ML19323A519
| ML19323A519 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 03/15/1980 |
| From: | Vollmer R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Degen G AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323A521 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004210299 | |
| Download: ML19323A519 (6) | |
Text
y neg#o, UNITED STATES
~j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[
t
- .g j
W ASHINGTON, O. C. 20555
- ..../
March 15,'1980 V
'+,
Docket No. 50-10 Ms. Geri Degen 205 N. Gregory Urbana, Illinois 61801
Dear Ms. Degen:
This is in response to your recent letter to Chairman John Ahearne, which expressed your concern related to the chemical decontamination of Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit No.1.
We have been reviewing this project since Comonwealth Edison's initial decontamination proposal on December 12, 1974. On December 9,1975, we issued a condit.fonal authorization which allowed Comonwealth Edison to initiate the chemical decontamination subject to the completion of three items which would be resolved as follows:
1.
The testing program will be completed and the results submitted for the review and approval of the NRC ttaff prior to performing the proposed chemical cleaning.
2.
A pre-service inspection program for the primary coolant boundary will be formJlated and submitted for NRC review and approval prior to returning the reactor to service.
3.
A post-cleaning surveillance program which includes additional surveillance specimens and a specimen withdrawal and examination schedule will be submitted for NRC review and approval prior to returning the reactor to service.
A copy of our Safety Evaluation in support of these actions is enclosed for your information.
Since our 1975 authorization Comonwealth Edison has completed its materials test program and construction of the necessary support facilities to carry out the project in a safe and environmentally acceptable manner. Our review of the testing program and the facility construction is continuing and will be completed prior to the chemical cleaning that is currently scheduled for early 1980.
The decontamination process involves the circulation of a Dow Chemical Company cleaning solvent through the reactor primary cooling system.
The solvent, identified as NS-1, has been developed to remove the thin, tightly adherent, layer of highly radioactive oxide that has formed on the inside surfaces of the Dresden 1 primary cooling system.
80 0A 210299
% ~
t Ms. Geri Degen fiarch 15, 1980 The solvent will preferentially dissolve ti.: oxide without significantly attacking the underlying base metal of the primary cooling system piping.
After removal of the uranium fuel, the solvent will be circulated through the primary coolant system for approximately 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> at about 250*F.
After circulation the solvent and the dissolved oxides will be drained from the reactor to a waste treatment facility located adjacent to the reactor. Any remaining solvent will be cleaned from the reactor by rinsing with demineralized water. The rinse water and solvent will be stored in the waste treatment facility storage tanks until processed to concentrate and solidify the solvent and dissolved radioactive corrosion products,.
The decontamination will be carried out entirely within a closed system and all waste processing will be accomplished within a specially designed, earthquake proof, leak tight, building. All transporation of radioactive wastes will be done in accordance with all applicable NRC and Department of Transporation regulations.
Because of these precautions, there will be no increased hazard to the health and safety of the citizens of Illinois or any degradation of the environment in Illinois.
After processing the concentrated waste solution will be solidified in 55 gallon drums using a process developed by the Dow Chemical Conpany for the solidification of low level radioactive wastes. This solidification process has been tested on the NS-1 solvent and produced a solid waste form that contained no free liquids. The waste solidification procedures include a quality control process test on each barrel of waste to provide additional assurance that the liquid waste has been properly solidified.
After solidification the waste drums will be transported by a comercial i
radioactive waste carrier to a licensed solid waste burial ground such as Beatty, Nevada or Hanford, Washington. These arid, desert sites have been specifically selected for the disposal of the Dresden waste to I
further assure that there is no interaction of the waste with ground water. Because the waste is in a solid form, the ground water level is approximately 300 feet below the surface, and the burial sites are located in remote, uninhabited locations, there is adequate assurance that the waste will remain isolated from potential pathways for exposure of the population.
The cost of the Dresden 1 decontamination has been estimated at 36 million dollars. Much of this cost represents one time development costs which would not be incurred in subsequent reactor decontamination at Dresden 1 or other nuclear facilities. At this time there are no plans to decon-taminate the primary cooling system cf other U. S. nuclear facilities, I
e
l Ms. Gerf Degen March 15,1980 however, preliminary estimates of the cost for decontamination currently f
operating U. S. reactors range from 1 million to 5 million dollars per i
reactor and would vary depending on the extent of modification required at a specific facility to perform the decontamination.
The decontsmination of reactor primary cooling systems will reduce the radiation exposure levels in the areas of these systems, thereby permit-t ting greater access to the system for inspection, modifications, and repairs. These activities provide greater assurance of the continued safe operation of the reactor and are therefore in the best interest of the health and safety of the public. Furthermore, the decontamination I
will reduce the occupational exposure of the individuals employed at i
Dresden.
