ML19319B509
| ML19319B509 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 04/13/1979 |
| From: | Reid K Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Roe L TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319B510 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001230632 | |
| Download: ML19319B509 (3) | |
Text
6
~
..0-
< ^*
w/ enclosures DISTRIBUTION: 183 only:
Cydlw/ enc. 1-3---Docket File BHarless April 13,1979 NRR Rdg ACRS (E58 ORB #4 Rdg Cy#4--(16)
L POR OPA, CMiles NRC PDR RDiggs Docket Ho. 50-346 3R HRDenten Gray File VStello Xtra (4)
DEisenhut JRBuchanan mod BGrimes TERA D
RVollmer Nr. Lowell E. Roe - Cyd6 Dg Vice President. Facilities TJCarter Development Qgn Q T WRussell RClark -
b d
u g' RIngram Cy 42 f
Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 6'
GVissing 300 Hadison Avenue OELD Toledo, Ohio 43652 w/ encl.1-3-- I&E (5) -HQ Cy3, Reg. Cye5 BJones (4)
Dear Mr. Roe:
BScharf (10)
The Comission has issed the enclosed Amendment No.14 to Facility Operating License No. !iPF-3 for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit Mo.1, in response to your submittal dated June 5,1973, as revised September 20, 1973 Nove.ber 10, 1978, Decenber 26, 1973, January 12, 1979, February 22, 1979, and March 16. 1979.
The amendment modifies the license to include the current Co= mission-approved physical security plan. This nas been discussed with and agreed to by your staff.
We have cmpleted our review and evaluation of your physical security plan as revised, ar.d have concluded that the physical security plan for your facility, when fully implemented, wil' provide the protection needed to meet the general performance requircrk.i.ts of 10 CFR 73.55(a) and the objectives of the specific requirerents of 13 CFR 73.55, cara-graphs (b) through (h), without impairing your ability to safely ocerate your facility. We therefore further conclude that the plan as ravised is acceptable.
The enclosed Security Plan Evaluation Report (SPER) represents our evaluation and acceptance of your physical security plan as revised.
The SPER is being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR cp l 2.790(d).
N Changes which would not decrease the effectiveness of your approved r
security plan may be nade without approval by the Comission pursuant
[6m 7 +1 to the authority of 10 CFR 50.54(p). A report containing a description M
of each change shall be furnished to the Director, Office of Mt.: lear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D. C. 57) 20555, with a copy to the appropriate NRC Regional Office within two 8001230(p3h i
e l
o n
y Mr. Lowell E. Roe.
months after the change is made. Records of changes ecde without Comission approval shall be maintained for a period of two years from the date of the change.
We have evaluated the potential for environmental impact of plant operation in accordance with the enclosed amendment. We have deter-mined that the amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level, and will not result in any significant envirorcental impact. Having made this determin-ation, we have further concluded that the amendment involves an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact and pursuant to 10 CFR 351.5(d)(4) that an environmental inpact sta_ tenent or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be preparad in connection with the issuance of this anendment.
The amendment does not involve significant new safety infor"ation of a type not considered by a previous Co.nission safety review of the facility.
It does not involve a significant ir. crease in the probabil-ity or consequences of an accident, does not involve a significant decrease i i a safety margin, and therefore does not involve a signiff-cant haza ds consideration. Ne have also concluded that there is reasonabl? assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endange.ed by this action.
A copy of the Notice of Issuance is also encloser'.
SI"C'"'I7' Of]S D
UJ d dtY
\\
gp-m Robert N. Reid, Chief
.U_
Operating Reactors Sranch f4 i
a a
Division of Operating Reactors
Enclosures:
1.
Amendment No. "
2.
Security Plan Evaluation teport (PROP.) Cy f6 l
3.
Notice cc w/ enclosures 1 and 3 only:
See next page
. 0RBde.;DDR.... 9.R.Sds.; DOR..
.iEAPIR..
. Ab
'.y...C-OR 00R.
.me s
- 7 RIngram N.
GVissing/cb 8
ir_s
, [p,(
j RRe 4/..O../79 4/.... / 79 4/
- /79 4////79 OATE M 4--
bsc ronn m am mcu one
- "='h=~~"'~~~**"'*"""*'"
l
s oledo Edison Company s
cc w/ enclosure (s) 1 and 3 on13 :
L Mr. Donald H. Hauser, Esq.
Director, Technical Assessment The Cleveland Electric Division Illuminating Company Office of Radiation Programs P. O. Box 5000 (AW-459)
Cleveland, Ohio 44101 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Crystal Mall #2 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Arlington, Virginia 20460 Shaw, Pittman, Potts i
and Trowbridge U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 1800 M Street, N.W.
Federal Activities Branch Washington, D.C.
20036 Region V Office ATTN:
EIS COORDINATOR Leslie Henry, Esq.
230 South Dearborn Street Fuller, Seney, Henry and Hodge Chicago, Illinois 60604 1
300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43604 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Ohio Department of Health Nuclear Power Generation Division ATTN:
Director of Health Suite 420, 7735 Old Georgetown Road 450 East Town Street Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Ida Rupp Public Library 310 Madison Street Port Clinton,0hio 43452 President, Board of County Connissioners of Ottawa County Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 Attorney General Department of Attorney General 30 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Harold Kahn, Staff Scientist Power Siting Commission 361 East Broad Street l
Columbus, Ohio 43216 l
l l
l w
-m-m
-<,,,w, w-
,aa,
A
.2-The Consnission has determined that the issuance of this amendment will not result in any significant environmental impact and that pursuant to 10 CFR 151.5(d)(4) an environment:' impact statement or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with issuance of this amendment.
The licensees' filing dated June 5, 1978, revised September 20, 1978, November 10, 1978, December 26, 1978, January 12, 1979, February 22, 1979 and March 10, 1979, and the Commission's Security Plan Evaluation Report are being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d).
The withheld information is subject to disclosure in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 19.12.
For further details with respect to this action, see (1)
Amendment No. 14 to License No. NPF-3 and (2) the Commission's related letter to the licensee dated April 13, 1979.
These items are available for public inspection at the Comission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. and at the Ida Rupp Public Library, 310 Madison Street, Port Clinton, Ohio.
A copy of items (1) and (T) may be obtained upon request addressed to the J. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission, Washington, D.C.
- 20555, Attention:
Director, Division of Operating Reactors.
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 13th day of April 1979.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.O < /
77 J //< d W3.W Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Operating Reactors 1