ML19321B012

Viewgraphs Entitled Ofc of Executive Director Program Review

ML19321B012
Person / Time
Issue date:	07/15/1980
From:	NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:
Shared Package
ML19321B009	List: ML19321B008 ML19321B012
References
REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8007250024
Download: ML19321B012 (38)

Text

e 4

e o'

l O

N to Ct O

O P

-r i

EDO PROGRAM REVIEW JULY 15,1980 i

I i

I s

~

INDEX

(

OVERVIEW.

NRR - 6 Programs Casework Fire Protection Unresolved Safety Issues Operating Reactor Licensing Actions Systematic Evaluation Program Qualification of Safety Related Equipment NMSS - 5 Programs Waste Management Domestic Safeguards Transportation Fuel Cycle & Material Safety Spent Fuel Storage IE - 1 Program Revised Inspection Program RES - 2 Programs 3

Long Range Research Plan Risk Assessment SD - 2 Programs low Level Radiation Decommissioning IP - Program International Efforts DED0 - 1 Program Emergency Preparedness AEOD - 1 Program Operatingdata TMI - 1 Program Action Plan Three Mile Island r

t.

J OVERVIEW DietettmAt== ei MC 5 Se 8

% Se too s

' ///

'////

/

r / / /,

~

////

////

rvv v4 Kx^x'x x'Xx'x p:/Qvg1 x,X/Qx

XXx; XXx; xxx) xXx>

W x1 YxV

////

MN X'%

////

xXX:x x:X>0x xxx'x

'[

S FY-a wtc 8 Offta==

19 %

t i

F

! l

{

DVERVIEW es_t-t_ _,,_.

_ ssev i

me e

V//////)

h VH H/A VHMA VHH//

VHH/A VHMA l

VHH/A VMHA

\\

(MMA

( M H /A i

(HHHA

(/HM)

?M/MN i

(MMA

(/MHA YMH/A v/MHA Y/MHA YMM)

V/HHA YHHHA VMM)

/MM)

VMM)

Y/MH)

/HMA VMHA VMHA 8

FY-W Mit B DFftee.

19 %

i i

PiANS FOR FY 81 ED0 ESTABLISil AND TRACK KEY MILESTONES, MAJOR RESOURCE LEVELS 0

IMPORTANT HILESTONES FOR 19 PROGRAMS, TM1 ACTION PLAN AND OTHER MAJOR OFFICE TASKS 0

RESOURCE CONTROL AT PROGRAM OR MAJOR OBJECTIVE LEVEL

\\

0 TIE TO SES PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS O

SIMPLE REPORTING SCllEME TO ED0 AND COMMISSION O

IMPLEMENT VIA PROGRAM SECTION OF PPP6 BEFORE START '81 l

4 t

I f

i OFFICE OF fluCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION CASEWORK FIRE PROTECTION UNR_ESOLVED SAFETY ISTUES OPERATING REACTOR LICENSING ACTIONS SYSTEHATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM

~

QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT

't DATE:

7/11/80 FY 80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW PROGRAM AREA:

POWER REACTOR CASEWORK

~

MAJOR OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISHMENTS MO 1.

DEVELOP TMI 2 LICENSE REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPED FRO'M NRC/TMI TASK ACTION FOR NEAR IERM OL PLANTS PLAN (NUREG 0660)

K0 2.

RESUME ISSUANCE OF NEAR TERM OL'S FL LICENSES ISSUED FOR THREE NT0L PLANTS (SEQUOYAH [ MAR 80]; NORTH ANNA 2 CAPR 80],

AND SALEM 2 [APR 80])

APPROVAL FOR LOW P0HER TESTING (5%) issued FOR NORTH ANNA 2 (JULY 3, 1980);.SEQUOYAH (JULY 11, 1980); SALEM EXPECTED IN JULY 80 SSER (NO. 10) ON DIABLO CANYON ISSUED IN JUNE 1980 ESTABLISHED REVIEW SCHEDULES FOR UPCOMING OL LICENSING ACTIONS M0 3.

DEVELOP COMMISSION POLICY ON

, COMMISSION POLICY PAPER (DRAFT) PREPARED IN REQUIREMENTS TO RESUME ISSUANCE OF JULY 1980 ON MATTERS AFFECTING CP REQUIREMENTS CP'S FOR SIX APPLICATIONS (11 UNITS)

BASED ON NRC/TMI ACTION PLAN (HUREG-0660),

i FY80 PESOURCES (NPJ1)

SY

$K 1

133'.

11,077 TOT /L

FY-80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW PROGRAM AREA FIRE PROTECTION MAJOR OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISHMENTS OPERATING REACTORS M0. 1 REVIEW PROPOSED DESIGN MODIFICATIONS REVIEWS ARE BEING COMPLETED AS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED (SER SECTION 3.1)

FROM LICENSEE MO. 2 RESOLVE OPEN ITEMS (SER SECTIONS 3.2 & 3.3)

REVIEWS ARE BEING COMPLETED AS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED FROM LICENSEE M0. 3 RESOLVE CONTESTED ISSUES PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULE TO RESOLVE CONTESTED ISSUES llAVE BEEN RECEIVED M0. 4 ISSUE SER SUPPLEMENTS AND FINAL TECilNICAL DEFERRED UNTIL FY-81 WilEN NRC STAFF AND LICENSEES AGREE SPECIFICATIONS ON REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS NEEDED IN FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM M0. 5 REPLICATION TESTS OF APPROVED DESIGNS INITIATED REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION TO THE LICENSEES M0. 6 DEVELOP TilREE YEAR AUDIT PROGRAM INITIATE REQUEST TO CONSULTANT TO DRAFT PROGRAM CASEWORK H0. 7 REVIEW FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR OPERATING COMPLETED FOR OL'S TilAT llAVE BEEN ISSUED - 3 ARE 90%

LICENSE APPLICATIONS COMPLETE M0. 8 REVIEW FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR ALL CP REVIEWS ARE DEFERRED INDEFINITELY t

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION SAFETY TECllN0 LOGY M0. 9 RESOLVE GENERIC ISSUES DRAFT REPORTS ON GENERIC ISSUES IIAVE BEEN PREPARED STAFF REVIEW liAS BEEN DEFERRED BECAUSE OF HIGHER PRIORITY WORK H0.10 IMPROVE REGULATORY GUIDANCE PROPOSED RULE AFFIRMED BY COMMISSION AND PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED MO. 11 VEHIFY REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS RESEARCH TEST PROGRAM IS ONG0ING

MJOR ISSlES ID.1 FIRE PROTECT 10fl FEATURES TO ASSURE SHLITDON4 CAPABILilY ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR ALTERNATE Ato DEDICATED SitITDONt CAPABILITY.