With respect to requests for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the Dresden Unit 1 decontamination, the Nuclear Regulatory l
Comission is fully comitted to satisfying all requirements of the National Envir'onmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our regulations which implement the NEPA requirements are contained in Title 10, Part 51.5, of the United States Code of Federal Regulations. These regulations are in conformance with guidelines issued by the President's Council on Environmental Quality which were in effect prior to July 30, 1979. They identify the following types of actions for which NRC must prepare an environmental ispact j
statement:
"(1) Issuance of a permit to construct a nuclear power reactor, testing facility, or fuel reprocessing plant pursuant to Part 50 of this chapter; (2) Issuance of a full power or design capacity license to operate l
a nuclear power reactor, testing facility, or fuel reprocessing j
plant pursuant to Part 50 of this chapter; l
(3) Issuance of a permit to construct or a design capacity license to operate an isotopic enrichment plant pursuant to 50.22 of this chapter; (4) Issuance of a license to possess and use special nuclear material for processing and fuel fabrication, scrap recovery, or conversion of uranium hexafluoride pursuant to Part 70 of this chapter; (5) Issuance of a license to possess and use source material for uranium milling or production of uranium hexafluoride pursuant to Part 40 of this chapter; (6) Issuance of a license authorizing connerical radioactive waste j
disposal by land burial pursuant to Parts 30, 40, and/or 70 of this chapter;
Ms. Geri Degen March 15,1980 i
(7) Conversion of a provisional operating license for a nuclear i
power reactor, testing facility or fuel reprocessing plant to a l
full power or design capacity license pursuant to Part 50 of this chapter where no final environmental impact statement has been previously prepared; i
(8) Issuance of a license to manufacture pursuant to Appendix M of Part 50 of this Chapter; (9) Amendments of Parts 30 and.40 of this chapter concerning the exemption from licensing and regulatory requirements of any equip-ment, device, comodity or other product containing byproduct material or source material; and (10) Any other action which the Comission determines is a major Comission action significantly affecting the quality of the human l
envi ronment. "
The Comission is presently in the process of modifying our Environmental l
Protection regulations to take into account, voluntarily, the regulations promulgated by CEQ which became effective July 30, 1979. We have concluded that this action is not one of these actions requiring an environmental l
impact statement under current Comission regulations.
While our regulations do not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement, we are evaluating the environmental impact of the proposed action to determine whether an environmental impact statement should be prepared because of specific circumstances related to this particular
}
action.
If it is determined that an environmental igact statement need not be prepared, a negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal will be prepared in accordance with Sections 51.7 and 51.50(d) of our pro-cedures for environmental protection. We will coglete our review and issue I
the appropriate statement or appraisal prior to the Dresden decontamination.
l The chemical decontamination of nuclear reactors is not an experimental I
process. Over the past twenty years, extensive experience has been obtained in the decontamination of reactor components such as pumps, i
valves, heat exchangers, and pipes. This experience has demonstrated that radioactive contamination can be removed from reactor cogonents and significantly reduce the occupational radiation exposure to j
personnel who require access to these components for purposes of repair, inspection or modification. Such components have been cleaned, inspected.
l and returned to service without any evidence of damage caused by decon-i tamination.
In addition to the decontamination of reactor cogonents, at least eighteen reactor primary cooling systems or parts of those systems have l
been decontaminated in the United States since the early 1960's. Table 1 identifies these and other major decontaminations that have taken place to date throughout the world:
P
,vn, r
,--~--
-e,
2.m it Ms. Geri Degen March 15,1980 e
me ig
- EE
.==h TABLE 1
- E Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor 1962 is.
Shippingport PWR 1964 EE Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor 1965 Qif Hanford, N Reactor 15 major decontam.
1964 to present
!==
SENA Power Plant Chooz, France 1967 q.=1 Rheinsberg PWR Rheinsberg, Germany 1968 sg Douglas Point Canada 1970
!is NPD Canada 1973
=
Gentilly Canada 1973 15.-
Douglas Point
' Canada 1975 Q
Dresden Unit 1 Test Loop using 1976 Er Dow NS-1 Solvent HE:1 Peach Bottom Regenerative Heat 1977
'~.?ll.,
Exchanger using DOW NS-1 E
In summary, the Dresden decontamination has been carefully planned to
[@'
improve the safety of the reactor and reduce the exposure of plant jgg personnel to radiation. The waste produced by the process is similar ggi:
in type and quantity to the. waste routinely produced at Dresden and its its?
processing, transportation, and disposal will not cause any new hazards
@R not previously evaluated and deemed acceptable.
E EEE Sincerely, 51 EE
!b
- ==
Richard H. Vollmer, Acting Assistant
!!i Director for Systematic Evaluation 55 Program 55, Division of Operating Reactors M
rm:
Enclosure:
M.1 Safety Evaluttion 59 E5.
