ML19325D575

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-289/89-21 on 890926-29.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Environ Monitoring Programs,Including Mgt Controls,Audits,Qa & Implementation of Listed Programs
ML19325D575
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 10/10/1989
From: Bores R, Joseph Furia
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19325D574 List:
References
50-289-89-21, NUDOCS 8910250063
Download: ML19325D575 (6)


See also: IR 05000289/1989021

Text

,.,

.

.

- .

- -

-

,

.:

,

. , _

-,

.,

~

- ..;

,y

e-

<-

..

.

.

,

l

' ,

,

.

.

-

l

l

i

NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

.

Report Nos. :50-289/89 *c1

y

Docket Nos.

50-289

.

j

j"

Licenst Nos'.

DPR-50

Priority

Categnry C

Licenser:

GPU Nuclear Corporation

!

P. O. Box 480

Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057.

Facility Name: Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1

Inspection At:

Middletown, Pennsylvania

'

!

Inspection Conducted:- September 26-29, 1989

,

,.

.

Y _-

~

Inspector:

N*

k-

/0^/Odf

J.: Furia, Radiation Specialist, ERF5

date

F

i

D

/G-/@49

Approved By: (.)

.-

~

Tate

-

,

'R. Bores, chjet, Eftluents hadiation

'

Protection'Section, FRSSB

'

!

I'spection Summary:

50-289/89-21)

--Inspection on September 26-29, 1989 (Inspection Report No.

-

.

4

.

Areas Inspected: Routine, unanno:inced inspection of the radiological

,.

environmental monitoring programs including: Management controls; audits,

,'

quality' assurance; and implementation of the above programs.

Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were

noted.

L

j

e

t

s

'

>

,.

!

'

i

8910250069 G9.1010

i.

Q

' ADOCK 03000289

,

POR

,

PPC

,,qs

,

,

J'

.:~.

. -

-

-,

- -

.-~.o

.

-

_

,

. ~ .

+

__

..

-.

o

f

,.

l

.-

,

,

,.

I

1

DETAILS

1.0 Personnel Contacted

1.1

Licensee Personnel

  • C. Smyth, Licensing Hanager, TMI-1

Licensing Engineer, TMI-2

  • R. Wells, Jr., I&C Mainter.ance THI-l

l

  • P. Peavy,
  • C. Incorvati, Audit Manager, TMI

i'

  • D. Hassler, Licensing EngineerManager, Environmental.TMI-l
  • B. Good

Controls

  • W. Ressler, Manager, Environmental Radiation Laboratory

Environmental Program Manager

R.' Danahy,

T. Bradley, Quality Control Officer

>

W. Cooper, Health Physicist

1.2 NRC Personnel

  • T. Iloslak, Resident Inspector

1.3 State Representative

  • S. Peleschak, Site Representative, Pennsylvania Departraent of

Environmental Resources

.;

  • Denotes those present at the exit meeting on September 29, 1989,

2.0 Purpose

The purpose of this routine inspection was to review the licensee's

program in the area of Radiological Environmental Monitoring under both

l

normal and emergency conditions.

3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring . Togram (REMD)

,

In accordance with plant procedures, sampling analysis and presentation

I

of environmental results are the responsibility of the Manag9r,

l

Environmental Controls for TMI

who reports through the Corporate

Manager, EC to the Vice Presiden(EC-TMI),diological and Environmental

t for Ra

<

l

Controls. The ManaEer, EC-TMI is responsible for both the TMI EC

and the operation'o. the Environmental Radiation Laboratory (ERL). program

1,

L

3.1 Quality Assurance / Quality Control

^

L

The quality assurance program at TMI involved Quality Assurance (QA)

I

audits of the EC-TMI Department and principle vendo" activities.

'i

This program was conducted in accordance with the TMI Quality

t

l

Assurance Plan.

L

l

l

.

..

.

.

--

,

.

.

,, .

..

M

,

0;

,

.

3

..

e

'

As part of this inspection the QA audit re

1989,examinedtheEC-TMIprogram. ports-TM$ortfortheE

activities was reviewed. kuditRe

-88-18, dated January 70

The scope and technical de th of,

this audit was found to be exceptionally good. The audit iden ified

five findin s needin followup.

Three of these findings were

directly re ated to he REMP.

None of the findings involved a

significant safety issue and all were resolved in a timely manner.

,

The EC-TMI program included the staffing of a position of Quality

-Control Officer QCO) in accordance with Procedure 9420-ADH-4590.01,

Rev 2, " Quality ssurance In the GPUN Environmental Radioactivity

Laboratory - General Guidelines". The C0 reports directly to the

Manager EC-TMI,l sis, gularly submitted blank and spiked samples tosplit sam les be

and re

l

the ERL for ana

'

quality control

aboratory (Tel dyne Midwest Laboratory), and

L

evaluated all quality control results including results from the ERL

partici)ation in the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Cross-Cieck Program.

In addition, the QC0 conducted periodic quality

,

l

control inspections and prepared a semiannual quality control report.

TMs program greatly enhances the REMP at TMI. The inspector had no-

further questions in this area.

1

' 3.2 Meteorological Monitorin_g

As part of this inspection, the inspector reviewed the calibration

~!

records of the meteorological tower instrumentation.

Calibration of

!

I

the, instrumentation was conducted semiannually, with the last

I

calibration completed on April 26 1989.

