ML19322A921
| ML19322A921 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 09/03/1975 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911270687 | |
| Download: ML19322A921 (2) | |
Text
'
ew
- NRC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCK 5T MATERIAL (TEMPORARY FORM)
CONTROL NO:
FILE:
c Duke Power Co.
DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER F ROM: Charlotte, M. C.
William O. Parker.Jr.
9-3-75 4 A 79 YYY ORIG CC OTHER SENT NRC PDRg TO:
Roger S. Boyd 1 Signed SENT LOCAL PDR Tv CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO-E 1
/270/287 ENCLOSURES:
Aj DESCRIPTION:
Ltr. re our ltr dtd 7-18-74 & their ltr of 8-3 )-
74 & withdrawal of proposed tech spec. withdra m
dn 2-27-75,& submittal in July 1975...
Advising they fMl that proposal of a : tech Spec ACKNOWLEDo =U fcr steam generator surveillance should be de-UL layed until Section 11 is revised.....
DO NOT REMOVE PLANT NAME: Oconee 1-2 VCR 9-11-75 FOR ACTION /INFORMATION BUTLER lL)
SCHWENCER (L) ZIEMANN (L)
REG AN (E)
REID(L)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ COPIES CLARK (L)
STOLZ (L)
DICKER (E)
LEAR (L)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies PAR R (L)
VASSALLO (L)
KNIGHTON (E)
SPIES W/ Copies f// Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies KNIEL (L)
AURPLE (L)
YOUNGBLOOD (E)
Lux Wyopies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION G 8 C F !D TECH REVIEW DENTON LIC ASST A/T IND.
MHC POR GRIMES R. DIGGS (L)
BRAITMAN AGC, ROOM P-506A) SCHROEDER MACCARY GAMMILL H. GE ARIN (L)
SALTZMAN y60SSICK/ STAFF
\\ KNIGHT KASTNER E. GOU LBOURNE (L)
MELTZ CASE PAWLICKl BALLARD P. KREUTZER (E)
GIAMBUSSO SHAO SPANGLER J. LEE (L)
PLANS BOYD STELLO M. RU.T.IBR00K(L)
MCDONALD MOORE (L)
HOUSTON ENVIRO S. REED (E)
CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L)
NOVAK MULLER M. SERVICE (L)
DUBE (Ltr)
SKOVHOLT (L)
ROSS DICKER A. SHEPPARD (L)
E. COUPE GOLLER (L) (Ltr)
IPPOLITO KNIGHTON M. SLATER (E)
PETERSON P. CO LLINS TEDESCO YOUNGBLOOD H. SMITH (L)
HARTFit:LD (2)
ENISE J. COLLINS REGAN S. TEETS (L)
KLECKER
_ OPR LAIN A3 PR ECT D G. WI LLI AMS (E)
EISENHUT GINTON FILE & REGION (2)
BENAROYA
/
~
V. WILSON (L)
Wig / -N# N d
MIPC VOLLMER TMITLliSS R. INGRAM (L)
//y d
M. DUNCAN (E)
/
,e s;
EXI,ERN AL DISTRIBUTION
/
W
- LOCAL PDR
'fMA
' ' dd +
/-TIC (ABERNETHY) (1)(2)(10) - N ATION AL LABS 1 - PDR SAN /LA/NY
/ - NSIC (BUCHAN AN) 1 - W. PENNINGTON,'Rm E.201 GT 1 - BROOKHAVEN NAT LAB 1 - G. ULRIKSON ORNL 1 - ASLB 1 - CONSU LTANTS NEW3 ARK /BLUME/AGBABI AN 1-ewton Anderson 9
ACRS'T:~.
SENT
" 'r 1 7911270
'/
8-
/7 7
,~
('
Regulat00' Docket File' DUKE POWER COMPANY Powza BU11.DINO 4aa SouTu Cnuncu SrazzT, Gn.ARI.OTTE, N. C. 28242 WI LLI A M O.PARMER.JR.
/
m' w.. o o...,e.
-...,,.~,
,{
37 3-40 e 3 seca pacoucco-w!B N
s September 3, 1975
{
dh H,-
NG 'cY- "
L 3 Ed
.C(*
~
tr,
/
5s
- ' d,'
\\
^
Mr. Roger S. Boyd, Acting Director
.-ilee,,
s b[\\ \\
Q.,
Division of Reactor Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'N Washington, D. C.
20555
,llE' bb $ 7g 4 *
Subject:
Oconee Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 W-
..~;" N
- ,f,
Dear Mr. Boyd:
b On July 18, 1974, the AEC requested that Duke Fower Company
' a 5 4
proposad revision to the Oconee Nuclear Station Technical Specif -
cations to incorporate therein a program for staam generator tube surveillance consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.83, Revision 0.
On August 30, 1974, a submittal in response to this request was made.
Subsequently, on February 27, 1975 the proposed technical specifi-cation was withdrawn trom further consideration and review. At that time, however, it was stated that a proposed technical specification would be resubmitted following re-evaluation of the matter and evaluation of the results of the Oconee 1 steam generator inspection.
The inspection of the Oconee 1 steam generators following the first cycle of operation, and evaluation of the results thereof, have been completed. Additionally, the Commission issued in July, 1975 Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.83.
It is understood, however, *. hat criteria for steam generator surveillance are being developed for inclusion in Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and that it is intended that these criteria be issued in the Winter 1975 addenda to Section XI.
Based on all information currently available, as summarized above, it is felt that proposal of a technical specification for steam generator surveillance should be delayed until Section XI is revised to address this matter.
In the interim, however, inspections on the Oconee unirs will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of Regula ory Guide 1.83.
Ver truly yours,
~
u e: '
d.
1111am O. Parker, Jr.
DCH:vr O t' " o
.%