ML19319B028

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 771104 Memo Requesting NRC Position Re Instrumentation Calibr Records at Facility.Issue Is Whether Current Technical Actions by Licensee Are Adequate
ML19319B028
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/08/1977
From: Klingler G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Long F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8001060027
Download: ML19319B028 (2)


Text

.~. w., v. n..

(',gg.,J }.ia Mnle IE H g.

R01 Rda.

i ADFC Chron.

CE"l i r !,' ;r 1.7/

......;.- u.

I F. J. Long, Chiaf, f A rs l'rantii, P.II l

r.O M/dWUM FOR:

l J.11. Sniezek, A/C f r FC. DRUI, It I

f TtiRU:.

G. R. Klingler, FC, I.GI, IE Fl:CM:

ACCEPTAGILITY OF "SisFETY-RELATED" DESIG:

t SWJECT:

AT CCO::EE (F2 404) fi2)

Q position Le Your nano of 1:ovember 4,1977, rat;unsted that an IE:!:

establisned with reqard to a position illI has inten on instremnta-In tica c.alturation reccres at Juxa iovar Cui.pany's Oconeu Plant.

l reviewing this c:attcr ua hava discussed the i i

and A.11. Garland, QAS, liRR).

The Oconce technical specification Section 6.5.2 9 requires calibr tion records for a peried of six yer.r; for cali' ration perforced in accordmce with surveillance requirements for The rcquire-Guide 1.03 (hav.1) which endorses i'.51 ii4b.2.3-r74.

cents of MISI 1:45.2.9 for calibration records outside the purvicu tha technical specification requires storage or.ly until the instruna The calibration progran applied by Oconeo for those is recalibrated.-

instrurents in conter.cion appears adequate.

is consistent with Ti.c IE: liq position for handling this matter, whic) the requirevents of !!C 0300 is as follows:

Itcas uhich the P.cgion believes should Lolcay ca the ficansce "Q"-list seioald be identified to the licensee along with the 1.

Region's rationale.

If tha licensee accepts tnis and adds the idcit 2.

~

his QA program to those items.

,[

If the licensco refuses to accept the Ecgion's reconuendati The notificnica should 3.

the Region should notify IE:1Q.includa the rationale of th on tha Q-list 'as well as tiia licensee's rationale for not including the itcas.

773190371 0'

M J k-

-[.....a SURNAME >,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

.................p................p................e...~............i....-.....

ll w:5.n.=e s

- it u s. so.amic emums eeress Fcem N AC+318 47.75) HRCM 0240 80010600 27

.I

(

.i F.'J.-Lon9 3_

l 4.-

the inclusion of the items as a pret, er ti e lica 5.

Mihn the items have been added to u.e 0-lis In our view, tiie real issue to be considered is tdiether or not the contaansurate to the importance of tho' system whether or not tha item is designate.i as a Q-listed item.

itens identified in Enclosure 2 to your I?oveder 4It is items that the tions program slicensee does not include as part of his QA for opera T'.002 hould be identified to IE:1!Q along with the Region's i

rationale for inclusion (i.e., what should.the li for not including them.

e Please contact me if you require any further assistance in this m er.

)

G. R. Klinaler, Field Coordination Division of Reactor Operations Inspection, IE

cc:. C. E. Alderson -

K. V. Seyfrit-O

='

'1

~l s

. ;:n w -...~......

r y...~...,

... 7 l

GRKlindi L

\\

Jn nezek sunny m Form NRC-318,(7,75)idRCM O240 u w s ooven==seev es nen. o,r sa

~

" ~ " " " " '

tr s.co.sys.

.