ML19317G997

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards NRC Ltr to B&W Requesting That Corrected ECCS Model Be Submitted Re Review of Nuclear Boiling Heat Transfer Correlation.Requests Facility re-evaluate ECCS Cooling Performance Using Corrected Model
ML19317G997
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 12/15/1976
From: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML19317G998 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004020656
Download: ML19317G997 (3)


Text

'

(I..._ 3

, f, DISTRIBUTION:

Docket File December 15, 1976 NRC PDR L PDR ORB #4 Rdg Docket'No.: 50-312 VStello KRGoller TJCarter Attorney, OELD OI&E (K3)

~......

Sacramento Municipal Utility District RReid ATTH: Mr. J. J. Mattimoe VRooney (2)

Assistant General Manager RIngran.

and Chief Engineer DElliott 6201 S Street DEisenhut P. O. Box 15830 TBAbernathy Sacramento, California 95813 JRBuchanan ACRS (16)

Gentlemen:

Gray File During the course of our review of emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation models, it has come to our attention that the iz Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) ECCS evaluation model, which was used

'T for your facility, uses a nucleate boiling heat transfer correlation during blowdown after critical heat flux (CHF) is first predicted.

This may not conform to the requirements of Appendix K to 10 CFR

50. The criteria for compliance with Appendix K have been established by the NRC staff and discussed with B&W representa-tives. Enclosed is a copy of our letter to B&W requesting that a corrected ECCS model be submitted for our evaluation as soon as possiLle.

This natter is similar to one identified with respect to another nuclear steam system supplier's evaluation model; and, based on our experience in connection with developing a correction for that model, we have concluded that there are acceptable correlations which can be used and which have a small effect on the calculated s

peak clad temperature.

It is expected that the effect on calculated peak clad temperature would be small enough so that modification of your Technical Specifications will not be required; however, j

o this must be verified for your facility by reevaluation of the ECCS cooling performance using a corrected model.

j

}>

i D

L?

V-8004020 $b

f

+

7:-i:i

-~'

Sacramento Municipal Utility District.y

==e Acc'ordingly, submit as soon as possible, a reevaluation of your m.su-ECCS cooling performance using an NRC staff approved model that se does not use a nucleate boiling heat transfer correlation during

E

blowdown after CHF has been predicted by the approved CHF correlation.

.;~;

Sincerely,

  • ~'

Mg21 ;

Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Operating Reactors cc: See next page as=

p.

e r

f E

ORB *4:00, ORB #3:00 /p CgBy[00R o,,ie s,

VRooney:rm DElliott'

'Eeing.

12/j/76 12/I3/76 12//5/76 T..fm ATC 513 (Kev. 9 53) AICf 9240 W u. s. sovsmNu zur P=i%tino orriers isra.sas.ies

I

.= -=

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

m. ::.w

~ ::"^::.

cc: Davia S. Kaplan, Secretary and General Counsel

~.

6201 S Street 1..

Post Office Box 15830

=:

Sacramento, California 95813

.sg.

E:

Business and Municipal Department Sacramento City-County Library E

828 I Street Sacramento, California 95814 t

  • ^Y
MZ::.

e

r

=:: :. :::

e

'* $ ?..

e

=w e

g k

.i e

e

':.W:'.

.?-

T

.:k:::

7-7

:n.: :: :'.

..J

_. _. _ _..