ML19318A988

Submits Addl Info Requested by NRC Re IE Insp Rept 50-341/79-25.Procedures Developed Include Deviation Disposition Request,Corrective Action,Project Audit Response & Reorganization

ML19318A988
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	06/09/1980
From:	Hines E DETROIT EDISON CO.
To:	Fiorelli G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
EF2-49, EF2-49-000, NUDOCS 8006240481
Download: ML19318A988 (3)

Text

a Edward Menes

[)EBIriOil lf uune 9,

_SO

_C;p,.%.sh*

(sj re,_co., con m

e

'dr. C. Fiorelli, Chief Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Eranch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cctaission Regicn ::1 799 Roosevelt Read Glen Ellyn, Illincis 60137 Subj ec t :

Supple = ental Response to Inspecticn Report No. 50-311/79-25.

Dear "r.

Fiorelli:

This lettcr ccntains the additional infernaticn concerning actiens taken on the Fermi II Prcject to centrol conditions adverse te quality as requested in ycur letter dated March 24, 1980.

The attachment to this letter provides a sutrarized '.istory of acticas taken relative to activities identified in ycur Inspection Reports as being in ncnccc-pliance with 10CFR50 Appendix 3, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Acticn".

There are four basic procedures which have been developed f or use on the Fermi II Project to provide instructions for identifying causes of problems and/or obtaining corrective action to prevent recurrence of significant conditions adverse to quality. These procedures have been generated and revised when determined necessary to improve and assure adequate corrective action.

Fellowing is a description of the proce-dures, or portions of the procedures, which pertain to this subject:

1.

Deviation Disposition Eequest (DDR), Procedure No. AP-VII-02.

In general, this procedure describes the metheds used to identify, document, control, disposition, provide corrective action, nctify affected personnel and close cut deviations. More specifically, the procedure requires the Centractor/ Daniel Engineer responsible for dispositioning the deviation to determine the cause of the nonconformance. A statement is to be provided on the DDR for:

reflecting t'.:e cause and describing the action to be taken to pre-vent or minimize recurrence of similar types of nonconformances.

In the event preventive type corrective action is not applicable, it is to be so noted on the form with a statenant of justifica-tion.

The Centractor/ Daniel C;C Manager is responsible to assure that the corrective action statement is appropriate and that implementation of the action is capable of being verified.

Prior to closing a DDR, the Quality representative verifying comp {etion of the disposition is responsible to assure that the ccrrective action has been acccmplished or is in progress.

Supporting docu-d mentation for implementation of corrective action is to be 2h\\

s referenced or attached to the form.

I b 6l 800624o

C'

., =

.Mr.i G..Fiore111 ~

_ June 9,.1980 1Page Two

-EF2-49,000-2., Correct.ive Action', Procedure No. AP-VII-08.

This procedure des-

~ cribes the method used to identify and-report observed or poten-tial conditiens adverseeco quality.

It provides_for deter =ining

.the causa and obtaining posit'ive corrective action to preclude or minimize: future occurrences. Quality problems identified during surveillance,: inspection, or by review of DDR's are reported on a Corrective Action Report form (the procedure requires review of LDDR'sito. determine existence of general quality trends). The reports are sent to the responsible-personnel for action. Copies

'of.the. reports are distributed, as a minimum, to the Daniel Pro-

~~

, ject l Manager,-Detroit Edison Project Superintendent, QA Manager, and. responsible _ Discipline Manager. Quality personnel are

~

required to verify. adequate action has'been taken tc correct the l adverse condition prior to closing.

13.

Proj ect Audit Response,. Procedure No. AP-II-07.. _ This procedure provides a ' standard format for r'esponse to Project Audit Finding Reports.

It includes monitoring of open status by an individual

-(Project Audit -Coordinator): who reports to the Daniel Project

' Manager.

If responses are1not submitted within the time pre-scribid, the Project Audit Coordinator notifies the responsible Daniel: Discipline Manager and Daniel Project Manager of the delin-quent response for resolution.

o4 ~. 'Stop/ Start. Work Authority, Procedure No. AP-II-04.

This precedure identifies the Preject Persennel who have authority to issue step work orders and describes the cethod to be used to implement this action.',Stop work action is provided if the controls discussed previously are insufficient-in obtaining adequate corrective action.

5.

Reorganization of' Site Quality Organization. The site quality organizations of Edisen and Daniel have been combined to provide a more1 effective ~ organization. This additional effectiveness will be reflected in corrective action as well as other areas associated with quality.

. All actions taken to provide effective corrective action are closely monitored and: additional changes are made as needed.

We: trust this letter addresses the additional concerns indicated in you61etter of' March 24, 1980.. We will be glad to discuss any further

-. concerns'youimay-have.

Very truly yours, s'

q r

~

b 3

gh 7 EH/EAW/pn-

Attachment.

t y

c b w

1 '

V 5 -'

i

_J

]

r.

t

+. * -

3.

Mr. G. : Fiore111 June 9, 1980 Page Three EF2-49.000 Mr. Victor.Stello,'Jr.,; Director cc:

Office of Inspection'and Enforcement Division of Reactor Inspection Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory ~ Commission

'Jashington D.C.

20555 Mr. Bruce Little, Resident Inspector Office of Inspection and Enforcement Enri c Fermi 2 Construction Site Newpo r t. Michigan 48161 l

t l

l I

i-V s

2

_.mA..A