ML19323D929
| ML19323D929 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1980 |
| From: | Taul H DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | Toalston A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| EF2-48-877, NUDOCS 8005220558 | |
| Download: ML19323D929 (19) | |
Text
c-
= - - - -
~
COPY 2 of 3 Detroit Edienn N;4 rab
"'n '""
5 %#%F 5 I (313) 23EB000 E 2: -
M7 4
April 30, 1980 EF2 - 48,877 Mr. Argil Toalston, Chief Power Supply Analysis Section Antitrust and Indemnity Group Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555
Dear Mr. Toalston:
Reference:
Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341
Subject:
Information for Antitrust Review Detroit Edison hereby transmits three (3) originals and twenty-two (22) copies of updated antitrust information, as you requested.
This information is being provided consistent with the NRC's Regulatory Guide 9.3.
Very truly yours, AAl Enclosures cc:
Mr.
L.
L.
Kintner i
THis DOCUMENT CONTAINS POOR QUAUTY PAGES t
8005220558 L
BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY Docket No. 50-341 ENRICO FERMI UNIT 2 INFORMATION FOR ANTITRUST REVIEW OF THE OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION i
April 1980
a INTRODUCTION On September 26, 1972, the Commission issued Applicant in this Docket a construction permit containing language which satisfied Applicant's commitment to the Justice Department.
The condition in the construction permit is as follows:
" Applicant agrees to abide by the agreements and interpretations between it and the Department of Justice relating to Article I, paragraph 8 of the Electric Power Pool Agreement between the Applicant and Consumers Power Company as specified in a letter from Applicant to the Director of Regulation dated August 13, 1971, and the letter from Richard W. McLaren, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, U.S.
Department of Justice, to Bertram H.
Schur, Associated General Counsel, Atomic Energy Commission, dated August 16, 1971.
(Copies of the Letters are attached)
On May 1, 1973, an agreement was executed between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company called the
" Electric Coordination Agreement between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company".
This agreement per Article XIV cancels and supersedes the " Electric Power Pooling Agreement" dated December 22, 1962.
This agreement further states under Article 1, paragraph 6 " Connections with Others" as follows:
"This Agreement shall be revised, amended, modified or replaced in order to admit third parties, having public utility functions and responsibilities, to this or an amended, revised, modified or new agreement.
To be eligible, the applicant third party must have the:
(a)
Ability to meet the installed reserve capability responsibility criteria then applicable to the parties hereto (without prejudice to the right of the parties i
hereto, upon the entry of an applicant, to propose such changes, if any, in the terms and conditions of said participa-tion as may be necessary to allocate equitably all costs and benefits of said participation between the applicant and the parties hereto) ;
(b)
Ability to participate in the interconnection and grid line responsibilities; (c)
Ability to have its system be dispatched by the central control center of the parties hereto;
(d)
Ability to provide representation on the five standing committees of this Agreement; (e)
Ability to comply with the other terms and conditions of this Agreement; and (f)
Ability to have sufficient financial stand-ing so as to reasonably assure that it can 4
perform fully the various provisions of this Agreement."
The new co-ordination agreement was reviewed by the U.
S.
Department of Justice in Dockets 50-452A and 50-453A (Greenwood Units 2 and 3) and found to be in compliance with Enrico Fermi Unit 2 construction permit condition.
On January 5, 1976 a new agreement was executed between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company called the " Electric Coordination Agreement between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company".
This Agreement per Article XIV cancels and supersedes the May 1, 1973 Agreement Article 1, paragraph 6,
" Connections with Others", omits the eligibility referred to:
"(f) ability to have sufficient financial standing so as to reasonably assure that it can perform
' fully the various provisions of this Agreement."
ANSWERS TO REGULATORY GUIDE 9.3 1 (a).
In the initial filing, Enrico Fermi Unit 2 was scheduled for operation in 1974.
Four units, two fossil-fired at 800 MW each and two nuclear at 1150 MW each, were scheduled to follow Enrico Fermi Unit 2 starting in 1977 and running through 1980.
