ML19319B272

Requests Advice Whether Fes for Unit 1 Must Be Redistributed or Recipients Notified That Fes Is Applicable to Other Two Units

ML19319B272
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	02/22/1972
From:	Ernst M US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Muller D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8001140698
Download: ML19319B272 (1)

Text

T y

. +,, rw w te n.,

b 4

s

~

ENyyg9,y February 22, 972

,4 k

4:

a ;x

.e

[g9 D'. E. Muller

~

0CONEE 2 AND 3

.y DOCKET 1:0S. 50-270 and 50-267 The DRL review plan, dated February 5,1972, does not appear to include'any i

REP input. -As I understand it, the'Oconec FES is opocifically for 0conae.1, but the evaluation was written to include occace 1, 2, and 3.

If'this;is? -

true,isome input from REP csy be required; for example, the Ocones 118'may have to be redistributed, or at 1 cast a letter m.sy have to be written'and'

~ dictributed pointing out the fact that the Oconeo FES nico is applicable to 0conce 2 and 3 and has previously besa prepared and distributed.

@+.,

Please advina.

1. ~

,;t

' 'li':! y.'

or:vnt son.d ar,

( ~ bad

. a; 3.3, C Q ae M. L. 2n.st

" ' ^

Acafetant for Plans and Programa

,y ?

Division of Radiological and %. 6 EnvironmentalProtectiond[7[~

~ %,

cc: A,'Giambucco 9g T. McCreless

%:sf?

REP Files J($:

,9

' JAW Kd:

N5s&.

iM 19i.fMgn c;-

$$$8sf' 5)$$$Q

~'

" Q((:f?;-

, g.,

' [+

ng M

.orrect,

REP-l ', j_,

1 c.

gtg ee g,

summt m a.

~.'

=2/22/72:

W

" ' ~

a-

~

_ _, our >

w Fone AEC-Ste (Rev.9 53) AECM 0240 :,

,. A u s e,ovahwsM w=c r,serct n'o @r rse 0 QL14$f 72 D

_