ID. 2 SAE ID. 3 SEVERAL ISSUES ARE C0fGESTED BY SAME LICENSEE. A PROPOSED RtLE TO RESOLVE TIESE ISSLES IMS BEEN AFFIRED BY TIE C0441SSION. TilREE MAJOR ISSUES IMVE BEEN RAISED Willi TIE PUBLICATION OF THIS ISSUE (1) WlETTER ALL PLANTS WILL iMVE TO BE REEVALUATED FOR CONFORF%NCE TO TIE RtLE IN ITS FINAL FORH.

l (2) WETTER PLANTS WILL iMVE TO SillITDONI IF TIEY DON'T WET TIE lFPLEKNTAT10ft DATES SPECIFIED, Ato (3) WilOi ALTERANTIVES ACCEPTED BY T}E STAFF REFRIN ACCEPTABLE (STAFF.YS. APPLICANT PERCEPTIONS OF REQUIRED FDDIFICATIONS).

ID. Il TIE C0f4 TESTED ISSUES, SEE PROPOSED RLLE SECTION IllAW PD. 5 HEmER DESIGt4S APPROVED BY TIE STAFF PROVIDE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECT 10ft AS DETERMINED BY T}E REPLICATION TEST.

[0. 6 0UR TEGINICAL SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE A TillRD PARTY AUDI1' 0F TIE F' IRE PROTECTION PROGRAM AT OPERATING PLANTS. '

kE T1EED A PROGRAM FOR ESTABLISHING THE CRITERIA FOR SUOi AUDITS AND OUR ASSOCIATED REVIEW PROGRAM.

tD. 7 twe FD. 8 Inte PD. 9 ETIDDS FOR DElERMINING FIRE DETECTOR LOCATIONS EFFECT OF INCREASING RADIATION LEVELS Off DETECTORS llE USE OF RETARDANTS TllE PERFORFMNCE OlARACTERISTICS OF WATER SHIELDS LER'S C0f1CERNING FIRES OR, EQUIPMENT FAILURES

.ID.10 RULE Oil FIRE PROTECTiott R.G.1120ONFIREPROTECTION

[0. 11 TESTS TO C0t4 FIRM PRESENT STAFF POSITION BASIC RESEARol ON FIRE PROTECTION SEALS, FIRE BARRIERS, GAS & WATER SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS FlLL SCALE REPLICATION TESTS EVALUATION OF TIE EFFECTIVENESS OF FIRE DETECTIVE SYSTEMS.

lY-80 RESOURCES i

NRR RES STD lE TOTAL E

h n

h a

h a

h a

h 7.0

'115

.5 500

.5 0

2.9 0

10.9 930

FY80 PROGRAM...,EA REVIEW DATE:

7/1 J0 PROGRAil AREA: UNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUES HAJOR OliJECTIVES ACC0liPLISIMENTS M0.1 - FOR 3 USIS NUR'G REPORTS WITH A TECHNICAL RESOLUTION E

i HO.1 MAINTAIN PROGRESS ON 17 UNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUES (USI)

WERE PUBLISHED FOR COMMENT CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW

- FOR 6 USIS CONTINUED PROGRESS WAS MADE WHICJ WE ANTICIPATE WILL RESULT IN ISSUANCE OF A 11UKi6 REPORT MO.2 PREPARE REPORT TO CONGRESS ON TECHNICAL RESOLUTION DURING THE REMAINDER OF 9$0 NEW UNREGOLyED SAFETY ISSUES F

BY JULY.t98U FOLLOWING A Eli C

W FA

- FOR 11 USIS CONTINUED PROGRESS WAS MADE IN A DEFINED E

PATH TOWARD RESOLUTION THI-INVESTIGATIONS AND OTHER SOURCES

- FOR 2 USIS WE NEED TO FINALIZE THE TASK ACTION PLAN

- FOR 2 USIS WE ANTICIPATE DIFFICULTY AND FURTHER DELAY IN ACHIEVillG RESOLUTION M0.2 - A COMMIS 10N PAPER PROPOSING SIX NEW USIS WAS ISSUED ON JULY

, 1980.

AFTER REVIEW DY JHE COMMISSION THE UAJOR ISSUES CONTENT WILL BE PUBLISHED AS A NURtG REPORT TO CONGRESS.

110.1 - RESOLUTION OF SOME ljSIS Wiu INVOLVE RULEMAKING (E.G., ATWS) i

- ADDITIONAL EFFORT IS BEING MADE TO ASSURE A PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION AFTER THE TECHNICAL RESOLUTION OF A USI IS COMPLETED.

FY 80 RESOURCES

~

g

_S1 AK_

_S1 iL 28 1,'500

-l'.'8 600K

l.

i FY 80 PR0mAM AREA REVIEW l

PR08AMAREA: OPERATING REACTOR LIENSING ACTIONS MJOR OILECllWS ACC0f0LISitENTS l

ID 1. ASSURE PLANTS CollTit4JE TO OPERATE SAFELY

- PREPARATIG4 m NlC INPUT FOR LICENSING A. REVIEW DESIGN AND OPERATIG4AL CHAf1GES ACTIMIS B. EVALUATE OPERATING EXPERIENCE AND

- ISSUEDEVALUATIG1FORTMI-1 RESTART If1SPECTIG1 NiD Ef1FORCEE NT FINDifiGS RE: C0fPLIANCE Willi N1C ORoER C.

ISSUE LICENSING ACTIONS AND CHANGES

- C0fPLETED TIE EVALUATION OF ALL IMI IN ALL0k#WLE OPERATING CalDITIONS SHORT.-TERM LESSONS LEARNED REQUIREKfRS C0fPLETED1500LICENSINGACTIONSVS.

93'l PROJECTED FOR 11E PERIOD (10//9 TO 6/80), 3300ACTIONSAREOUTSTANDillG i

MJOR ISSLES m 1. ASSURE PLAllTS CollTINUE TO OPERATE SAFELY A. SIGrilFICAtlT INCREASE IN BACKLOG AND WORKLOAD BECAUSE T IMI B.

IflCREAsiflG NUMBER OF ACTIONS ARE BEING CONTESTED BY LICENSEE Af4D/0R ltRERVENORS FY80RES0lllCES NE SY

.tK N 1. ASSURE PLANTS CotRINUE TO OPERATE SAFELY 2111 9,972

BUFO 7n0/30 FY30 ff0GRN1 ARfn OfNIBL TW1 AREA:

SEP (PilASE II, FI FVEN 01 TFR Pl#1TS)

OR ORJELTIVES ACCOTl_IslVBITS.

