ML19323B093

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Re Util Analysis of Postulated Fuel Handling Accident Inside Containment.Safety Evaluation Encl
ML19323B093
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 04/15/1980
From: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML19323B094 List:
References
NUDOCS 8005090249
Download: ML19323B093 (3)


Text

8 00$ 0 9 0 M 3 p

["% ##

UNITED STATES q

)J.[%

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j

. g wasWNGTON, D. C.10555 j[

April 15, 1980 Docket No. 50-312 Mr. J. J. Mattimoe Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer Sacramento Municipal Utility District

)

6201 S Street P. O. Box 15830 Sacramento, Califoraia 95813

Dear Mr. Mattimoe:

By letter dated January 17, 1977, we requested that you evaluate the poten-tial consequences of a postulated Fuel Handling Accident Inside Containment (FHAIC) at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station. The potential con-sequences of an accident involving the handling of spent fuel inside contain-ment had not been evaluated previously in a Safety Evaluation for Rancho 1

Seco. By letter dated March 21, 1977, you submitted an evaluation of this accident.

We have reviewed your submittal, and by our own independent analysis, we have calculated that the thyroid potential consequences of the FHAIC for Rancho Seco is 104 Rem at the Exclusion Area Boundary. We require that the potential consequences of an FHAIC are appropriately within the guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100 (i.e., less than 100 Rem thyroid). We have concluded, taking into account the conservative assumptions used in calculating the potential consequence dose, that the potential consequences of the postulated FHAIC for Rancho Seco are sufficiently close to the required 100 Rem thyroid dose to be considered appropriately within the exposure guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100 and are, therefore, acceptable.

The enclosed evaluation also conriders the failure of all the fuel pins in two spent fuel assemblies indicated of a recent study, following the dropping of an assembly about 14 feet into the core and directly hitting another assembly.

Because the potential consequences of damaging all fuel pins in two assemblies is also within the exposure guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100, we conclude that the potential consequences of this postulated accident are acceptable and no additional restrictions on fuel handling operations and plant operating pro-j cedures are needed.

Sincerely, "M

e b

h

d. a Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 l

Division of Operating Reactors

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure: See next page

~

r---

Sacramento Municipal Utility District cc w/ enclosure (s):

Christopher Ellison, Esq.

David S. Kaplan, Secretary and Dian Grueufch, Esqdommission General Counsel California Energy 6201 S Street 1111 Howe Avenue

7. O. Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95825 Sacramento, California 95813 Ms. Eleanor Schwartz Sacramento County California State Office Board of Supervisors 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E., Pa. 201 827 7th Street, Room 424 Washington, D.C.

20003 Sacramento, California 95814 Docketing and Service Section Business and Municipal Department N clear u

y Comission Sacramento City-County Library Washington, D.C.

20555 828 I Street Sacramento, California 95814 Resident Inspector Di c

, Technical Assessment 0

alifornia 95628 Of f Radiation Programs Dr. Richard F. Cole "9

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ej rystal MaH #2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Arlington, Virginia 20460 Washington, D.C.

20555 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Mr. Frederick J. Shan Region IX Office Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ATTN:

EIS COORDINATOR Panel 215 Fremont Street U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Francisco, California 94111 Washington, D.C.

20555 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esq.

Babcock & Wilcox Chairman, Atomic Safety and f!uclear Power Generation Division Licensing Board Panel Suite 420, 7735 Old Georgetown Road U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

!.ethesda, Maryland 20014 Washington, DC 20555 Thomas Baxter, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, f!N Nashington, D. C.

2003G Herbert H. Brown, Esq.

Mr. Michael R. Eaton Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.

Energy Issues Coordinator Hill, Christopher and Phillips, P. C.

Sierra Club Legislative Office 1900 M St., NW 1107 9th St., Room 1020 Washington, D. C.

20036 Sacramento, CA 95814 Hslen Hubbard i

P. O. Box 63

.Sunol, California 94586

.m

__