ML19322E350
| ML19322E350 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/12/1980 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Crouse R TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322E351 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003270246 | |
| Download: ML19322E350 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1979030
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:gD f tGg ' UNITED STATES e o i!O 8' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3# n . $ REGION ill $ ~ * * O, [ 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD . % . . .+ ,d' GLEN ELLYN,ILLINOls 60137
FEB 12198C Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company ATTN: Mr. Richard P. Crouse Vice President Energy Supply Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, 011 43652 Gentlemen: This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. I. N. Jackiw, E. R. Swanson, and L. G. McGregor of this office on December 3-7, 11-13, and 19-20, 1979 of activities at the Davis-Besse Power Station authorized by NRC Operating 1.icense No. NPF-3 and to the discussit , of our findings with you at the conclusion of the inspection. The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas ex mined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records. observa- tions, and interviews with personnel. During this inspection, certaiu of your activities appeared to be in non- compliance with NRC requirements, as described in the enclosed Appendix A. Th;s notice is sent to you pursuant tc the provisions of Section 2.201 of the Nur's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regula- t i o rm . Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this of fice within twenty days of your receipt of this notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance: (1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. As discussed with you this was a special inspection to review the effec- tiveness of your QA program in selected areas for both past and ongoing activities. While the items of noncompliance and unresolved items iden- tified during this inspection taken individually, are not considered sig- nificant the examples indicate that further management attention in these areas is needed. We will continue to review the effectiveness of your QA program during future inspections. In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the , enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document , ' 1 fdO3270 gg_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _3
.. . .. .. .- . . .- -. O l' l Toledo Edison Company -2- [[B 12 he'-
> Room, except as follows. If this report contains information that you or ' your contractors believe to be proprietary, you must apply in writing to , this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to with- hold such information from public disclosure. The application must include a full statement of the reasons for which the information is considered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary infor- ! mation identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the , application. t We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection. j Sincerely, Y,f9 .- - h /, . E.'F. Heishman, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Enclosures: 1. Appendix A, Notice of
Violation 2. IE Inspection Report No. 50-346/79-30 . cc w/encls: Mr. T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent Central Files ' Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR ! Local PDR ' NSIC TIC Harold Kohn, Power Siting Commission Helen W. Evans, State of Ohio e f + i 1- f i ! ! [ ._. _ _ - . . - . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . , ,. - }}