ML19319C172
| ML19319C172 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1973 |
| From: | Sampson G TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| To: | Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319C173 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001310530 | |
| Download: ML19319C172 (1) | |
Text
_
l ;3
('.f..
,, p p ~ a) s
)
LJ
.m: e
%./
.. s %}---.
i roteo0
- g q-EDISON a
. ~ s;r
...9 i
~z 6
GLENN J. SWPSCN ts., x., fy.f v c. pres.eene. pa.or s ' Q.:
M January 26, 1973 Mr. R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Directar for Pressurized Water Reactors Directorate of Licensing U.S. Atomic Energy Coc=ission Washington, D.C.
20545 Docket No. 50-3h6
Dear Mr. DeYoung:
Our October 30, 1972, letter in response to your september 26, 1972, request for Toledo Edison to review the Davis-Eesse Nuclear Power Station non-Class I (seis=ic) equip =ent that =ight potentially adversely affect the perfor=ance of safety-related equipment, pro =ised a further reply within 90 days. This
,[
l letter responds to that pro =ise.
's
,/
w/
A detailed review was made of non-Class I (seis=ic) syste=s and co=ponents to deter =ine whether failures could adversely affect safety-related syste=s and equip =ent by any of the following = odes :
1.
Falling of non-Class I (seismic) equipr.ent onto essential safety equip-
=ent.
Spraying of essential safety equipment due to non-Class I (seismic) co=-
2.
ponent rupture.
3.
Flooding of essential safety equipment due to non-Class I (seis=ic) co=-
ponent rupture.
This review has resulted in sc=e design =odificatiens to ensure that safety-
^#
related equip =ent vould not be adversely affected. Portions of the fire pro-2 tection piping have been upgraded to Class I (seis=ic) design and portions of
,Jj /
several other piping syste=s are being upgraded to Class I (seismic) design.
In certain areas, curbing is being added where water frc= potential ruptures
~
j might affect safety-related equipment at that or sc=e 1cwer building elevation.
d(
So=e valves, both autc=atic and =anual, are being added to certain piping
[
syste=s to prevent or =itigate flow of water into a failed syste=.
9J So=e portions of this review are still under study, but all design require =ents vill be established within 90 days.
I
[09,(?
n
~
I I
Yours very truly,
- f., :
u/
p yp -
h COPY SEST REGION 3
/+,='
. ~ mt
-b THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISCN AVEN TCLEDO[ HIO 43652 caS:cd
(
l 8001310/ go j