ML19323F986
| ML19323F986 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 05/19/1980 |
| From: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Clayton F ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8005300066 | |
| Download: ML19323F986 (5) | |
Text
' e' f **20e y,,
.,c, UNITED STATES y
)
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSION g
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 2f455 e
a May 19,1980 Docket No. 50-364 Mr. F. L. Clayton, Jr.
Senior Vice President Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35219
Dear Mr. Clayton:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR FARLEY 2 OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION As a result of our continuing review of the operating license application for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, we have developed the enclosed request for additional information.
Please provide the information requested in the enclosure. Our review schedule is based on the assumption that the additional information will be available for our review by May 30, 1980.
If you cannot meet this
~
date, please inform us within 7 days after receipt of this letter so that we may revise our scheduling.
Sincerely n
J-A. Sc wencer, Chief Licensing Branch #2
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page 1
l 806.s300 o 6 6
l Mr. F. L. Clayton,'Jr.
2 May 19,1980 I
cc: Mr. Alan R. Barton Executive Vice President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Mr. Ruble A. Thomas Vice President Southern Company Services, Inc.
Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Mr. George F. Trowbridge Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036
' - ~ ~ ~ __
S w
e G
ENCLOSURE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-364 Requests from the following branch in NRC are included in this enclosure.
Requests and pages are numbered sequentially with respect to requests transmitted following issuance of SER Supplement No. 3.
i BRANCH PAGE N0.
Radiological Assessment Branch 331-2 3 31 - 3 1
e
~
,n.
331-2 RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT BRANCH 331.lA The response to 331.1 concerning the spent fuel transfer (12.1-5, 12.1-9) tube operation is incomplete. Provide the results of your review of the recent Unit 1 survey and conclusions referenced in your March 17, 1979 letter.
331.2 It appears that the quantities of radiation protection (12.3.2.3) equipment in Tables 12.1-1 and 12.3-2 provided for normal station operation is not adequate to meet the anticipated needs of a two unit plant during normal operations, accident conditions and during major outages that require supplemental workers and extensive work in high radiation areas. You should revise these tables to show equipment adequate to operate a two unit plant.
In addition, you should include a table specifying the quantity and types of respiratory protection equipment available.
331.3 (12.3.1.1)
It is our position that you commit to implement your radiation protection program in accordance with Regulatory Guides 8.2; 8.4; 8.8 (as applicable to operat'ng plants);
8.9; 8.10; 8.13; 8.14; and 8.15 or submit acceptable alterna-tives.
You should revise Section 12.3 of the FSAR to include this information. With regard to your commitment to imple-ment an ALARA program in accordance with Regulatory Guide 8.8, you should:
a)
Identify by title the individual (s) responsible for the ALARA program, and describe how they are placed in the organization, particularly the mechanism for communication with plant management.
b)
Identify by title the individual (s) to be responsible for the independent radiation protection review of design anc' equipment changes potentially involving significant occu-pational exposures.
Provide the health physics education and experience of each such individual. Describe formal arrangements for assuring that adequate independent radiation protection reviews are performed, and that adequate records are kept to document the completion of each such review.
r
331-3 331.4 The individual listed as Chemistry and Health Physics Supervisor is no longer on the plant staff.
You should update Section 13.1.3.2.7 to provide information for the current incumbent. The individual functioning as Health Physics Supervisor must meet the qualifications for a Radiation Progection Manager (RPM) recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.8, " Personnel Selection and Qualification,"
Section 13.1.3.1 should be revised to show these qualifications.
331.5 It is our position that the Health Physics Foreman and Technicians meet the qualification requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.8 which references ANSI 18.1.
Section 13.1.3.1 of the FSAR should be revised to reflect such qualifications.
Section 4. of ANSI 18.1 lists position qualifications that include education, training and experience as elements leading to qualification.
In addition, the experience referenced must be in the individual's speciality, which in this case would be radiation' protection.
I
\\
i i