ML19327A163
| ML19327A163 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/01/1980 |
| From: | Bernard Grenier Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19327A156 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-B-2325, CON-FIN-B-2325-0 20-80-232, NUDOCS 8008010215 | |
| Download: ML19327A163 (6) | |
Text
- -
.p : ;.,. ;., > 7.,..,
- p..y,y.zc q:,q.y.; :q
- -. ~..g.-
., -..,..../..
e -p..,.e b
Q)
NRC s ee v 173 u s Noctt AR RtcutaroRv couusssioN ORDE R NUM6t R NE 20-80-232 m
DATE STANDARD ORDER FOR DOE WORK
.sq 7/1/80 ISSUE D TO LOOE Oft.cel ISSUE D 0 C INRC Of f.cel ACCOUNTING CITATION Division of Systems Integratior 3)X02[0.'b
^*"" ""
"'a; Richland Operations Office Office of Nuclear Reactor 8'"""""
DRnnb M en
~
PE RFORMING ORG ANIZ ATION AND LOCATION Pacific Northwest Laboratory 82325 - O Richland, Washington WOR K PERtOO THIS ORDER i
FIN TITLE fixed [1 ESTIM ATED 00 1
State-of-the-Art Review and Evaluation of Systems Interaction F ROM.
TO Methods 7/1/80 11/10/80
' 5 OBLIGATION AVAILABILITY PROVIDED BY:
A T"'s oaotR 5 40,000*
- s IOT AL OF CRO(R$ PL ACED PRsOH 10 THis OAlt WITH THE PERFORMING O 1GANIZATION UN C L H T H E S A ?.'l APPROPRI ATION SYMBOL" ANO THE FIRST F OUR OiGITS OF THE S
2,54,^^^
vuu
-.7 6 A4 NUYSE H CITE D ABOvt
- I C TOT AL ORDERS TO DATE ITOT AL A & B' S 2,583,000 O AMCuNT INCLUDEO IN "C" APPLIC ABLE TO THE ' FIN NUMBE R" CITED IN TH S ORDER S
40,000 FiNAr.CIAL FLExiBILtTv 3 evNOS neLL NOT BE REPROGRAMMED SETWEEN FINS. LINE D CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS AUTHORi2ED C FUNOS MAY BE REPROGRAMMED NOT TO EXCEED : 10.0F FIN LEVEL UP TO $50K. LINE C CONSTITUTES A LIMITATIC 1 ON OBLIGATIONS AUTHOR ZED
- * (~
- STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROVIDEO DOE ARE CONSIDERED PART OF THIS ORDER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1 ATTACHYENTS THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE HERE8Y SECURITY M ADE A PART OF THIS ORDER
$ WORK ON THIS ORDER IS NOT CLASS!FIEO.
{3 STATEMENT OF WORK C WORK ON THIS ORDER INVOLVES CLASSIFIED
- [ ADDITION AL TERMS AND CONDITIONS INFO A M ATION NRC FORM 187 IS ATTACHE 0.
C OTHER
,,,'ef.
R( *.* A R K S Af ter signature, please send to the NRC Office of the Controller, ATTN:
D. Dandois and provide a copy of this order to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, ATTN:
P. Triplett, NRR, P-428.
- This project is to be incrementally funded in FY 1980 af ter receipt of an acceptable proposal.
- }'
/
m
\\) f IssUINS AtlTHORITY ACCEPTING ORG ANIZATION
"teW5A Ll' Gregl.h 7[z/rc
Technical Assistance Program Manage #
r NRC F aHv in it is,
O s
PROPOSAL C0!! TENT
~The mininum items required in all proposals are:
1.
Perforcing organization's name and locatien.
2.
FIN Title, FIN Number, and B&R Number (NRC's) (as on statement of work)'.
3.
Perfon.ing organization's key personnel, program manager, or principal investigator, their r sumes and FJS phone number.
4.
Background (definition cf the problem including the objective (s) to be attained).
5.
Work to be perforced (Provide a concise description of tasks to be performed and expected results for the period of performance.
Note technical data requirements, potential problems, and other technical information needed to fully explain the effort.
Highlight changes from prior authorized SCW's, if any, identify thanges in performance, schedule, or costs).
6.
Identify major subcontracts, including consultants.
7.
Costs estir.ated to be incurred by DOE contractors, subcontractors, and ccnsul tants.
l.,i,s,t_byfi_s_c,alge,ar ta comp 1,e t_ ion,:
a.
Manyears of Technical Support (MTS) b.
Costs:
(1)
Direct Salaries (Labor) for tRS (2) Material and Services (excluding ADP)
(3)
Total ADP Support (4)
Subcontracts (5)
Capital Equipment (6)
Direct Travel Expense (Toreig.. travel must be shown separately)
(7)
General and Administrative Expense (include indirect labor cost) c.
Total Estimated Cost:
8.
forecasts:
a.
