ML19319A953
| ML19319A953 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1976 |
| From: | Jay Collins Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319A954 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912300235 | |
| Download: ML19319A953 (2) | |
Text
[?
)*
i
( -
7 W
Dociet Nos. 50-269/270/2T,7 A. Schwencer, Chiof, Operating Reactors l'.rnnch No.1, DOR HD40RANIAN FOR:
J. Collins Chief, Cffluent Treatmnt Systens I: ranch, DSE TPOM TAR-1792, REVIEW OF KASE MARGL"DU. :CILITf CAFETY f4fBJECT:
ANALYSIS RI Pi>PT, OCO lEE NUCL1; AR RTATIO';, lti1T I:0S.
},
2 Km 3 Wo havo reeicwed the Safety Aulysis Report on the Oconce ?luste "ansgeiwit I
Tacility, dated Jtme 23, 1075, suMtitted by thu licensee for uur review, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59.
Our review was supplemnted by a visit j
13, 1976, to review tho.ewly con-to the Oconee Nucient Station oa "ay structed intorin Radioactivo b'aste ihnages ent racility and by discussicus
}
with the licensee on the initini operation of the nodified rad easte systens.
l Subse<tuent to our visit, the licensee has provided supplenental inforristion by letter from X. Parker to A. Schwencer, dnted June 30, 1976, concerning the ciodified radwasto systen operation at Oconee. Our safety evaluation of the radweste systen moJification is enclosed.
I Based on our evaluation, wo find that the modified radwaste systecs are i
acceptabic as the pernanent radunste system at Oconeo provided that the The design deficincies identified in the enclosed evaluation ero net.
codified radwnsto systens at Oconce do not met the requirements for nonitoring of release of radioactive natorials in accordance with General Design Criterion 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50, are not consistent with the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.21, and do not acet the criteria for ensuring the absence of free liquid in solid wastes given in franch Techni-l in a letter dated June 30, 1076, the 11censeo stated cal Position 11-3.
that radiation conitors will be installed which will be capabic of taonitoring f odines and particulates in tLo buildinf. ventilation exhaust, In addition, the licensee has identified, in a letter dated December 16, 1975, components of the modified radwaste system that do not confor:s with the guidelines for rade.te system design given in Branch Technical Position, ETS311-1 (Rev.1), and that will be replaced, i
Our evaluation does not include the seisnic desir,n anclysis of the newly erected waste sonagement facility building, accident analysis of systcu failures, or occupationni exposures resulting from the equirnent and The capability of the modified rmheaste systen to meet building layouts.
the requirements of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50 uill be evaluated in a supplemer,t to the Safety Evaluation Poport.
,-- - 1 ; ; _.i s.
- ' 1M Co
- 2 c
t John T. Collins, Chief
,9 v rffluer.t "r m t m t SYetens Er'tDch Division of Site Sufr ty and a
oF rtC E F
...e.imaney
.se,i g s$
e.,se.a.,
=
pain 4 p.
vagamquerF9 '
-$8 e '-spu-emog ymgese,,,p g= ewe *
-e em pave >
W u. a novannesent ene evine orricas sere.ese-see Istte ABC IIS @#T,7-53) AEG 0140
.1912 300 2 35 f
,e A.-Schwencer 2'-
p, g ; g yg i
t-l I
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation Peport cc:
.S. llanauer.
- 11. Denton' 4
l D. f'ulle r Pe Miraglia K. Galler D. Eisenhut i
R..Vo11cer
.R. Nacos.
J. Ililler-D. Neighbors E. Crimes i
V. Stello (u/o cncl)
. W. I!cDonald (w/o cnc1)
J. Panzarella (w/o c.scl)
P. Shuttleworth (w/o enc 1)
M. Bell W. Burke J. Lee
- j i,
DISTRIBITTION:
}
Docket File'50-269
" 50-270 i-50-287 l
'NRR Reading File j
DSE Reading File
[
ETSB Reading File-2 JTCollins
. I I
.. g i-
. t.
OFrecsW DSEiETS5~
DSE:ET5B- ~~DSifi5f5B~~~
~~
~ ~ ~ ~
x 27m" "JLecido ~
itBell JCollins
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
"Ti 191 17K~~
i T f fi r - """"1 9 1 ~ Ti m
~ ~ ~ ~ "~'
~ ~ ~ -
~~
3l. Persa ABC.)!B (Rev. b53) 'N 0140.'
~
W u. s. 'o'v'sawEtwi paiwtowe orricas sera ses see s
-