ML19319A869
| ML19319A869 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Mcguire, McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/1972 |
| From: | Bennett W Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912191039 | |
| Download: ML19319A869 (4) | |
Text
^
~
'.T.Eya,q7c4'A974
,y
%*h.
. i..,.,,., ir.J 5ede yA,364 l UNITED: STATES OF A31 ERICA ATO3fIC -ENERGY 1C0511IISSION In theJ3 fatter.of
)'
Doc M Nos. M 50-270A DUKE POWER COi!PANY 00-287A
)
kOconeeUnites.1,--2&3,
)
501369A, 50-370A AlcGuireJUnits!1 &'2)
)
~
l NOTICE AND ORDER FOR. PREHEARING CONFERENCE g.
2 1' LEASE TA KE NOTICE, that pursuant to the Atomic
~
Energy' Commission's Notice of Antitrust Hearing dated
~
June 28, 1972, and published in the Federal Register
'(37 FR 13202) on' July 4, 1972, and in accordance viith the said Commission's Rules of Practice, a prehearing conference will be held in the above entitled proceedings f
on September 6, 1972 at 10:00 a.m.
local time, at Courtrooni. 309, U. S. Court of Claims, 717 '.fadison place, N.W, Washington, D.
C.
20005.
The cardinal objective of said prehearing conference
.will be to-' establish a clear and particularized identifica-t' ion of' matters related-to the issue whether activities
-under theipermits applied for would create or maintain a: situation inconsistent with the antitrust l a v.'s a s -
sh$ccifiedinsubsection.10gao the A tomic Energy Act '
g,Dq", c..
M
\\
.of-1954,a s amended".
a o
p
.3
~ ~ '
- i
./
~
~--
et.w
. 3,, '
?-
_.s
'< u' yg)1kyg yp3 0
m m.
~
~
.E 2
^J yfi,C 3:
I l -
2~-
~
g;g c. p;,. -
a.
.~
(
A 1
' Y MTO TIIAT END ~,- -
r JEach ofi thef actorneys, for the fparties'and for L
?
xA.
- - ?,
y tho '. petitioners -l col int.ervene. will suppl y.1 u -
'~
g, l writing to this' Board and'to each other on'or I efore Augusti9',;1972 a'staecuent. listing:
- p b
c
^
11)) 'Tneflegalitheory of th'e party or pJnitioner n
~
=concerningithe; question whether the issuance cf the perinics applied for vould.crcare oc
~
p
.uaintain'a.s tuat on : inconsistent.u!th'the i
i antitrust'laus and supplyia; the authorities
~
relied on in support of such thecry.
l2)~ The_ detailed facts on which such lesti theory I
is - based, -including the da t:es, places, 'and
~ pernons iovolval md att. aching copl: a of all' n-
'docurnents pertaining therut.o.
c
-B.
Following the ' ei: change - of suel statenenta cnd -
E,
. priori to thelprehearing confertoce, ~ thu :1ttorneyn
~ :for the parties and the petitionern are t vga"sted s
to discuss with each other;and report to the
.c
- BoardOat the.prehearint-confercuce.on
~.g 1)
'theiprospect o.f settlement;'and f
- 2) their willingnesc.to stipalnte to. phreienlar:
[
W
. fa c t n. or to a ; s t;;,t gent.. o E t'GetN.
' 't s
'E i
g, E
3 o
1,
-+
.Q-t 5
, 1 t
i y'
'~
ll.' ~
^ _
i;;.t l
- r.
n l4.
a y
) F. 2, s p-(
y
+
=
wm w,
~
+
y
_-a,
'(
-Q'.
(,
-a g,.. : '
.f. i, Eachtof the parties andEthe:petitioncrc;sh ll'
. ~...
E"
- C.,
a C
~
..be? irepared ito submit' at': the prehearing
- y T
0-
- conference
y y
.w f)
A;' Written: statement setting;forth under l
i-
. topical; headiur,s o concise nLa trricnt of the ennential fact's and a recit.tl of the-t conter.ced isnues of fact an'd of law.
+-
- 2).Aischedulefof additio.inl discovocy;-it any,.
4
~ which'he requires and v time table chcuing the 'iLites ~by uhich each Ltem
<>f discovery
';(.'
sill licL coropleted.
- 3).
Copies-of writtcu c:thiba.Ls a:A i,rinted
. documents 'which will b'c offered ia evidanc~e at tlie formal hearing.
_The names. and addresses of all uitnesmiu
~4)L:
E now intended-to"be called.
It2U: suggest ed t hat the forer.o!up, iincu:.e. cit s: be
~
c::chany,cdD orlif impracticable,.'madd wvailable :.o all
~
coonselffor; theiri examination prior' to the lim. hearing' -
w f
I
- con ferenc e'.
^
x In' addition o -detern.ining the. particular facto: E p
C k
g
.i
+
g g
g
.g-s -
,.s.
s
~
f.
~
" 7 ; 6dij ekis itCiCard.inal";obj etit i.ve' tbh. Mat! fill: also:
i ~'
4 7
[ 1 Q
l f..
- 'Al'~6),
',j.+
t
- .w 7,, ;
, ~,.
u.
, - +:
a, s
4 g
b g..,
<jJ.
7-g--
%1 ~
r-e
',y
g p
.4.
t o
a s
c y,,y
>< y'
,,f '-.,, -
Q,y
(;;~ r.
g c
- < ;^
71p chear:orallcrguments;on the petitions 1to j
C 1s y
~
s intervendLand consider;smen:Lnents :thereto;
- c a
~
C '
,2.
r
~
coaaid g hotions~aadrcsced:to:
r4 m y,
' \\'.
l' a) jurisdictional questions fincluding ricnciut; w-f
- 1 proceeding,s beTore the Fdderal Poacr Cca.niist,
- inn :
m'
, ~
^
ib) the 3 dter.c f advise of.thes Attorney Ceneral O
S+
.c)' other mNtters including: simplifici.tloa of u.
Lissdac;-additicnal discovery;.~. reduction in th'e'!cmouritfof proof and at.uher o f c:< port
- witnesses; scLticment proposals; I he ' Llu.c l'-
1'.%
' table for discovery, if any;. t-h c 1mescur a tio.
'of_ rhe evidence at for.,v1 hearia[;; thc' final
- listing ofJuitucuses and c:: change -of writtc.n j
. testimony-and doce:::catary evidence; tile sub.un c;on
- and exchange-of -trial biicfs; andJ mich 'other mattern as may nid in Lhe di:.po:;it. ion oi' tho m
~ proceeding.
'Each party shall be represented at the preheaH.ag-
~
f c6nferenceibyf the attorncy.who e::pects to present Lthe :
L z chidenceJat 'the forsalJheahing.
m BY OXG:n OF T!11 7.TChlC-SAFhTY, iA!!D LIf T.RO U!C - BO/d:D
~
f.e-_.
1 p
1
- I r.
, s t
7 s/ t</ * ' l, **
e.
- r.-
. / '
- /
f
., x /_ "
~-
Sys t 'c.lter. K. )Mnne t ti, C!stiman g
.,, ~. U N.-:.-
-(
. cr
~ 1 DIscu6d arf 4achisiton,iD'TC.
D 1
- 7.., 3 ;cy, -., u.. y-m,p.
, y.,;
- f?
u
- f 7
i
' p'..
4
.?-;
4 s
i.-R -
^ -
'Q y,: ' '.,
,___-J
_,, - 'j :
-:g,
['
__ z.
f
.' ~~
< '_f s
),.
_i P.
]
5 s
e
'-