555 E5 F. lie 555
=
=-
.5l 5 ::
Mi iEE 15
- 55 5.5 EE'
- =
.is ;
55' i2,
i
UNITED STATES NUDI. EAR REGULATORY COMNISSION a
W ASMINeToN. C. c. 29555
(
SA.:ETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGUI.ATION SUPPORTING AUTHORIZATION TO CEEMICALLY DECONTAMINATE THE PRIMARY COOLING SYSTEM AT DRESDEN UNIT 1 CO)DiONWEA1.TH EDISON COMPAVY DRESDEN NUCLEAR POKER STATION UNIT 1 EX)CKET NO. 50-10 4
i IhTRODUCTION By letters dated Dece=ber 16,1974, April 1,1975 and April 14,197S, the Co==enwealth Edison Co=pany -(CECO) requested authorication.to carry out a che=ical decenta=ination of the interior surfaces of the Dresden Uni: 1 pri=ary coolant syste=.
L The pu pose of the decentamination is to re=ove a deposition of activated corrosion products which is tightly bonded to the pri=a:y coolant system i
The presence of the corresien products in the piping and ec=ponents.
syste= results in high' levels of radiation in ad,iacent areas and li=its access to these areas for the purpose of in-service inspection, rou.ine
=aintenance and plan: =edifica io=s.
CECO has tentatively scheduled the che=ical cleaning project to begin in Jaruary 1977 with an anticipated return to service scheduled fe.
l July 1977.
t EVALUATION The staff's review of CECO's proposed
- che ical decon-Mnation of-the interior surfaces of the Dresden Unit i pri=ary ' coolant system has been co.pleted.
The results of this' review are as follows:
1.
Environ = ental I= pac:
i The. che.ical de:en a ination of the Dresden i pri=ary coolant system vill be perfor=ed entirely within a closed deconta=ination system.
The syste: has been desi;;ned so that no che=ical or radiological fro:.he d teontamination wastes will be released to :*.e environ =en:
All wastes generated in' the process will be either solidified.
proc ess.
for offsi e burial at a licensed burial ground er reprocessed for reuse ensi:e. The solid westes produced c.re si=ilar in type and quantity to these hendled reu inely a-the site. Therefere, no adverse environ = ental i-pacts are anticipcted due to the deconta=ina:irn.
/
p
\\ /
s
. mano I _.._
2 L
2.
Materials Co=patibility The staff has reviewed the results of the material testing progra:
that has been carried out in supper of the ' proposed Dresden 1 The test program was organized to look decontamination progra=.
at corrosive effects during the deconta=ination process and possible~
residual effects during subsequent reactor operation.
i Based upon our review of the results of the testing progra= completed I
to date, we have concluded that the test progra= adequately evaluated those asuects of the materials co=patibility that we consider to be As a result cf our discussions with Ceco's consultan:,
i=cor: ant.
Di. Craig Cheng of Argonne Sa:ional Laboratory, we find that the re=aining program will be conducted in a =anner that will answer our l
presently " unresolved concerns and the test results will be adequately, interpreted and reported.
We conclude tha: upon the successful co=pletien of the testing program described in the sub=ittals and with an adequa:e surveillance and inspe,ction progra=, the Dresden Nuclear Power Station Uni: I can be subj ected to the described che=ical cleaning process without undue corrosion or edaer deleterious materials co=patibility effects that would adversely effect the integrity of the pri=ary coolant systa=
and connec:ed syste=s.
A s=all nu=ber of ite=s of concern have not been resolved to the staff's full satisfae: ion at this ti=e.
However, we conclude tha:
authori:2: ion to carry out the' che=ical deconta=ination should be -
j granted in anticipation of the successful resolution of these open ite=s in the near future. The following open items are identified at this ti=e as requiring resolution to the staff's satisfaction:
The =a:erials test progets will be co=pleted and the test (a) results will be analyzed and reviewed prior to the beginning of the cleaning process.
~
Surveillance specimens in addition to those now planned will be
~
(b).
determined by =utual agreement with the applicant and a schedule for speci=en withdrawal will be stated.
A pre-service inspection progra= for the primary coolant boundsry (c) and scie:y related syste=s will be for=ulated and performed prior to re; urn to power.
l I
i I
I
3.
E!!1uent Treatment Systems We have deter =ined that the effluent treatment system, if constructed as described in the CICo submittals, is capable of handling the ty" es and quantities of effluents expected to be generated by the decon.
ta=ination program. Our review was li=ited to the use of the syste:
for chemical dei:enta=in'ation only, and use of the system for an>* c:..e purpose subsequent 'to that progra:n =ust be reviewed prior to such us e.
4.
Radiological Safety We ha've furth'er concluded that the radiological safety progra=,
described in the sub=it als is adeo,uate to assure tha: the health and safety of.he public and the onsite personnel. will not be endangered by the Dresden 1 decontanination proj ect.
CONCLUSION I
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) because the chemical cleaning does not involve a significant increas e in the probability or consec,uences of accidents previously considered and does not involve a significant decrease in a safety =argin, the cleaning
. project does not involve a significan: ha:ards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will be endangered by operation in the proposed =anner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in co=pliance w :h the Co==ission's regulations and :.e issuance of this amendment will not be ini=ical to the co =en defense h.=d security er to the health and' safety of the public.
Date:
December 9,1973 e
9