ML19317G681
| ML19317G681 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 04/11/1972 |
| From: | Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Davis E SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003250742 | |
| Download: ML19317G681 (1) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
9
_w._.
A anyhyoerm~ t:rlWW:.?fCW*?%:Q
?'$N#9. W W8fW
- M W M s & d M e(n % W W MiW @r W & lfM M;NT!
'M
' MMP&Wy2
~
M.
s
% 4' ' s; p:,
x:
-um
- ggg:4 lg" \\. 'Q
- e
- q:
.A; 1}'r DISTRIBUT h :.
ay. S.,
s l
1?l 2t s
4
'97 f
m afs
'I;ocal PDR g gg.
.y
. - -~~
< + -
Docket File APR 11 tyg DRL Readin8 PWR-1 File I
Docket No. 50-312 R.C. DeYoung, DRL Licensing Assistant (2)
Prcject Leader 4
Sacrasiento Municipal Utility District ATTH:
E. K. Davis, General Counsel
- gg.y 6201 S Street, Poet Office Box 15830 e
Sacramento, California 95813
(
y
. d %y
~ " y 1-' A
- "!'W *"t *
'T' - @,
/Seatlemen-
k
~'
7
'7 The regulatory staff has prepared the attached draft criteria regarding innhastrial security. This draft material reflects
~'
3,
.pr*14=4 y thinking by the staff en thin subject. 'It is'.
s w:MR furnished to applicants for the pumpeses of illustrating the t ; if"
~
scope of security ~ planning that is sonsidered appropriate and identifying specific aspects of security nlanning that should gQ be addressed in seenrity plans. Applicants are encouraged to' use the draf t criteria as a " checklist" in the preparation of F
security pinna.
N m..
I These criteria are not and should not be regarded as firm D'
. requirements of the_ regulatory staff; conformance with every 9+eriterion is not essential.
_ OWS.mTR,
'MLE jg.
. Sincerely:*
- @a rN.
-<d L'~"
9e
. wn:
vi C '.
&v k % W
- w... ~
,, u.s ;.
r
.a m 2;...
utw m;,;m:
., w :n
., = ;Cw: y y.yW.v.W.p%,vp
'+ W m r 4.
ag.-
-G 4, ry,4 s w -w.
w.
v y*..
y. 3 y,y
- Orig. al s. neg by
,y p p yg g m
v.
n y
, _ fig 4-m 3,:.y aja ;;pgg m a. l,
M2 a.:c. Deyoung
. q. : n,.,py. -
sw
.-G4 m
..gw,
, M#O M. ( DeYoung.Assistan,t Direater g g @.
c 3.y
+
r4
- %;.@ti M.s N M$r v k ;. lier Pressurised Water,Ba=etere gAnge#BL
- .;gyMho+ y.., g ge e q, & N p u.M. (Division of Beestor Lisensim's[u[$ff(kNA$r ma wz qn : &m... 9 n.p.,9%pq?rg g n gn m
3, m m., yww ?,r. g pfy,yyq /..
x Qw.p.
y
% g g Eseleement,i 9
M y Dufsf2 Critaria on w:ij: pq wgg c y p ; W %>- W q
.,, z, scy.g-Q;p 48hp;".3yp <.g;6 gg:
n W kf,4.f
- 2;.
Wh+hk%C]f b
fY h.f & ?
G
".9 D
@ 3 n-e*
mgyp'[:(+{m;
- Lg-
- w.
'e
'~
l ytj jyi l[
' - ;cc':
Mr. David S. Kaplan
,k w cj w
j Ts l ; %.,.
Aa U N,.~ ' -Secretary &' Attorney M $201 S Street
' C '_
'.N Y, 9.4,
- 4, 0:. f** W M.b.%,MU.
4
-+
p: m v.s A,$.. a:EM,a.n.Am
+
d-
..,'-,. _ :. e.
- a JP. O. Box 15830... " '
f.. Ai.
. ~n m,, w
_.n.
&m.
,. c s
. #a L ' A Sa.cramen,to *.Cali.fornia 95813 vs e.
y a ce;Mr._ m
, 1: m:
pr -
.e l
-. y i L'- W,fa t % W P A S M P : 4 ;8:0.04250;ys:,sg. 9.a m T#9 2'
....,;~,,, w. w sh
.a w.w: n n.. m; py 3mg y. -
a n.
wn w
. -. - n.y
.x,,
1 CRESS'
,DR4/., --l'._
- DRL @lR-1.. -..DRf1/AD PWRS H4 Mg@
@f;&Q j
_.o.n
.s
.T-2025-L.
3PjJI :
.n SA..h.r Y _ u,w e1 ' %%ww *rw.
w2 iM2
- ^W W n
- a,,
_ _a_ a_..
monauv RED
. m.
+
m.
m
..,.w.--,m. ww;*j p,_ y,*
ou -
--re %. m.,4.,,
n"m%ng%~.m, i
y.e..
, %.y.,.A r_p_t s m m, w-r; p.
3 o
. gr
' a.
n--g m
s
. v..
- - - - -e
- ~
mm m g w
g/6/72[ ; an'kk.Afddf]2,.y.V j'yfJ7%.w Q1]M2.
- NC;%g& 4 UMMb&p
- ww.
e m&Q&W kkg
- s
- E= Auc-ne ta+3MRg snojggn.ww;,gg"%,ggmf_a,,3 gnwQ 7 j jgygmagg
_MWi%AMQ:$4ffdMMw4Mdmdhh$hMakhiWWhuiM;Midr dthW$,,
@G _ _
i DRAFT CRITERIA ON INDUSTRIAL SECURITY The Draft criteria reflects preliminary thinking by the staff on this subject.
These criteria are not and should not he regarded as firm requirements of the regulatory staff. Conformance with every criteria is not essential.
I - APPROACil:
Criterion 1 - General Guidelines Physical protection shall be based on controlling access to the facility and obtaining assistance from local alw enforcement authoritics. As a minimum the plan shall combine at least the following elements:
(1) en-employee investigation; (ii) a security force; (iii) a lighted fence or other lighted physical barrier which surrounds the facility; (iv) a lock and key system; (v) a system of intrusion alarms to protect each door or other opening in vital buildings; (vi) 1.iaison with local law enforcement authorities; (vii) redundant tamper-resistant communication links with local law enforcement authorities.
Crfterion 2 - Employee Intent on Sabotage i
This class of opponent 1's considered to be neutralized by pre-emoloyment irvestigation, by restrictione on package and vehicle access to the facility, and by procedures which minimize access to vital rooms, buildings, and structures.
Criterion 3 - Non-em lovee Intent on Sahn a
The fecce surrounding the facility DUPLICATE DOCUMENT opponents from gaining access to t Entire document previously resolute oppoenet the fence shall entered into system under:
Oo3MOOSb ANO No. of pages:
[h
- - _....