ML19320B348

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Comments on Ofc of Policy Evaluation Paper on Impact of NRC Post TMI-2 Requirements on B&W Reactors & Facility Transient.Requests Submittal by 800515,w/inclusion of Program Ofc Views
ML19320B348
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River, San Onofre  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/1980
From: Ahearne J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML19320B344 List:
References
NUDOCS 8007100211
Download: ML19320B348 (1)


Text

('

, O) l

,.,9* 4%q{c, UNITED STATES

!}

~ j NUCL EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION q

.. E WASHINGTON D C. 20555 k..v,/

April 29,1980 CHAIRMAP(

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Acting Execut ve Director for Operations FROM:

John Ahe:rne

SUBJECT:

OPE EVALUATI 0F THE IMPACT OF POST TMI-2 NRC REQUIREMENTS ON B&W REACTORS AND THE CRYSTAL RIVER TRANSIENT (OPE MEMO, APRIL 24, 1980)

Please provide for the Comission your reaction to this paper, including recomendations. Please include the views of the Program Office. Your coments are requested by May 15th.

Attachment cc: Comissioner Gilinsky Comissioner Kennedy Comissioner Hendrie Commissioner Bradford Secretary OGC OPE 8007100 W

[

c.

UNITED STATES g$eGj NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

,.gyg,p l April 24, 1980

MORANDUM FOR:

Chairman Ahearne Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Kennedy Commissioner Hendrie Commissioner Bradford FROM:

Edward J. Hanraha[

SUBJECT:

OPE EVALUATION OF.riE IMPACT OF POST TMI-2 NRC REQUIREMENTS ON B&W REACTORS AND THE CRYSTAL RIVER TRANSIENT I.

INTRODUCTION On February 28, the Commission directed the Office of Policy Evaluation to make an independent evaluation of the impact on B&W reactors and on the Crystal River event of the post-TMI-2 requirements.

In making its appraisal, OPE considered all of the post-TMI-2 requirements -- including the Short Term Lessons Learned Task Force (NUREG-0585) as well as bulletins, orders, and letters related to the TMI-2 accident.

In the course of performing this evaluation, we had discussions and meetings with the NRC staff and B&W engineering staff. On a site visit, we also met with Florida Power at the Crystal River Unit and Duke Power at their headquarters in Charlotte. We received substantial technical assistance from Dr. M. A.

Schultz, a professor in the Department of Nuclear Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. There is clearly some overlap betweer. the scope of our review and that of the recent B&W Task Force Report:

Transient Response of B&W Reactors (NUREG-0667). Accordingly, I have commented on the B&W Task Force reco=cendations in several instances where they are directly pertinent to the Crystal River transient.

We prepared a comprehensive list of post-TMI-2 NRC requirements, the status of implementation of the requirements at Crystal River on February 25 and brief statement of our assessment of the impact of each requirement on the February 25 transient. This compilation is presented in Appendix A.

The OPE staff encountered difficulty in compiling this comprehensive list of requirements since no single individual or organization knew all that had been required of B&W reactor licensees.

Severai independent groups were responsible for analysis and development of new NRC requirements after the TMI-2 accident -- the B Short-Term Lessons Learned Task Fc*,'

W.,

ForceformedinresponsetotheCry Rg DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Contacts:

Q t

Bill Travers, OPE h

Entire document previously Dennis Rathbun, OPE

['

entered into system under:

A

/"[. n 63-43276 e

SOMMOM(

~

E ANO E'h/ SM-No. of panes:

30

~

e-m u ma

%