40.1 REVIEW NID DOCLtiEllT C0fPARISON W1111

- STAFF llAS C0tPLETED 500 SAFETY EVALtlATIONS CURREllT CRITERIA

- STAFF llAS DEVELOPED SITE SPECIFIC EARTIOUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRA

- STAFF llAS DEVELOPED CRITElllA FOR PIPE BREAKS AND TORNADO WillDS

10. 2 IDEllTIFY 1%JOR DEFICIEfCIES EARLY

- SEISlilC PROGRAli ilAS RESULTED IN ONE Sil0/l CAUSE ORDER ON LIOUEFACTION N1D MODIFICATION OF DEFICIENT SUPPORTS IN ALL PlR4TS

- STAFF IS DEVELOPING POSIT 10ft ON FLOOD PROTECTION FOR Ol4E PLAllT

- PALISADES C0tlTAltitENT OVERPRESSURIZATiott C0f1CEft1 RESOLVED.

l

- PulLISli HUREG-0098 Off SE!SlilC C0f1SEfNAT! Sits i

40.3 Pil0 Vile BASIS FOR litTEGRATED AND BALMICED

- IElGELY DEFERRED PEHQlNG CQiPLET!Ott 0F 110.1 BACKFIT DECISIONS

~

ntlSSLES 20.1 PROGRN1 IS DIFFICULT DUE TO UNIQUE CONSIDERA,TIONS. LICENSEES ARE NOT AGRESSIVELY PLRSUING PROGRNi.

00. 2 RESOLVits t%)0R DEFICIEtCIES IS REQUIRING SIGNIFICANT EFFORT.

ro. 3 flECESSARY TO FIRST CUiPLETE 10.1 TO PROVIDE BASIS FOR DECISIONS.

AlfS0tKES IN fo.1 REVIE\\l AND DOCulialT C0fiPARI-2 2. 11 iS25 SOf1 WITH CURREllT CRITERIA

20. 2 IDOlTIFY lt/UOR DEFICIENCIES 9.2 35 EARLY

10. 3 Pf0 VIDE BASIS FOR ll(TEGRATED

,ll NID BAIElCED BACKFIT DECISIONS 10TILS 32.0 1560

FY80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW PROGRAM AREA:

EQUIPMENT 00AllFICATION

_ MAJOR OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISilMENTS M0 1.

REVIEW 0F ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF STAFF llAS 69 OPERATING PLANT RESPONSES AND IS PROCEEDING WITil REVIEW ELECTRICAL AND MECilANICAL EQUIPMENT IN OPERATING PLANTS M0 2.

REVIEW 0FSEkSMIC&DYNAMICQUALIFICATION STAFF llAS INITI ATED REVIEW 0F 11 SEP PLANTS 0F ELECTRICAL AND MECilANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR SAFETY SYSTEMS AND PERFORMANCE SEISMIC SAFETY MARGINS RESEARCil M0 3.

IMPROVE BASIS FOR REGULATION COMMISSION ORDER (CLI-80-21) INSTRUCTED STAFF T0 INITIATE RULE. MAKING ON ENVIRONMEhiAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ADDITIONALLY S.D. IS DEVELOPING AND UPDATING SEVERAL STANDARDS TO IMPROVE THE REGULATORY DASE M0 4.

INSPECT INDUSTRY QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAMS SEISMIC TESTING OF ELECTRICAL PANELS IIAS BEEN COMPLETED AT SOUTilWEST AND PERFORM VERIFICATION AND METil0D0 LOGY RESEARCil INSTITUTE.

PROGRAM WILL BE EXPANDED DUE TO TEST RESULTS.

Tests DYNAMIC TESTS WERE CONDUCTED TO DEVELOP METil000 LOGY FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING OF VALVES AND TO EVALUATE Tile RESPONSE OF TilESE COMPONENTS I

MAJOR ISSUES M0 1.

COMMISSION'0ilDEROFMAY 23,1980 (CLI-80-21) REQUIRES COMPLETION OF STAFF REVIEW 0F SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL QUALIFICATION IN llARSil ENVIRONMENT BY 2/11/81.

M0 2.

SEISMIC & DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT MUST BE REASSESSED TO ASSURE Tile ABILITY TO BRING THE PLANTS TO A SAFE SituTDOWN CONDITION DURING A SEISMIC EVENT AND TO ASSURE EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY DURING TRANSIENTS AND ACCIDENTS.

M0 3.

C0FNISSION ORDER OF MAY 23, 1980 INSTRUCTED Tile STAFF TO INITIATE RULE MAKING ON Tilf ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION.

OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.

M0 4.

IMPROVE Tile DASIS AGAINST WillCil Tile REGULATORY PROCESS EVALUATES EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION. AUDIT Tile INDUSTRIES i

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION PROGRAM.

I

i

.i 580 RESOURCES NRR RES S.D.

IE TOTAL SY

$K SY g

SY E

SV $K SY

$K O 1.

REVIEW 0F ENVIRON-(7) 474K 0

0 0

0 0

0 (7)*

474K MEllTAL QUAL. OF ELEC-TRICAL AND MANUAL EQUIP!iEllT Itt OPERATING PLAllTS 10 2.

REVIEW 0F SEISMIC AllD (7) 291K 0

0 0

0 0

0 (7) 291K DYllAlitC QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL AND 14ECllAtilCAL EQUIPMENT, K0 3 IMPROVED BASIS FOR REGULAT1011 (5) 100K 0

0 (3.5) 10K (2) 70 (8.5) 180K MO 4.

IllSPECT INDUSTRY QUAll- 0 0

(0.5) 900K(0.2) 35 (0) 0 (2.7) 935K FICATION TESI PROGRAMS AllD PERFORM VERIFICA-T10N AND METil0D0 LOGY TESTS TOTAL (19) 865K (0.5) 900K (3.7) 45K (2) 70K (25.7)18P0K i

I t

i

.%L.-

1.

-m.

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS i

WASTE MANAGEMENT DOMESTIC SAFEGUARDS TRANSPORTATION FUEL CYCLE & MATERIAL SAFETY SPENT FUEL STORAGE 4

9 9

4

FY80 PH06HM N._lGlEH PROGRNIAREA: WASTE mat lAGEMEllT (IllGN-LEVEL 1 114J0R OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISilMEN[S t0 1 CONouCT SITE SCREENING AND STAFF llAVE STARTED Tile REVIEW OF DOE SITE SCREENING ACTIVITIES CilARACTERIZATI0tt REVIEWS

'AND IN-SITU TESTING PLANS PD 2 IMPROVE BASIS FOR REGULATION

- PUBLISiiED PROPOSED PROCEDURAL REGULATION DECEMBER 6, 1979

- PUBLISilED TECilNICAL REGULATION ANPRM ON MAY 13, 1980 PO 3 ASSESS Tile NAT10ftAL HIGil LEVEL

- COORDlHATED Tile PREPARATI0t' 0F THE NRC INPUT TO AND WILL WASTE MANAGEMEidT PROGRAM COORDINATE Tile REVIEW OF T;iE NATIONAL PLAN

_ MAJOR ISSUES H01 IIAC ACTI0ttS SUGGEST CURTAILMENT OF NRC ACTIVITY IN THIS AREA

~

PU 2 PROCEDURAL RULE WILL BE SENT TO Tile COMMISSION AS A FINAL RULE BY END OF Fi80 TECilNICAL RULE W:LL BE SENT 10 COMMISSION AS 'A DRAFT RULE WITH EIS BY END OF FY806 l03 EXPECT EPA STANDARD FOR NRC REVIEW Tills SUMMERJ NATIONAL PLAN SCllEDULEO FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMEtti

+

11EGINNillG lit SEPTEMBER.

