ML19325D520

Proposed Tech Specs,Updating Pages 3/4 7-34,7-19,7-22,7-23 & B3/4 9-3

ML19325D520
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	10/16/1989
From:	DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19325D515	List: ML19325D514 ML19325D516 ML19325D520
References
NUDOCS 8910240309
Download: ML19325D520 (15)

Text

w

.k..

Il. $.' . ATTACHMENT A-1 y, -

L i

5 Revise the Beavor Valley Unit No. 1 Technical Speci'ications as f '

follows:

[ Remove Paaes Insert Paaes E

3/4 7-34 3/4 7-34 i

i

.3/4 7-19 3/4 7-19 3/4 7-22 3/4 7-22 l

3/4 7-23 3/4 7-23 B3/4 9-3 B3/4 9-3 t

l

[.

i f

i-l l

l l

l 8910240309 891016 PDR ADOCK 05000334 P PDC 1

l

/; ,1 ,

i

.. P11NT SYSTEMS V 3/4.7.13 AUXILIARY RIVER WATER SYSTEM l

LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.7.13.1 At least one auxiliary river water subsystem shall be ,

. OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.

ACTION:

With less than one ARWS subsystem OPERABLE, restore at least one subsystem to . OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT '

STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following thirty hours.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS t

4. 7.13.1 At least one. ARWS subsystem shall be demonstrated OPERABLE: .

a. .At least once per 92 days, by verifying that each pump  ;

i develops at least 60 psig discharge pressure, while pumping through its test flow.line.

b. At least once per 18 months during shutdown by starting an Auxiliary' River Water System Pump, shutting down one Reactor

' Plant ' River Water System Pump, and verifying that the Auxiliary River Water Subsystem provides at least 8000 gpm cooling water to that portion of the Reactor Plant River Water System under test for at least 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

~

BEAVER' VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 7-34 PROPOSED

i i

s

..- P'[. ANT SYSTEMS f 3/4.7.8 SUPPLPMENTAL LFAX COLLECTION AND RELFASE SYSTEM (SLCRS)

LIMITING CONDITION'FOR OPERATION 3.7.8.1 Two SLCRS exhaust air filter trains shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.

ACTION:

With one SLCRS exhaust air filter train inoperable, restore the ,

inoperable train to' OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30-hours.

, t SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.8.1 Each SLCRS exhaust air filter train shall be' demonstrated' h L OPERABLE:'

a. At least once per 31 days on a STAGGERFD TEST BASIS by: ,

1. Initiating, from the control room, flow through the HEPA t I.

filter and charcoal adsorber train and verifying that the l train operates for at least 15 minutes.

l

b. At least once per 12 months or after every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of system operation or (1) after each complete or partial l h,

replacement of a HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber bank, or (2) after any structural maintenance on the HEPA filter or

charcoal adsorber housings, or (3) following painting, fire or chemical- release in any ventilation zone communicating with the system by:

Iz

1. Verifying that the charcoal adsorbers remove 1 99% of a >

halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant test gas when they are testing in-place in accordance with ANSI N510-1975 i while operating the ventilation system at a flow rate of 36,000 cfm i 10%.

l l

l l-BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 7-19 PROPOSED l

l o

7 u-  ;;

[

V.

,. PLANT SYSTEMS t

b 3/4.7.9 SEALED SOURCE CONTAMINATION ,

I LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION

~

3 3.7.9.1 Each sealed source containing radioactive material either in excess of 100 microcuries of beta and/or gamma emitting material or 5 microcuries of alpha emitting material shall be free of 2 0.005 microcuries of removable contamination.

l APPLICABILITY: At all times.

- ACTION:

a. With a sealed source.having removable contamination in excess of the above limit, immediately withdraw the sealed. source from use ,

and either:

1. Decontaminate and repair the scaled source, or.

2.- Dispose of the sealed source in accordance with Commission .

c Regulations. ,

1

b. The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

l l SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS l

4.7.9.1.1 Test Requirements - Each sealed source shall be tested for i leakage and/or contamination by:

a. The licensee, or

b. Other persons specifically authorized by the Commission or an Agreement State.

The test method shall have a detection sensitivity of at least 0.005 microcuries per test sample.

