ML19326C064

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Approves Util 771019 Request for Relief from Certain ASME Code Requirements & Forwards Related Fr Notice.Ruling Should Not Be Interpreted to Grant Relief from Existing Tech Specs
ML19326C064
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear 
Issue date: 04/20/1978
From: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Cavanaugh W
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML19326C065 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004180738
Download: ML19326C064 (3)


Text

_

  • \\.n i

-]k 5*

lr

QQ"' fj f

l; {} h q;"* j

- *

  • f}

}'*

[ f q

a3m n.c wi.4.s., n./ &9V y u Wig el%.,:%chaWre

- u. s,.

.s 1.

n.,

w w:

. u-:m.p.....

7 :;p.

x o,,

..g

n y.~ s:;,.o;

- [; s 7 e ;.

, 3 3. y y :.

V p.

L W

.n

t., ;D~,

n ;. :~7 e

.7, r v 1 6. M i:: w,. ;r.. X : O M b e

c> n
:

. Www

+

U 1g-c @ Y. -- @ k - M y. % W DISTRIBUTIOHf ~ 23f W G y ! Q L M Q,.

v Docket File

~

BHarless, ; '

cc-g g'i ;

~

m, /,, ~c s4. Extraf Cys;eir.

S.. il 20,1978 M.5(u_.

pr e'

.~w[.x,.m;-NRCPDR.

? Gray File;4 ~ z S i

.. J 1

~0'ock' t No. 50-313{ "a v,YNM

. ' 4,8.

>M ' E PDR s. d ? u 1,

ORB #4 Rdg-.

.2-LShao ~,. - w

,,is

-VStello

- N. ZJHetmore.;...Q,. -, r.g%'

c n

n

~p;-

g. - ml i BGFimes/TJCarter~

~

M. C. - A'

,,n.a, c.-

m-

, yy,p.RIn ram <f[dWWWL:# N V 'Wk sfny IM n.'N n

A

<= y y y

<

  • 6.%#xeciit1'vW "tairPGheerationhttorney g

.IM4M98aed;MeIt'risemhM9eparteentk'g@m s

"MN s

e j.Mkia. iBos,551bQy'as'df72203u, yENgfRa%

BSch'arr,,%(2)m,ggg ggg <

y,-

i dones Little Rock?Arkans

% n. yqq.pp.ep.ggy

~

DEisenhut 9

w+

h,

' E M+

Gentlenen:

OPA, Clare Miles ACRS (16)

RE: ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 1 TBAbernathy n -,*-...u.chanan JRB

..x.-

s.. e 8 ; o.

e..- w. e,m.c - - w.m

.,g

' _Sy Jetter, datediQctobec.19,21977,,yosisubeitied a. proposed (.gdyg,she

' inservice inspection and~ testing-program description.and a regnest for 2 3 relief free selected ASPE: Code requirementsJpursuant 'th 10fCFR '50.55a'(g). #%-

  1. . ~

Al though we have not completed our detailed ; review of.your sabe ittal, jj.

'fPplesent those ASME Code' requirements that you h' ave found.to eer preliminary review sakes" clear to us thet'your proposed progrsef to?

~

" a would increase 'the*scepk of.;f neerviceiinsneties 'and" Vastidg lfor ysisF:S*d98" facili ty teysed. that;corrently;'

f red hy yoke Tectuiical)' Sip ~eeftfcattensu~h3 i y:g....p i M.e M. cee.ns,tmenC he_ W. sf

'ing e.f. J,oe_ri1~~^1%s. ',.

AW

~%

s.

e s

Wit tis @impract1 cal. vttdoithkiftf tihensj,;e'desige

'lfs %@v

~

7e a

p o.f' c'esesrestiW compknents;,f. fey poe / se net eerse'f aJecithe' 'specified ATIE Ceee regafraseets and that ianesittee..e( th se regpirements would~gt

+

9 we j

'MPresurt thlereshipogeasseslIdiffte,eltfesfwfNutfaQceedensistS$$?@h.

i i

, f, increase rn tin leveneramatttee,r;sefewLyberefere;, permat' tej: jam;c.