FY80 RE300l[CES 1/

NMSS RES SD IE 0 TILERS TOTAL M

K M

M M%

M

'M N0 1 CONDUCT SITE SCREENING AND.

72 11193 5 2 5 23'10 0

0 0

0 0

61 97 389't.5 CilARACTERIZATI0tt REVIEWS l

M0 2 IMPROVE BASIS FOR REGULATION 17 6 3'125 3 18 960 12 3 830 0

0 0

0' 31 7 5215 3 MO 3 ASSESS Tile NAT10tlAL Hl611-S.6 356 2 03 0

0.fi 0

0 0

0 0

6.'3' 356 2 i

LEVEL WASTE MAllAGEMENT PROGRAM 10FAl.

30.ll. 5275 11 6 3300 12 7 830 0

0 0

6,1 117 7 9'16 6

.}/ RESOURCES DO fiOT INCLUDE ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT OR TiiE FY80 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST OF $

PROGHNi AREA: WASTE MANAGEMENT (LOW-LEVEL)

NAJOR OBJECIIVES KCOMPLISilWN[S

$1 PERFORM llEALTil, SAFETY, AND ENVIR0tNENTAL ASSESSMENTS

- RENEWED ONE NRC LICENSE.

- COMPLETED TECilNICAL ASSISTANCE TO STATE OF WASHINGTON.

- PROVIDING CONTINUED TECittilCAL SUPPORT TO TMI PROGRAM OFFICE.

R) 2 DEVELOP REGULATi0tl FOR LLW DISPOSAL

- COMPLETED PRELIMINARY DRAFT AND DISTRIBUTED FOR CONMENT.

- DRAFT TO COMMISSION APRIL 1981 SPotiSORED AND PARTICIPATED IN REGIONAL WORKSHOPS.

~

IO 3 DEVELOP GUIDANCE'TO SUPPORT HEALTil,

- COMPLETED DRAFT FORMAT AND CONICAT GUIDE.

\\

SAFETY, AND ENVIR0tNENTAL ASSESSMENT PREPARING VOLUME REDUCTION POLICY STATEMENT FOR THE COM I

- COMPLETED STUDY ON LIQUID SCINTILLATION WASTE.

MJ0lLIEiUES

~

$) 1 NOltACETODISPOSEOFCbMMERCIALTRU.WASTEINCOUNTRYAT.PRESENT.

I APitlCATIONS FOR NEW SITES.

NO STATES DEVELOPING SPECIFIC l

$) 2 POTENTIAL APPLICANTS Il0LDING BACK APPLICATIONS FOR SITES SINCE COMP 11EllENSIV i

N) 3 LICENSEES GENERATir4G SIGNIFICANT LLW.

MUST DEVELOP TECllNICAL BASIS FOR DEALING WITH SPECI AL DISPOSAL P FY80 RES00EES J/

NNSS RES SD IE OIllERS

-a a

St u

a zaz u

z 51 S.E NO 1 PERF0ftM llEALTH, SAFETY, AND 60 76 0 16 9 / 11 0

0 05 0

12 7

9 3 '1741' ENVIRotNENTAL ASSESSMENTS NO 2 DEVELOP REGULATION FOR LLW DISPOSAL 70 465 0

0 43 0

0 0

0 0 11 3 165 i

N0 3 DEVELOP GUIDAldCE TO SUPPORT NEALTH, 70 300 15 916 21 0

'O O

O O 10 6 1216 SAFETY, AND ENVIR0!NENTAL ASSESSMENTS 10IIL 20 1525 31 1890 64

.0 05 0

12 7 31 2 3422 i

l 1/ DOES NOT INCLUDE ORGANIZATION SUPPORT OR FY80 SUPPLEMElif 0F $900K.

DATE: 7/02/80 EY80 PROGRM A11EA REVIEli I'l(OGRM N(LA: WASTE NAtlAGENEilT (URAfilllH RECOVERY) ilMulLDIUECIIVES KCOMPLISlK)(IS to 1 URAi{ lum RECOVERY LICENSING

- COMI'LETED 3fl HAJOR CASE REVIEWS AND STARTED REVIEW OF DOE REME ACTION PROGRAM

{

f0 2 IMPROVE BASIS FOR REGULATION

- COMPLETION OF GEIS ON URANIUM HILLING AND ASSOCI ATED REGULATI0ldS; ON SCliEDULE FOR END OF FY80 fiAJORISSUES I01 PETITION TO !!(TERVENE-ON WESTERN NUCLEAR SPLIT ROCK HILI' LICENSE RENEWAL llAS BEEll FILED.

BACKLOG IS REMAlHING AT ONCOMFORTABLY 111 611 LEVELS.

D80 HES00EES l/

~~

}4 MSS RES SD IE OTilERS ~

IUTAL M

SY

.M M

.SY %

.SY

.SY N0 l.

URAtituN RECOVERY 19.f1 18810 0'

0 0

0 35 0

0 3 ' 22 23 2 1862 MO 2 IneRov,E.DASIS FOR REGULATION 11 1 1f 0 13 6118 12 0

0 0

18 500 8.fi 1288 1

t 10fM.

23 5 1980 13 6118 12 0

35 0

2 1 522 31 6 3150 I

1/ RESOURCES DO NOT INCLUDE ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT OR Tile FY80 SUPPLEMENTAL 1

N 7/8/M N $ PfDf7 WA ((VlSl

-Pit 0cRN4 AREA: DOMEST.lC SffEEl&DS.

I KC#PLISiltHfIS

. ID 1. LICENSING.I INPUT OF REFINED ACCOLNTABILITY MEAStJtES TO STING II'A0 PROGRAMS TO FulTIER TIEIR EFFECTIVENESS AND TO C0tHRIBUIE TO lllE NEW -

UPGRADEllulE. STAFFREVIEWllASBEEN INITIATED ON R

'~0R CONTINGENCY PLANS, GilAPD TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PLANS; CATECORIES

/l t%TERIALS PROTECTION IUNS FOR POWER No ION-l@ER REACTORS, Ato CATEGORY I/.l/ I FUEL FACILITY SECURITY AND TRANSPORT PLANS.

PD 2.