4.7.9.1.2 Test Frequencies -

Each category of sealed sources (excluding startup sources and fission detectors previously subjected to core flux) shall be tested at the frequency described below.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 7-22 PROPOSED

r,; - ,

a t 1-c  ;

.,, .$NTSYSTEMS T' i 1

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued) I r-il

a. Sources in use - At least once per six months for.all sealed '

sources containing radioactive materials.

I'

l. With a half-life greater than 30 days (excluding Hydrogen'3) and ,

I 2. In any form other.than gas.

!d b. > Stored sources not~ in use - Each sealed source and fission  :

H detector shall be tested prior to use or transfer to another

. licensee unless tested within the previous .six months.

Sealed sources- and fission detectors transferred without a- ,

certificate indicating the last test date shall be tested l.

prior to being placed into use.

c.. Startup sources and fission detectors - Each sealed startup

< source and fission detector shall be tested within 31-days' ,

prior to- being subjected to core flux or installed in the core and following repair or maintenance to the source. .

4.7.9.1.3 Reports - A Special Report shall be prepared and submitted to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 on an' annual basis  ;

if sealed source or fission detector leakage tests' reveal the presence of 2 0.005 microcuries of removable contamination. ,

L i

l' l-l g

BEAVER VALLEY - Unit 1 3/4 7-23 (next page is 3/4 7-26) 1:

h PROPOSED L

1 1

REFUELING OPERATIONS BASES 3/4.9.10 AND 3/4.9.11 WATER LEVEL - REACTOR VESSEL AND STORAGE POOL

.The restrictions on *ninimum

. water level ensure that sufficient water depth is available to remove 99% of the assumed 10% iodine gap activity l released from the rupture of an irradiated fuel assembly. The minimum '

. water depth is consistent with the assumptions of the accident analysis. ,

2 442 9.12 and 3/4.9.13 FUEL BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM The limitations on the storage pool ventilation system ensure that all radioactive material released from an irradiated fuel assembly will be

. filtered through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber prior to discharge to the atmosphere. The OPERABILITY of this system and the resulting iodine removal capacity are consistent with the assumptions of. the accident analysis. The spent fuel pool area ventilation system i is non-safety related and only recirculates air through the fuel ,

building. The SLCRS portion of the ventilation system is safety related and maintains a negative pressure in the fuel building. The SLCRS flow is normally exhausted to the atmosphere without filtering, however, the flow is diverted through the main' filter banks by manual actuation or on a high radiation signal.

3/4.9.14 FUEL STORAGE - SPENT FUEL STORAGE POOL The requirements for fuel storage in the spent fuel pool ensure that:

(1) the spent fuel pool will remain subcritical during fuel storage; i

and (2) a uniform boron concentration is maintained in the water volume in the spent fuel pool to provide negative reactivity for postulated I

accident conditions under the guidelines of ANSI 16.1-1975. The value of 0.95 or less for k eff which includes all uncertainties at the 95/95 probability / confidence level is the acceptance criteria for fuel storage in the spent fuel pool.

1 L The Action Statement applicable to fuel storage in the spent fuel pool I ensures that: (1) the spent fuel pool is protected from distortion in the fuel storage pattern that could result in a critical array during l the movement of fuel; and (2) the boron concentration is maintained at l 2 1050 ppm (this includes a 50 ppm conservative allowance for uncertainties) during all actions involving movement of fuel in the spent fuel pool.

, The Surveillance Requirements applicable to fuel storage in the spent .

fuel pool ensure that: (1) the fuel ausemblies satisfy the analyzed f I

U-235 enrichment limits or an analysis has been performed and it was determined that eff is 5 0.95; and (2) the boron concentration meets the 1050 ppm limit The enrichment limitations for storage of fuel in a 3 of 4 array in the spent fuel pool is based on a nominal region average enrichment with individual fuel assembly tolerance of + or - 0.05 w/o U-235.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 B 3/4 9-3 PROPOSED

4 '

w? .