Milestone Cl.2rt for asso. plist.is..j the work.
O
b.
Planned monthly rate of costs by fiscal year.
This may be provided with the first report of an authorized program if not :.nown at time of proposal submittal. At the beginning of each subsequent year, reports should include the planned monthly rate cf costs for the ensuing year.
9.
Conflict of Interest:
In order to assist the Comnission in its evaluation, the 00E Contracting Officer shall describe any significant contractual and organizational relationships of the 00E, its contractor, their employees, or expected subcontractors or consultants on this proposal, with industries regulated by the fiRC (e.g. utilities, etc.) and suppliers thereof (e.g. architect engineers and reactor n.anufacturers, etc.) that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of interest.
10.
Reporting Requirements (as on statement of work).
(
e 9
e e
O
n
_E_N_C_L.OS.U.P.E. 3 STATEnENT _0F_'fPK
Title:
State-of-the-Art Review and Evaluation of Systems interaction Methods FIN No:
82325 B&R No:
20-19-10-09 Technical Monitor:
F. Cof fman (FTS 492-7499)
Cognizant Branch Chief:
J. F. Stolz (FTS 492-7391)
Backaround The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is developing a systems interaction program which proposes to define and subsequently implement systems interaction regulatory. requirements and guidance on light water reactor plants.
This is the objective derived from Section II.C.3 of the Action Plan in NUREG-0660.
Since systems interaction evaluations regulatory guidelines and requirements i
need to be developed for nuclear power plants; and a consensus regarding definition and methodology is lacking, initially it is appropriate to evaluate and define this effort on a broad front using several systens experts for assistance.
Accordingly, the objectives and scope of this task are shared in parallel with FY '80 task efforts by several other contractors.
The follow-on phase for FY '81 will narrow our direction as noted below in Task 4.
The state-of-the-art effort is the initial phase of defining applicable method-ologies that may have potential for relatively near-term use in systens interaction evaluations.
Objective The objective of this project is (o obtain methods that hold the best potential for further development and near-term (in second half FY '81) use by industry and NRC on systems interactions evaluations for future casework or operating plants.
Work Reovirements Estimated Level of Effort:
1.0 man-year.
Projected Completion Date Task 1.
Describe and assess current systematic methods 9/15/80 that have been used, or considered feasible for use, on any complex system comparable to a light water reactor plant.
This effort should include an assessment of the SANDIA (SETS) methodology (NUREG/CR-1321) and the methods used for the Diablo Canyon seismic systems interaction evaluation.
.?-
Projected Completion Date Task 2.'
Provide a definition of systems interaction 9/15/80 and corresponding safety failure criteria.
Task 3.
Provide an inventory of a range of systems interaction scenarios with emphasis on actual operating experience to:
(a) better focus on the definition of systems interaction and (b) have a basis for evaluating the ability of the methodologies described in Task 1 to
" predict" these examples.
Task 4 Reconcend a methodology or alternative (s) that 9/15/80 have the best potential for furttier development and near-term (second half of FY '81) use by i
industry and the NRC sta ff on future casework or operating plant systems interactions evaluations.
This~ effort shou 1J provide the basis for follow.on studies in FY '81.
Task 5.
Peer review meeting among participants & NRC 10/15/80 management regarding results of Task 4 Task 6.
Preparation of Final Report.
11/10/80 level _of Effort and Period of Performance The. level of ef fort is estimated at 1.0 man-year over a 4.5 month period (July 1, 1980 to November 10,1980)
Reporting Reouirements l.
Prepare and submit a report in accordance with Manual Chapter 3202 (a copy of which is enclosed) containing the findings and conclusions includino the bases upon which they were reached to the cognizant branch chief by the dates indicated below:
Draft Report - 09/15/80 Final Report - 11/10/80 2.
A monthly business letter report will be submitted by the 15th of the month to the cognizant branch chief with a copy to the Technical Support Branch, ATTN:
B. L. Grenier and L. Rubenstein, OSt.
These reports will contain the following information related to accomplisnment of this program.
Su r:ary of the progress and work completed during the period, including milestones reached or, if missed, an explanation provided;
~
3 The amount of funds expended for. manpos;er and coeruter services during the period and cumulative to date; If problems are encountered or anticipa:ed, a description of the plans for their resolution.the schedule of their implementation and their impact on the overall program; Plans for the next reporting period.
~
Meetings and Travel Provide for 4 one-day meetings at NRC Headquarters, including Task 5, and another of which will take place in the fall 1980 with the ACRS Subcommittee.
In addition, the contractor should plan for other travel needed to obtain source material for this study.
NRC Furnished Materials
\\
The NRC will furnish the contractor with a copy of the referenced SANDIA Phase I report.';UREG/CR-1321; ind the staff's safety evaluation report on j
{
the Diablo Canyon Systems Interaction Progran when available in August 1980.
l i
1 O
E
.