ML19322E615
| ML19322E615 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1980 |
| From: | Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Counsil W CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-03-12, TASK-3-12, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8004020007 | |
| Download: ML19322E615 (5) | |
Text
C nry o,,
UNITED STATES 8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
5 E
WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 0
8 March 6, 1980
/
Docket No. 50-213 Mr. W. G. Counsil, Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Operations Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Conpany Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101
Dear Mr. Counsil:
RE:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT HADDAM NECK PLANT Reference 1: Guidelines for evaluating environmental qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors -
Ecciosure 1 to NRC letter to licensees, dated February 15, 1980.
Reference 2: Guidelines for identificrion of that safety equipment of SEP operating reactors fo: which environmental qualification is to be addressed - Enclosure 2 to NRC letter to licensees dated February 15, 1980.
In our meeting of February 21, 1980 regarding the subject program, we indicated that an accelerated review schedule was being developed for this p rogram.
The schedule is attached as Enclosure 1, which includes the required date for your submittal showing conformance to the qualificat. ion guidelines of reference 1.
The information to be provided in your submittal, as required by references 1 and 2, is summarized in Enclosure 2.
Where you have previously submitted some of the required information, it is sufficient to incorporate information already on the docket by specific reference.
It is not necessary to resubmit.
However, an orderly organization of the information should be maintained.
For example, if any previously submitted table is changed, revised pages should be submitted. does not show submittal dates for Palisades and Oyster Creek, 4
since the scheduled site visits for these plants precede any practical submittal date.
Material provided for these two plants will be upgraded to the level of other plant submittals through a question-and-answer process.
8004020 CD7
4 r.
Mr. W. G. Counsil March 6,1980
- n!
With respect to containment environmental conditions and systems required for accident mitigation we will request additional information, some of it prior to the dates listed in the enclosure, and provide some clarification of the guidelines.
J.
Sincerely, Y
's. Dennis L. Ziemann, Chief 2
Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Operating Reactors
- f
Enclosures:
As stated e
cc
+ + -
Il t
a_,
.s g
l
~
i t
e-t i.
~
4
Mr. W. G. Counsil March 6,1980 cc w/ enclosures:
Day, Berry & Howard U. S. Environmental Protection Counselors et Law Agency One Constitution Plaza Region I Office Hartford, Connecticut 06103 ATIN:
EIS C0ORDINATOR JFK Federal Building Superintendent Boston, Massachusetts 02203 Haddam Neck Plant RFD #1 Post Office Box 127E K M C, Inc.
ATTN:
Richard E. Schaffstall East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
Mr. James R. Himmelwright Suite 1050 Northeast Utilities Service Company Washington, D. C.
20006 P. O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Russell Library 119 Broad Street Middletown, Connecticut 06457 Board of Selectmen Town Hall Haddam, Connecticut 06103 Connecticut Energy Agency ATTN:
Assistant Director Research and Policy Development Department of Planning and Energy Policy 20 Grand Street Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Director, Technical Assessment Division Office of Radiation Programs
( AW-459)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Crystal Hall 12 Arlington, Virginia 20460
ENCLOSURE 1 i
SEP QUALIFICATION PROGRAM SCHEDULE i
l Licensee Site Visit Consultant Plant Submittal Date (week of)
Final Report Palisades Currently under review 1/21 6/30 Oyster Creek Currently under i
review 3/10 7/21 Ginna 4/25 5/5 8/4 I
i Zion 2 5/1 5/19
- 8/11 Indian Pt. 3 5/1 6/2 8/18 Zion 1 5/1 6/9 8/11 Indian Pt. 2 5/1 6/16 9/2 Millstone 1 6/ 2 6/23 9/8 Haddam Neck 6/ 2, -
7/7 9/15 Dresden 2 6/2 7/14 9/22 San Onofre 6/2 7/21 9/29 Dresden 1 6/ 2 7/28 10/6 Yan_kee Rowe 6/2 8/4 10/14 Lacrosse 7/1 8/11 10/20 Big Rock Point 7/1 8/18 10/27
- Effort will be made to perform a significant portion of the Zion 1-site evaluation at this time.
r e
ENCLOSURE 2 i
SEP QUALIFICATION PROGRAM SUBMITTAL CONTENT I
1.
The emergency procedures and list of safety-related systems addressed in reference 2.
2.
The definition of and basis for the hostile service conditions both inside and outside containment addressed in reference 1 section 4.0, Service Conditions.
3.
The identification and justification of equipment considered qualified by experience in accordance with reference 1 section 4.3.3, Areas Normally Maintained at Room Conditions.
4.
The tabulation of safety-related equipment located in a hostile environment, with identification of the service conditions and qualification testing for each, in the format used for either SEP Topic III-12 or IE Bulletin 79-018 submittals.
5.
The list of equipment in the tabulation of item 4 that is not qualified in accordance with the specific requirements of reference 1, together with justification for the deviations from the guidelines.
Reference 1:
Guidelines for evaluating environmental qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors.
Guidelines for identification of that safety equipment of Reference 2:
SEP operating reactors for which environmental qualification is to be addressed.
i