (ENTIES FILE)

, o. N o.

gj."'ygg* gage,,, ym

)

acrenaco to oara accmco av oars i Agencies comments on draft Envire J.G. Kappler 2-15-72 g

Statement for Oconee Station Unit If s w/2 cys for ACTIO:t

\\STEDUf1CWI A s File Cy ABC PDE 1

)

Compliance (2) i Paulus M. Fitzpatrick DeTomaz

w. DFM"

)

{ !,',,.

i O

J' Morris /Sc Mrr u

sci a er

,,d Earas 4,

2 12mmtar D1Nunes A' UU Kastner i

i u.s. Arouac ENzacy couwss' "

MAIL CONTROL FORM roauarcsus 1

9 U.S. GQ V E RNMEN r PRIN rt NG O F FIC E U 1971 424-462 IO W 7912300 M 7D

50 -pg c,

-w state of haitti Carolitta JOHN C. WEST O'rict or ruc Govcanon o ov e.n no m February 11, 1972 cotuwau asan

f. 's 1D cb

.?

u.e n:~l:5f:f,

-U C.)

L v;

'y

-l$.h m

.+

Mr. Lester Rogers, Director

/j~/

%4

, r,7p Division of Radiological and c,

l Il Environmental Protection

,A United States Atomic Energy Commissi'(Tif h',w.g Washington, D. C. 20545

/'li

Dear 1x. Rogers:

I have reviewed the comments made by Federal agencies on the draft Environmental Impact Statement of the Oconee Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1.

I was especially interested in the comments of the Corps of Engineers, the Department of Commerce, and the Environ-mental Protection Agency and am sure that these recommendations and requests for more comprehensive data itill be included in the final statement.

It is my desire to maintain a balanced economic growth for South Carolina and, at the same time, insure the quality of the environment. The final Environmental Impact Statement must be com-prehensive enough to allow for the complete evaluation of the environmental effects and, therefore, the establishment of the necessary monitoring procedures.

Sincerely, a

//

John C. West

/jf 785 e

V