ML19322B810
| ML19322B810 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1977 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322B801 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-77-06, 50-269-77-6, 50-270-77-06, 50-270-77-6, 50-287-77-06, NUDOCS 7912050795 | |
| Download: ML19322B810 (3) | |
Text
_... _ _ _. _.__. _ _
m f)
/
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Based on the results on an NRC inspection conducted on April 25-28, 1977, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with conditions of your NRC Facility Licenses No. DPR-38, 4
DPR-47 and DPR-55 as indicated below.
These items are infractions.
Technical Specification 6.4.1 requires that the station be operated
)
A.
and maintained in accordance with approved written procedures.
Contrary to the above, certain instrument calibration procedures were not completed as written. Examples include:
The " Maximum Tolerance Exceeded Sheet" was not completed
)
1.
as specified in Section 10.0 of procedure IP/3/A/340/4 when as found calibration values exceeded 2% in October 1976.
Step 4.5 of procedure IP/3/A/305/1M was signed off in October 2.
1976, signifying that drawings in the Master Instrument File agreed with drawings referenced in the procedure; whereas, the procedure had not been updated to include the appropriate reference drawire list for Unit 3 and the verification could not be accomplished as required.
Section 17.2.16 of the Duke Power Company Quality Assurance Program B.
Topical Report which implements Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 states that discrepancies revealed during the performance of station operation, maintenance and testing activities must be resolved prior to verification of the completion of the activity being performed.
Section 17.2.5 of the Topical Report which implements Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires in part that the written instructions and procedures contained in the Administrative Policy Manual (APM) be implemented by personnel as i
Section 4.2.7 it pertains to the performance of their activities.
of the APM requires verification that all checklists, blanks and data sheets have been completed and all acceptance criteria have been met before a procedure is approved.
This section also requires that action be taken to resolve any discrepancies identified and that such discrepancies and the corrective actions be documented.
Contrary to the above, several instrument calibration procedures contained erroneous data or had incomplete data sheets, but had been approved as being complete without documentation of these discrepancies and the corrective action taken.
Specific examples include:
Procedure IP/3/A/210/4 completed in March 1977 had blank data 1.
spaces on Data Sheets No. I and 2.
L os 76 o
pu
m I
/
.(~'
2.
Procedure IP/2/A/200/10 completed in May 1976 contained erroneous and/or unacceptable data on Data Sheet No. 4.
s e
l J
r.
s)
)
APPENDIX B NOTICE OF DEVIATION Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted during the period April 25-28, 1977, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted in conformance with your commitments to the Commission as indicated below:
Contrary to the licensee's commitment on Page 14A-19 of the FSAR that the gas analyzer used for measuring post-accident hydrogen concentrations in the reactor building will have an accuracy of + 2 percent of full scale, the calibration tolerance specified in the calibration procedure results in an accuracy of i 10 percent of full scale.
1 l
l i_
-..,