? . .t

< s

, is

, W , s. g

-t .

g_, - 'si. f'  !

r '

F ,

ATTACHMENT A-2 l

!N' ' , l t ,

.Revi se' the Beaver." Valley Unit. No. 2 Technical Specifications as~ l b .follows:

b '

i. Remove Pages Insert Paaes -

[* , 3/4 7-28 3/4 7-28 e

3/4~7-18 .3/4 7-18

.I  %

3/4 7-20 3/4 7-20 3/4.7-21' 3/4 7-21 L

I s.*

+

t l '

P l E 1.

l-  ;

3 ll f.

i i

i

}-

\\

T l.

i l

PLANT SYSTEMS i

3/4'.7.13 STANDBY SER"!CE V6TER SYSTEN (SWE) i tiMITING CONDITION Foi OPERATION I J

3.7.13.1 At least one standby service water sub5ysten shall be OPERABLE. l l

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4. l l

ACTION:

With less than one SWE subsystem OPERABLE, restore at least ont subsystem to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STAND 8Y within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following thirty hours.

i SURVEftLANCE REOUIREMENTS _,,,

4.7.13.1 At least one SWE subsystem shall be demonstrated GPERABLE: I

a. ;y ,;rify bg thet ameh punmdevelopf at least 109 p*4-differentT&T l

. pressure whule pumpina theae;5-m an riv, lir,; t , Sated pue-

<" " te Sr.ciTTeition 4.0.5. t

b. At least once per 18 months during shutdown by starting a Standby f; Service Water System Pump, shutting down one Service Water System Pump, and verifying that the Standby Service Water Subsystem provides  !

at least 8584 gpm cooling water to that portion of the Service Water System under test for at least 2 haurs. l i

I l

l.  ;

I a At 1 ea tat once per 92 dayh, by verifying that each pump develops at least 109 psid differential ej r e s sur e , while I i pump!09 Lhrough ! it test f1ow 1ine.

l l

l t i

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 2 3/4 7-28 W0fGSE.h

- . .. _ ___ -_-_. - . __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _f

PLANT SYSTEMS

-3/4.7.8 SUPPLEMENTAL LEAK COLLECTION AND RELEASE SYSTEM (SLCRS)

LIMITING CORDITION FOR OFERAT10N 3.7.8.1 Two SLCRS exhaust air filter trains shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4. -

ACTION:

With one SLCRS exhaust air filter train inoperable, restore the inoperable train to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTOOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 4.7.8.1 Each SLCR$ exhaust air filter train shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a.' At least once per 31 days by initiating, from the control room, flow through the " standby" HEPA filter and charcoal adsorber train and

. verifying that the train operates for at least 15 minutes with the heater controls operational,

b. At least oice per 18 months $d-(1) after each complete or partial I replacement of a HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber bank, or (2) after any structural maintenance on the HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber housings or ventilation zo(3) following painting, ne communicating firesystem with the or chemical by: release in any

1. Verifying that the charcoal adsorbers remove > 99.95% of a halo-genated hyCrocarbon refrigerant test gas when they are tested in place in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 while operating the ventilation system at a flow rate of 59,000 cfm + 10%. ,

2. Verifying that the HEPA filter banks remove > $9.95% of the DOP when they are tested in-place in accordance with ANSI H510-1980 while operating the ventilation system at a flow rate of 59,000 cfm i 10%.

3. Subjecting the carbon contained in at least one test canister or at least two carbon samples removed from one of the charcoal adsorbers to a laboratory carbon sample analysis and verifying a removal efficiency of > 99% for radioactive methyl iodide at an air flow velocity of 077 ft/sec 120% with an inlet methyl iodide 8 > 70% relative humidity, concentratien of 1.5 to 2.0. mg/m and 30*C 1 h'C; other test condition , i shall be in accordance with ANSI H510-1980. The carbon samples not obtained from test canisters shall be taken with a slotted tube sampler in accord-ance with ANSI N509-1980.

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 2 3/4 7-18 hlOSf$)

.a

PLANT SYSTEMS 3/4.7.9 $EALED SOURCE CONTAMINATION <

l LIMITINGCON0fTf0NFOROPERATION ' <

1 3.7.9.1 Ecch' sealed source containin of th;;; ;;:nt444+e-of byer; ;;; :;;;g radioactive  !

rial l ht:d ir,material 10 CF" either 30.71inerexcess

> 0.1 ;i: c- )

rk

:1 =;; :th:r ::t:rie4,- ir.;kdir,; ;1phe ;;itt;r; shall be f rei of  !

> 0.005 microcuries of removable contamination.

~

.. t APPLICA8ILITY:

goo- wicNG97'es of be.$u ad

• AT ALL TIMES. gjg g,,j,f of g m,c g/o

\

cy , e's of  !

