ML19325E575
| ML19325E575 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 10/18/1989 |
| From: | Chaffee A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19325E574 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-89-13, NUDOCS 8911080036 | |
| Download: ML19325E575 (2) | |
Text
,
mxg 4l:l
,; a a
[
o' APPENDIX A
.c i
-Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-312 Sacramento Municipal Utility District.
License No. DPR-54 l
14440 Twin Cities. Road Herald, California 95638-9799
~During.an NRC inspection conducted on July 22 through'Sep'tember 8, 1989 a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"s10 CFR Part 2,
-Appendix C (1989), the violation is listed below:
f L
A.'
Technical Specification"6.8.1 states, in part:
" Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering... the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Safety Guide 33, November.1972."
Safety Guide.33, November 1972, Appendix A states, in part that Administrative Procedures shall be developed to assure procedure
- adherence and temporary change methods when procedures can not be t'
followed.
\\'
Procedure,.RSAP-1308, " Potential Deviation from. Quality", Section 5.3.4,
~ "
states:1 "The originator shall deliver the Potential Deviation from Quality.
(PDQ) report to the Operations Technical Advisor (OTA) within four (4) hours from the time of identification."
Contrary to the above, on August 17, 1989, a PDQ reporting that the "B".
Bruce GM Emergency Diesel Generator failed a surveillance test due to an j
" unexpected malfunction of plant equipment" was not written and delivered' to the 0TA within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of identification.
4
. This is a repeat Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the Sacramento Municipal Utility
. District is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to j
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, t
Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrater, Region V, and a copy totthe NRC Resident Inspector, Anthony D'Angelo, within 30 days of
.the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly 1
L marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each I
u violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and'the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why I
Q i
w m-v.
'y'
'.d 2-1 s
i 1
c.
L'
. the license.should not be. modified, suspended,'or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.. Co.nsideration may be given to i
- extending the response time for. good cause shown.
. c FOR THE N CL RREGOLATORYCOMMISSION l
i af 1
-A. E. Chaffee, Deputy Director Division'of Reactor Safety andProjects Dated at Walnut Crggk, California this 16 day of ut e 1989.
L l
i
[
i-1 4,
?'
t l
)
<'D,,.'
s 4
1 ~
i j
I 4
11 l
s
+,
s l;
I J
4 of
't y '