ML19320D746
| ML19320D746 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/27/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19320D735 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900089 99900089-80-1, NUDOCS 8007220150 | |
| Download: ML19320D746 (1) | |
Text
5_
..n U
Huico Incorporated Docket No. 99900089/80-01 NOTICE OF DEVIATION Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on May 5-8, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements as indicated below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 states:
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance i
with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for detennining that important activities have been satisfactorily accompl i she.d." Deviations from these requirements are as follows:
A.
Paragraph 18.3.1, Section 18.0 of the ASME accepted QA manual states that "The Auditor performing the Quality Assurance Audit shall have no direct responsibility in the area being audited."
Contrary to the above requirements, one (1) QA Supervisor audited both NDE and procurement on 1-24-80 and 3-25-20 respectively while assigned QA supervisory capacity in both functions.
B.
Paragraph 18.3.6, Section 18.0 of the ASME accep.ted QA manual states that "A log of the Quality Assurance Internal Aucit Schedule, the audit reports, follow-up action and re-audit shall be maintained by the Quality Assurance Manager."
Contrary to the above requirements, the Quality Assurance Manager does not maintain a log for audit reports, follow-up action and re-audits.
C.
Paragraph 18.3.4, Section 18.0 of the ASME accepted QA manual requires the Audited Department Head to respond to adverse findings including probable causes, corrective action and the effective date of the correc-tive action.
Contrary to the above requirements, Audited Department Heads do not j
include the probable cause or effective date of corrective action in their response to adverse findings.
Examples were identified in internal audits 4-80 and 7-80 for nonconfonnances and doGren9 tion.
-8007220/5'O
..