ACTION: / ba ~

iM a la ve,ne +t/M 8f *a/f'#*/ - - - - -

i a.

-E+sh- sealed source M4Mremovable contamination in excess of the above limitfyehe+4-h-immediately Jht Soled withdraw)(Jrom mote. use ang6t$tk

1. Eith;r Vecontaminate)( and repai or  :

2. < sealed' scarce  :

Dispose)( of ir) accord ce with Commission Regulations.

b.

4JM %l Scu n e '

i The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable. .

$URVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS '

4.7.9.1.1mTest Requirements - Each sealed source shall be tested for leakage  :

and/o dofftamination by: l

a. The licensee, or j

i

/ b. Other persons specifically authorized by the Commission or an l Agreement State.

The test method shall have a detection sensitivity of at least 0.005 microcuries  !

per test samplo. '

2 4.7.9.1.Trquencydescribedbelow.

at the Test Frecuencies - Each category of sealedl source .

l a

Md. pM . ore A S o u rc e s i n u s e leke TudfhVs t.a% wi s o@c e dp rdM44ho$.ietth dlt $ f V)uk)P At least once per six months for all sealed sources i

j Mer/% containing radioactive materials, /

p 1 Withahalf-lifegreaterthan30 days (eIcludingHydrogen3)and

/

2. In any form other than gas, j (etclYs N .slatl'uf Seur'CN osN hr S$;i

\ dehchtl puius & salu e< W k ec.v %)

l BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 2 3/4 7-20 l

fAO f0Slb

, )I PLANT SYSTEMS , , .

and hs% ton t$6C of l l \

SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS (CONTINUED) I

b. Stored sources not in use Each sealed sourcaAshall be tested prior l to use or transTer to another licensee unless tested within the pre- l vious six months. Sealed sources ransferred without a certificate J indicating the last test date sha be tested prior to eci g placed

$s Edsion Odedet.s anul$sfik de[e ht

c. _Startup source 64- Each sealed startup sourceAshall be tested rior i to being subjected to core flu and following repair or maintenance to the source, en an g,j g3/g Comissio Reports

}'4.7.9.1.3 - A Special ursuant to Specification 6 Report f9.2 .hhh ource00 :p ifallfbeprep eakage tests te al the presence of > 0.005 'icrocuries of removabl conta nation. .

i mgg et th$$allY IN Y Celt g pgj$,&

Jctus<  ;

7

. u O

l l i i

BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 2 3/4 7-21

{ ,

ATTAC1 DENT B

• ~

Safety Analysis Beaver Valley Power Station Proposed Technical Specification change

[ BV-1 Change No. 168 BV-2 Chanae No. 3,0 Description of caendment requeet: The proposed amendment would  !

update applicable BV-1 and BV-2 specifications.  ;

BV-1 gurveillance requirement 4.7.13.1.a for the Auxiliary River i Water System has been revised to reflect the quarterly testing '

requirements of the other pumps in the technical specifications. The auxiliary river water pumps are classified as Non-Nuclear Safety ,

(NNS) and as such are not required to be tested in accordance with  !

the IST program per ASME XI. This proposed change will eliminate the current requirement for testing these NNS pumps three times as often  ;

as the safety related pumps that are required to achieve safe plant shutdown. The test frequency for the safety related pumps was changed from monthly to quarterly in Amendment No. 117 in accordance  :

with the 1983 ASME XI Code edition. The maintenance and operations '

history of the auxiliary river water pumps does not reflect the need ,

to retain the monthly test frequency. Amendment No. 117 also removed i the requirement to cycle power operated or automatic valves through ,

one complete cycle of full travel. This was removed because the NRC position is that valve cycle surveillances do not need to be included i in the technical specificationu sinco all safety related valves are cycled as part of the IST program. The auxiliary river water pump motor operated discharge valves are cycled as part of the IST '

program. BV-1 surveillance requirement 4.7.13.1.a has therefore been  ;

revised to require demonstration of at least one auxiliary river -

water subsystem operable at least once per 92 days, by verifying that each pump develops at least 60 psig discharge pressure, while pumping through its test flow line. Therefore, this is an administrative change and does not affect the UFSAR or any regulatory basis.

