ML19317G412

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-302/75-12.Corrective Actions:B&W QC Will Review Previously Submitted Data for correctness.ISI-64 Revision Provides for Correlation of Calibr Dates W/Test Data
ML19317G412
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River 
Issue date: 10/16/1975
From: Rodgers J
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Moseley N
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19317G408 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003030816
Download: ML19317G412 (2)


Text

.

(

X Y

)

v) vnaa

(

s..

Florida

~

~

~

Power October 16, 1975 F

Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Director Directorate of Regulatory Operations U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Region II, Suite 818 230 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, GA 30303

Subject:

IE:II:EJV 50-302/75-12

Dear Mr. Moseley:

In accordance with the provisions of NRC Rules of Practice, Part 2, d

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, we wish to provide you with the following response to the apparent noncompliance resulting from your inspection 75-12.

The subject of the infraction was FPC's activities regarding procedures for data recording during performance of the pre-service inspection program.

The corrective steps which have been taken by FPC and the results achieved are as follows:

B&W was informed of the areas the NRC found inadequate in the data reviewing process.

Mr. G. A. Terning, Site Manager, B&W Preservice Inspection Team wrote a lett e dated September 25, 1975, informing us of the action they have taken "to correct the NRC findings".

Action taken included review for correctness by Mr. Terning and the B&W Quality Control Supervisor, all data previously transmitted to the Plant Staff.

All future data will be reviewed by Mr. Terning and the B&W Quality Control Supervisor.

The inadequacy of the Data Recording Procedures was discussed and a proposed revision was developed. This revision was approved by the Plant Review Committee and is being added to Procedure l

ISI-64, " Administrative Procedure for Handling Nondestructive Examination Data for Preoperational or Inservice Examination",

of SP-304, "Preservice Inspection".

This revision will provide h

a plan to assure sufficient and correct data to allow trace-V ability of calibration data to the test performed on a specific date.

8008ose N Conoral Of fis-a uni TN,,v.tn..rth Streat Ans th. P O Anv 1an42 St Petersburo. Fionda 33733 813--866 5151

[

...........v.

..va c i cy, u. c au.

Page 2 October 16, 1975 3

e Data which has entered the review proce s by the plant staff, since this infraction appears to be free of all discrepancies found in the Preservice Inspection Data and Calibration Sheets, as specified in IE Report 50-302/75-12.

The corrective steps which have been taken to avoid further reoccur-rences are as follows:

Implementation of the change in ISI-64 as stated in Section 1, above will allow correlation of calibration dates with test data.

Crystal River Plant Staff will perform a more thorough review of Calibration and Test Data Sheets as set forth in SP-304, Preservice Inspection.

Prior to transmittal to the Plant Staff the B&W Preservice Inspection Team Site Manager and the B&W Quality Control Supervisor will review all Calibration

.i and Test Data Sheets for completeness and correctness.

It is our opinion that because of the above, Florida Power Corporation is now in full compliance with its commitments as stated in the Crystal River Unit 3 FSAR Section 1.7.6.

We hope that the above is self-explanatory and fully satisfies your requirements for closure of this item.

Please advise us if any further information is required.

(j Very t

yours, h

^

^

M. f JTR: ldh J. T. Rodgers Assistant Vice President cc:

M. H. Kleinman

,0)

'%)