- However, lower growth rate projections coupled with slippages and changes in generation expansion plans, resulted in the addition of one fossil-fired (800 MW) unit that went into commercial operation in 1979.
No other unit additions are planned prior to Enrico Fermi No. 2.
Following the Fermi 2 unit, two coal fired units (650 MW each) are authorized for commercial operation, one in 1984 and the other in 1985.
Present projected reserves appear to be adequate until the late 1980s when capacity and energy purchases from other utilities may be necessary to supplement projected Detroit Edison reserves (See attached revised Load Forecast Tables 1 and 2).
4 2
1 (b).
The Detroit Edison Company has amended or replaced in whole the following agreements with other electric utilities, since the initial filing of Fermi 2:
A new Inter-Utility Power Interchange Agreement between The City of Detroit and The Detroit Edison Company went into effect October 1, 1978. (1)
A new Electric Coordination Agreement between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company became effective January 5, 1976.
(1)
A new Interconnection Agreement between Consumers Power Company, The Detroit Edison Company and Ontario Hydro went into effect January 1, 1975.
Amendment No. 2 went into effect July 1, 1979.
(1)
The Inter-Utility Power Interchange Agreement between the City of Wyandotte and The Detroit Edison Company was amended effective March 1, 1978.
(1)
A new " Interconnection Agreement" between the Ford Motor Company and The Detroit Edison Company went into effect September 5, 1979.
(2)
The Operating Agreement among Consumers Power l
Company, The Detroit Edison Company and Indiana and Michigan Electric Company now has sixteen amendments, the latest of which was filed January 30, 1980.
(1)
As a result of conferences held with representatives of the Anti-trust Division of the U.
S.
Department of Justice in the filing of construction permits for the Enrico Fermi and Greenwood nuclear units, The Detroit i
Edison Company agreed to accept certain conditions pro-posed by the Justice Department.
In conformance to those conditions, the Consumers Power Electric Coordination Agreement was consumated.
The new agreements with Ford Motor Company, the City of Wyandotte and the City of Detroit was primarily a format change to be more uniform with the other interchange agreements.
(1)
On file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2)
In process for filing with the Michigan Public Service Commission 3
1 (b).
The new amendments with Ontario Hydro, as well as (Cont'd) the amendments to the Operating Agreement with Consumers Power Company, Indiana and Michigan Electric Company and Toledo Edison Company were basically price changes.
A new agreement between The Detroit Edison Company and Northern Indiana Public Service Corporation became effective May 1, 1979.
This agreement is similar to i
the one with Indiana and Michigan Electric Company.
1 (c).
The following changes to transmission in respect to:
l (1) the nuclear unit, (2) interconnections, or (3) connec-tions to wholesale customers, have been made since the initial filing for Enrico Fermi Unit 2.
(1)
The original Enrico Fermi Unit 2 transmission J
included four 345 KV circuits.
These circuits were part of the planned transmission for two units (Enrico Fermi Unit 2 and Enrico Fermi Unit 3).
Due to the indefinite deferment of Enrico Fermi Unit 3, two of the transmission circuits have been deferred.
(2)
Original plans called for four 345 KV circuits interconnecting Detroit Edison with Toledo Edison.
These included two circuits from Detroit Edison's Lulu Station.
That station is now deferred and there now exists a single tap to Toledo Edison from a double cir-cuit Detroit Edison line.
This results in a total of only three interconnections between Detroit Edison and Toledo Edison.
4 (3)
Transmission to the City of Pontiac, City of Croswell, and the Thumb Electric Co-op has been strengthened.
The City of Sebewaing now has a 40 kV interconnection with Detroit Edison.
Automatic' throw-over of the circuit to the Southeastern Michigan Rural Electric Co-op has been added to improve power supply reliability.
1 (d).
In the Fall of 1974, representatives from the Rural Electric Association Northern Michigan Electric Coopera-
'tive, Inc., and Wolverine Electric Cooperative, Inc. net with Detroit Edison to discuss the possibility of their purchasing Detroit Edison existing generation as well as generation still under construction.
