ML19318A724
| ML19318A724 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/26/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19318A709 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900703 99900703-80-1, NUDOCS 8006240073 | |
| Download: ML19318A724 (2) | |
Text
.
)
RTE-Delta Corporation Docket No. 99900703/80-01 NOTICE OF DEVIATION Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on February 19-21, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements as indicated below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 states: " Activities affecting qual-ity shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished." Deviations from these requirements are as follows:
A.
Paragraph 3.2 and 6.1.2, and their respective subparagraphs (a) and (b) of the Quality Assurance Manual, Revision E, dated February 1980, requires that drawings or revisions for nuclear applications be subjected to an in-depth review by the Chief Engineer or a Senior Design Engineer assigned by the Chief Engineer. Additionally, a memorandum of the result of the review is to be written and signed by the reviewer and initialed by an individual in the Quality Assurance Department.
Note: The Quality Assurance Manual, Revision D, dated June 1979, con-tained the same requirement.
A memorandum dated January 18, 1980, attested to completion of an in-depth review with the result being approval of the drawing.
Contrary to the above, the in-depth review of Sheet 3, Revision 3, dated January 18, 1980, of Drawing No. D10325 was inadequate.
The in-depth review failed to detect change number six (6), noted at three (3) loca-tions on the drawing. No such change had been made to tLe drawing.
l 80062400
2 B.
Paragraph 10.2 and its subparagraph (a) of the Quality Assurance Manual, Revision E, dated February 1980, state respectively:
"On projects requiring equipment to be furnished in nuclear plants, the following will apply in addition to requirements in
'C' Level' (sic)
"The leadmen in Manufacturing will in the process of manufacturing, inspect their own work and initial same as the 'C' and 'N' Level on the 'In-Production Quality Check List.' In addition at the
'N' Level they will request of the inspector to inspect in process equipment and add his initials when accepted."
Note: The Quality Assurance Manual, Revision D, dated June 1979, con-tained the same requirement.
The NRC inspector observed that there were no documents identified as, In-Production Quality Check Lists. The inspector was informed that the referenced documents were identified as In Process Inspection Forms.
Contrary to the above, the In Process Inspection Forms (Welding, Fab-rication, Assembly, Wiring) dated from November 1, 1979 through January 5,1980, had not been initialed by the inspector for the Direct Current Distribution Centers, Nos. 21DA and 21DB. These units were safety-related and had been shipped. The forms incorporated provisions for QC verification and date.
I l
- 1 I
_ -.