ML19322C660
| ML19322C660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1979 |
| From: | Rogovin M NRC - NRC THREE MILE ISLAND TASK FORCE |
| To: | Trowbridge G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322C658 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NTFMT-790712-04, NTFMT-790712-4, NUDOCS 8001180283 | |
| Download: ML19322C660 (7) | |
Text
,,...
~
..:tu,o,n !,=s i'
'l E,*.! : l i' U I ' f Al O TW D ' J 'J !! Oi '
,],.,
j
... n.r.. o c. :
3
(.
l July 12, l'J/0 In Reply Refer to:
f;TFTM 790712-04 Mr. George F. Trcubridge Shaw, Pittcan, Potts & Tro. bridge 1800 M Street, ?;.W.
Washington, D. C.
20035
Dear Mr. Trowbridge:
This will confirm the recent ccnversation George Frampton and I have had with you and Ernest Blake concerning production of documents we will be seeking in the course of the f;uclear Regulatory Cor. mission's Special Inquiry on the accident at Three Mile Island.
He veill be serving you next week stith a broad subpoena similar to the subpoena served on you by the President's Cor. mission on June 4,1979.
However, we have agreed that rather than seek production of all documents covered by various subsections of this subpoena on vat ious dates, we will instead rake specific requests to you in writing for specific materials falling within the subpoena.
Tne first of the written requests we will be making under the subpoena is attached hereto.
This request reflects the very useful conversations George and I had with Mr. Blake yesterday (July 11) at the site.
Sin ~ rely, f
T
'/
Mitchell Rogo
, Director I;RC/TMI Special Inquiry Group,
r, closure:
L_ quest for Documents and Informatian P00R BRI8lW; gee >g 8 0 0118g. 2 P3
.:y
.,- s,
i ur, s 6.. e
.,s 3
'1**t "1.9 t,.,.i j 3 ] 1 9.... i, g.
Please provide the following documents or,.. hare appropriate, provide in writing the information called for, en or by July 30, 1979:
1.
Frovide any docu.ents reflecting the design specifications, design criteria and design bases for design of the TMI-2 centrol room, and any analysis, study, simulation, evaluation er test of such design, particularly with respect to the "huran er.gineering" cr "numan factors" aspects of such design, including the folicwing:
a.
Design-related criteria, etc., that cay be c:r.tained in contract documents such as contract specifications, subcor. tract specifications, reports on design recuired by the contract, ard related caterials.
b.
Special Study Reports o
Siralations o
Reviews / tests o
Evaluations c.
Design Analysis o
Laycut o
Component selection o Arrangement of CR o Orerator tasks (titelines/ task ar.alyses) o CR :o be rods 11ed af er (if any) t o
Environmental spacifications 2.
Provide the following specific equipment information:
a.
For the Reactor Coolant Pumps and the Reactor Coolant Makeup Fumps; (1)
Pu.p-motor design specifications (speed-torque curves, name plate information, characteristics, etc.)
(2)
Motor voltage drop calculations.(pump acceleration time,etc.)
(3)
Pu
-motor environ ental cualification documentation.
P00R ORIGINAL
i 2.
b.
For the pi. ssurirer heater contacts, the envircr. mental qualification docur:ntation.
3.
Prcvide the following informacion relating to the company's consideration of the n:ture of the "nydrog:n bubt ee" from I'. arch 28 until appecxiutely April 2,1979, and the danger, if any, caused by it:
a.
Who viere the principal people within the company (including F.et Ed. GPU and GPU Services) who considered and evaluated thi:, problem?
b.
Who were the principal people from outside the company (for example, frcm ESW, the NRC, or other industry parsor.nel or censultar.ts), if any, whose acvice or assistance vias sought?
c.
What plant data were acquired or gathered together in an effort to address the problem of the bubble, and how was it acquired?
d.
What analyses were performed and v: hat determinations were made concerning the bubble (including its size, dangerousness, etc.), and approximately when and by whom viere they made?
e.