Their proposal would provide a source of funds to aid Detroit Edison to resume t
its construction on new generation.
The proposal resulted in an agreement, signed in February, 1977 whereby The Detroit Edison Company sold an undivided ownership of 20 percent of the Enrico Fermi No. 2 Unit to' Northern Michigan Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Wolverine' Electric Cooperative,.Inc.
4
' l' (e).
Two' basic changes were made in the Wholesale or Resale F
rate structure.
1.
The valley hours were increased to exclude only the period of 1100 hours0.0127 days <br />0.306 hours <br />0.00182 weeks <br />4.1855e-4 months <br /> to 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> Monday through Friday.
This change was made to coincide with the Michigan jurisdictional rates and thereby avoid any possible pricing conflict.
2.
The rate structure for Consumers Power was changed at their request.
See attached Schedule No.
5.
Copies of the latest rate schedules are attached.
1 (f).
The Village of Sebewaing and the Michigan Minicipal Co-operative Power Pool have been added as new wholesale customers.
There have been no changes concerning parts (2), (3) and (4) of the question.
1 (g).
The following units are presently scheduled for operation after the Enrico Fermi 2 unit.
No power output allocations have been made for any of these units.
As the company agreed in the Greenwood Units 2 and 3 Dockets (50-452A and 50-453A) the right of_ participation was offered to entities in southeastern Michigan.
No entity agreed to participate with Detroit Edison in the units as either owners or purchasers of power output from these units.
However, as a result of the offer the Michigan Municipal Co-operative Power Pool commenced negotiation with the company and was taken on as a new wholesale for resale customer.
Unit Size (MW)
Type Year Belle River 1 664 Fossil 1984 Belle River 2 664 Fossil 1985 1 (h).
As was mentioned in the initial Enrico Fermi Unit 2 filing, negotiations were underway between the Public Lighting Commission of the City of Detroit and The Detroit Edison Company regarding a proposed revised interconnection agreement.
The new agreement became effective October 1, 1971.
It provided for mutual emergency _and standby assistance, economy energy interchange and the sale or purchase of capacity and energy between the parties.
A new agreement with expanded provisions including trans-mission services became ef fective October 1, 1978.
The Village of Sebewaing has been generating all of its own requirements, utilizing low-cost interruptible-rate gas as its primary fuel and oil as its backup fuel.
5
1 (h).
Due to the shortage of these fossil fuels, Jt approached (Cont'd)
The Detroit Edison Company and a contract for the sale by The Detroit Edison Company to the Village of Sebewaing for 2,500 kW was negotiated.
On November 15, 1973, a 40 kV Interconnection was placed in service between the parties.
In the Summer of 1974, The Detroit Edison Company was approached by the Michigan Municipal Co-operative Power Pool concerning a capacity and energy purchase.
An agreement was negotiated wherein Detroit Edison sold 20 megawatts of capacity at a 100 percent load factor to the Michigan Municipal Co-operative Power Pool, beginning September 1, 1974, and running for at least two years.
Charges for this capacity and energy are at Detroit Edison's wholesale for resale rate.
At the request of the co-operatives, on two occasions the sale was increased from 20 to 30 megawatts.
In March of 1979, the Company offered the Michigan Public Power Agency and the City of Lansing up to 200 megawatt ownership in Enrico Fermi No.
2, and the Belle River Plant, Units 1 and 2.
Discussions between the parties are still underway.
Wabash Valley Rural Electric Cooperative (Indiana) approached the Company in 1979 regarding their possible interest in purchasing a part of Greenwood No.
1, an oil-fired generating unit that Detroit Edison placed in service in July of 1979.
Negotiations are still underway.
j IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Detroit Edison Compar.y has caused its name to be hereunto signed by Harry Tauber, its Vice President -
Engineering and Construction, this 30th day of April, 1980.
THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY O
f BY:
Harry Tauber Vice President - Engineering and Construction 6
'1
- STATE OF MICHIGAN
)
)
SS.