Calibrations were performed

'

inaccordancewithStationSurveillanceProcedure3302-SA1,Rev6,

i

" Meteorological Instrwnentation Calibration". Additionally the

licensee cor. ducts ,aonthly surveillances of the meteorolo ical

,

'

instrumentation both at the tower base station and in th Units 1 and

2 control rooms.

j

3.3 Sampling Stations and Media Collection

l

In accordance with the lant procedures listed below, the REMP for

l

TMI collected samples oh various environmental media for analysis.

'

9420-IMP-4522.01, Rev 11, "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

t

Milk"

l

9420-IMP-4522.02, Rev 14, "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

Thermoluminescent Dosimeters"

9420-IMP-4522.03, Rev 9, "REMP Sample Collection Procadure -

'

Aquatic Stdinent"

!

!

c n

}

1

O.

i

,

v.;

.

,

.;

,

4

,.

lh

9420 IMP-4522.04, Rev 7 "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

Terrestrial Vegetatioli"

l

9420-IMP-4522.05 Rev -14. "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

'

'

Air l'odine / air Particulates"

'

9420-IMP-4522-06 Rev 14, "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

Surface /DrinkingWater"

9420-IMP-4522.07, Rev 12, "REMP Sample. Collection Procedure -

Precipitation"

9420-IMP-4522.08, Rev 9. "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

Soil"

9420-IMP-4522.09, RevJ,"LandUsaCensus"

9420-IMP-4522.10, Rev 4, "THI Groundwater Monitoring"

9420-IMP-4522.13 Rev 5 "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

l

High Volume Air Particulate"

.

9420-IMP-4522.15 Rev 1, "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

AquaticVegetalion"

p

l

9420-IMP-4522.16, Rev 2, "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

-

L

Fish"

9420-IMP-4522.17, Rev 2, "REMP Sample Collection Procedure -

Air. Tritium"

i

These procedures were found to be comprehensive in scope and to

adequately reflect the existing program.

As part of the inspection, sampling stations and apparatus for

sampling air particulates air iodine, air tritium, high volume air

sampling, groundwater, drinking water, and direct radiation

measurement utilizing thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD)ilized was

and the

Reutter-Stokes Monitors were observed. All equipment ut

determined to be in working order,he Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

and sampling locations were

determined to be as indicated in t

The number of sampling locations was determined to exceed that

'

required under plant Technical S)ecification 3.23, " Radiological

excellently conducted. g" , and t11s program was determined to be

Environmental Monitorin

The inspector also reviewed the licensee's program for the

measurement of tritium in the environment, especially in light of the

w

.

-

-

-

.

_ . _

_

.

-

_

,

-

, ,

i

4

i.

-

5

)

(

.

)

J

Water (AGR)poration of 2.3 million gallons of Accident Generated

planned eva

from TMI-2 over the next two years. The licensee

currently determines tritium levels in ground and drinking water,

precipitation, fish and animal life milk and vegetation. The

i

licensee co'unenced monitoring of tritium in air in September 1989.

No additional monitoring stations were planned by the licensee,

'

,

although the frequency of tritium analysis in milk was to be

increased from monthly to biweekly upon startup of the evaporator.

The in:pector had no further questions in this area.

- 3.4 Environmental Radiation Laboratory (ERL)

The licensee's ERL performed analysis of most of the environmental

samples collected with the exception of strontium analysis and

tritium analysis In milk at.d biolo

The laboratory

utilized two low background alpha /gical media.

beta counters six germanium

crystals for gamma analysis ar.d two liquid scinf.111ation counters.

Records for the calibration and daily quality control checks for

these instruments were examined and determined to be excellent. As

part of the inspection,- the following procedures were reviewed.

"

9420 ADM-4590.04, Rev 3, " Data Review and Reporting"

-

9420-IMP-4592.01, Rev 4, " Determination of Gross Alpha and

a

Gross Beta Radioactivity in Water"

9420-lMP-4592.02, Rev 4, " Determination of Tritium in Water

by Liquid Scintillation Counting"

-

9420-IMP-4592.05, Rev 1, " Analysis of Air Particulate

Filters for Gross Alpha / Beta and / or Gamma

Radioactivity"

9420-IMP-4592.07, Rev 1 Preparation of Milk and Water

Samples for Radiochemical I-131 Analysis"

9420-IMP-4592.08, Rev 2, " Calculation of Iodine-131 Activity

'

,

in Milk or Water"

I

9420-IMP-4592.09, Rev 0, "Prept. ration of Standards, Tracers

.and Carriers"

9420-IMP-4592.ll, Rev 0, " Laboratory Instrument Calibration"

,

9420-0PS-4592.10, Rev 0, " Preparation of Air Tritium Sampics

for Analysis"

9420-SUR-4523.05, Rev 6, " Determination of REMP Action

Levels a i Subsequent Actions"

L

'

'

. - . .

,

-,

-

.

. -

-

,._.-

..-

-- -

.

- -

-

-

- - .

.,

..

'

. .

'

6

These procedures were determined to be excellent, and the inspector

had no further questions in this area.

4.0 Exit Interview

The inspector met the licensee representatives (denoted in Section 1) at

the conclusion of the inspection on September 29, 1989. The inspectors

summarized the purpose, sco)e, and findings of the inspection. At no time

during the inspection did tie inspector provide any written information to

-the licensee.

l

,

i

1

l

!

!

!

.

.-

.

. . . .

-.

.-

-

-