10' CFR 50.55a( g)(6)f Q

' pending. semple tiear e(K,4me c hereby ggrant. rettef:, Jeol asg te teriw i-eetailed.revtowgfree9these sinservice@gQy

~

C R,inspecsien and;teseisg. regetrements: et tAe. GEE.'CeWe.thet,you have,i L 3 4.,.

i

%D i rogues'teC fieregveF,914ite theissi efitterfn6rviWinsiperdisre%.@g'RW 7

w

  • N E and{ testing wtiltl; be7 erressed; by year"preposed program, laed;the grenUngTld t

{ {,, > eff this"reliaf jtsfgjely[en,'. inheNiepractiea.li tiy,c'f'selgictad ';Amtj M%g l

j Code regetrements, ye.have determined. that the rel1ahgrastta( neftherjJ,M.pg ;

i-increases considere. the p. reta611i.t,y,'er. c.onsequence.s+of ascidents; a. revice

> r. ! D-

- s (per escreases safety margins, and; that~, therefore, 'it1does QQ ' ~

w

.w

~

not,fnycive ~a s19mificaat-heaards(consf oera tien. ;Therefern yes Jare.? p g authorized to,, and^shouTd proceed to,0toplesent your; proposed l proerami f

3 (exce.pt where yeaer current Technical Specifications are more restrictive).

, ;., 3 e.

, <. g.

3 gy y.,. 3

-~

_k

- 6 ).,f,,.h.

"N

Mk

.N.

^

(

r

.. y

.m'%,x, c:-

:n 7 7%%. d.n_1%.:c l

8 00D 8073 8

T. M " Q s ifn f 4jQi p y & Q Q f } l Q S 1 fbnI'M MdM AW$

11 T

e n.M.

- h % f.s q;m; g

t

& y,wan,3.

p h.p ys Q,Q jp g&y a yy n '

qsJ: 4gf:.

yQg MQQQyGQ.f g%_gs g $.

. w R 2 ' W;p

% l..g h.J.. 5.nS&s]oWep [4 h %,

f.

y 9ht,C"omptny d[2 s

m&.,@.,W.%. p,.

>f;{. MA'@3Ty.yy. y@ 4Qp'Qu pQ., y, q :@e

'i 1

. 'y y*fl,. -

.. {p ; "'. *;.* W.

ll. '. ' Q 7,.. '.. " }. ol&fR fff.

, Suring the,. peri'ed between the 'date that the requireme'nts of la CF

.e s -

. ;y }

~. _

Q W,..,

-?

Neu;r detailed review of your setmittal-you must comp 1y' %ish both.you

. existing Technical: Spect fications and your proposed inservice,inspectiong. 7,

[anddesting, program, gli theJ event' conflicting. requirementslari,se.,fd jh;@ '

some components,'you must comply'with the more restrictive requirements ' n gf (e.g., shorter inspection intervals, increased number of parameters ? f ' 4 7, s measured).

Inletther words, the granting of this relief from ASME,f. QfL

~

. wCode requirements ;should net be interpretied; to,give,you;rel f ef;. frap 4g~ 'gP

':h

efkthedrequir ~

nts 'i MNMMd keu, existing.. Technical <

if tsattons.@f e any

~.,4,,1111 :g..(,)41 s,.eue,.vi.e.N.. n y,[

.s.,,

$ 3, s.~ )

., 0.etober8.1kl h.1 hf j

if p,, ;c.J

.diber... ta.iled;.

f.ina,l.f w

su w

r-A.

. +m

,. e,di f,1' ca t tens '.r4 w

  • p ec r

-ev

- hich mer.c.r-a resul t ng:from,the.a.g 'taff y.s

  • review)S. (2 T gr. ~
  • s.. ant-relief 6. r't A

e e

C y

." < '- M'y 6.

w ar oo is

'

  • frosiany'5WCode requirements thet aresdetermined totse tmpractidaND6.MS for your facility for the duration of the inspection interval and

.PWP'

~~

(3) issue appropriate changes to your Technical Specifications.