IlESOLUTION OF ADDRESSEDSAFEC41ARDS ISSUES RELATING TO PROTECTION AGAINST !NSIDER TIEFF OF Dott! 00ANTITIES ffNERIC AND OF NLELENt t%TERIAL AND SADOTAGE OF SPENT FlEL Sill MNTS T11ROUGil LEBAN AREAS. ADDRESSED 6

TECilNICAL ISSUES ISSUES RELATING TO INSIDER SADOTAGE OF RFACTORS.

hlLISilED RULES, IlfLElENTATION GilDANCE Ato PROVIDED TESTIFDNY DEALING Willi t%JOR ISSIES ItAOLVING SP(NT FI)EL SillPNENTS REACTOR

[

SAFEGUARDS, TRANSIENT SillPNENTS, STTtATEGIC YU, AM) fATEGORY I / 11 MATERIAL.

U) PED l

CAPABILITY ALTERNATIVES TO REQUIRE FORE TIMELY AND LOC'l 17E'

( D TECTION NO RESOLlRION OF t%TERIAL LOSSES, WillCll HILL BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF AN.

PGRADE h1E.

IU 3.

INSPECTION STAFF llAS DEVELOPED, t%INTAINED AND CONDlETED INSPECTION PROGtAMS FOR TfA AIO PilYSICAL 'SECLRITY!

AT FUEL FACILITIES, REACTORS, N4D SillPMElRS OF StH, lHCLUDING SPENT FUEL.

N W W.-

IU l.

ADEQUACY OF Tld NO PilYSICAL PROTECTION PROGRAMS AT LICENSED FACILITIES N4D TTtANSPORTATION ACTIVITIES.

PD 2.

liiE PitoiECTION OF Pl0LIC llEALTil No SAFETY FROM: TilEFT OF SIM AT LICENSED FACILITIES, SAB0 TARE OF lWER REAC10RS BY AN INSIDER, SABOTAGE OF SPENT FUEL SillPMEtRS. RESOLUTION OF IPNENTORY DIFFERENCES AT FlEL CYClf FACILITIES, lilEFI'6P CATEGORY I t%IERIALS IN TRANSIENT SilllWNTS.

S SK S

$K SbiK SY SK S

$K

$K S

K PD 'l.

LICENSING

'13

~51 6

1,1ft.

11 9 1,912

/

l t0 2. lles0LurION OF ffNERIC

& IECilNICAL ISStES SS 1,0fl9 8 li,000 lli 2,300 7/

7,WJ PD 3.

INSPECTION T 1,0@

T 1,60 TOT /\\L 98 1,8m 8 ll,000 90 1,0 %

l'i 2,300 6

3,161 216 10,261

FY80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW PROGRAM AREA:

TRANSPORTATION DATE:

JULY 7, 1980 MAJOR OBJECTIVE:

ACCOMPl.ISilMENTS M0.1.

CERTIFYT[lANSPORTATION

- DOE SPENT FUEL SillPPING CASK CERTIFIED.

PACKAGES

- OVER 100 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS APPROVED.

I MAJOR ISSilES:

NO 1.

MODEL NO.NFS-Il SPENT FUEL CASK.

MO 1.

FRACTURE TOUOllNESS CRITERIA FOR TRANSPORTATION CASKS.

l l

1/

FY80 RESollRCES NMSS RES SD TOTAL M

M E

M~K M.l E %

M K

11.7

-- l H0 1.

CERTIFY TRANSPORTATION 11.7 PACKAGES 9.5 1163 N0 2.

IMPROVE DASIS FOR 0.3 195 1.2 687 8.0 281 HEGULATION 27,0

M0 3.

INSPECTION 27.0 TOTAL 12.0 195 1.2 687 8.0 281 27.0 11 8. 2 1163 1

1/

RESOUR~CE~S DO NOT7NCEUDE ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT OR Tile FY80 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST.

~

FY-80 PROGP4M AREA REVIEW

'ROGRAM AREA:

FUEL CYCLE AND MATERIAL SAFETY DATET JULY 7, 1980 i

3 LAJOR OBJECTIVES:

ACCOMPLISilMENTS 10 1.

FUEL CYCLE.1 MATERIAL

- TERMINATED LICENSE AT U.S. NUCLEAR, OAK RIDGE, TN, RELEASED LICENSING PROGRAM

' FACILITY FOR UNRESTRICTED USE.

- AMENDED ALL URANIUM FUEL FACILITIES LICENSES TO COMPLY WITH EPA REGULATIONS.

- REVIEW OF RETIRED DOCKET FILES IIAS IDENTIFIED MORE TilAN 200 CANDIDATE SITES FOR FURTilER INVESTIGATION.

- COMPLETED 2129 MATERIALS LICENSE REVIEWS.

- PROVIDED ADVICE TO STATE OF ARIZONA ON DISPOSITION OF AMERICAN ATOMICS TRITIUM WASTE.

- CONDUCTED EIS SCOPING MEETING IN PRATTVILLE, AL, FOR PROPOSED WESTINGil0USE FACILITY.

H0 2.-

IMPROVE BASIS FOR REGULATION - DEVELOPED GUIDE FOR INTERIM STORAGE OF LOW-LEVEL WASTE.

OF FUEL CYCLE R MATERIALS PROGRAM MAJOR ISSilES:

MO 1.

ALARA PROGRAM FOR MEDICAL LICENSEES.

M0 2.

REVISION OF 10 CFR PART 20 FY80 RES0llRCES LSS RES SD E

TOTAL Sl E

SY E

S_Y E

S_Y E

S_Y E

67.5 1520

~

,M0 1.

FUEL CYCLE AND MATERIAL 67.5 1520 LICENSING PROGRAM 20 2.

IMPROVE BASIS FOR REGULATION 12.5 507 1.8 2220' 12.0 85 26.3 2812 i

FOR FUEL CYCLE & MATERIALS PROGRAM

~-

78.9 291 78.9 291 IO 3.

-INSPECTION TOTAL-80.0 2027 1.8 2220 12.0 85 78.9 291 172.7 11623

}/

HESOURCES DO NOT INCLUDE OliGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT OR TIIE FY80 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST.

FY80 PROGRAN AREA REVIEW

'ROGRAtt AREA:

SPEtiT FUEL. STORAGE DATEI JULY 7,~198(

~

iAJOR OllJECTIVE: -

ACCOMPL!SilMENTS l

10 1.

PEllFORM SAFETY AllD EllVIR0llMEllTAL

- GE NORRIS SPEliT FUEL IlEllEWAL APPLICATION BEING PROCESSED.

ASSESSMEllTS FOR LICENSING DECISI0llS & REMEDIAL ACTI0tlS I

iAJOR ISSilE:

MO 1.

AFR SPEllT FUEL STORAGE LICEllSIllG

- AFR LICEllSillG RULE ilAS llEEtt SENT TO Tile COMMISSI0ti.

DOE LICEllSE APPLICATiellS EXPECTED LATE IN FY81.

