ML19327B764
| ML19327B764 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1989 |
| From: | Ronald Bellamy NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8911130115 | |
| Download: ML19327B764 (5) | |
Text
'
.m w
y'.
Y October 31, 1989 f
h Docket No.-50-244 Rochester Gas and' Electric Corporation ATTN:- Mr, Robert C. Mectedy General Manager Nuclear' Production ir 49 East Avenue E
Rochester, New York '14649
[.
Gentlemen:
(
SUBJECT:
10 CFR 50.54(p) SUBMITTAL - R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT H
This is in response to your letter of October 12, 1988, regarding changes'to the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Security Plan and Security Force Training and Qualification (T&Q) Plan.
We have reviewed.the information contained in'these plan revisions and have determined that portions of the revisions are consistent with the' provisions of 10 CFR.50.54(p).and are considered ecceptable.
However, certain other portions cf the. revisions'are not considered acceptable
.for.the reasons stated in the enclosure to this letter.
For those portions, you are to modify your plans accordingly or revert to previously-approved plan wording as discussed in the enclosure.
Corrected page revisions should be submitted to this office within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
The enclosures to your letter are being withheld from public disclosure since they contain Safeguards Information and must be protected in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21.
E. D. Sylvester (215-337-5308) is our contact should there be any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
/3 Ronald R. Bellamy, Chief Facilities Radiological Safety and Safeguards Branch t
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards 1
Enclosure:
As Stated Ac.ot p
cc:
See Next Page t
i 1
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY GINNA - SG REVIEW REPORT - 0001.0.0 i
8911130115 891031 PDR ADOCK 05000244 i
F pNu i
ru
]
p 3.f i
1 Enclosure I
f.
CHANGES NOT CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE Pace Section Comment
-1:4 and 1.3.1 The revision to the Security Plan deletes t-1:5 Security Plan the commitment that the psychological screening test be administered by a professional member of the Corporate Health Services Division staff. This is a decrease in the effectiveness of the Plan because the Plan no longer specifies who evaluates the tests.
NRC guidance-(Review Guideline No.
- 1) requires that the results of psycho-logical tests administered for the purpose of personnel screening for access authori-zation be evaluated by a qualified psycho-logist or psychiatrist.
3 1:5 1.3.1 The previous revision of the Security Plan Security Plan requires that all contractor personnel be l
screened for access authorization in accordance with Section 4.3 of. ANSI 18.17-1973.
The current revision also permits personnel reliability to be established by three years of trustworthy employment in lieu of meeting the i
requirements of Sections 4.3(1) and 4.3(2) s of ANSI 18.17-1973. This alternative is considered a decrease in the effectiveness of the screening program and is, therefore, p
not acceptable. Three years of trustworthy employment is not considered to be an acceptable substitute for the background investigation required by Section 4.3(1) and the psychological evaluation of Section 4.3(2) of ANSI 18.17-1973.
13:2 13.5, 13.6 Both the Security Plan and the T&Q Plan L
Security Plan revisions change the length of time that security records must be maintained at 41 T&Q Plan Ginna. The revised plans now require records to be maintained for three years, which in most cases represents an increase i
s in the retention period. The changes are not, however, in total agreement with the latest rule change relating to records retention published in the May 27, 1988 Federal Register Notice (53 FR 19240).
1
.g y~,
l!
~
n.,
~
3-
?
6;;~e ;'
t s<
s 11 4
+ ; ? 1, t 2
,j, 3
+
^
t
[,[
~
CHANGES NOT CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE
'. +
g>,
', Pace:
Section-Comment
.g b'
'Further, the records retention requirements-
.of neither the previous nor: current plans include al.1 categories of. records required:
.to be~ maintained by 10-CFR Part 70,; The-
'.g
. plans ~ should be further revised'to-be y;.1 consistent ~ with regulatory requirements.
ad-fi,
a s:
?
{
s' L
,~
If I. '
i
'k s,
i P
+
l n
- i.k,
)
>a
.}
b,t c j
s
gM w
t'. m'.;i t. ;l'-.S o.
(
L,:2, 5
', R Rochester Gas'and'
'2-9::%
Electric Corporationi 7
g,
't Y
~
i
.n CC
I f:: n:
Harry H. Voig't, Esquire-I P"
LeBoeuf,' Lamb', Leiby and MacRae' tr-
-1333 New Hampshire' Avenue.,N.W.
o Suite'1100'
.i Washington,-D.C. 20036 u<
s jf
'6 Resident Inspector e
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory. Commission
- i 1503' Lake Road' r
Ontario,xNew York 14519
...p
+
n
'Ms. Donna:Ross~
t '-
Division:of Policy Analysis & Planning
[.
.New York State Energy Office?
Agency Building 2 f'>
' Empire State Plaza ~
4 D
1
Albany,New.YorkL: 12223L 4
Mr.. Bruce A'. Snow, Superintendent ~~
y
~
Nuclear Production-
.Rochest'er Gas & Electric Corporation' l;
89-East Avenue.
Rochester, New York. 14649-0001 Charlie Donaldson,<Esq.
= Assistant Attorney General.
.New' York' Department of. Law
^
120' Broadway.
j 1
(:.
L ublic 'Docun:nt Room (PDR).
t P
- Local: Public Document Room (LPDR) i
. Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) i C
p.
1 r
(;
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY GINNA - SG REVIEW REPORT - 0003.0.0 0
i o
n.
-~
m.
.s
.\\
.;;o;,.. _
n 2,
.M' p'
- Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation v
p:
bec- (w/ encl):'
' Chief, NRR/RSGB' p[" '
[
Document Control Desk (Official Record Copy )!RTOS' Code RQD1'(w/o enc 1)
Region I-Docket Room, w/ concurrence Region ~I Licensing File, w/concurrenc(w/o enc 1)
F e,
((. '
Region I Safeguards Files w/ concurrence Region I Section Chief DRP-1A (w/o encl) r
[.
(,.
p.
e p..
L:
L i.
I s
p f:
i-L
[.
t L
e.
l-RI:DRSS' RI:
SS RI:DRSS Sylv er Ke i Bellamy 10/3t/89 10/Ji/89 10/3 //87 i
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY GINNA - SG REVIEW REPORT - 0004.0.0 l
e.
[
.