COUNTY OF WAYNE
)
Harry Tauber, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he is Vice President - Engineering and Construction of The Detroit Edison Company, the Applicant i
j for licenses hereunder; that he has read the foregoing Application for Licenses and knows the contents thereof; and that the same are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
/
/3 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of A 1,
1980.
O '
[
.t u..
t um N Q j:( */ hllD! C, I " Y'
(
i My Comad" cc L c.ae3 Ecb. 21, 33
THE DETR0lT EDISON 000FANY f
F.E.R.C. Electric Tarlff, Volume No. 1 Third Revised Sheet No. 4 (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 4)
Rate Schedule No. 2 RATE SCHEDULE GOVERNING SERVICE TO:
City of Croswell RATE PER MONTH.
A Customer Charge of:
5850.00 per month A Facilities Charge of:
51,500.00 per month A Demand Charge of:
18.56 per kilowatt of billing demand per month
]
An Energy Charge of:
2.14 per kilowatthour applied to 1.01 times the meter 6 4 ouantity FUEL ADJUSTMENT AND PURCHASED POWER ADJUSTMENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is subject to the provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3.
\\
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tari f f.
SPECIAL FACILITIES CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
MINIM' M CHARGE:
J Customor Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated a bove.
Month!y Biiiing Demand The daily demand is the highest 60-minute integrated reading of the demand meter in each day, excluding valley hours. The monthly billing demand is the highest daily demand established during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is exceeded by the highes t demand occurring during valley hours on the same calender day.
In no event will the monthly billing demand be less than 65% of the highest monthly billing demand during calendar months of June, July, August, September and October of the preceding eleven calendar months nor less than 50% of the contract capacity. Demands are to be based on 1.01 times the metered quantity.
VALLEY HOUR USE: See Tariff Paragraph 3.1 of the Company's Tariff.
POWER FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.2 of the Compeny's Tarif f.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRUPTIBLE OPTION: If service is elected in accordance with Paragraph 3.4 of the Company's Tariff, the demand charge will be reduced by $2.40 per kilowatt per month, t
issued by:
E. L. Crove, Jr.
Effective April 1, 1980 under authority of Letter Vice Chairman of the Board order of the Federal Energy Itegulatory Commission dated January 17, 1980 in Case Issued On April 1, 1980 No. era 0-100
THE DETR0lT EDISON C0eFANY Third Revised Sheet No. 5 4
F.E.R.C. Electric Teriff, Volume No. 1 (Supersedes Second Revised Shoot No. 5)
Rate Schedule No. 4 RATE SO4EDULE GOVERNING SERVICE TO:
The Thisab Electric Cooperative RATE PER MONTH:
A Customer Charge of:
3750.00 per month a Demand Charge of:
19.72 per kilowatt of billing demand per sponth An Energy Charge of:
2.14 per kilowatthour For service at less than 40 kilovolts, Energy Charges are to be applied to 1.01 times the metered quantity.
FUEL ADJUSTMENT AND PIRCHASED POWER ADJUSTMENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is subject to the provisions of Tarif f Faragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tarif f.
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tariff Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tariff.
SPECIAL FACILITIES QiARGE: See Tariff Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tariff.
MINIMUM CHARGE: Customer Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus the Demand Charge as stared above.
Monthly Billing Demand The daily demand is the highest 60-minute integrated reading of the demand meter in each
- day, excluding valley hours. The monthly billing demand is the highest daily demand established during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is exceeded by the h ighest demand occurring during valley hours on the same calendar day.
In no event will the montnly billing demand be less than 65% of the highest monthly billing demand during calendar months of June, July, August, September and October of the preceding eleven calendar months nor less than 50% of the contract capacity. For service at less than 40,000 volts, demands are to be based on 1.01 times the metered quantity.
VALLEY HOUR USE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
POWER FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.2 of the Company's Tarif f.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRUPTIBLE OPTION: If service is elected in accordance with Paragraph 3.4 of the Company's Tarif f, the demand charge will be reduced by 52.40 per kilowatt per month.
