ML19322B919

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards License Application W/Amends,Nc Municipalities Joint Petition for Antitrust Review & AEC Reply to Petition. W/O Encl
ML19322B919
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/03/1971
From: Schur B
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Mclaren R, Jeffrey Mitchell
JUSTICE, DEPT. OF, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF
References
NUDOCS 7912170484
Download: ML19322B919 (2)


Text

_ _ _

-r-y n

~

.] 6 w

87o 3

February 3, 1971 9A 0?.

Esmerable John E. Mitchell Attermey General Attentian: Richard W. MeLares. Esq.

a e e Agtermey esmeral Antitrust Divistan Bear Mr. Mitshell:

In asserdamse with enheestimme 105 s. (1),105 s. (3) and 105 c. (8) of the Atomia Emergy Act of 1954, as amended (the Ast), un are enslosing the app 11astian filed by the Baka Feuer Ow to operate three==alame pouer reestera kasum as -

amits 1.1 and 3. usar Semesa, South Caroline. The appliaatima j

is tramonitted for your reviso paressma to sostian 105 s. of the Amt and Aer eueh advise to the casaissism as you determine to be appropriate to the finding to be made by the commissima as set forth in subsection 105 c. (5) of the Ast. W your request, we shall furnish er eamos to be furnished to yes seek taformatism as you detensian to be appropriata in======**a= with your revise and the readering of yew adrias.

This proceeding is subject to the spostal previaism ande in subeestian 105 s. (3) of the Ast ise operating lisemos applica-times is esses whose latervomers er petitisaare der leave to i=*==vene in the earlier presseding en the esmetructism y===it oseght to ehtaan a determiastiam of antitreet mattere er advemme a jurisdiatismal heela ser such deenemina*4mm. Persono in the described slaes hose the right to request as antitreet revise under sostima 105 e. within 25 days after publicatism in the Federsi Resister of a estime of filing of an application for se operating 11aemme.

Seek a 25-day motime with respost to the three Geomme unita une published in the M Resister en h 29,1970 (35 F.R.

l 1970s). rarement es the motime, eleven north cas 1sma sumiaipal-itime, she more joint interveemre in the esmetraction permit pseemedtags and ute had eenght to edessee a jurtadiational basis l

l l

omm>

SURNAME >

OATE >

......d

== u.c.us mo.

u>

u.c- --- com.--o-12 170 g

pww

~

i

.s 1

Besorable Jeha y. M cane E 2-February 3, 1971 for the determination of antitrust matters, have filed a timely joint petities requesting as antitrust review. For your inforestism, I as slas anslosing a copy of the joint petition sad the AEC regulatory staff's reply to the petitism.

As you may recall, the eleven umanicipalities appealed to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia from the Comunissima's damimi of asceptions to the initial decisics (C.A.D.C. No. 21, 706 Bee. 5,1969).

The three Geomse units are askeduled for operatima at apprJximately one year intervala, with Unit i espected to be ready for operaties this spring. A Noties of Proposed Issuance of an operating Liem=== for thsit I wee published in the Federal Resister om Jammary 8, 1971 (36 F.1. 296). Whether er est a public hearing is held on the matter of as operacing lisease for Unit 1, it appears probable that, apart from antitrust esesidera-i tiens, the license would otherwise be ready for issuance prior to the completies of antitrust review pursuant to secties 105 c. of the Act. After consultaties with Joseph J. Saunders, Esq., of your staff, it has been determined that if in fact a license is otherwise ready for issuance, prior to completies of the pro-cedures with respect to satitrust matters, the license any be issued pursuant to subsectiara 105 c. (8) of the Act, subject to conditimes, as set forth in 10 CFE 54.55(b), to assure that any s# x g ;t findings and orders of the Commissies with respect to antitrust matters will be gives full force and effect.

If I can be of further assistmase in this matter, please de met hesitate to call upon me.

Sincerely, Bertras H. Schur Associate General Counsel Distribution:

Easleseres:

AEC PDE 1.

Applicaties and pertiment DRL m e.

OGC Files Beth/G'twn/ Docket 2.

h int FM ities BHSc 3.

AEC Reply to Petitism bec:

Carl Horn, Jr., Esq.

)

rice Ro Esq.

? w/o enci y }B. Snapp,J_sq.

iam gas, y

.,__w u

OGC omer >

\\/

sums,, _JBKnot /jis BHSchur l

1-29.71 1-

-71 carr >...

nrm 4xc-stacan.s-un u.om on== cmcrain-o-me.

---,---Ne-.N-m-wa a

-.we se.

.-.-r

-,.,,,,.. - ~.. _ _.,,,. _,,,,,

.,