ML19319B239

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies of Current Mechanical Engineering Branch Reevaluation of 720427 Request for Info to Comfirm That Level of Sophistication Required for Unit 1 Design Does Not Differ Significantly for Units 2 & 3
ML19319B239
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/1972
From: Maccory R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Deyoung R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8001130039
Download: ML19319B239 (1)


Text

,

I/ld 2 2 1372 Richa rd C. DcYoung, Assistant Director for PWR's, Directorate of Licensing REVILV 0F MECHANICAL DESIGN OF GCO:iEE 2 & 3, DOCKET Nos. 50-270/237 The Review Plan-Oconee Nucicar Power Station, Units 2 & 3 dated 2-16/72

~

indicated several items which vere judged to have been reviewed on Oconee 1 approximtely 2 years ago (April 1970) and required no further review for Oconee 2 & 3.

However, the extent of the review on Oconee 1 iny not reflect the requirements for new plants uhich are currently under review. At the request of !;r. A. Schwencer, the L Mechanical Enginecting Branch is currently reevaluating their request for information dated 4-27-72 to again confirm that the Icvel of sophistication required for the design of the Oconee 1 plant has not significantly changed for Oconee 2 & 3 Due to the depth of e

f..

investigation required for this review, it vill not be completed until

}

5 ~5-72.

2 Ottynal shined by

ng Tff 03 076 R. R. Maccary, Assistant Director for Reactor Safety Directorate of Licensing ccs E. J. Eloch, DDR S. H. Uanauer, DRTA F. Schroeder, L A. Schwencer,L-D. Lange, L I. Peltier, L H. -Bramer, L W. Mcdonald, L LIME-L
ME 1;

/

A A-;M omcc >

...; Bramer3j,,,j H

, p;,,,nga R.,,y4C cary.'...

La

-i suear >

5/w /72

. 5/ 22/ 72.........._...

....../ 2 t/ 7 2 5

Turm AEC-Sia (Rev.9-53) AfCM 0240

c. s. cortaNur>T rarsTtwo or ricr : 1,te o. en.34s g601'130 O A;

.