Vke Ch ruin f the soard Effective: April 1, 1980 under authority of letter order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Issued ont April 1. 1960
- **I" d***d J*"
- U II* I" U U " "
Mo. ER80-100
THE DETROIT EDISON 00pFANY
(
F.E.R.C. Electric Teriff, Volume No. I Third Revised Sheet No. 6 (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 6)
Rate Schedule No. 5 RATE SCHEDULE GOVERNING SERVICE TO:
Consumers Power Company at Pontiec, Michigan RATE PER MONTH.
A Customer Charge of:
12,500.00 per month A Demand Charge of:
16.95 per kW of on-peak billing demand plus:
11.75 per kW of maximum demand for service at subtransmission levels 11.15 per kW of maximum demand for service at transmission levels The maximum demand shall be the highest 30 minute demand created during the previous 12 billing months, including the current month, but not less than 50% of contract capacit>.
Energy Charges:
2.254 per kilowatthour f or all kilowatthours used during the on-peak period.
1.954 per kilowatthour for all kilowatthours used during the of f-peak period.
For service at less than 120,000 volts, energy and demand Charges are to be applied to 1.01 times the metered quantity.
FUEL ADJUSTMENT A>0 PLRCHASED POWER ADJUSTMENT: The Energy Charge in the abov to the provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tarif f.
LATE PAYMENT QiARGE:
See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tari f f.
SPECIAL FACILITIES CHARGE:
See Tariff Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tariff.
MINIMUM CHARGE:
Customer Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated above.
POWER FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tariff Paragraph 3.2 of Company's Tariff.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRUPTIBLE OPTION:
if service is elected in accordance with Paragraph 3.4 of the Company's Tarif f, the demand charge will be reduced by 12.40 per kilowatt per month.
Ponthly On-Peak Billing Demand The monthly on-peak billing demand shall be the average of the 4 weekly highest 30-minute integrated readings of the demand meter during the on-peak hours of the billing period in no event will the monthly on-peak billing demand be less than 65% of the highest monthly on-peak billing desmand during the calendar months of June, July, August, September, and October of the preceding eleven calendar months, nor less than 50% of contract capacity.
(Continued On Next Page)
Issued By:
E. L. crove. Jr.
Vice Chairman of the Board sfiective April 1.1980 under authority of 14tter order of the Federal Energy Segulatory issued Ons April 1, 1940 cocuission dated January 17. 1980 in case No. EA80-100
THE DETn0lT EDISON 000FANY Third Revised Sheet No. 6
{
F.E.R.C. Electric Tarlf f, Volm No. I (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 6)
Schedule of On-Peak Hours On-peak hours are those hours between 1100 hours0.0127 days <br />0.306 hours <br />0.00182 weeks <br />4.1855e-4 months <br /> and 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> each day, Monday through Friday, legal holidays excluded.
The following will be considered legal holidays for the purpose of applying this schedute:
New Year's Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, " Monday" holidays, where legally recognized, will be recognized in place of the
" traditional" holidays.
l l
1ssued Sys E. L. Crove, Jr.
Effective: April 1,1980 under authority of letter Vice Chairman of the Board Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission dated January 17, 1980 in case Issued on: April 1, 1960,
gio. Emao loo
THE DETR0lT EDISON CorANY Third Revised Sheet No. 7
(
F.E.R.C. Electric Tariff, Voline No. 1 (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 7)
Rate Schedulo No. 6 RATE SO4EDULE GOVERNING SERYlCE TO:
Ylllage of Clinton RATE PER MONTH:
A Customer Charge of:
5150.00 per month A Facilities Charge of:
12,000.00 per month i
A Demand Charge of:
19.39 per kilowatt of billing demand per month An Energy Charge of:
2.l( per kilowatthour applied to 1.01 times the metered quantity.
FUEL ADJUSTMENT AND PLRCHASED POWER ADJUSTENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is subject to tne provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tarif f.
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tarif f.
