ML19317F845

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards AO-75-13.Provides Details
ML19317F845
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 09/24/1975
From: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To: Engelken R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
Shared Package
ML19317F846 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002210589
Download: ML19317F845 (1)


Text

'.

(** n.'.".i1.p.

d aimLh G.aLud

. p;

[\\g)

' SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT D 6201 S Street. Box 15830. Sacramento. California 95813: (916) 452 3211 September 24, 1975 Mr. R. H. Engelken Director of Regulatory Operations Region V NRC Operations Office si 1990 N. California Boulevard Walnut Creek Plaza, Suite 202 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Re: Operating License DPR-54 Docket No. 50-312 i

Abnormal occurrence 75-13

Dear Mr. Engelken:

p As' defined by proposed Amendment No. 30 to Technical Specificntions

i for the Rancho Seco Nucicar Generating Station, Section 6.9.1 and Regulatory

  • Cuide 1.16, Revision 3, Section C.2.B.2, we are reporting the following J

Abnormal Occurrence as A0-75-13.

1 O

A surveillance test of the Diesel Generators safety features actuation i

(

was being performed on September 3, 1975. The plant was-in a cold shutdown for maintenance with the "A" Decay Heat Removal System in service. During the course of the test Breaker 52-3B06 blew a fuse and failed to cycle, pre-venting operation of a "B" diesel vent fan. Investigation into the cause of i

the failure revealed a missing internal spacer on a stationary conta'et in-one of the relay circuits, a Westinghouse Type MG-6, Model #288B977A19, General'.

and Specific Purpose Relay. The missing spacer allowed the stationary contact?

to travel forward approximately 1/4" and contact a crimped lug on a negative contact. This effectively placed 125 volts DC across the relay contacts, destroying them and preventing the 52-3B06 relay from operating.

The relay was repaired and the ' fuses replaced, returning Breaker 52-3B06 to operation. The surveillance test was again performed on September 5, 1975 to test the system, which operated correctly.

The cause of this equipment failure was the omission of a spacer during the assembly of a relay. An inspection of simi W relays for a similar omission

]

will be performed to prevent recurrence of thi4 wul.

There was no plant transient associated with this occurrence.

Respectfully,

  • .f)

A a

Enclosure.

J. J. Mattimoe

- [mI Director, MIPC(3)

Assistant General Manager

~ C I ces:.Directo'r', IE(30) and Chief Engineer 8 0 02 210 N7 COPY SENT REGION 9

AN. ELECTRIC $

  • TEM S E RVIN G M O R E T H A N - 6 0 0.0 0 0 IN.T H E HEART OF CALIFO R N I A

.