ML19326D506
| ML19326D506 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/18/1969 |
| From: | Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Allen R CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19326D507 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006110605 | |
| Download: ML19326D506 (2) | |
Text
__
~
5_
',4,
[
, [
1[.]
- {g['*
~
{ Distribution:
,c_
e
]
g
~
~,
-PER (2)
-.d"
.s_,
.m.-
2, Docket File DR Reading DEL Reading AD/RPReading Decket Ecsh329 PAMorris c:o 3a g~ ~o R2cyd 5u-330 CGC Cor::pliance (2)
D4uller JMurphy NBlunt ceae.nere raser capeny 212 West Mehigma Avenue Jeeksen, Michigan 49201 Attention: Mr. Ecbert D. Auen THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS senior Vice President P00R QUAllTY PAGES GentlencL Your September 11, 1969 letter outlines your underetending of a tentative schedule for the r===inder of the IRL review ci' the Mtd1=ad Plant. As you kace, discussicas with yeur representatives on sebeduling were presented sat a speculative and optimistie basis, rather them a firm basis, as your letter implies.
W. Boyd indiented our tarinet date for zwguesting add 1*1rs=1 informatien regarding your saplicaties was the week of Boytendier 22. Mr. Beyd also stated that to semplete our review in time for the February ACMS meeting we would need full and ecuplete infcmatica frtat you by at 1sant Bovember 7.
Should additimal questions arise as a mault of, unsatisfactory or incomplete information being sub-mitted, we could act predict what effect this might have en the review schedule.
% March 28, 1969 letter to you indicated that the Midland site is unacceptable for use with the resetor plaat design initially preycsed in your PSAR. Your Amenduest No. 2, dated May 28, 1969, provides in-formati m related to design changes made as a result of this cceelusion.
Our request for additimal information is based en our review of your initial applicatica, as well as Amendment No. 2.
He are conducting car review of your applicatice with full knowledge of your scheduling needs. Our ability to meet your requ$reuseats will depend in large measure ce the adequacy and comipleteness of yeur applicatien, as emended. He sculd be happy to discuss the progr'.ss en your applice.
tica at any time.
Stac*N17s Or!ri.ul 517 ed by a
om, s.
en-1 OF7tCE >
b _( n%y Mr Boyd :th Morris Divisica of Beactor Licensing sunwE >
...../H./69 9/ /EI9 9
DATE>
Form AEC-518 (Rev. 9-53) AECM 0240 m a sovsmasset estutino omcs : esos o-aes-est
. _ ~.-
8006 110 M
. - - - ~ - - - - - ~
-~
e
..qi is t
2F'!
.c
',,g"",'y" I"{j35 h I ^
Co.
orwue:
Consumers Power nwon t; u ruo.
Jackson, Mich.
LT N.
/
X oinue cc:
oa'o" 1
a' o.,c.nswtato:
T o:
Morris ACTION NECESSARY O
conCo ntnce O
av:
COMMENT NO ACilON NECE55 Arty C '
~
F ILE COoE.:
%48,MO POST OFFICE o,1, CLASSIF:
1 ntCayto y y
,ta no.
no,c ngm j
- o47, oosca.riiona uost u. u naassit.co, discussion with Boyd on 9-3-A 9g 39 regarding schedule for const permit W/ 4 cys for action Ltr re review.... 3 submitting proposed DISTRIBITTION t only 30-330 Ltr achedule A eg file cy Ler only 50-330 auct sunos:
Dromerick (2)
OGC H. Price Es Staff Case Morris /Schrceder
~
Dube/Invine Boyd D. Tis 9 son IEEMAftKS:
Rosen Moore
- p. r
- c Howe M All CONTROL FORM ronu arc 327 43.%p u.s. Arouec cucpoy couu,sion
-* u s sovimar iemn or,,cs:us-eri e
$