ML19319A964

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Review of Util 751205 Proposed Amend to OLs DPR-38,DPR-47 & DPR-55.Proposed Relaxation of Administrative Controls Unwarranted
ML19319A964
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/19/1976
From: Sniezek J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Purple R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19319A965 List:
References
NUDOCS 7912300272
Download: ML19319A964 (3)


Text

f K'

d i

JAN 1 P 1976

/

. R. A. Parpla, Chief ORB 1, IL DUKE POWER COMPANT - OCOMEE 1RIITS 1, 2 4HR 3 - DOCKET mos.

70/237 We have reviewed the subject ita

's letter with attasimmat to Mr. 3. c. Itasche, dated December 5,1975. relattag to the Ocomes Techniem1 Specifiaations (TS). We eensider the proposal to be at aisafficant varianae with requirements established la the Mainistrative Controls Section of the Standard TS and related industry guides / standards which have been adopted by a mejerity of it

r.

In view of the operating reeord at ceemee, we de met believe that raimmation of =d=i=iatrative controls is marranted.

' Our primary coneers is that the liaan-has aliminated the Station Review committee (SRC) and.has transferred tis responsibility and anthority to as individsal (or gr.ap) from the independent review and audit body. Moreover, it appears that the review fonettaa

+"

previously performed by the SRC will now be accomplished by a single individual she may have mewimum practical experience equivalent to one year at the facility. Based om discussions between C. G. Eack, IL, and members of my staff, we understand that action in the form of I

requirements for a multidiacipliam review will be incorporated in the proposed TS. Such action should alleviate our eenaern la this matter.

In addition, mini=== training and experience requirements are not established for nonprofessional personnel. Likewise, rep 1=* - t and requalification training for all personnel is met addressed.

We reconnend that these itees be addressed in the current TS change.

t If you require additional information or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me or F. J. Nolan on a2 tension 27451.

lS

,33]D, m

)D

).h J. n. Salem /

D ek, chiar a o j\\1 0

j\\1U uu A !r0 a Light Watar Raaetor Progrees Branch, IE cc E. E. Mwis, IIIII DISTRIBUTION:

1. E. Ball, IE IE Files Central Files

[

F. J..Nolan IE IE Reading I

G. G. Eack, IL.

RIP Reading

{

Jtete McGough, IL LWRPB Chron t

A i

cuet /

,LWRPB, _ _

L_.

/_,'

I orric =

  • 7JNolan: pap J

iezek

..u-*==*

1L_J7.6, -

.1L /.76.

,,,,, n

.s Form AEC-318 (Rev. 9-53) AECM 0240 W u....ovannusNT raenten. orricas i.74 sa

.e 791230017 1 g i

~..,,..,.,.,..

.,.;,---,.,..,,,-.y._,,.,,

_m_

-a

. w.. ;

w.c4. s.......

u.

a-a_o.,_,

ll / f r.'

' { r ts//1, i

6.0 AM!!NIST:U.TWE m:10Ls t

I s

~~

I

- ORCAnlZATION, RLT!W, AND AUDIT 6.1 L

I 6.1.1

~ orrer.iration s

L The s'tation' Manager shalT be responsible for overall facility I

' 6.1.1.1-operation and shall-delegate in writing the succession to this I

responsibility during his, absence.

1

~

g In all natters pertaining to actual-operation and =aintenance 6.1.1.2-and to these Technical Specifications, the station llanager shall l

{

report to and be directiv responsible to the Vice President, l

The t

Steam Production, through the Manager, Nuclear Product $on.

organisation is shown in Figure'6.1-2.

i i

Technical Services and (1*C" g The station organization inr operat ons,Maintenan o shall be functiunally 6.1.1.3 t

Micit:um operating shif t requirecents are specified in Tabic 6.1-1.

?

O' i

6.1.1.lp g/ locorporated in the staff of the station _shall be supervisory and J

t I

h(,)3(? j./ professional personnel neering the minicum requirc ents e

'e

. sing the training and experient:e~ described in Section 4 of the I

i j

E ANSI N18.1-1971, " Selection and Training of Sccicar Power Plant

+

i

' Personnel."~

t fg g.,

t Retraining and replacement 'of station personnel si,au %

  • n

?-

'a'ecordance with Section 5.5 of the AKS1 hl8.1-1971. "h2 < tion sud l

6.1.1.5 '

{

N. p[. 5( Trainin5 of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel."

p 6.1.2 Technical Review and Control g

y 6.1.2.1

' Activities A6M eEd a

1

n.. Procedures required by Technient Specification 6.4 and other procedurcs

}

~

which aficet station nuclear safety, and changes (other than editorial or e

j t

I typographical changes) thereto, sha?1 be prepared by a qualified individual /

Each'such procedure, or procedure change, shall be reviewed j

W organt:ation.

i

by an' individual / group other than the individual / group which prepared the g

[1 procedure, or procedure change, but who cay be from the sacie organization

't as the individual / group which picpared the procedure, or procedure change.