SPECI AL FACILITIES OtARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
MINIMUM CHARGE:
Customer Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated a bo v v.
Monthly Billing Demand The daily demand is tha highest 60-minute integrated reading of the demand meter in each day, excluding valley hourt. The monthly billing demand is the highest daily demand established during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is exceeded by the h ighest demand occurring during valley hours on the same calendar day.
In no event will the monthly billing demand be less than 655 of the highest monthly billing demand during calendar months of June, July, August, September and October of the preceding eleven calender months nor less than 50% of the contract capacity. Demands are to be based on 1.01 times the metered q ua nt it y.
VALLEY HOUR USE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
POWER FACTOR Cl.AUSE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.2 of the Company's Tarif f.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRUPTIBLE OPTION: If service is elected in accordance with Paragraph 3.4 of the Company's Tarif f, the demand charge will be reduced by 52.40 per kliowatt per month.
Issued ty:
E. L. crove, Jr.
Effective April 1. 1980 under authority of Istter Vice Chairman of the Board Order of the Federal Energy segulatory Coamaission dated January 17. 1980 in Case Issued On: April 1. 1980 llo. ER80-100
e THE DETR0lT EDISON (XM'ANY Third Revised Sheet No. 8
(
F.E.R.C. Electric Tariff, Volume M. 1 (Supersedes Second Revised SheeY No. 8)
Rate Schedule No.14 RATE SCHEDULE GOVERNING SERYlCE TO:
The Southeastern Michigan Rural Electric Cooperative RATE PER MONTH:
A Customer Charge of:
$250.00 per month A Demand Charge of:
59.03 per kilowatt of billing demand per month An Energy Charge of:
2.l( per kilowatthour FUEL ADJUSTMENT WD PLRCHASED POWER ADJUSTMENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is subject to the provlt.lons of Tariff Paragraph 3.3. of the Company's Tariff.
I LATE PAYMENT WARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tarif f.
SPECI AL FAC!LITIES CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
MINIMUM CHARGE: Customer Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated above, i
Monthly Billing Demand The daily demand is the highest 60-minute integrated reading of the demand meter in each
- day, excluding valley hours. The monthly billing demand is the highest daily demand established during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is exceeded by the h ighest demand occurring during valley hours on the same calendar day.
In no event will the monthly billing demand be less than 65% of the highest monthly billing demand during calendar months of June, July, August, September and October of the preceding eleven calencar months nor less than 50% of the contract capacity.
VALLEY HOUR USE: See TarI f f Paragraph 3.1 of the Company's Tari f f.
POWER FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.2 of the Company's Tarif f.
i i
l
(
lesued By:
- 1. L. Crove. Jr.
Effective: April 1.1980 under authority of letter Vice Distroan of the Board Order of t.he lederal Lavrgy twsulatory Issued on: April 1, 1980 Cousaission dated January 17, 1980 in Case Iso. Ea80100
[
THE DETR0lT EDISON CDFANY F.E.R.C. Electric Tariff, Volume No. I Third Revised Sheet No. 9 (Supersedes Mceid Revised Sheet No. 9)
Rete Schedule No. IB RATE SCHEDULE GOVERNING SERVICE TO:
Village of Sebewalng RATE PER MONTH.
A Customer Charge of:
5150.00 per month A Facilities Charge of:
11,250.00 per month A Demand Charge of:
510.04 per kilowatt of billing demand per month An Energy Charge of:
2.14 per kilowatthour applied to 1.01 times the metered quantity FUEL ADJUSTMENT AND PURC> LASED POWER ADJUSTMENT: The Energy Charge in the abov to the provisions of Tariff Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tariff.
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE:
See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tarif f.
SPECIAL FACILITIES CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
MINIMUM CHARGE:
Customer Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated above.
Monthly Billing Demand The daily demand is the highest 60-minute Integrated reading of the demand meter in each excluding valley hours.
- day, The monthly billing demand is the highest daily demand established during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is exceeded by the h ighest demand occurring during valley hours on the same calendar day.