1/

FY80 RES0llRCES ~

NMSS RES SD IE TOTAL SY~

iK S_1 1K SY IK S_1 SK SY SK 10 1. LICEtiSillG 2.5 250 2.5 250 3.0 3.0 10 2. IMPROVE IIASIS F011 REGULATI0tl 0.6

~

MO 3. IrlSPECT10tl 0.6 i

6.1 250 0.6 TOTAL 2.5 250 3.0 I

}7-~ RESOURCES Do fl0T lilCLUDE ORGAfflZATIorlAL SUPPORT Oll. Tile FY80 SUPPLEMEllTAL REQUEST.

w

9 9

9 0FFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT i

REVISCD IllSPECTION PROGRAM 5

l h

l l

1 0

' FY'1980'PROGRAn AREA' REVIEW PROGRAM AREA: Revised Inspection Program I

HAJOR OBJECTIVES

' ACCOMPLISHMENTS Achieved as of 6/7/80.

l.

By June 7, 1980, have one resident inspector or the equivalent thereof) at each site having one or more units in pre-op, startup, or operation.

Fi fty-three Operations. residents. assigned as of.._,,__ __ -

2.

By September 30, 1980 have a second resident inspector on dual unit sites and a third resident June 30,1980 I

inspector on triple unit sites. (67 residents)

Inspection program is now based on total integration of 3

Revise program to integrate region-based inspectors and resident inspectors inspection effort.

region based and resident inspector expertise. THI lessons learned incorporated in inspection program.

j Time spent at the site directly observing licensee / con-4.

Increase direct verification of licensee activities through expanded independent measurement / direct tractor activities and assessing safety conditions has observation program, increased. 20% increase in contract activities over 79 associated with independent measurement efforts.

Five management and one series of program appraisals 5.

Evaluate licensee performance, effectiveness of the IE inspection program and confirm inspector

..<>e been accomplished and criteria have been defined objectivity.

against which inspector objectivity will be measured.

t Sixteen Construction res'idents assigned as of 6

By September 30, 1980 have a resident inspector assigned to 24 construction sites.

June 30,1980.

Two Safeguards residents assigned as of June 30, 1980 7

By September 30, 1980.. ave two resident inspectors assigned to selected fuel facilities.

I i

h.

e

MAJOR ISSUES Achievement of 100% resident assignments by end of FY 1980 made difficult by:

Financial impact of relocating lliring freeze liigher turnover rate for inspectors in general Achievement of FY l'980 PAT program goals not possible:

Same type personnel needed for both resident inspectors and PAT; PAT is #1 priority. Used on THI investigation

~

PAT only 47% staffed as of 7/1/80 l

l FY-80 RESOURCES I&E SY -316

$ K-3,298 i

o O

e

I 4

0FFICE OF fl0 CLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCil L0flG RAllGE RESEARCil PLAN RISK ASSESSi1EllT S

9 E

e q

e e

e e

Q

O l

O Q.

~~

FY 80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW PROGRAM AREA:

LONG RANGE RESEARCil PLAN MAJOR OBJECTIVE (S):

TO DEVELOP A SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES FOR IDENTIFYING AND RESOLVING SIGNIFICANT RESEARCil POLICY ISSUES, AND TO COORDINATE A 5-YEAR PLAN.

~

ACCOMPLIS!!MENTS:

COORDINATED Tile PREPARATION OF A LONG RANGE RESEARCil PLAN FOR Tile SAFEGUARDS, REACTOR ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, WASTE MANpGEMENT AND FUEL-CYCLE DECISION UNITS.

PLAN FORWARDED TO EDO,' COMMISSION, AND ACPS

~

FOR REVIEW (7/10/80).

SCHEDULEt LONG RANGE RESEARCl,1 PLAN FOR Tile REMAINING RES DECISION. UNITS T0 BE COMPLETED 9/30/80.

MAJQR_1SSUE:

LONG RANGE RESEARCil PLAN FOR FAST BREEDER REACTORS AND ADVANCED,

CONVERTERS IS UNCERTAIN BECAUSE OF FUTURE FUNDING CONSTRAINTS FOR TilESE DECISION UNITS.

~

i FY 1980 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW

\\

Program Area: Risk Assessment Major Objectives Accomplishments H0 1.

Develop Hethodology for Probabilistic Published NOREGs on Estimators for the Binomial Predictions Failure Rate Common Cause Hadel, and Bayesian Analysis of Camponent failure Data H0 2.

Develop and Apply Systematic Methods

- Published Report of the Task Force on Interin j

to Predict Accident Scenarios for Operation of Indian Point, in Conjunction with NPP and Other Facilities of the Nuclear OPE

~

Fuel Cycle Supported NRR with' Auxiliary feedwater Systens Reliability Reviews, THI-2 Cleanup Risk Studies.g Short Tenn System Improvements, and Cost-Benefit Study for Use of Potassium Iodide

~-

1 H0 3.

Develop and Analyze Data Bases on lluman Reliability, Conanon Cause

- Published NUREGs an Data Susanaries of Pumps. Contml Failures, Component and Systen Rods and Drive Mechanisms, Diesel Generators, and failure Rates Valves at Nuclear Power Plants i

Major Issues H0 1.

To satisfy the need for improved methods and software.

I H0 2.

To identify obvious outliers while developing a skilled cadre for application of probabilistic/detennini p techniques (IREP).

H0 3.

To improve the data base for quantitative risk assessments of NPP.

l I

FY 1980 Resources RES (PAS)

IE NRR TOTALS i

SY

$K R

SY

$K SY 5K H0 1.

Develop Hethodology for Probabilistic Predictions 5.5 1200 H0 2.

Develop and Apply Systematic Methods to Predict 12.5 3650 Accident Scenarios for NPP and Other Facilities of the Nuclear fuel Cycle H0 3.

Develop and Analyze Data 8ases on Human Reliability, 5.0 1100 TOTAL - 23.0 5950 87 8.0 638 31 6675 1.

Hesources Do Not Include Organizational Support or the FY 1980 Supplemental Request.

9 e.

I i}

4 0

re e

~

TN EM O

P O

L E

V E

D t

S f

D 0

O R

I A

T D

A G

l N

I G

l A

D l

T A

fi S

R 0

e I

F L

S O

E S

V l

i E

E V

C L

t0 I

F W

C F

O E

O L

D e

e 9

~

EN FY80 FROGWI E REVIEW PROGRAMAREA:

ilEALTil EFFECTS FROM LOW LEVEL RADIATION MJOR OBICTlWS ECQfLISifMS I

N 1.