' d"#

A copy of the Federal Recister Hotice related to this action is l

OnCiO5td* ; _., p 4%.

., y.;, y.y' N.,qs; q'f f9&;&:RQQQ&

  • > p&;,._ * '., &\\ ; qj )Q;% )1,Si ncerely% RQ% 1,.&*.kfl15 s,.'

-c tis '.."

Wi

,4. y. f

, y q q. ";

~

?,l.' fi g (..

i

.~

4 aw nm - ;--

4 5.p.m 1

,' - n y

,. s.,

g..,

t

.- n, e g. y..'...

....w 4,

,e..

e n

,(

'N 9

A '*gl

~*?*'

f *. 5

      • 1
  • -f *l h

')

m.%.,

gz,

  1. 7

~. m.

m e

, $y, %-w Q. '

N [ hh.

t U. l Seid',\\ C)N eY '

a O, d."N. m: b b F. x I

e wom a ame,. rett.(sr.eictenra.cw@v@w#. e, -

s s

MM,An%. 3,.r.i,Naete.

w E.

ivts n

o.

a w

p a w,1 1 w w 2 %' @ M, _

m.. w w. w,

.ma-

. a.. L m., 4~- d+. %...~.. DF_w' * >..%~a.' Y,

.n a.. '.,r,s.

c

,~w.,.

- n?v,( 4.>, '+

l

' n

~ co' w e.nc esitro.:a ;bs

e a ~ w. u w + ~v
  • e:>-

M

.,. k., u m

,k N!b

v.. ;

h ;;7h,'~' ENf fbOe M&, _5ff,r'ff.e(

N *$

Nh h j Q, h h...

l Nb i

(

f m m...g-m ah fhf,fh&,

w m xym

.wm,m.m N

p l W M,.%e m m n w m

~, w, w @ -@ Q; A C A, p pxW ; %n'd e.S dv. p h W /.f'.;M m

. C.Cf.qM.L,3,.,

n.W MW A4 t2

/

I c ; w,.e w.4.

v.. Ox,:

eM/

m&

~W n.

y

.y u.

g..s Y *'

4.f

{

k& $hn

~fA.

fc w ~-

n,.. _g f. _e.s g. 3,.

n;E hW j.

w n.., v ;...,.. < a.:p, ; p,'.W-*w*

}

. a

.,.p{,.m. c;. _.

4 n

p.,;g6 4 v y e orp u t A3 e

p

  • : h=w,

. y s '

> g. 3 p/ ' <

  • g a. y xm.

m

-a u-s.s s m y. ::.w x "..

i 7.h '. 6 :

c,y 7 w.

  • (s-

.g (i', * ;,, Q"W, y, { a 3

n 5

l

- (-

2 n

d' E

9.

2~

^ " d(( ' ' -

    1. 4 '

l -

< G if';

ss e g% j e p, * *l

  • Me

'y;.y + ',';'U 1y d< g g* q;e a k.i li +

+^c._m, w: #

^

i y.b h.. ' ' yre q W.x

} ;g

.i.y ORB)45.DJR 0R M:00R

.1TS

.C-EUDORb y.QEL M-5C-05BW s,

n,m.

n/ gjg[

.me.

  • Ringram g cv p ng:rm

. JWetmor LShao um,wl Miefdf jg

.,m,,, _

~

l

- - m. a.. u..

a. e *. _.__ __. _.. a.s m v.

'd gk :w % gk. g, m e.

n. ":m n.,,.. u,,e n-n

-- w

- n l

1

~

c Arkansas Power & Light Company cc w/ enclosure:

Phillip K. Lyon, Esquire House, Holms & Jewell 1550 Tower Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Daniel H. Williams Manager, Licensing Arkansas Power & Light Company Post Office Box 551 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Mr. John W. Anderson, Jr.

Pl ant ~ Superintendent Arkansas Nuclear One Post Office Box 608 Russellville, Arkansas 72801 Arkansas Polytechnic College Russellville, Arkansas 72801 9

0 5

8 e

I e

9

- -