ML19322D624
| ML19322D624 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1977 |
| From: | Metropolitan Edison Co |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322D622 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002180047 | |
| Download: ML19322D624 (5) | |
Text
'.
i.
=
11/23/77 0
T>il #2 1973 CC::STCCTIO:: SUDGET ASSU11PTIO::S
~...-
goo 21so OY7
4 Budget Assumotions In order to prepare this budget and give the figures on this budget more
- cieaning, certain assumptions had to be made.
These assumptions are in this enclosure.
L 1.
Plant operating Assumetions:
e a.
Fuel load - 2/73 Initial criticality - 3/78 Several plant startups and shutdowns during testing phase, c.
d.
Commercial operation beginnir.g 6/1/75 4
1 2.
Personnel / Payroll Assumotions:
Personnel range from 25S in the beginning of December 1977 a.
to 266 at the end of May 1978 (Payroll figures are slipped one month. Hence, months 1/78 - 6/78 are budgeted.).
For control purposes, these people fall into two basic categories -
i those reporting to plant management and those reporting to corporate management. Personnel in the following departments t
report to plant management: O_oerations, Maintenance, Health Physics and Plant Engineers. The remainder - including Security, Administration, QC, Training and Generation Engi-neering - report to corporate management. The following breaks down the personnel assignment by month: g a
Budget Month Plant Corporate Total January 197S 199 59 258 February 1978-200 59 259
^ March 1978 201 59 260 April 1978 202 59 261' May 1973 202 63 265 June 1973 203 63 266
_.____.b.
Plant personnel can.be broken _down further..as follows:
Budget Month 3argaining Unit Sunervisory Total l
January 1978 141 58 199 February 1973 141 59 200 1
March 1978 142 59 201 i
April 1973 142 60 202 i
May 1973 142 60 202 June 1978 142 61 203 l
[
Sudgeted-straight time canhours were calculatad en a man-for-man basis fre plant personnel. Corporate straight time manhours were budgeted by using 1* nit 2 history and factoring in anticipated 1973 support.
44.*
9
.**e
- 4
, S.M4
,W ew-m* e
-e
.**a
-**Te sm pp w me g,9 ep.
pw gh *--
- -4 w'
.m q w %
y,.
+6,wem s>
aim %
Y g
..++
... =. - +..,
c.-__
m..
,,.,,w,m, w
tr.
v
=
~
11/23/77-Enclosure (2) c.
Overtime:
15% of all straight time =anhours was used as the overtime factor to develop payroll.2 This overtime percentage is based on calculations made for a test month (September 1977) and is consistent with the figures used to develop the 1978 Unit 2 OSM budget.
d.
Met Ed personnel will not be transferred to Unit 1 to support refueling - scheduled for Mid-March through May.
22% overhead is applied to all payroll dollars.3 e.
3.
Materials and supplies Assumptions:
a.
Equipment accounta (325.XXXX) consist mainly of dollars cccmitted to be spent that have not yet been booked, and to a small extent, estimates of additional equipment needed by plant personnel.
b.
Total consumable dollars budgeted for 1/78 - 3/78 are based primarily on Unit 2 construction history - using 8/77 - 10/77 data.
For 4/76 - 6/78, Unit I history (1977) was used to estimate Radwaste Consumables and Operations Consumables. These two consumable categories are expected to be active after initial criticality.
c.
Full auxiliary steam usage is budgeted for 1/73 - 3/78, with partial usage (because plant should be operating most of the time) budgeted 4/73 and 6/78. One startup is budgeted using fuel oil.4 d.
25% stores overhead is applied go materials issued from warehous_e stock (T154 account).)
4 Consultants Assumotions:
a.
RMC, Ichthyological Asso'ciates, C. Wurtz, Teledyne Isotopes, Porter Gertz, Pickard & Lowe, and Millersville State College dollars budgeted are based on Unit 2 1977 history plus 5%
_. _. _ _. _ ___._.._. ___escala tion. These consultants are required for environ-mental and ragulatory reasons.
b.
Stearns Roger amounts budgeted are for assistance with fuel handling bridges during fuel load.
20vertime percentages are presented in manhours. Overtime percentage is calculated by dividing overtime manhours by straight time =anhours.
A factor -
.of 1.65 converts bargaining unit manhours to dollars.
3This percentage.is reviewed annually and changed, if necessary, en 3/1/73.
' Fuel oil costs 100X for each startup, based on Unit 1 history. Stes:
-costs are based on 1977 Unit 2 history.
-525% based on Unit I history.
4
-.e> <hede,e
...-.4..
,-*--e 6*
,e
-*-*N
111/23/77 Enclosure (2) c.
Babcock.5 Wilcox amounts budgeted are based on 10/7/77 J.
L. Kunkel memo to J. J. Barton saying Met Ed is responsible for tasks 6 and 8 of the Master Services i:
Contract.
d.
One full time on-site Westinghouse turbine representative is budgeted to start 4/78.
e.
MPR estimate is based on 8/30/77 N. Williams to R. Hedges memo.
f.
Legal fees are based on 1977 Unit 2 history plus 5% escalation.
j g.
NUS amounts budgeted are for billing lag of services completed 12/31/77.
f.
h.
TMI #2 share of PWR OTSG Study is budgeted based on S/3/77 J. F. McConnell to D. B. Wise memorandum.
5.
Maintenance assumotions:
a.
Catalytic involvement is not budgeted until just prior to fuel load in February; it is assumed that GPUSC will pick up these costs until fuel load. Catalytic personnel l
are budgeted as follows:
2/78 4 people 3/78 4 people 4/78 12 people 5/78 38 people
{
6/78 38 people 1
j Only straight time manhours, at a rate of $15/ hour, are budgeted for Catalytic personnel.
3 b.
Currently 9 of 15 Mercury Instrument Techs on site are
~
working for :tet Ed in Unit 2.
As more systems are turned over to Met Ed, more:techs will be released to Met'Ed.
Then 6 - 8 techs will be transferred to Unit i for refueling.
- - As-a result, budgeted Mercury manpower is: - - - -
1/78 9 people 2/78 11 people
-3/78 13 people 4/78 9 people 5/73 8 people 6/73 S people It is also assumed that the techs overtime rate will be 10%.
5-
-m.b aem 4.p,,.,
ap.a-I
t
's.
~
11/23/77 Enclosure (2) 6.
Other Assumotions:
a.
Of fice Machine Rental, Telephone Expences, Trar.'portation, and Miscellaneous Other Charges are budgeted in accordance with Unic 2 1977 his tory.
b.
Food Services, Radwaste Jhip=ents, and Laundry estimates are based on Unit 1 1977 history.
7.
General Assumptions:
a.
Billing lag: Met Ed direct costs, such as payroll, are budgeted one conth after actual occurrance.
Invoices to GPU are lagged one month.
Materials and consultants fees incurred directly by Met Ed are lagged 2 months.
5.
No ";200 money" is budgeted after commercial date, but 1978 Unit 2 O5M budget relies on the availability of such funds to cover the completion of incomplete construction work items.
/
e
~ - * - - -
--e-
?
.