In no event will the monthly billing demand be les. than 65% of the highest monthly billing demand during calendar months of June, July, August, September and October of the preceding eleven calencar months nor less than 50% of the contract capacity. Demands are to be based on 1.01 times the metered quantity.
VALLEY HOUR USE:
See Tarlf f Paragraph 3.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
POWER FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.2 of the Company's Tarif f.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRUPTIBLE OPTION: If service is elected in accordance with Paragraph 3.4 of the Company's Tarif f, the Demand C.harge wiII be reduced by 32.40 per kilouatt per month.
1esued By:
- 1. L. crove, Jr.
Effective: April 1,1980 under authority of Letter Vica Chairman of the Board Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Iseued Ons April 1, 1980 Commission dated January 17, 1980 in Case No. E180-100 i
THE DETROIT ED1 SON 008PANY F.E.R.C. Electric Tarif f, Volume No. I Third Revised Sheet No. 10 (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 10)
Rate Schedule No. 20 RATE SCHEDULE GOVERNING SERVICE TO:
The Michigan Municipal Cooperative Power Pool RATE PER MONTH:
A Customer Charge of:
$150.00 par month A Demand Charge of:
19.00 per kilowatt of billing demand per month An Energy Charge of:
2.054perkilowatthour FUEL ADJUSTMENT AND PURCHASED POWER ADJUSTMENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is sub to the provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tarif f.
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tariff Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tariff.
MINIMUM CHARGE: Customer Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated above.
Monthly BilIing Demand The monthly bitling demand is the contract capacity.
Issued Sys E. L. crove Jr.
Vice Chairman of the Board E f fec tive: April 1.1980 under authority of Letter Order of the Federal Energy segulatory Issued on: April 1. 1980 Commission dated January 17. 1980 in Case No. ER80-100
TABLE 1 DETROIT EDISON ANNUAL PEAK DEMAND AND ENERGY PROJECTIONS ANNUAL ENERGY ANNUAL PEAK REQUIREMENTS YEAR-LOAD (MW) kWh x 106 1963 3,281 18,632 1964 3,616 20,375 1965 3,975 22,375 1966 4,273 24,704 1967 4,422 25,611 1968 4,835 28,171 1969 5,201 30,303 1970 5,465 31,158 1971 5,986 33,062 1972 6,049 35,616 1973 6,935 37,798 1974 6,614 35,826 1975 6,467 35,034 1976 6,613 38,046 1977 7,381 39,238 1978 7,312 39,930 1979 6,829 39,593 1980 7,105 37,842 1981 7,382 39,704 1982 7,533 40,566 1983 7,904 42,406 1984 8,212 44,174 1985 8,536 45,656 1986 8,863 47,240 1987 9,173 48,683 1988 9,475 50,426 1989 9,792 51,810 1990 10,108 53,289 April 1980
TABLE 2 COMBINED SYSTEMS OF DETROIT EDISON AND CONSUMERS POWER ANNUAL PEAK DEMAND AND ENERGY PROJECTIONS COMBINED SYSTEMS COMBINED SYSTEMS ANNUAL ENERGY COINCIDENT PEAK REQUIREMENTS YEAR LOAD (MW)
(kWh x 106) 1963 5,476 30,899 1964 5,966 33,535 1965 6,526 36,913 1966 7,099 40,595 1967 7,280 42,276 1968 7,846 46,286 1969 8,435 49,738 1970 8,751 51,253 1971 9,573 54,571 1972 9,743 58,946 1973 11,265 63,010 1974 10,723 60,452 1975 10,601 59,316 1976 10,798 64,041 1977 11,657 66,068 1978 11,912 67,422 1979 11,224 67,499 1980 11,925 66,757 1981 12,322 69,318 j
1982 12,753 71,877 1983 13,284 74,690 1984 13,702 77,114 1985 14,176 79,514 1986 14,663 82,071 1987 15,143 84,486 1988 15,615 87,289
)
1989 16,032 89,253 1990 16,448 91,333 i
April 1980