IWROVE TIE TEOt11 CAL BASES IEGINICAL REPORTS APO EVALUATIONS ON FOR IFPLEfENTING STAtlDARDS

- IFPROVING UiOERSTNOING OFDOSE-EFFECTRELATIONSHIPS (B10llAilCAL DISTRI-ATID REGULATlot4S BUTION AND DOSES FROM RADIONUG.lDES AND FUEL t%TERIALS, IEALTH EFFECTS RESEAROI - EPIDEMIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY FEASIBILIU PLAft(ING STUDY CONTRACTOR REPORT)

IFPROVING BASIS FOR DETERMINATION OF EXPOSWE AfD DOSE (DOSIFETRY PERFORMANCE TESTING, TEIRRON CALIBRATION S0mCE 600 ERAT 10N)

- ASSESSING EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTECTION PROGRAMS (RESPIRATOR N O DOSIFETRY PERFORMANCE TESTING) m 2. ESTABLISH APPROPR! ATE STANDARDS

- ACTIVITIES RElATED TO RADIAT10fl POLICY CoutiCIL AND INTEP.I.GENCY FOR RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE C0ffilTTEE ON RADIATION RESEAROI GEf4ERAL PUBLIC, SPECIAL SUB-GROUPS ACTIVITIESTOESTABLISHAPPROPRIATEAlMALEVELS WITill!1 TiiE SEllERAL PUBLIC Ato OCCUPATICliAl POPULAT10tlS MJOR ISSlES & PR0Ilfm m 1. PERFGtMA'NCE TESTIf1G FOR PERSONNEL DOSIFETRY Af1D EFERGEilCY USE OF RESPIRATORS ARE MAJOR ISSUES

'm 2. PROBLEM Willi ESTABLISilMENT OF RADIATION POLICY COUNCIL AGENDA. EXTENSIVE 10 CFR 20 REVISION C0ftENTS - WILL TAKE CONSIDERABLE TIME TO CHARACTERIZE, C0tHRACTOR ON FEASIBILIW/PL##11NG STUDV tiET Willi RELUCTANCE OF A FEDERAL AGENCY TO SUPPLY DATA ESTABLISif ENT OF FEDICAL ALARA PROGRAM FY80 RESOURCES sn FS e

M.ES TOTAL _

a a

2 n.

m 1. TEOffilCAL BASES 2.1 380 1.9 1f61

.1 80 11. 1 2 1 '111 m 2. APPROPRIATE STANDARDS 1.5

.1 130

.2 75 1.8 205 l

MTEI 7/08/80 FY80 PROGRAM A E A [ b df 068AMATA:

DEC0441SSIQ11tlG UOR ORIFfTIWS KCOWLISif0fIS 31.

DEVELOP INFORMATI0ff BASE

- TEGINICAL REPORTS COMPLETED FOR PWR, BWR & 10ST FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES

) 2...

DEVELOP GEllERAL POLICY

- WORKitlG PAPER G: DRAFT EIS READY FOR INTEROFFICE REVIEW (7/25/80)

- DRAFT STAFF REPORTS 01 tiMOR ISSUES CQiPLETED 33.

DEVELOP REGULATORY OIAtJGES DRAFT STAFF REPORT Q1 SUGGESTED OlAf1GES CQiPLETED l

M0[LISSES 8 PIMBi 31.

CONTRACTOR WAS 9 tmntS LATE Wim BWR TEOt11 CAL REPORT 0 2 8 3. CaimACTOR EFFORT ON DRAFT EIS WAS LNSATISFACTORY ASSURING AVAILABILITY OF FLNDS FOR DEC044ISSIONING IS IIIGilLY CONTROVERSIAL CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABLE RESIDJAL RADIDACTIVITY WAS NOT AVAILABLE Y80 [S00RCFS SD

[S OMR TOTALS SY.

E SY.

E S1 SK Sr 7 0 1.

DEVEWP INFORtiATION BASE 3.0 820.'

0.7 110 0 2.0 5.7 1220 O 2 & 3. DEVELOP POLICY & REGULATlaiS 2.0 5fl.2 0.6 2'.'6 5fl.2

~

b i

~

OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS 8

l f

FY 80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW Date: 7/9/80 Program Area:

International Efforts Major Objectives Accomplisimient Expo't-Import Licensing;

- Took steps to innrove timeliness and quality of. export licensing M0 1.

r International Safeguards; reviews; prepared proposed Part 75 to implement the U.S. voluntary Intelligence Support safeguards offer; took steps to acquire improved international 1

(PPPG A.3.e.)

safeguards and nonproliferation / intelligence information.

M0 2.

Regulatory and Safety Research

- Took first steps in post-THI upgrading of HRC and aultilateral Information Exchanges efforts to acquire and use foreign reactor operating data; signed (PPPG 8.2.g.)

several new and renewed exchange agreements.

MO 3.

Safety Assistance to IAEA and

.- Provided safety assistance to developing countries in key areas.

Developing Countries; within staff resource restraints i.mposed by THI; completed work on International Standards several IAEA power reactor safety guides.

Major Issues M0 1.

Whether all NRC actions necessary for ratification of the U.S./IAEA Safeguards Agreement can be completed in i

time to complete ratification at the outset of NPT Review Conference, to begin August 11.

M0 2.

Ilow responsive will foreign abencies be to NRC and NEA efforts to acquire reactor operating data.

MO 3.

Whether available technical staff resources, which have decreased since THI, can be focused further in key areas to best serve safety assistance interests.

FY 80 Resources N IP NHSS _

IE SD RES NRR TOTAL E

E E

E E

E E

E E

E E

E E

H I

N0 1.

10 7

(292) 1 18 (292)

M0 2."

5 (12) 2 1

8 (12)

M0 3.

2

'(82) 1 5

1 9

(82) l TOTAL 17 (94) 7 (292) 2 5

2 2

35 (386) 1/ Resources do not include organizational support.

9 e

OFFICE OF Tile EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS EMERGEllCY PREPAREDNESS I

4 e

4 4

4 i

=

FY 80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW PROGRAM AREA: Emergency Preparedness ilAJOR OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISHiiENTS H0 1.

UPGRADE EMERGENCY PSEPAREDNESS

- STAFF llAVE G0NE TilR00Gi RULEMAKING PROCEEDINGS TO PREPARE FINAL RULE AT AND AROUND NUCLEAR REACTORS PRESENTLY BEFORE THE CONNISSION. STAFF AND FEMA NAVE JOINTLY PUS-LISilED FOR INTERIM USE AND C0FelENT CRITERIA FOR PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF PLANS.

H0 2.

i'PGRADE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

- STAFF flAS PREPARED COMMISSION PAPER DESCRIBING RULEMAKING AND CRITERIA I

AT AND AROUND MATERIALS LICENSEE PREPARATION SCllEDULE.

I AND FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES N0 3.

UPGRADE Tile AGENCY'S PLANS FOR

- STAFF IS PREPARING A COMPREllENSIVE AGENCY PLAN FOR RESPONDING TO NUCLEAR.

RESPONDING TO INCIDENTS AT NUCLEAR INCIDENTS AT NUCLEAR FACILITIES. STAFF llAS PREPARED A SERIES OF FACILITIES COMMISSION PAPERS DESCRIBING FOUR POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES FOR A NUCLEAR DATA LINK (NDL) WillCil IDENTIFIED RESPECTIVE COSTS.

