ML19317F469

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Dispute W/D Nunn Re Review Responsibility for Items 2.6,2.7,2.8 & 2.9
ML19317F469
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/18/1972
From: Schwencer A
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8001140701
Download: ML19317F469 (1)


Text

TEB 181972 NOTE TO FILES OCONEE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 REVIEW PLAN DOCKET NOS. 50-270/287 Based on a brief discussion with Dwight Nunn, I learned that it wa intention of his group to review Items 2.6, 2.7 s the

, 2.8, and 2.9.

I indicated that PWR Branch No. 4 intended to review item 2.6 reinted to u i

heat sink and that the other items in our judgement have already been mate subjected to intensive review and found acceptabic prior to Dece:tber 19 and it was not our intention to require repeat review been developed since the prior review.some new policy guideline or 11e indicated that he felt as a minimum he should exanine these areas of the application and if he could not agree that there were no new issues or overlooked items he would Ict us know.

further review on asterisk items.I indicated that our review schedule has be d?AuvdV A. Schwencer cc:

R. C. DeYoung R. B. Minogue D. Nunn I. Peltier A. Schwencer PWR-4 Reading 8001140 g

m

-