ML19325E212
| ML19325E212 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1989 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19325E211 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-89-27, NUDOCS 8911020234 | |
| Download: ML19325E212 (1) | |
Text
_.____ _____ _.
[
).
i l.
l 1
q Illinois Power Company Docket No. 50-461 clinton Power Station License No. NFF-62 J
i l
As a result of the inspection conducted on August 18 though October 6,1989, i
and in accordance with the 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C - General Statement of f
i PolicyandProcedureforNRCEnforcementActions(1989),thefollowing i
j violation was identified:
}
10 CFR 50, Appendix 8, Criteria !!! requires, in part, that measures be
~
established to assure that applicable design basis are correctly translated j
j into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Criteria III t
designorganizatIons,part,thatmeasuresbeestablishedforcoordinationamong further requires in i
j j
i 1989 until Contrary to the above, from initial plant licensing on April 17thelicenseefailed,to the condition was identified on October 24, 1989, ensure that the design basis for a Loss of Feedwater Heating Accident was drawings, procedures and i
correctly translated into specifications i
instructions. and failed to ensure coordination among General Electric and Sargent and Lundy Engineers, design organizations with responsibilities in the construction of the Clinton Power Station, with regard to the design basis for l'
the Feedwater Heating System. That failure resulted in the plant being designed, constructed and operated such that single failure or o erator r
actioncouldcausealossoffeedwatertemperatbreinexcessofte100
[
degrees Fahrenheit design basis.
ThisisaSeverityLevel!YYiolation(Supplement 1)(50-461/89027-01(DRP).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1)thecorrective actions that have been taken and the results achieved; (2) the corrective i
actions that will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when i
full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your i
l response time for good cause shown.
)
00T 2 61989 h b~.A.
Datec Edware 6. steenman, Director Division of Reactor Projects r
8911020234 891026 ADOCK0500g1 DR
_