't

Such' procedures"and procedure changes may be approved for teeparary use by two members of the' station staff, at'least one of-when holds a Senior Reactor

~

Procedures and procedure changes 1

Operator's Lidense on the unit (s) affected.

1 e approved prior to'use or within seven days of receiving temporary approv-I 4

al for use by the station Manager; or by the Operating Superintendent, the

~

5-y Technical. Services Superintendent or the Haintencoce Superintendent, as

+

previously designated.by.the station nanager.

y 3

-b. : Proposed changes to the Technical Specifications shall be prepared by a j

qualified individual / organization. The preparation of each proposed Tech-

[

"~

e

]

nical Specifications change 'shall be reviewed by an individual / group other q~.

than the' individual / group yhich prepared the proposed change, but who may '

i l

6.1.. - '

j

d ',

.._.....j..

~

r

f. 4_,

1 V

' be fren the sane orcanization as the individual / group which prepared the

[f d propoi.cd chan;;e. Proposed changes to the Technical Specifications shall i

be app.oved by the station Manager.

i Propor:d modifications to station nuclent cafety-related structures, sye-c.

tems e,nd components snall be desi ned by a quelified individual /orn:nization.

~;

S Each !.och codii1 cation shall be revinted by an individual / group other than

[

the Individual / group which designed the codification but who r.sy be f rom the q

e scoe or2anization cs the individual / group which designed the codification.

j k

Proposed nodifications to station nuclear sainty-relcted structures, systems l

fy and coaponents chall be coproved prior to i=plementation by the statica d

i Manager; or by the Operating Superintendent, the Technical Services Super-y j, intendent, or the Haintenance Superintencent, as previously designated by fQ the station Yanagcr.

^

r~

[

d.

Individuals respnsible for reviews perfor=ed in accordance with 6.1.2.1.a.

I 6.1.2.1.b, and 6.1.2.1.c shall have a minintra of five years of technical i

experience, of which a mini =un of one year shall be nuclear experience.

A 0

V-maximum of four yects of this five years of experience e.sy be fulfilled by

'-I

  • I academic o~r related' technical training.

1 Proposed tests and experiments which affect station nuclear safety and are,_

c.

not addrev 1

in the FSAR or Technical Specificatican shall be reviewed by i

the

.:..r - $

usager; or by the operating Superintendent, the Technical Servi-j J,

ces Supes... e dent or the Maintenance Supa-intendent, as previously desig-nated by LL. station Hanager.

A

- i Incide is raportable,_ pursuant to Technical Specification 6.6.2.1 and vio-jy lations of Technical Speci~fications shall be investigated and a report pre-o

[

fb pared which evaluates the occurrence and which providec reco=nendations to i

7 f[.

prevent recurrence.

Such reports shall be cporoved by the station Henager g

and transnitted to the Vice President. Stean Production, or his desitace; a

and to the Director of the Nuclear Safety RevieuBoard.

g.

The station llanager shall assure the perfor ance of special reviews and i

l [b [ requested by the Vice Presiaent.

investigations, and the preparation and submittal of reports thereon, as x

/

p Stear. Pronuction.

~

h., The station security program, and implementing procedures, aball I

} be reviewed at least annually.

Changes deternined to be necessary as a p / result *of such review shall be approved by the station Hanager and trans-i,J mitted to the Vice President, Stean Production. or his designee; ar.d to 4 U the Direttor of the Nuclear Safety Eeview Board.

~

l

1. AThe station energency pl'an, and icplecenting procedures, shall Ybe l

f'Yres;reviewedatleastannually.

Changes determined to be necessary as a

.lt of such review shall be approved by the station Manager and trans-

}/

l

',$' mitted to the Vice President. Stean Production, or his designee; and to the t

i Director of the Nuclear Safety Review Board.

j JOu t

9

~

~~ *

  • _.,