ML19319D362
| ML19319D362 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River, 05000303  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1968 |
| From: | Pautzke C INTERIOR, DEPT. OF, FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE |
| To: | Price H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003160197 | |
| Download: ML19319D362 (2) | |
Text
l 1
1 1
M * *** 7 e w,,,,. f.',,pc ' f -
L,.. M.3'f}c r,s 7,.{C ' {aQ*{.,L
. -7,[.,*.(
I 3,g,_-7 ~.,.9,.. %. p a r-
.. e
==
'O DATE OF DOCUATNTs DATE 8tCtr#f0 NO.s W..
,.. or saa anseraer 4-18 08 4-22 68
.L u s Fish snd Wildlife Arvice t i,,,
y,yo,
,,, oar,
- omie, Washington, D. C.
(C. Pautzius) los O RIO.a CC:
OTHER:
!!arold Price 1
1 d'
DAt AuswritD C uCUnatsCs ACTION NECESSARY O
'Y' NO ACTION N!CESSARY O C ##fN' O
CLAasif.
POSI OFilCE Fitt CODia f
DCCKET ( 50-30? - -303 U
seo. NO, M5CRIPilON: (Must Es Uncl.wf..d)
REFERRID TO DATE RICilVID BY DATE
, Ltr. responding to our 2-9-63 Itr.
l uhich transc:itted Avend. 62 to PEAR g.
3, 4,3 fer Crystal River.......... nd hereby v/2 cys. -- Ita AC IILi furnishin!; their cococnts....
thCLOSUkt$s Info Cooles to H. Price la Staff Lon0:
n w
.e..com. a. A-,-
/m #Mi kd 3-extdas Lev 1=d i
Skcrsholt 1-OGC (T. Conm:r) h
..;,"yyC S t*^5 4' Distribution 7'.1-suppl. f11 Cc5py
- J 1414 U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMIS$10N Mall CONTROL FORM roa"m Ance W v... novsRNMENT PRINilNG OFFICE: 8947-279483 8003160 ) y 7 p
t,
-O g, g g.
IN REPL,Y REFER Tor J,1tpfs UNITED STATES 4_
~
- p DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
,f FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
- /
WASHINGTON. D. C.
20240 APR 181968 Mr. Harold L. Price Director of Regulations U. S. Atomic Energy Comission Washington, D. C.
205h5
Dear Mr. Price:
This is in response to your letter of February 9 trans-mitting a copy of Amendment No. 2 to the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report of the application for a construction permit for the Crystal River Nuclear Station, Units 3 and h, Citrus County, Florida, Docket Nos. 50-302 and 50-303. We understand that the Florida Power Corporation has revised its application and is now planning for only one nuclear reactor at the station.
We have reviewed the planned radiological monitoring program as described in Amendment No. 2 and believe that it is adequate in scope. The frequency of sampling, however, was omitted. We recommend that samples be collected and analy::ed every 6 months, as mentioned in our letter of February 12.
We also find no reference to studies to determine current velocities and patterns in the estuary receiving plant effluent, as recomnended in our report. This program is necessary for the accurate determination of circulation patterns and dilution rates of radioactive effluents.
Sincerely yours, I
Comissioner
'l '.
-