ML19319B278
| ML19319B278 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1973 |
| From: | Clark R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Dicker G US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001140745 | |
| Download: ML19319B278 (2) | |
Text
-
r j
- Y
..x.
JAN 2 3.1973 J
(
. j f
-r"
_w.
,y Ci@/!p;y% bl.(,8 ' g i Docket Nos. 50-270 %
and 50-287 4
s c.
.)
n h*
s C. K. Dickor, Chief, Environmental Projects Branch 2, L OPERATING IICENSE FOR_OCOMEE UNITS 2 AND 3
Reference:
' F h 1 Invironmental Statement related to Operation of
'Oconee Huelcar Station Units 1, 2 and 3 dated ihrch 1972 1.
As requested,'I have revieved the reforenced FES to evaluato whether
~
d' it adequately assesses the environmental inpact of operating all three Oconee ur.its. Throughout the statencat, the evaluation of i= pacts (e.g., thernal enrichment, radwaste releases, fuel shipacnt, etc.)
was based on the combined effects of sitmitaneous operation of Units 1, 2 and 3.
y.
~
There are eleven (11) places in the FES, including Agency co=::ents, where additional studies or data are reco=nended. In como cases, there is an implication that data from operation of Unit 1 (on thornal modeling, stratification, dissolved oxygen, etc.) vill be used to evaluate the effects of operation of Unita 2 and 3.
(Ref:
Dept. - of Interior cocmcets, pages 19, 21 and 22 cod p.117 of report).
I have reviewed the cort spondence in the Docket Files to determine what cornitments, if any, vere nado with respect to hearings and consents.. The Agencies that corr:ented on the DES referred only to Unit 1, since the letter requesting corments referred only to t' nit 1.
Except for Interior, there was nothing in the co::ments which indicated that they were restricted to Uait 1.
All correspon-dence - except for the Federal Register notice - forvarding the FES pointed out that it "has been-written co*:sidering the conbined effectsJof operation of Units 1, 2 and 3"(including #1). The Notice of Availability _ of the FES, however, stated that "the subject stata-
~
ment is only final with. respect to Unit 1.
A further opportunity will be afforded to interested persons to submit connents with respect
, to environmental' matters concerning Units 2 and 3" (incladame #2).
y-y i
h oma g:.y....
+.
.=
.g
' suaNwt > d..Sd..' i.b.iE.i om S 0 !.C.........
..8.0.0.1.110...7.y.h m _,,... y o...
g V
3
m
<w.
u -
.~
_ ;* s
=
t:r 1'
.i' w.
e,-
' ~
r I
G. - K. Dicker. Chinf, EP-2
- M ? 3 D73 3
\\
s
'l It is.recom:sendd that:
l 4
'a.~
Ma verify that Duke Power has_ initiated the studies that r
- the FES recornended "be started ASAP and prior to operation
~ 10 of Unit l'( by visit to the site.
1
. : e s
?':2:,
-b.
Va reviav and'ovaluate the data collected on the abova studies and prepara a supplement to the FES to satisfy
- Interior's:coz: cents.
M-
... q'.
pt
?>'
-; e. We acnd the PT.S with.oupple:nent to the Agencies that.
1 4
+
c ' s i
. responded t'o the DES pointing out that the DES which they.
~
previously, reviewed had covered all three units.; y 1
i
,l p e n 2:g p -
,e;.
m;t u.
,p,te
,;n s.
+
eM m,
+.
,e,
.)'
t c g.
4 ::
m-p,+
, w R.-J. Cinrk rnvironmental Projects _ Branch Directorate of Licensing y y
t a-
.e e
.a w.
~ *n"..
1 DISTRIBUTIUNi'
~ '
DocketFilesMEEVIRON)i. _ [$.,
e RP Reading ~ "u
~
xL-
.' f
=
r ecw
%. +e
- c, EP-2 Reading -
-R.-J. Clark l
v:, a
,n :n. + a :>,
mm l
m4 m m-w
,m i
n, n.o 1
g.1
- $1 s
r *
+
4 'J.I 91
.- n w,.
e '
c 3g-
- -t
-; g,
- ~
i~,
r
,a a
, ww w,w n j,,,
wt.s.,. n,w L
.[-
i$j; * ($ ', Yi f,
.['?
ttdj f.%t ANQ2 4 N'
4-c,
t.c 1%n ww ws.au.
'.+.~.-.wn e..m., n ;....v -.
v
.- m
.s
..- pn e a. :.V n.s_b. _M.,_c n.o. - u-mn., *~a u, -,&__. ww w A.t% w m.t
.e 4 -
% w,w. :M.... uw w c m. m.w^ r,i l.~i n 1 e..nd,,3' Lhh%- cd.;..
n.
. ~ -
.~ - -
w c
a' A
mi 2
..a
<.. s..z t
3h 5 '>
~'-~ ~ l~a -
~
Y
~ ~ ~ - ~ - - - - ~ ~
- - - - - - ~ ~ -
7 Lsumin@c >..RJ.CMatkJpph.,
r
._..,a,,-
~
. 7 l
m_ r >.1. /.23. /.7. 3....... '......
1.
Fons AEC-318 tRev.9-53) ALCM 0240-
- e
- eas -to-cent unre -
^
-f'-'
...--.----.~.----.--a