ML19329A166

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 761213 Telcon W/Util Re 761204 & 09 Steam Generator Tube Leak Occurrences
ML19329A166
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/16/1976
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Shao L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7912300189
Download: ML19329A166 (2)


Text

!

06 DEC 161976 Il0TE T0:

D. G. Eisenhut, Assistant Director for Operational Technology p

FROM:

L. Shao, Chief, Engineering Branch. D0R m

SUBJECT:

OC0!iEE UNITS 1 & 2 STEAM GENERATOR, TUBE LEAK OCCURP,ENCES Pursuant to the items reported in the Weekly Highlight on the steam I

generator tube leakage incidents at Oconee Units 1 & 2, we have uade a conference call, on December 13, 1976, to Duke Power Company to r

obtain additional details on the occdrence. Participants in the con-versation are F. Alneter, B. Liaiand" Don Neighbors, of HRC and Dave Holt and Bill Haller of Duke Power. The Oconee Units are Babcock &

Wilcox designed plants. The steam generators are once through vertical l

design with tube sheets at too and bottom and approximately 16,000 Inconel 600 tubes.

i Details of the conversation and the discussion are sumariced as follows:

1.

Incidents - A 1.5 gpm leak was detected on 12/4/76 at Unit 1, and a 2.0 gpm was detected at Unit 2 on 12/9/76.

Both units were sub-sequently shutdown following each leak incident.

2.

Locations of Leaks - Both leaks were found at locations about 1/2 inch lie'157'tTe top tube sheet in the superheating region.

In Unit 2, the leak is in the center of the Il-E quadrant, while in Unit 1 it was r

i near the periphery ed B generator.

t 3.

Tyoe of Crack _s r y both fiber optics and ECT, the crack in the B i

generator of Unit 2 was found to be in circumferential direction.

The location of crack initiation; whether from ID or OD, has not been detemined. Two tubes are to be pulled and examined at the B&W i'

laboratory.

The type of crack associated with the leak in Unit I has not been l

deternined.

4.

,0perational Cycles - Oconee Unit 1 has gone through about 40 to 50

~

heatup and'shutEin cycles, while Unit 2 has about 25 cycles. The i

number of operational cycles riay be important in the attemtp to define i

a failure or crack initiation nechanism. The AB is about 60*F, and M is about 1350 psi from primary to secondary side of the tubing.

orracs >

sunseases k oats >

- Fone AEC.313 (Re-9 53) A A 0240 W u. s.oovannesswr resuvine orrecss seta.sas.see 7 912300 /N g

i

"~

1 o

F e,

- D. G. Eisenhut ;

5.

Conclusions - There are not enough data to substantiate any mechanism to inftTate the leakage. We s'pecifica11y asked them to find out the

~

location of possible crack initiations (ID or 00), the cicarance between tube and tube sheet Grid the operational history with respect to the secondary water chemi; 'ry.

i The licensee has indicated tinat they will report to us as soon as i

they complete the investigation with their NSSS.

L. C. Shao. Chief Engineering Branch Division of Operating Reactors cc:

V. Stello A. Schwencer J. D. Neighbors R. Stuart F. Almeter B. Liaw 1

i Distribution:

i Central Files EB Reading l

EB~ File No.

I i

i I

i I

i

.l i

j i

f Jh EB/D0R EB/D0R B/30R EB/DQRO,/

BLiaw:eti FA1 N R

. k

__t.Sh

.12/15/76 12//$^776 12/16/76 12////76 Form ABC 318 (Rev. 9 53) AECM 0240 W u. s. oovsnmessur rememo orrecs sera.sae.see m

,-