MAJOR ISSUES i

H0 1.

FINAL RULE IS BEFORE Tile COMMISSION. COMMENTS llAVE DEEN RECEIVED ON CRITERIA WilICil ARE BEING REVISED AND WILL i

REISSUED BY Tile END OF FY 80 H0 2.

DRAFT CRITERIA FOR PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF RADIOLOGICAL CONTINGENCY PLANS AROUND NHSS LICENSEES ABLE BY JULY 31, 1980. ADVANCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING WILL BE PUBLISilED DECEMBER 31, 1980.

t MO 3.

Tile COMPREllENSIVE AGENCY PLAN FOR RESPONDING TO NUCLEAR INCIDENTS AT NUCLEAR FACILITIES WILL BE SUBMITTED BY SEPTEMlER 30, 1980. STAFF IS REFINING Tile COMMISSION-FAVORED NDL ALTERNATIVE IN TERMS OF COST AND RELATIONSNIF TO OTilER DATA ilANDLING REQUIREMEllTS (SPDS, TSC, & E0F).

WILL BE PREPARED BY END OF FY 1980.

Tile NDL SPECIFICATIONS SUITABLE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDDING FY 80 RESOURCES NRR SD NHSS IE SP TOTAL

.1Y.

.il_

SY.

_i_

S_Y

.lK.

SI 1K_

11

.1K.

1Y IK H0 1.

21 1350 2

340 10 157 8

1920 41 3757 i

H0 2.

1 8.3 400 9.3 400 HQ 3.

8 285 8

285 21 1350 3

340 8.3 400 18 442 8

1920 58.3 4,452

D g

OFFICE FOR Analysis AND EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA OPERATIONAL DATA i

t l

l 1

k i

O

DATE: 7/09/80

~

FY80 PROGRAM AREA REVIEW PROGRAM AREA: OPERATIONAL DATA ANALYSIS MAJOR OBJECTIVEd ACCOMPLISHMENTS HQ I. IHPLEMENT ORGANIZATIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

- AE00, OEEB/NRR, OEAB/IE ORGANIZED AND WORKING ON OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE AN INTEGRATED EVENTS - STAFFING NEAR COMPLETION.

NHC PROGRAM FOR TiiE COLLECTION AND EVALUATION

- PREPARED PROGRAN DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING AE00 INTERIM OFFICE PIAN, OF OPERATIONAL DATA.

EDO INTERIH PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW OF REACTOR OPERATIONAL DATA, DRAFT HANUAL CilAPTER FOR OPERATIONAL SAFETY DATA REVIEW PROCEDURRS.

- INITIATED A CONTRACT WITH THE NUCLEAR SAFETY INFORMATION CENTER TO DEVELOP A PROCEDURE TilAT WILL PERHIT CODING LER EVENT SEQUENCE INFORMATION IN A COMPUTER READABLE AND SEARCHABLE FORMAT.

- INITIATED DISCUSSIONS WITH INP0/NSAC AllED AT IDENTIFYING An AE OF COOPERATION, PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO THE COLLECTION OF DATA AND Tile USE OF A COHHON DATA BASE.

- INITIATED A PROGRAM TO SCREEN FOREIGN OPERATING EXPERIENCE TO I

IDENTIFY SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND TO CODE AND RETRIEVE FOREIGN 5

DATA IN Tile SAHE HANNER AS DOMESTIC.

- BECAN DEVELOPMENT OF AN AGENCY-WIDE PROGRAM FOR THE COLLECTION, ANALYSIS, AND FEEDBACK OF NONREACTOR OPERATIONAL DATA.

6 NO 2. PERFORM ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL

- SYSTEHATIC REVIEW AND SCREENING OF ALL NEW LERs IN PROGRESS.

j

[

DATA.

- ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS AND CASE STUDY REVIEWS OF SIGNIFICANT OPERATING EVENTS IN PROGRESS WITilIN AEOD, IE, AND NRR.

l HAJOR ISSUES

1. REVISED REPORTING REQUIREHENTS - STAFF PAPER TO THE CottilSSION IN JANUARY 1981.

2. FUTURE UTILIZATION OF AND IMPROVEMENT OF Tile NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (HPRDS) - STAFF PAPER TO T!!E COMMISSION IN AUGUST 1980.

3. ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS TO BE DEFINED IN AN NRC MANUAL CliAPTER FOR OPERATIONAL SAFETY DATA REVIEW PROCEDURES.

44. PROPER STAFFING LEVELS AND NEED FOR PROGRAM SUPPORT COORDINATION FOR SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES INVOLVING OPERATIONAL DATA l

ANALYSIS.

FY80 RESOURCES 1/

)

AEOD NRR NMSS HPA IE RES SD SP TP ADH E

$K S.Y.

$K SY.

$K.

pY jK SY

$K SY jK SY

$K SY $K SY-jK SY

$K 22.0 110 8.5 200 6.3 80 5.5 125 18.0 50 4.0 1900 0.8 05 -

T TOTAL 65.6 SY 2465K l

I,/ BASED ON ESTIHATES DEVELOPED DURING Tite PROGRAM AREA REVIEW OF Tile FY 1982 BUDGET REQUEST.

0 C

f 6

e 0

o e

e 88,

=

G 4

J

~

.t.o 4J l

W J

Z C

e==

Z k""-

W U

w 1:2:

~-

e i

l l

\\

l e

= d? o

).

i i

TMI ACTION ITEMS COMPLETED AS OF JUNE 1980 I.A.2.1 Isaiediate upgrading of operator and Septor Operator (NRR) training and qualifications, s

I.A.3.1 Revised scope and criteria.for licensing exams.

(NRR)

I.B.1.1 Management for operations - long term improvements.

(NRR) 1.B.I.2 Management for operations - evaluation' of NTOL applicants.

(IE)

I I.D.6 Control Room Design - Technology Transfer Conference.

(RES)

II.B.6 Support of Study to reduce risks at operating reactors (NRR) near high population densities (NOREG/Cr 1409, 10, 11). -

II.B.7 Safety Review Consideration - analysis of hydrogen control..

(NRR)

III.A.2.2 Development of guidance and criteria.

(NRR)

IV.E.5 Assess currently operating reactors.

'(NRR)

I.

MAJOR ISSUES RELATED TO TMI ACTION ptAN II.B.8 Rulemaking Proceeding on Degraded-Core Accidents (SD) - NRC Office Coordination, Unresolved Safety Issue.

II.F.2 Identification of and Recovery from Conditions Leading to Inadequate CoreCooling(NRR)-Uncertaintywjth' January 1,1981 Implementation.

j III.A.2.a Upgrade Licensee Emergency Support facilities (SD) - Action Dependent on Final Rule.

O