Similar to the BV-1 Auxiliary River Water surveillance .

requirement, BV-2 sutveillance requirement 4.7.13.1.a for the Standby  ;

Service Water System has been revised to reflect the quarterly ,

testinct requirements of the other pumps in the technical specitications. The standby service water pumps are required to be tested periodically during unit operation, shutdown and refueling periods in accordance with UFSAR Section 9.2.1.2.4. No where in the UFSAR does it require these pumps to be tested in accordance with the requirements of ASME. The ASME XI Code only applies to Class 1, 2 or 3 components that are required to perform a specific function in shutting down a reactor or in mitigating the consequences of an accident and that are provided with an emergency power source. UFSAR Section 9.2.1.2.1 and 9.2.1.2.3 state, "A DBA is not considered coincident with requirements for the Standby Service Water System."

These pumps are not Class 1, 2 or 3 components, therefore, these pumps are not required to be tested in accordance with the IST 1 program per ASME XI. Hence, DV-2 surveillance requirement 4.7.13.1.a has been revised to require demonstration of at least one standby service water subsystem operable at least once per 92 days, by verifying that each pump develops at least 109 psid differential pressure, while pumping through its test flow line. Therefore, this is an administrative change and does not af fect; the UFSAR or any regulatory basis.

f ATTACHMENT 1 (C:ntinund) -

,, Page Two Both BV-1 and BV-2 surveillance requirement 4.7.8.1.b have been i revised by replacing "and" with "or". The "and" implies that more than one condition must be satisfied before the required surveillance testing is performed. However, the intent of the surveillance requirement is to require testing after satisfying only one of the  ;

stated conditions. This is consistent with the use of "or" where only one condition must be satisfied before the required surveillance  ;

testing is performed. Therefore, this is an administrative change and does not affect the UFSAR or any regulatory basis. ,

BV-1 and BV-2 specification 3.7.9.1 have been updated to reflect l the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) limitations on sealed source contamination with the exception of surveillance requirement 4.7.9.1.3 Reports. The STS require submittal of a " report" to the Commission. The current surveillance requirement requires submittal ,

of a "Special Report" to the Commission. This Special Report is i listed in Administrative Control 6.9.2 and the addressee (Document Control Desk) is the same for submittal of either an annual report in r accordance with 6.9.1.4 or submittal of a Special Report in accordance with 6.9.2. Therefore, the requirement for submittal of a i Special Report will be retained. The revised LCO changes the range ,

of sources controlled by this specification to sealed sources in  ;

excess of 100 microcuries of beta and/or gamma emitting material or 5 microcuries of alpha emitting material. This will substantially -

reduce the requirements for testing and reporting inconsequential leakage from sealed sources of low activity materials. The Action and surveillance requirements have also been reworded to reflect the STS and clarify the requirements. Sealed sources are not considered in the safety analysis but are administratively controlled as a routine occupational exposure concern of the NRC approved radiological controls program in accordance with 10CFR20. Therefore, this is an administrative change and does not affect the UFSAR and is consistent with the STS.

BV-1 Bases 3/4.9.12 and 3/4.9.13 Fuel Building Ventilation System '

has been revised to correct an error in describing t.te Supplemental Leak Collection and Release System (SLCRS). The current bases state "The SLCRS portion of the ventilation system is safety related and continuously filters the fuel building exhaust air." This is i incorrect, since although the SLCRS takes suction on the fuel building to maintain a negative pressure in this area, the normal exhaust air is not filtered through the main filter banks. However, upon a high radiation signal the exhaust air flow is diverted through j the main filter banks prior to discharge to the atmosphere.

t Therefore, the bases have been revised to correctly describe the operation of the system as follows: "The SLCRS portion of the ventilation system is safoty related and maintains a negative i pressure in the fuel building. The SLCRS flow is normally exhausted to the ataosphere without filtering, however, the flow is diverted I through the main filter banks by manual actuation or on a high radiation signal." Therefore, this is an administrative change and is consistent with UFSAR Section 6.6 which describes the operation of l the SLCRS.

l l

l

r ATTACIDENT C No Signifcant Hazard Eysluation Beaver Valley Power Station Proposed Technical Specification Change l BV-1 Change No. 168 BV-2 Chanae No. 30 Basis for proposed no significant harards consideration determination: The Commission has provided standards for determining whether a significant hazards consideration exists in accordance with 10CFR50.92(c). A proposed amendment to an operating license for a facility involves no significant hazards consideration if operation of the facility in accordance with tha proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

