ML19322E619
| ML19322E619 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1980 |
| From: | Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Counsil W NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-03-12, TASK-3-12, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8004020015 | |
| Download: ML19322E619 (5) | |
Text
i
/$f
/
'o UNITED STATES g
E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 kl' March 6,1980
.....f Docket No. 50-245 Mr. W. G. Gounsil, Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Operations Northeast Nuclear Energy Company P. O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101
Dear Mr. Counsil:
RE:
ENVIP,0NMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT N0.1 Reference 1:
Guidelines for evaluating environmental qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors - to NRC letter to licensees, dated February 15, 1980.
Reference 2: Guidelines for identification of that safety equipment of SEP operating reactors for which environmental qualification is to be addressed - Enclosure 2 to NRC letter to licensees dated February 15, 1980.
In our meeting of February 21, 1980 regarding the subject program, we indicated that an accelerated review schedule was being developed for this program.
The schedule is attached as Enclosure 1, which includes the required date for your submittal showing conformance to the qualification guidelines of reference 1.
The information to be provided in your submittal, as required by references 1 and 2, is summarized in Enclosure 2.
Where you have previously submitted some of the required information, it is sufficient to incorporate information already on the docket by specific reference.
It is not necessary to resubmit.
However, an orderly organization of the information should be maintained.
For example, if any. previously submitted table is changed, revised pages should be submitted. does not show submittal dates for Palisades and Oyster Creek, since the scheduled site visits for these plants precede any practical submittal date.
Material provided for these two plants will be upgraded to the level of other plant submittals through a question-and-answer process.
I 8004020OlJ
Mr. W. G. Counsil March 6, 1980 With respect to containment environmental conditions and systems required for acciden_t mitigation we will request additional information, some of it prior to the dates listed in the enclosure, and provide some clarification of the guidelines.
Sincerely, Y ww1' ffk
/1. Dennis L. Ziemann, Chief i
Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Operating Reactors
Enclosures:
As stated
Mr. W. G. Counsil March 6, 1980 cc w/ enclosures:
William H. Cuddy, Esquire Connecticut Energy Agency Day, Berry & Howard ATTN: Assistant Director Counselors at Law Research and Policy One Constitution Plaza Development Hartford, Connecticut 06103 Department of Planning and Energy Policy Anthony Z. Roisman 20 Grand Street Natural Resources Defense Council Hartford, Connecticut 06106 91715th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20005 Director, Technical Assessment Division Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Office of Radiation Programs ATTN: Superintendent
.(AW-459)
Millstone Plant U. S. Environmental Protection P. O. Box 128 Agency Waterford, Connecticut 06385 Crystal Mall #2 Arlington, Virginia 20460 Mr. James R. Himmelwright Northeast Utilities Service Company U. S. Environmental Protection P. O. Box 270 Agency Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Region I Office ATTN:
EIS C0ORDINATOR Resident Inspector JFK Federal Building c/o U. S. NRC Boston, Massachusetts 02203 P. O. Box Drawer KK Niantic, Connecticut 0635/
K M C, Inc.
ATTN:
Richard E. Schaffstall Waterford Public Library 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
Rope Ferry Road, Route 156 Suite 1050 Waterford, Connecticut 06385 Washington, D. C.
20006 First Selectman of the Town of Waterford Hall of Records 200 Boston Post Road Waterford, Connecticut 06385
ENCL,05URE 1 SEP QUALIFICATION PROGRAM SCHEDULE Licensee Site Visit Consultant Plant Submittal Date (week of)
Final Report Palisades Currently under review 1/21 6/30 Oyster Creek Currently under i
i review 3/10 7/21 Ginna 4/25 5/5 8/4 Zion 2 5/1 5/19
- 8/11 Indian Pt. 3 5/1 6/2 8/18 Zion 1 5/1 6/9 8/11 Indian Pt. 2 5/1 6/16 9/'c Millstone 1 6/ 2 6/23 9/8 Haddam Neck 6/2,*
7/7 9/15 Dresden 2 6/2 7/14 9/22 San Onofre 6/ 2 7/21 9/29 Dresden 1 6/ 2 7/28 10/6 Yankee Rowe 6/2 8/4 10/14 Lacrosse 7/1 8/11 10/20 Big Rock Point 7/1 8/18 10/27
- Effort will be made to perform a significant portion of the Zion 1 site evaluation at this time.
ENCLOSURE 2 t
l SEP QUALIFICATION PROGIO SUBMITTAL CONTENT, i
1.
The emergency procedures and list of safety-related systems addressed in reference 2.
2.
The definition of and basis for the hostile service conditions both inside and outside containment addressed in reference 1 section 4.0, Service Conditions.
3.
The identification and justification of equipment considered qualified by experience in accordance with reference 1 section 4.3.3, Areas Nonnally Maintained at Room Conditions.
i 4.
The tabulation of safety-related equipment located in a hostile environment, with identification of the service conditions and qualification testing for each, in the format used for either SEP Topic III-12 or IE Bulletin 79-018 submittals.
5.
The list of equipment in the tabulation of item 4 that is not qualified in accordance with the specific requirements of reference 1, together with justification for the deviations from the guidelines.
Reference 1:
Guidelines for evaluating environmental qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors.
Reference 2:
Guidelines for identification of that safety equipment of SEP operating reactors for which environmental qualification is to be addressed.
-