Provide any documents reflecting the data mentioned in (c) and (d), above, including the " bubble book."
f.
Provide any report thac has been prepared or is acquired concerning the bubble and/or the company's evaluation of the bubble.
4.
With respect to the filters and filtration systems of the Auxiliary Evilding and the Fuel Handling Building, the Supplementary Auxiliary Exhaust Filter System, and the Reactor Purge and Control Room Filtration Units, supply results for all in-place tests that have been conducted, including startups.
For the carbon in these systems, supply the laboratory test results prior to installation, and any results of testing of spent carbon.
If available, supply the date tested, time in service, and service environment. Be i
sure to include the applicable procedures for all tests performed.
If _some or all of. these reports-and results are in the pcssession of a testing laboratory.or any other party, please surrr.arize What vou understand is available and who should be contacted to obtain
'such material.
l P00RORIGINAl.
_3 1
E.
Provide the fM1r ia; = fministrative and orcanizational information:
a.
Fer the Met Ed Company:
1.
An organizational chart of the company viith occupants of positicn on March 28, 1979.
2.
An organizational chart of the Three Mile Isla7d plant, with occupants of positions on March 28, 1979.
3.
Job descriptions of supervisory TMI plant personnel (to include down through shift foremen), including descrip-ions of responsibility ard authority.
a.
The personnel holding the positions identified in 5.a.3, above, 24 months before fuel lcading; at fuel lcading; and on March 28, 1979.
b.
For the GPU and GPU Services Companies:
1.
Organizational charts with occupants of positions on March 28, 1979.
2.
Job descriptions for positions important to decisions relating to the design or operation of TMI-2.
3.
The names of personnel holding positions identified in 5.b.2, above, and their qualifications for holding such positions, for the following three dates:
(i) 24 months before fuel loading; l
(ii) at feel lcading; er.d l
(iii) on March 28, 1979.
c.
A list of all company personnel involved in the incident through April 2,1979.
E.
Provide tne following information:
a.
Identify the principal company (Met Ed-GPU Services) personnel (name and position) who were in the observation center on March 28.
Indicate their approximate times of arrival and, if possible, their principal functions (i.e., in-charge, estiriatis; potential doses, interfacing with ?!RC, etcc).
l l
l P00R~0REE
i 6.
b.
Identify the principal company personr.el (ncme and position) who were lo the observation center cnd/or n. embers of the Met Ed-Plant 0;'erations Group (whichever is appropriate to managing 'teration of the plant) from March 29 thrcugh April 16.
Indicate their principal functions.
Identify the principal ccmpany personnel (name and position) c.
who were involved in providing technical support to the plant staf1 for March 28 through April 1 (e.g., Mr. Wilse.s croup that drove to the site on March 28 from the GPU Services Corporation office; Mr. Arnold's group that dis-cussed the accident with Mr. Herbein and others, etc.)
d.
Identify the principal personnel (name, organizational affiliation and position) who were members of the GPU Technical Support Group beginning on April 2.
Indicate their primary functions.
Indicate which persons frequently attended meetings of the Technical Working Group, e.
Identify the principal utility personnel (name and position) who requested support frcm outside organizations and individuals such as utilities, industrial groups, NSS vendors, architect-encineers.
If possible, identify major requests made for such assistance on March 28 through April 1.
f.
Provide a rough organizational chart, including names, of the utility organization that was in effect for directing the outsice support effort.
g.
Identify any significant differences in requesting and directing the outside support effort during the first days following the accident in comparison to the more formal orcanization employed after April 1,1979.
I h.
Identify the principal personnel (name, position and organi-zational affiliation) who were members of the Industrial Advisory Group, the Waste Management Group, the Plant Modifications l
Group, and the Task Management / Scheduling Group.
Indicate their primary functions.
l i.
Identify the principal meetings or discussions (including telephone con.ersations) that lead up to and/or resulted in the following decisions:
-v (1) ~Mr. Herbein's decision t6 stop di' char.ging steam
~~
s through the atmospheric dump valves at about 1400 on 'sarch 20.