The proposed changes do not involve a significant hazard consideration because:

1) The test frequency for the BV-1 Auxiliary River Water (ARW) pumps in surveillance requirement 4.7.13.1.a has been changed from monthly to quarterly. This is consistent with the test frequency for the plant safety related pumps. These pumps are classified as Non-Nuclear Safety (NNS) and as such are not required to be tested in accordance with the IST program per ASME XI. Since the ARW pumps are backups to the safety related River Water pumps operation on a quarterly basis is sufficient to provide the operator with the information required to evaluate the performance of these pumps. This is consistent with BV-1 UFSAR 9.16 which provides for periodic testing of the ARW system from the auxiliary river intake structure to the river water system Connection.

The BV-2 Standby Service Water (SWE) pumps surveillance requirement 4.7.13.1.a has been changed to require testing quarterly in lieu of testing in accordance with specification 4.0.5. Similar to the BV-1 ARW pumps these pumps are also Non-Nuclear Safety and therefore are not required to be tested in accordance with the IST program. Since the SWE pumps are backups to the safety related Service Water pumps testing on a quarterly basis without the requirement to test in accordance with ASME XI will still provide the operator with sufficient information to evaluate the performance of these pumps. This is consistent with BV-2 UFSAR 9.2.1.2 which provides for periodic testing of the SWE system from the alternate intake structure to the service water system connection.

Both BV-1 and BV-2 surveillance requirement 4.7.8.1.b have been revised by replacing "and" with "or". The "and" implies that more than one condition must be satisfied before the required surveillance testing is performed. However, the intent of the surveillance requirement is to require testing after satisfying only one of the stated conditions. This is consistent with the use of "or" where only one condition must be satisfied before the required surveillance testing is performed.

l'

} ATTACHMENT C (C:ntinund)

. . . . - Page Two f

i Specificacion 3.7.9.1 has been updated for both units to reflect l the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) limitations on sealed l source contamination with the exception of surveillance  !

requirement 4.7.9.1.3 Reports. The requirement for submittal of I a Special Report in accordance with specification 6.9.2 will be  !

retained. The LCO has been modified by changing the minimum  !

range from sources controlled by this specification to sealed i sources in excuss of 100 microcuries of beta and/or gamma  !

emitting material or 5 microcuries of alpha emitting material.  !

The Action and surveillance requirements have also been reworded I to reflect the STS and clarify the requirements. Sealed sources  !

are not considered in the safety analysis but are  !

administratively controlled as a routine occupational exposure concern of the NRC approved radiological controls program in l accordance with 100FR20.

i The BV-1 Bases 3/4.9.12 and 3/4.9.13 Puel Building Ventilation l System has been revised to correct an error in describing the operation of the Supplemental Leak Collection and Release System i (SLCRS) . The current bases state "The SLCRS portion of the  !

ventilation system is safety related and continuously filters the i fuel building exhaust air." This is incorrect, since although  !

the SLCRS takes suction on the fuel building to maintain a l negative pressure in this area, the normal exhaust air is not j filtered through the main filter banks. However, upon a high l radiation signal the exhaust air flow is diverted through the 3 main filter banks prior to discharge to the atmosphere, f Therefore, the bases have been revised to correctly deteribe the operation of the system as follows: "The SLCRS portion of the ,

ventilation system is safety related and maintains a negative }

pressure in the fuel building. The SLCRS ficw is normally i exhausted to the atmosphere without filtering, however, the flow i is diverted through the main filter banks by manual actuation or on a high radiation signal." i These changes are consistent with the FSAR accident analysis I assumptions and therefore will not increase the probability or  !

consequences of any accident previously evaluated.

2) The proposed changes provide clarification and consistency r betwe6n the two units for surveillance test requirements and i frequency. These changes will not reduce the safety of the plant .

since they are consistent with the FSAR accident analysis and will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from those described in the FSAR.

3) These changes are consistent with the accepted criteria for operating, testing and verification of system operability. The proposed change will not affect any of the plant setpoints or margin to the accident analysis limits and will not reduce the margin of safety as a result of these changes.

Therefore, b4 sed en the above considerations, implementation of the proposed changes sill not involve a significant hazard.

-,