(Specifically, include any conversations Mr. Herbein may have had with anycne leading up to this decision.)
POOR ORIGINAL
5
/
(2)
I'.r.
Creit:'
decision to ha"e Mr. Herrein go to the site at about 900 on March 2E.
(Specifically, include any conversations Mr. Creit: may have bad with others leading up to this decision.)
(3)
Mr. Creitz's decision to have Mr. Herbein and others 90 to the Lt. Governor's office on about 1400 on March 28.
(Specifically, what conversations Mr. Creitz may have had with others.)
(4)
Mr. W rbein's decision to have Mr. Miller begin to repressurize the primary reactor coolant system on the late af terno:n of March 28.
(5;'ecifically, include any ccnversations Mr. Arnold may have had with B&W personnel or with !;RC personnel, or with ocher company personnel or consultants; conversations Mr. Arnold had with Mr. Herbein; and conversations Mr. Herbein had with Mr. Miller or any others leading up to this decision.)
j.
With respect to each discussion or conversation listed in item i above, summarize briefly the substance of the conversa-tion, including any notable points covered, or any decisions reached in the conversation.
7.
Provide the Touche-Ross Report submitted to the President's Commission on June 20, 1979, Document No. G/l(g)-1.
E.
Provide the materials relating to co=.ercial operation of TMI-2 provided to the President's Commission on June 15, 1979, Document t;os. G/l(l) - 1 to 4.
9.
Provide:
a.
The materials relating to training proviced to the President's Commission on June 22, 1979 under Items III.1 (k) and III.3(d) of the Commission subpoena.
b.
Insofar as the "ove materials de not cover the information listed below i-nis subsection, please also provide documents and/or informa..on relating to:
(1)
Description of the co6pany's training program.
- (2)
Any analyses or evaluritions of' the training program,;
(3)
Description of the bases for and/or program for selecting or recruiting operators.
(4)
Identify the personnel within the company primarily responsible for the development and implementation of the program for selection of operators and the program for traininc of operators.
l
. c..
10.
Mete available for us to inspect at the site the n.aterials 4
provided to the Frcsident 's Com,ission on June /2,1979 rela'.ing to the history cf.he IMl En.2rgency Plan, Docuim:nt rios. G/3(e)
- 1 thru /5.
11.
Insofar as is ::ssible Provide from the bulk of materials sub-mitted to the essi:ent's. Co.nnission on June 15, relating to news releases (Doc
- .: Ms. C/10) those documents reflecting press releases, stae-ints and briefings given by com;mny officials curing the peri;; March :'S through April 10, 1979.
12.
Provide the.ir uces of the Plant Operations P.eview Com-ittee, the General Office F.eview Board, and the Generation F.eview Committee for TMI-2.
1:e
".derstand that these materials have already been submitted to the Fresident's Commission and that we can obtain copies of that submission from you.
11.
The locked valve log for TM:-2.
14.
The equipment cut-cf-service log for TMI-2.
15.
A document entitled, " Plant Precautions and Limitations,"
apparently baaring a document de.signation DP 1101.1.
15.
The written results of internal audits required by the technical soecifications to be conducted annually, for both TMI-l and TMI-2, and any ccrrespondence or ir.ternal esmoranda related thereto.
- 17. Make available for our inspection on the site operator records as follows:
for all ';!C-licensed personnel on the site March 28 or assigned throu;h April 2, (a) Date of licens e examinations, resuits of tests and requalificaticn records.
(We understand this material has been orovided to a congressional cor.nittee and can be sent to us. )
(b) Training rec,rds.
(c)
Personnel hisotries, including personnel evaluations, and medical and psychological records and evaluations.
15.
A complete set of all transmittal letters sending raterial to the President's C:, i.ission both prior to a'nd subsequent to the. _
June 4,1979, suiccena, and whether er not the material was transmitted under or pursuant to the subpoena.
200[0MER